|
Read Plume's link....
Read the first link through, all I saw was a study that said "we were
successful in cutting down on second hand smoke (we think)"... Nothing to do with the discussion we were having about the effects of second hand smoke... And you wonder why I don't read his posts? |
Read Plume's link....
On 3/2/2012 11:44 AM, JustWait wrote:
Read the first link through, all I saw was a study that said "we were successful in cutting down on second hand smoke (we think)"... Nothing to do with the discussion we were having about the effects of second hand smoke... And you wonder why I don't read his posts? Oh, wait a minute.. Let me answer for Plume: "Oh, so now you want more second hand smoke, just poison your kids, and puppies, WHAT ABOUT THE PUPPIES, and old people...?" snerk |
Read Plume's link....
|
Read Plume's link....
On 3/2/2012 1:22 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... Read the first link through, all I saw was a study that said "we were successful in cutting down on second hand smoke (we think)"... Nothing to do with the discussion we were having about the effects of second hand smoke... And you wonder why I don't read his posts? I wonder if smoking dope is as harmful to your health as smoking cigarrettes? -- O M G |
Read Plume's link....
In article om, 5@
5.com says... On 3/2/2012 1:22 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... Read the first link through, all I saw was a study that said "we were successful in cutting down on second hand smoke (we think)"... Nothing to do with the discussion we were having about the effects of second hand smoke... And you wonder why I don't read his posts? I wonder if smoking dope is as harmful to your health as smoking cigarrettes? I would guess so, if one was to smoke as much pot as a cigarette addict smokes cigarettes. But why are you in such a tizzy about pot lately? |
Read Plume's link....
On 3/2/2012 2:01 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In raweb.com, 5@ 5.com says... On 3/2/2012 1:22 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... Read the first link through, all I saw was a study that said "we were successful in cutting down on second hand smoke (we think)"... Nothing to do with the discussion we were having about the effects of second hand smoke... And you wonder why I don't read his posts? I wonder if smoking dope is as harmful to your health as smoking cigarrettes? I would guess so, if one was to smoke as much pot as a cigarette addict smokes cigarettes. But why are you in such a tizzy about pot lately? I see you are a member of the noiseless patient Spider organization. Is that part of the anti cigarette pro pot movement? -- O M G |
Read Plume's link....
On 3/2/2012 2:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In aweb.com, says... On 3/2/2012 2:01 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In raweb.com, 5@ 5.com says... On 3/2/2012 1:22 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... Read the first link through, all I saw was a study that said "we were successful in cutting down on second hand smoke (we think)"... Nothing to do with the discussion we were having about the effects of second hand smoke... And you wonder why I don't read his posts? I wonder if smoking dope is as harmful to your health as smoking cigarrettes? I would guess so, if one was to smoke as much pot as a cigarette addict smokes cigarettes. But why are you in such a tizzy about pot lately? I see you are a member of the noiseless patient Spider organization. Is that part of the anti cigarette pro pot movement? Where on earth do you get these crazy ideas in your head? From your head(er). See your header information below. Path: news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com! news.glorb.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: iBoaterer Newsgroups: rec.boats Subject: Read Plume's link.... Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:59:36 -0500 *Organization: A noiseless patient Spider* Lines: 26 Message-ID: R blah blah blah |
Read Plume's link....
In article ,
says... In article , says... Read the first link through, all I saw was a study that said "we were successful in cutting down on second hand smoke (we think)"... Nothing to do with the discussion we were having about the effects of second hand smoke... And you wonder why I don't read his posts? Really? That's all you got out of it? Can you read? Link #1's first few sentences: Secondhand smoke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It has been associated with serious health problems in both children and adults. Efforts to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke in Nebraska have included programs to prevent tobacco use among young people and campaigns for smoke-free workplaces and homes. Despite these interventions, young people continue to be exposed to secondhand smoke at an unacceptably high rate Link #2's first few: Every authoritative, peer-reviewed assessment of the scientific evidence over the years has concluded that Secondhand smoke causes a lengthening list of diseases. The only dissent has come from Big Tobacco and the scientists and organizations affiliated with it. Researchers supported by Big Tobacco are eighty-eight times more likely than independent researchers to conclude there is no evidence that Secondhand smoke is dangerous. The most current knowledge first... The first studies showing that Secondhand smoke causes respiratory problems in children were published over thirty years ago. First evidence that Secondhand smoke causes lung cancer was published in 1981. Since then, the list of dangers has steadily grown. This page sums up the major, independent, consensus statements produced by scientific bodies since 1985, most recent first. 2006 US Surgeon General. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. California Environmental Protection Agency. Update of the landmark 1986 Surgeon General's report. Emphasizes the effects of secondhand smoke on the heart, particularly the fact that effects occur within minutes to increase the risk of a heart attack. Confirms that there is no economic effect of smokefree laws on the hospitality industry, and concludes the ventilation systems cannot control secondhand smoke. Full report Effects Causally Associated with Secondhand Smoke Lung cancer Coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Low Birth Weight Lower respiratory illnesses in infants and children Middle ear disease in children (including otitis media and chronic middle ear infusion) Respiratory symptoms in children (cough, phlegm, wheeze, and breathlessness) Asthma in children Reduced development of lung function in children Yep, keep telling yourself that second hand smoke is good for your children. Where is the data? |
Read Plume's link....
On 3/2/2012 7:41 PM, BAR wrote:
Yep, keep telling yourself that second hand smoke is good for your children. Where is the data? More importantly, nobody ever said second hand smoke was good for anybody... That's what sucks about dealing with Plume, he can't have a reasonable debate without the bull****... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com