|
Read Plume's link....
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... Read the first link through, all I saw was a study that said "we were successful in cutting down on second hand smoke (we think)"... Nothing to do with the discussion we were having about the effects of second hand smoke... And you wonder why I don't read his posts? Really? That's all you got out of it? Can you read? Link #1's first few sentences: Secondhand smoke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It has been associated with serious health problems in both children and adults. Efforts to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke in Nebraska have included programs to prevent tobacco use among young people and campaigns for smoke-free workplaces and homes. Despite these interventions, young people continue to be exposed to secondhand smoke at an unacceptably high rate Link #2's first few: Every authoritative, peer-reviewed assessment of the scientific evidence over the years has concluded that Secondhand smoke causes a lengthening list of diseases. The only dissent has come from Big Tobacco and the scientists and organizations affiliated with it. Researchers supported by Big Tobacco are eighty-eight times more likely than independent researchers to conclude there is no evidence that Secondhand smoke is dangerous. The most current knowledge first... The first studies showing that Secondhand smoke causes respiratory problems in children were published over thirty years ago. First evidence that Secondhand smoke causes lung cancer was published in 1981. Since then, the list of dangers has steadily grown. This page sums up the major, independent, consensus statements produced by scientific bodies since 1985, most recent first. 2006 US Surgeon General. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. California Environmental Protection Agency. Update of the landmark 1986 Surgeon General's report. Emphasizes the effects of secondhand smoke on the heart, particularly the fact that effects occur within minutes to increase the risk of a heart attack. Confirms that there is no economic effect of smokefree laws on the hospitality industry, and concludes the ventilation systems cannot control secondhand smoke. Full report Effects Causally Associated with Secondhand Smoke Lung cancer Coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Low Birth Weight Lower respiratory illnesses in infants and children Middle ear disease in children (including otitis media and chronic middle ear infusion) Respiratory symptoms in children (cough, phlegm, wheeze, and breathlessness) Asthma in children Reduced development of lung function in children Yep, keep telling yourself that second hand smoke is good for your children. Where is the data? Can you not read??? Where are the links to the documents? You have read them haven't you. You do have their URLs handy? I've posted the TWICE. You never posted to URLs. http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/SHSBibliography.pdf http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483572/ http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ATS/14294 http://news.stanford.edu/news/2007/m...ng-050907.html Need more, just ask. |
Read Plume's link....
In article , says...
On 3/3/2012 8:57 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... Read the first link through, all I saw was a study that said "we were successful in cutting down on second hand smoke (we think)"... Nothing to do with the discussion we were having about the effects of second hand smoke... And you wonder why I don't read his posts? Really? That's all you got out of it? Can you read? Link #1's first few sentences: Secondhand smoke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It has been associated with serious health problems in both children and adults. Efforts to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke in Nebraska have included programs to prevent tobacco use among young people and campaigns for smoke-free workplaces and homes. Despite these interventions, young people continue to be exposed to secondhand smoke at an unacceptably high rate Link #2's first few: Every authoritative, peer-reviewed assessment of the scientific evidence over the years has concluded that Secondhand smoke causes a lengthening list of diseases. The only dissent has come from Big Tobacco and the scientists and organizations affiliated with it. Researchers supported by Big Tobacco are eighty-eight times more likely than independent researchers to conclude there is no evidence that Secondhand smoke is dangerous. The most current knowledge first... The first studies showing that Secondhand smoke causes respiratory problems in children were published over thirty years ago. First evidence that Secondhand smoke causes lung cancer was published in 1981. Since then, the list of dangers has steadily grown. This page sums up the major, independent, consensus statements produced by scientific bodies since 1985, most recent first. 2006 US Surgeon General. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. California Environmental Protection Agency. Update of the landmark 1986 Surgeon General's report. Emphasizes the effects of secondhand smoke on the heart, particularly the fact that effects occur within minutes to increase the risk of a heart attack. Confirms that there is no economic effect of smokefree laws on the hospitality industry, and concludes the ventilation systems cannot control secondhand smoke. Full report Effects Causally Associated with Secondhand Smoke Lung cancer Coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Low Birth Weight Lower respiratory illnesses in infants and children Middle ear disease in children (including otitis media and chronic middle ear infusion) Respiratory symptoms in children (cough, phlegm, wheeze, and breathlessness) Asthma in children Reduced development of lung function in children Yep, keep telling yourself that second hand smoke is good for your children. Where is the data? Can you not read??? Where are the links to the documents? You have read them haven't you. You do have their URLs handy? He posted a list, I spent some good time reading the first one, but it had NOTHING to do with the effects of second hand smoke.... Just a feel good article to explain another $tudy at another university. Feel good seems to be the most reliable science for them. Just like Global Taxing... Here you go, and BAR too!! Now, please post your "peer reviewed articles" that claim that second hand smoke is not harmful. http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/SHSBibliography.pdf http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483572/ http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ATS/14294 http://news.stanford.edu/news/2007/m...ng-050907.html Need more, just ask! |
Read Plume's link....
