Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You disappoint me Chuck. Show the true Harry colors. Knock the person
because he is not your very Liberal type. He is a damn good administrator. Look at his movie company. How tough is it to run a successful movie company that makes films featuring Arnold S.? I submit that a "good administrator" wouldn't be caught flat footed outside the filing office and have to admit to the press that he didn't even have a plan to run the state at the time he filed for office. A good administrator doesn't buy a business he has no idea how to run. Look at his real estate empire. So, suddenly every real estate investor is qualified to be a state governor? Most real estate wealth is created from passive income and capital appreciation. Buy right, get slightly lucky, and you make money inspite of yourself. Has more money than his in-laws and where is the administrative back ground of Ted Kennedy. And you guys love him. Bill Who is "you guys"? Doesn't include me. Ted K is a walking, talking, exhibit in favor of term limits. 2-3 terms ought to be enough for a senator, especially when the terms are six years apiece. These guys who serve decade, after decade, after decade become an instution- rather than a representative of the people. Don't forget that I'm well to the left of most Democrats. I want to see the people represented effectively (to actualize the concept of self government) and the Constitution upheld. To hell with political parties, any of them, that do not serve those two primary objectives. The welfare of the parties is supposed to be subordinate to the welfare of the people and the nation state. No particular fan of Kennedy here.....and certainly not among any group that "loves" him. Ted K is a mainstream, party Democrat- a status that means nothing to me, and maybe a lot of other independent liberals. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|