Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default I still don't want the stuff in my boat tanks

http://www.boatingindustry.com/news/...arine-engines/

Yeah the article is 3 mo. old but it looks like the E15 is wrecking
havoc on even some 4-stroke marine engines.

I shudder the thought of what it would do to my chainsaws too.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default I still don't want the stuff in my boat tanks

On 01/01/2012 8:26 PM, Tim wrote:
http://www.boatingindustry.com/news/...arine-engines/

Yeah the article is 3 mo. old but it looks like the E15 is wrecking
havoc on even some 4-stroke marine engines.

I shudder the thought of what it would do to my chainsaws too.


Could have told you that 10 years ago. Real gas burns better and does
less damage. But you have no liberty, you will buy what the government
tells you to buy.

Hazards of big fat interfering government.

No mater how liberally you try to ignore rationality and reality,
reality always wins in the end.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default I still don't want the stuff in my boat tanks

On Jan 1, 10:22*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
On 01/01/2012 8:26 PM, Tim wrote:

http://www.boatingindustry.com/news/...nt-of-energy-e...


Yeah the article is 3 mo. old but it looks like the E15 is wrecking
havoc on even some 4-stroke marine engines.


I shudder the thought of what it would do to my chainsaws too.


Could have told you that 10 years ago. *Real gas burns better and does
less damage.


Oh I knew about it 10 years ago, but some people here might not see a
problem with it.

It's not good stuff especially for carburetor type engines.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default I still don't want the stuff in my boat tanks

On 01/01/2012 9:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 1, 10:22 pm, wrote:
On 01/01/2012 8:26 PM, Tim wrote:

http://www.boatingindustry.com/news/...nt-of-energy-e...


Yeah the article is 3 mo. old but it looks like the E15 is wrecking
havoc on even some 4-stroke marine engines.


I shudder the thought of what it would do to my chainsaws too.


Could have told you that 10 years ago. Real gas burns better and does
less damage.


Oh I knew about it 10 years ago, but some people here might not see a
problem with it.

It's not good stuff especially for carburetor type engines.


While I think fuel injected engines handle it better, they too suffer.
I am in a high altitude area, and fuel millage is up but it should be
down. I suspect it is because we get the 100% gasoline.

But I am sure some congress people invested in ethanol.
--
No mater how liberally you try to ignore rationality and reality,
reality always wins in the end.
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,646
Default I still don't want the stuff in my boat tanks

On 1/2/12 1:01 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 10:04:24 -0700,
wrote:

On 01/01/2012 9:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 1, 10:22 pm, wrote:
On 01/01/2012 8:26 PM, Tim wrote:

http://www.boatingindustry.com/news/...nt-of-energy-e...

Yeah the article is 3 mo. old but it looks like the E15 is wrecking
havoc on even some 4-stroke marine engines.

I shudder the thought of what it would do to my chainsaws too.

Could have told you that 10 years ago. Real gas burns better and does
less damage.

Oh I knew about it 10 years ago, but some people here might not see a
problem with it.

It's not good stuff especially for carburetor type engines.


While I think fuel injected engines handle it better, they too suffer.
I am in a high altitude area, and fuel millage is up but it should be
down. I suspect it is because we get the 100% gasoline.

But I am sure some congress people invested in ethanol.


Why would fuel mileage be down at a high altitude?



Just the opposite, no? Doesn't the 02 sensor detect exhaust gasses
getting richer as the oxygen in the air thins out, and therefore the
system drops back on the amount of gasoline burned so as to maintain the
proper mixture? If there is less oxygen and you burn less fuel, you get
less power but more miles per gallon? Alas, I am a mere English major,
so I doubt my "understanding" of the physics is correct.








  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,581
Default I still don't want the stuff in my boat tanks

On 1/2/2012 1:12 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 1/2/12 1:01 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 10:04:24 -0700,
wrote:

On 01/01/2012 9:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 1, 10:22 pm, wrote:
On 01/01/2012 8:26 PM, Tim wrote:

http://www.boatingindustry.com/news/...nt-of-energy-e...