In article , says...
On 3/3/2012 10:13 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... On 3/2/2012 7:41 PM, BAR wrote: Yep, keep telling yourself that second hand smoke is good for your children. Where is the data? More importantly, nobody ever said second hand smoke was good for anybody... That's what sucks about dealing with Plume, he can't have a reasonable debate without the bull****... Well, let's clear it up. Either it's good for you or it's not good for you. Which is it? We should destroy all gasoline and diesel engines if you are concerned with polluting the air. Why aren't you going after all types of pollution. Because that side of the isle reacts to feelings and desires, not logic and law... Please show me peer reviewed studies backing that up. Oh, it's just your feeling, got it. |
Read Plume's link....
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:03:27 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 3/3/2012 8:57 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... Read the first link through, all I saw was a study that said "we were successful in cutting down on second hand smoke (we think)"... Nothing to do with the discussion we were having about the effects of second hand smoke... And you wonder why I don't read his posts? Really? That's all you got out of it? Can you read? Link #1's first few sentences: Secondhand smoke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It has been associated with serious health problems in both children and adults. Efforts to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke in Nebraska have included programs to prevent tobacco use among young people and campaigns for smoke-free workplaces and homes. Despite these interventions, young people continue to be exposed to secondhand smoke at an unacceptably high rate Link #2's first few: Every authoritative, peer-reviewed assessment of the scientific evidence over the years has concluded that Secondhand smoke causes a lengthening list of diseases. The only dissent has come from Big Tobacco and the scientists and organizations affiliated with it. Researchers supported by Big Tobacco are eighty-eight times more likely than independent researchers to conclude there is no evidence that Secondhand smoke is dangerous. The most current knowledge first... The first studies showing that Secondhand smoke causes respiratory problems in children were published over thirty years ago. First evidence that Secondhand smoke causes lung cancer was published in 1981. Since then, the list of dangers has steadily grown. This page sums up the major, independent, consensus statements produced by scientific bodies since 1985, most recent first. 2006 US Surgeon General. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. California Environmental Protection Agency. Update of the landmark 1986 Surgeon General's report. Emphasizes the effects of secondhand smoke on the heart, particularly the fact that effects occur within minutes to increase the risk of a heart attack. Confirms that there is no economic effect of smokefree laws on the hospitality industry, and concludes the ventilation systems cannot control secondhand smoke. Full report Effects Causally Associated with Secondhand Smoke Lung cancer Coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Low Birth Weight Lower respiratory illnesses in infants and children Middle ear disease in children (including otitis media and chronic middle ear infusion) Respiratory symptoms in children (cough, phlegm, wheeze, and breathlessness) Asthma in children Reduced development of lung function in children Yep, keep telling yourself that second hand smoke is good for your children. Where is the data? Can you not read??? Where are the links to the documents? You have read them haven't you. You do have their URLs handy? He posted a list, I spent some good time reading the first one, but it had NOTHING to do with the effects of second hand smoke.... Just a feel good article to explain another $tudy at another university. Feel good seems to be the most reliable science for them. Just like Global Taxing... Here you go, and BAR too!! Now, please post your "peer reviewed articles" that claim that second hand smoke is not harmful. http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/SHSBibliography.pdf http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483572/ http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ATS/14294 http://news.stanford.edu/news/2007/m...ng-050907.html Need more, just ask! More more more Thanks |
Read Plume's link....
