On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:46:50 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c" wrote:

On Mar 12, 5:18*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
Doonesbury Calls Abortion Law "Rape"



Spam

Yes, but was it reported?

Happy John wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:46:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Mar 12, 5:18 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
Doonesbury Calls Abortion Law "Rape"

Spam
Yes, but was it reported?

You can't report spam if it isn't spam. Sure it's off-topic, but it's
not spam.

On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:52:55 -0400, Earl wrote:

Happy John wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:46:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Mar 12, 5:18 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
Doonesbury Calls Abortion Law "Rape"

Spam
Yes, but was it reported?

You can't report spam if it isn't spam. Sure it's off-topic, but it's
not spam.

I know *I* can't. But some folks can. And the post was designed to sell something, albeit a ****ty
philosophy, therefore 'twas spam.

Happy John wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:52:55 -0400, wrote:

Happy John wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:46:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Mar 12, 5:18 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
Doonesbury Calls Abortion Law "Rape"

Spam
Yes, but was it reported?
You can't report spam if it isn't spam. Sure it's off-topic, but it's
not spam.
I know *I* can't. But some folks can. And the post was designed to sell something, albeit a ****ty
philosophy, therefore 'twas spam.
I'll give you that, but this guy/girl consistently misuses the term and
his/her posts only serve as an advertisement.