Yeah the article is 3 mo. old but it looks like the E15 is wrecking
havoc on even some 4-stroke marine engines.

I shudder the thought of what it would do to my chainsaws too.

Could have told you that 10 years ago. Real gas burns better and does
less damage.

Oh I knew about it 10 years ago, but some people here might not see a
problem with it.

It's not good stuff especially for carburetor type engines.

While I think fuel injected engines handle it better, they too suffer.
I am in a high altitude area, and fuel millage is up but it should be
down. I suspect it is because we get the 100% gasoline.

But I am sure some congress people invested in ethanol.


Why would fuel mileage be down at a high altitude?



Just the opposite, no? Doesn't the 02 sensor detect exhaust gasses
getting richer as the oxygen in the air thins out, and therefore the
system drops back on the amount of gasoline burned so as to maintain the
proper mixture? If there is less oxygen and you burn less fuel, you get
less power but more miles per gallon? Alas, I am a mere English major,
so I doubt my "understanding" of the physics is correct.








Just a guess would suggest that the small engine and low horsepower
doesn't allow for a lot of adjustment aside from being set for "normal"
air pressure and O2 concentration so it can't adjust far enough to
achieve "optimum" fuel to horsepower ratios. A rich mixture, like a lean
mixture, will not burn as efficiently...
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default I still don't want the stuff in my boat tanks

On 02/01/2012 11:12 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 1/2/12 1:01 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 10:04:24 -0700,
wrote:

On 01/01/2012 9:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 1, 10:22 pm, wrote:
On 01/01/2012 8:26 PM, Tim wrote:

http://www.boatingindustry.com/news/...nt-of-energy-e...


Yeah the article is 3 mo. old but it looks like the E15 is wrecking
havoc on even some 4-stroke marine engines.

I shudder the thought of what it would do to my chainsaws too.

Could have told you that 10 years ago. Real gas burns better and does
less damage.

Oh I knew about it 10 years ago, but some people here might not see a
problem with it.

It's not good stuff especially for carburetor type engines.

While I think fuel injected engines handle it better, they too suffer.
I am in a high altitude area, and fuel millage is up but it should be
down. I suspect it is because we get the 100% gasoline.

But I am sure some congress people invested in ethanol.


Why would fuel mileage be down at a high altitude?



Just the opposite, no? Doesn't the 02 sensor detect exhaust gasses
getting richer as the oxygen in the air thins out, and therefore the
system drops back on the amount of gasoline burned so as to maintain the
proper mixture? If there is less oxygen and you burn less fuel, you get
less power but more miles per gallon? Alas, I am a mere English major,
so I doubt my "understanding" of the physics is correct.


Let us go to the extreme to see if you get the point. Lets put a
reciprocating engine without an oxygen supply 1/2 way between here and
the moon.

Does it run? If not, why not? No gases to expand and push? No oxygen?
Bingo.

Generally, the higher the altitude the less fuel effluence the
reciprocating engines become.

--
No mater how liberally you try to ignore rationality and reality,
reality always wins in the end.
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,020
Default I still don't want the stuff in my boat tanks

On 1/2/12 8:35 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:12:47 -0500, X `
wrote:

On 1/2/12 1:01 PM,
wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 10:04:24 -0700,
wrote:

On 01/01/2012 9:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 1, 10:22 pm, wrote:
On 01/01/2012 8:26 PM, Tim wrote:

http://www.boatingindustry.com/news/...nt-of-energy-e...

Yeah the article is 3 mo. old but it looks like the E15 is wrecking
havoc on even some 4-stroke marine engines.

I shudder the thought of what it would do to my chainsaws too.

Could have told you that 10 years ago. Real gas burns better and does
less damage.

Oh I knew about it 10 years ago, but some people here might not see a
problem with it.

It's not good stuff especially for carburetor type engines.

While I think fuel injected engines handle it better, they too suffer.
I am in a high altitude area, and fuel millage is up but it should be
down. I suspect it is because we get the 100% gasoline.

