![]() |
Proposed Mobile Internet Service Interferes With GPS Units
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:14:49 -0500, JustWait
wrote: One can get accuracy to 3 ft, and even to 6 inches. Just have to throw money at it. Just with GPS? I was told the closest they could "tune" the atomic clocks in the sattelites created a sloppy area. "That's why they can't land a jet on an Aircraft Carrier with GPS alone, it can't account for the pitch of the deck"... The pitch of the deck has to do with altitude above sea level. GPS is notoriouly very inaccurate on that. Dang it, I forget the term, DPGS? Anyway you can set up your own stations around the field to increase accuracy. I know you could buy those units, but this was a while back. I hate to assume, but I assume they're still available. Years ago, before GPS, my company did a custom radio control for a local cane farmer's tractor, with all the necessary failsafes. He would drive the harvester and the R/C tractor with a fifth wheel trailer alongside. When the trailer was full, he'd drive the tractor to the pickup site, disconnect and hook on an empty and continue. Was this GPS alone, something else, or a combination?? Uh, look at the first sentence, "Years ago, before GPS,...". It was strictly radio control. We set up a custom panel in the harvester with a couple joysticks and a few switches. Rick |
Proposed Mobile Internet Service Interferes With GPS Units
On 12/23/2011 10:03 AM, Rick Morel wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:14:49 -0500, JustWait wrote: One can get accuracy to 3 ft, and even to 6 inches. Just have to throw money at it. Just with GPS? I was told the closest they could "tune" the atomic clocks in the sattelites created a sloppy area. "That's why they can't land a jet on an Aircraft Carrier with GPS alone, it can't account for the pitch of the deck"... The pitch of the deck has to do with altitude above sea level. GPS is notoriouly very inaccurate on that. Dang it, I forget the term, DPGS? Anyway you can set up your own stations around the field to increase accuracy. I know you could buy those units, but this was a while back. I hate to assume, but I assume they're still available. Years ago, before GPS, my company did a custom radio control for a local cane farmer's tractor, with all the necessary failsafes. He would drive the harvester and the R/C tractor with a fifth wheel trailer alongside. When the trailer was full, he'd drive the tractor to the pickup site, disconnect and hook on an empty and continue. Was this GPS alone, something else, or a combination?? Uh, look at the first sentence, "Years ago, before GPS,...". It was strictly radio control. We set up a custom panel in the harvester with a couple joysticks and a few switches. Rick Interesting, thanks. |
Proposed Mobile Internet Service Interferes With GPS Units
"WaIIy" wrote in message
... On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:21:03 -0500, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message . .. BusinessWeek is carrying an article today that says that government tests showed that the proposed LightSquared mobile service caused interference to 75% of all GPS receivers tested. The report can be found at: http://preview.tinyurl.com/7jyaazf There is big money behind this. I'd recommend writing your elected representatives and voicing your concerns. It seems to me real sailors needn't be concerned about this at all. Who needs GPS inland or very near coastal anyway where landmarks and navigation marks are eyeball visible? Those who proceed down the Intracoastal Waterway with eyes glued to their GPS readout are putzes to be sure. It's obvious you haven't sailed at night. Nighttime is for anchoring or docking when one is recreational sailing inland waterways. And, even if one likes to take unnecessary chances recreational sailing or even if one sails for a living commercially, since the interference is only within 100 meters of a transmission station, it will result in a GPS not being accurate for all of about five seconds (your sample rate is probably not much greater this this) when you're underway should you happen across such a station right in the middle of the channel. The concern about vessel navigation being compromised by this is a laughable one. Wilbur Hubbard |
Proposed Mobile Internet Service Interferes With GPS Units
On 12/23/2011 6:46 PM, WaIIy wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:30:38 -0500, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:21:03 -0500, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: wrote in message ... BusinessWeek is carrying an article today that says that government tests showed that the proposed LightSquared mobile service caused interference to 75% of all GPS receivers tested. The report can be found at: http://preview.tinyurl.com/7jyaazf There is big money behind this. I'd recommend writing your elected representatives and voicing your concerns. It seems to me real sailors needn't be concerned about this at all. Who needs GPS inland or very near coastal anyway where landmarks and navigation marks are eyeball visible? Those who proceed down the Intracoastal Waterway with eyes glued to their GPS readout are putzes to be sure. It's obvious you haven't sailed at night. Nighttime is for anchoring or docking when one is recreational sailing inland waterways. And, even if one likes to take unnecessary chances recreational sailing or even if one sails for a living commercially, since the interference is only within 100 meters of a transmission station, it will result in a GPS not being accurate for all of about five seconds (your sample rate is probably not much greater this this) when you're underway should you happen across such a station right in the middle of the channel. The concern about vessel navigation being compromised by this is a laughable one. Wilbur Hubbard You said "Who needs GPS inland or very near coastal anyway where landmarks andnavigation marks are eyeball visible?" Like I said - It's obvious you have never sailed near coastal at night. I've been trying to reason what gives with this corporate greed. No doubt once they own the bandwidth they will seek to license access to GPS frequencies they control or interfere with. This stuff of Global Corporate Monopoly/government needs to be brought to a screeching halt. Any conversation with our elected people, in Washington just runs into gibberish, diversion and defense of the new reality of Global economy, governance and supplier side rule. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com