On 3/3/2012 4:21 PM, oscar wrote:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:03:27 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 3/3/2012 8:57 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... Read the first link through, all I saw was a study that said "we were successful in cutting down on second hand smoke (we think)"... Nothing to do with the discussion we were having about the effects of second hand smoke... And you wonder why I don't read his posts? Really? That's all you got out of it? Can you read? Link #1's first few sentences: Secondhand smoke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It has been associated with serious health problems in both children and adults. Efforts to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke in Nebraska have included programs to prevent tobacco use among young people and campaigns for smoke-free workplaces and homes. Despite these interventions, young people continue to be exposed to secondhand smoke at an unacceptably high rate Link #2's first few: Every authoritative, peer-reviewed assessment of the scientific evidence over the years has concluded that Secondhand smoke causes a lengthening list of diseases. The only dissent has come from Big Tobacco and the scientists and organizations affiliated with it. Researchers supported by Big Tobacco are eighty-eight times more likely than independent researchers to conclude there is no evidence that Secondhand smoke is dangerous. The most current knowledge first... The first studies showing that Secondhand smoke causes respiratory problems in children were published over thirty years ago. First evidence that Secondhand smoke causes lung cancer was published in 1981. Since then, the list of dangers has steadily grown. This page sums up the major, independent, consensus statements produced by scientific bodies since 1985, most recent first. 2006 US Surgeon General. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. California Environmental Protection Agency. Update of the landmark 1986 Surgeon General's report. Emphasizes the effects of secondhand smoke on the heart, particularly the fact that effects occur within minutes to increase the risk of a heart attack. Confirms that there is no economic effect of smokefree laws on the hospitality industry, and concludes the ventilation systems cannot control secondhand smoke. Full report Effects Causally Associated with Secondhand Smoke Lung cancer Coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Low Birth Weight Lower respiratory illnesses in infants and children Middle ear disease in children (including otitis media and chronic middle ear infusion) Respiratory symptoms in children (cough, phlegm, wheeze, and breathlessness) Asthma in children Reduced development of lung function in children Yep, keep telling yourself that second hand smoke is good for your children. Where is the data? Can you not read??? Where are the links to the documents? You have read them haven't you. You do have their URLs handy? He posted a list, I spent some good time reading the first one, but it had NOTHING to do with the effects of second hand smoke.... Just a feel good article to explain another $tudy at another university. Feel good seems to be the most reliable science for them. Just like Global Taxing... Here you go, and BAR too!! Now, please post your "peer reviewed articles" that claim that second hand smoke is not harmful. http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/SHSBibliography.pdf http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483572/ http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ATS/14294 http://news.stanford.edu/news/2007/m...ng-050907.html Need more, just ask! More more more Thanks All propaganda... full of "may cause" and "thought to cause" and "we think".. and of course... "I Feel" which is the basis of all of these studies...;) I have read several of them now, not one has really been what it was supposed to be... |
Read Plume's link....
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... Read the first link through, all I saw was a study that said "we were successful in cutting down on second hand smoke (we think)"... Nothing to do with the discussion we were having about the effects of second hand smoke... And you wonder why I don't read his posts? Really? That's all you got out of it? Can you read? Link #1's first few sentences: Secondhand smoke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It has been associated with serious health problems in both children and adults. Efforts to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke in Nebraska have included programs to prevent tobacco use among young people and campaigns for smoke-free workplaces and homes. Despite these interventions, young people continue to be exposed to secondhand smoke at an unacceptably high rate Link #2's first few: Every authoritative, peer-reviewed assessment of the scientific evidence over the years has concluded that Secondhand smoke causes a lengthening list of diseases. The only dissent has come from Big Tobacco and the scientists and organizations affiliated with it. Researchers supported by Big Tobacco are eighty-eight times more likely than independent researchers to conclude there is no evidence that Secondhand smoke is dangerous. The most current knowledge first... The first studies showing that Secondhand smoke causes respiratory problems in children were published over thirty years ago. First evidence that Secondhand smoke causes lung cancer was published in 1981. Since then, the list of dangers has steadily grown. This page sums up the major, independent, consensus statements produced by scientific bodies since 1985, most recent first. 2006 US Surgeon General. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. California Environmental Protection Agency. Update of the landmark 1986 Surgeon General's report. Emphasizes the effects of secondhand smoke on the heart, particularly the fact that effects occur within minutes to increase the risk of a heart attack. Confirms that there is no economic effect of smokefree laws on the hospitality industry, and concludes the ventilation systems cannot control secondhand smoke. Full report Effects Causally Associated with Secondhand Smoke Lung cancer Coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Low Birth Weight Lower respiratory illnesses in infants and children Middle ear disease in children (including otitis media and chronic middle ear infusion) Respiratory symptoms in children (cough, phlegm, wheeze, and breathlessness) Asthma in children Reduced development of lung function in children Yep, keep telling yourself that second hand smoke is good for your children. Where is the data? Can you not read??? Where are the links to the documents? You have read them haven't you. You do have their URLs handy? I've posted the TWICE. You never posted to URLs. Wanna bet? Where are they? |
Read Plume's link....
