Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
War mongering? All sides are slinging the word "terrorism" around too
loosely ever since 9/11. I consider it terrorism to *deliberatly* target civilians in order to scare a population into doing or not doing something. Guerilla warfare isn't terrorism. Blowing up civilian busses is. There's a difference between tageting civilians and "collateral damage". I don't even see the Sept 11 *Pentagon* attack as "pure terrorism". The Pentagon *is* a legitimate military target and if you work there, you are part of the militarty structure. However the innocent people in the plane that hit the Pentagon are such high "collateral damage" as to be able to call it terrorism in light of the rest of the 9/11 attacks. If that plane was empty - I'd label the Pentagon strike as a "sucker punch". -W "Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:Jcjgb.272 Really? It's not? What would Canada call it if NY State decided Plattsburgh needed to expand north into Quebec for maybe 8 or 30 or 100 miles? |