But I am sure some congress people invested in ethanol.

Why would fuel mileage be down at a high altitude?



Just the opposite, no? Doesn't the 02 sensor detect exhaust gasses
getting richer as the oxygen in the air thins out, and therefore the
system drops back on the amount of gasoline burned so as to maintain the
proper mixture? If there is less oxygen and you burn less fuel, you get
less power but more miles per gallon? Alas, I am a mere English major,
so I doubt my "understanding" of the physics is correct.






You are correct! Between the O2 sensor and the Mass Flow Sensor, less
fuel will be fed to the engine to maintain the correct stochiometric
mixture. Summer and high altitude contribute to better fuel mileage,
though not necessarily maximum horsepower.



I am correct? Scary. :)
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,581
Default I still don't want the stuff in my boat tanks

On 1/2/2012 8:35 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:12:47 -0500, X `
wrote:

On 1/2/12 1:01 PM,
wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 10:04:24 -0700,
wrote:

On 01/01/2012 9:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 1, 10:22 pm, wrote:
On 01/01/2012 8:26 PM, Tim wrote:

http://www.boatingindustry.com/news/...nt-of-energy-e...

Yeah the article is 3 mo. old but it looks like the E15 is wrecking
havoc on even some 4-stroke marine engines.

I shudder the thought of what it would do to my chainsaws too.

Could have told you that 10 years ago. Real gas burns better and does
less damage.

Oh I knew about it 10 years ago, but some people here might not see a
problem with it.

It's not good stuff especially for carburetor type engines.

While I think fuel injected engines handle it better, they too suffer.
I am in a high altitude area, and fuel millage is up but it should be
down. I suspect it is because we get the 100% gasoline.

But I am sure some congress people invested in ethanol.

Why would fuel mileage be down at a high altitude?



Just the opposite, no? Doesn't the 02 sensor detect exhaust gasses
getting richer as the oxygen in the air thins out, and therefore the
system drops back on the amount of gasoline burned so as to maintain the
proper mixture? If there is less oxygen and you burn less fuel, you get
less power but more miles per gallon? Alas, I am a mere English major,
so I doubt my "understanding" of the physics is correct.






You are correct! Between the O2 sensor and the Mass Flow Sensor, less
fuel will be fed to the engine to maintain the correct stochiometric
mixture. Summer and high altitude contribute to better fuel mileage,
though not necessarily maximum horsepower.


The O2 sensor is a "differentiator", which is to say it develops an
electrical charge based on the "difference" between external and
internal oxygen levels... Like I said before on such small engines there
isn't a lot of room for adjustment by the computer anyway, not to
mention the computer may not really have the capability to fully come to
a "zero or null base" to work it's calculations off of because of the
contradictory information coming from the MAP (manifold pressure)
sensor, and the O2... Just sayin'...
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 437
Default I still don't want the stuff in my boat tanks

On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:22:17 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

On 01/01/2012 8:26 PM, Tim wrote:
http://www.boatingindustry.com/news/...arine-engines/

Yeah the article is 3 mo. old but it looks like the E15 is wrecking
havoc on even some 4-stroke marine engines.

I shudder the thought of what it would do to my chainsaws too.


Could have told you that 10 years ago. Real gas burns better and does
less damage. But you have no liberty, you will buy what the government
tells you to buy.

Hazards of big fat interfering government.

No mater how liberally you try to ignore rationality and reality,
reality always wins in the end.


Give us a break for a year. We *know* what we have for government!


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sell boat stuff?? John Gaquin General 1 March 10th 07 07:41 PM
flexible water tanks in a sail boat brad General 4 January 5th 06 12:17 AM
flexible water tanks in a sail boat brad General 0 December 21st 05 02:47 AM
OT stuff not going on the boat Skip Gundlach Cruising 1 May 31st 05 11:57 PM
OT stuff not going on the boat Skip Gundlach on wifi Boat Building 0 May 31st 05 11:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017