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... Read the first link through, all I saw was a study that said "we were successful in cutting down on second hand smoke (we think)"... Nothing to do with the discussion we were having about the effects of second hand smoke... And you wonder why I don't read his posts? Really? That's all you got out of it? Can you read? Link #1's first few sentences: Secondhand smoke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It has been associated with serious health problems in both children and adults. Efforts to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke in Nebraska have included programs to prevent tobacco use among young people and campaigns for smoke-free workplaces and homes. Despite these interventions, young people continue to be exposed to secondhand smoke at an unacceptably high rate Link #2's first few: Every authoritative, peer-reviewed assessment of the scientific evidence over the years has concluded that Secondhand smoke causes a lengthening list of diseases. The only dissent has come from Big Tobacco and the scientists and organizations affiliated with it. Researchers supported by Big Tobacco are eighty-eight times more likely than independent researchers to conclude there is no evidence that Secondhand smoke is dangerous. The most current knowledge first... The first studies showing that Secondhand smoke causes respiratory problems in children were published over thirty years ago. First evidence that Secondhand smoke causes lung cancer was published in 1981. Since then, the list of dangers has steadily grown. This page sums up the major, independent, consensus statements produced by scientific bodies since 1985, most recent first. 2006 US Surgeon General. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. California Environmental Protection Agency. Update of the landmark 1986 Surgeon General's report. Emphasizes the effects of secondhand smoke on the heart, particularly the fact that effects occur within minutes to increase the risk of a heart attack. Confirms that there is no economic effect of smokefree laws on the hospitality industry, and concludes the ventilation systems cannot control secondhand smoke. Full report Effects Causally Associated with Secondhand Smoke Lung cancer Coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Low Birth Weight Lower respiratory illnesses in infants and children Middle ear disease in children (including otitis media and chronic middle ear infusion) Respiratory symptoms in children (cough, phlegm, wheeze, and breathlessness) Asthma in children Reduced development of lung function in children Yep, keep telling yourself that second hand smoke is good for your children. Where is the data? Can you not read??? Where are the links to the documents? You have read them haven't you. You do have their URLs handy? I've posted the TWICE. You never posted to URLs. http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/SHSBibliography.pdf Since we closed the pools we haven't had as many people die from gunshot wounds. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483572/ Did you read the conclusion? http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ATS/14294 This is a review of a study, not a study. http://news.stanford.edu/news/2007/m...ng-050907.html Another review of a study. Need more, just ask. Sure provide me with links to the actual studies. |
Read Plume's link....
In article , says...
On 3/3/2012 4:21 PM, oscar wrote: On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:03:27 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 3/3/2012 8:57 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... Read the first link through, all I saw was a study that said "we were successful in cutting down on second hand smoke (we think)"... Nothing to do with the discussion we were having about the effects of second hand smoke... And you wonder why I don't read his posts? Really? That's all you got out of it? Can you read? Link #1's first few sentences: Secondhand smoke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It has been associated with serious health problems in both children and adults. Efforts to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke in Nebraska have included programs to prevent tobacco use among young people and campaigns for smoke-free workplaces and homes. Despite these interventions, young people continue to be exposed to secondhand smoke at an unacceptably high rate Link #2's first few: Every authoritative, peer-reviewed assessment of the scientific evidence over the years has concluded that Secondhand smoke causes a lengthening list of diseases. The only dissent has come from Big Tobacco and the scientists and organizations affiliated with it. Researchers supported by Big Tobacco are eighty-eight times more likely than independent researchers to conclude there is no evidence that Secondhand smoke is dangerous. The most current knowledge first... The first studies showing that Secondhand smoke causes respiratory problems in children were published over thirty years ago. First evidence that Secondhand smoke causes lung cancer was published in 1981. Since then, the list of dangers has steadily grown. This page sums up the major, independent, consensus statements produced by scientific bodies since 1985, most recent first. 2006 US Surgeon General. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. California Environmental Protection Agency. Update of the landmark 1986 Surgeon General's report. Emphasizes the effects of secondhand smoke on the heart, particularly the fact that effects occur within minutes to increase the risk of a heart attack. Confirms that there is no economic effect of smokefree laws on the hospitality industry, and concludes the ventilation systems cannot control secondhand smoke. Full report Effects Causally Associated with Secondhand Smoke Lung cancer Coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Low Birth Weight Lower respiratory illnesses in infants and children Middle ear disease in children (including otitis media and chronic middle ear infusion) Respiratory symptoms in children (cough, phlegm, wheeze, and breathlessness) Asthma in children Reduced development of lung function in children Yep, keep telling yourself that second hand smoke is good for your children. Where is the data? Can you not read??? Where are the links to the documents? You have read them haven't you. You do have their URLs handy? He posted a list, I spent some good time reading the first one, but it had NOTHING to do with the effects of second hand smoke.... Just a feel good article to explain another $tudy at another university. Feel good seems to be the most reliable science for them. Just like Global Taxing... Here you go, and BAR too!! Now, please post your "peer reviewed articles" that claim that second hand smoke is not harmful. http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/SHSBibliography.pdf http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483572/ http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ATS/14294 http://news.stanford.edu/news/2007/m...ng-050907.html Need more, just ask! More more more Thanks All propaganda... full of "may cause" and "thought to cause" and "we think".. and of course... "I Feel" which is the basis of all of these studies...;) I have read several of them now, not one has really been what it was supposed to be... It still hasn't provided the peer reviewed studies. |
Read Plume's link....
On 3/3/2012 7:50 PM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On 3/3/2012 4:21 PM, oscar wrote: On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:03:27 -0500, wrote: In , says... On 3/3/2012 8:57 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... Read the first link through, all I saw was a study that said "we were successful in cutting down on second hand smoke (we think)"... Nothing to do with the discussion we were having about the effects of second hand smoke... And you wonder why I don't read his posts? Really? That's all you got out of it? Can you read? Link #1's first few sentences: Secondhand smoke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It has been associated with serious health problems in both children and adults. Efforts to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke in Nebraska have included programs to prevent tobacco use among young people and campaigns for smoke-free workplaces and homes. Despite these interventions, young people continue to be exposed to secondhand smoke at an unacceptably high rate Link #2's first few: Every authoritative, peer-reviewed assessment of the scientific evidence over the years has concluded that Secondhand smoke causes a lengthening list of diseases. The only dissent has come from Big Tobacco and the scientists and organizations affiliated with it. Researchers supported by Big Tobacco are eighty-eight times more likely than independent researchers to conclude there is no evidence that Secondhand smoke is dangerous. The most current knowledge first... The first studies showing that Secondhand smoke causes respiratory problems in children were published over thirty years ago. First evidence that Secondhand smoke causes lung cancer was published in 1981. Since then, the list of dangers has steadily grown. This page sums up the major, independent, consensus statements produced by scientific bodies since 1985, most recent first. 2006 US Surgeon General. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. California Environmental Protection Agency. Update of the landmark 1986 Surgeon General's report. Emphasizes the effects of secondhand smoke on the heart, particularly the fact that effects occur within minutes to increase the risk of a heart attack. Confirms that there is no economic effect of smokefree laws on the hospitality industry, and concludes the ventilation systems cannot control secondhand smoke. Full report Effects Causally Associated with Secondhand Smoke Lung cancer Coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Low Birth Weight Lower respiratory illnesses in infants and children Middle ear disease in children (including otitis media and chronic middle ear infusion) Respiratory symptoms in children (cough, phlegm, wheeze, and breathlessness) Asthma in children Reduced development of lung function in children Yep, keep telling yourself that second hand smoke is good for your children. Where is the data? Can you not read??? Where are the links to the documents? You have read them haven't you. You do have their URLs handy? He posted a list, I spent some good time reading the first one, but it had NOTHING to do with the effects of second hand smoke.... Just a feel good article to explain another $tudy at another university. Feel good seems to be the most reliable science for them. Just like Global Taxing... Here you go, and BAR too!! Now, please post your "peer reviewed articles" that claim that second hand smoke is not harmful. http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/SHSBibliography.pdf http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2483572/ http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ATS/14294 http://news.stanford.edu/news/2007/m...ng-050907.html Need more, just ask! More more more Thanks All propaganda... full of "may cause" and "thought to cause" and "we think".. and of course... "I Feel" which is the basis of all of these studies...;) I have read several of them now, not one has really been what it was supposed to be... It still hasn't provided the peer reviewed studies. I know... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com