Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net... "Gary Warner" wrote in message ... "Clams Canino" wrote in message . net... About time Israel showed more teeth. -W You mean that their continually grabbing land that isn't theirs - even while supposedly "negotiating" in good faith isn't showing teeth? Israel has lots more money, militarty, and resources. They negotiate but all the while continue to make land grabs. Then they wonder why terrorists attack them. Hmmmm....isn't building walls annexing people a kind of terrorism?? No. Really? It's not? What would Canada call it if NY State decided Plattsburgh needed to expand north into Quebec for maybe 8 or 30 or 100 miles? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
... "NOYB" wrote in message k.net... "Gary Warner" wrote in message ... "Clams Canino" wrote in message . net... About time Israel showed more teeth. -W You mean that their continually grabbing land that isn't theirs - even while supposedly "negotiating" in good faith isn't showing teeth? Israel has lots more money, militarty, and resources. They negotiate but all the while continue to make land grabs. Then they wonder why terrorists attack them. Hmmmm....isn't building walls annexing people a kind of terrorism?? No. Really? It's not? What would Canada call it if NY State decided Plattsburgh needed to expand north into Quebec for maybe 8 or 30 or 100 miles? Geez, dont give Bush any ideas! If he finds out they speak French in Quebec he'll invade to punish to France for not supporting the war to find mythical weapons of mass destruction. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Martin" wrote in message
... Israel has lots more money, militarty, and resources. They negotiate but all the while continue to make land grabs. Then they wonder why terrorists attack them. Hmmmm....isn't building walls annexing people a kind of terrorism?? No. Really? It's not? What would Canada call it if NY State decided Plattsburgh needed to expand north into Quebec for maybe 8 or 30 or 100 miles? Geez, dont give Bush any ideas! If he finds out they speak French in Quebec he'll invade to punish to France for not supporting the war to find mythical weapons of mass destruction. Yeah....like biologicalular weapons. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message k.net... "Gary Warner" wrote in message ... "Clams Canino" wrote in message . net... About time Israel showed more teeth. -W You mean that their continually grabbing land that isn't theirs - even while supposedly "negotiating" in good faith isn't showing teeth? Israel has lots more money, militarty, and resources. They negotiate but all the while continue to make land grabs. Then they wonder why terrorists attack them. Hmmmm....isn't building walls annexing people a kind of terrorism?? No. Really? It's not? What would Canada call it if NY State decided Plattsburgh needed to expand north into Quebec for maybe 8 or 30 or 100 miles? Imperialism. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
War mongering? All sides are slinging the word "terrorism" around too
loosely ever since 9/11. I consider it terrorism to *deliberatly* target civilians in order to scare a population into doing or not doing something. Guerilla warfare isn't terrorism. Blowing up civilian busses is. There's a difference between tageting civilians and "collateral damage". I don't even see the Sept 11 *Pentagon* attack as "pure terrorism". The Pentagon *is* a legitimate military target and if you work there, you are part of the militarty structure. However the innocent people in the plane that hit the Pentagon are such high "collateral damage" as to be able to call it terrorism in light of the rest of the 9/11 attacks. If that plane was empty - I'd label the Pentagon strike as a "sucker punch". -W "Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:Jcjgb.272 Really? It's not? What would Canada call it if NY State decided Plattsburgh needed to expand north into Quebec for maybe 8 or 30 or 100 miles? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I agree with all that below. You seem to think Israel is right in it's actions - can you tell me why? Don't the Palestinian's have a right to fight to protect their land? "Clams Canino" wrote in message news:52mgb.511201$cF.181837@rwcrnsc53... War mongering? All sides are slinging the word "terrorism" around too loosely ever since 9/11. I consider it terrorism to *deliberatly* target civilians in order to scare a population into doing or not doing something. Guerilla warfare isn't terrorism. Blowing up civilian busses is. There's a difference between tageting civilians and "collateral damage". I don't even see the Sept 11 *Pentagon* attack as "pure terrorism". The Pentagon *is* a legitimate military target and if you work there, you are part of the militarty structure. However the innocent people in the plane that hit the Pentagon are such high "collateral damage" as to be able to call it terrorism in light of the rest of the 9/11 attacks. If that plane was empty - I'd label the Pentagon strike as a "sucker punch". -W "Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:Jcjgb.272 Really? It's not? What would Canada call it if NY State decided Plattsburgh needed to expand north into Quebec for maybe 8 or 30 or 100 miles? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with all that below.
You seem to think Israel is right in it's actions - can you tell me why? Don't the Palestinian's have a right to fight to protect their land? Well let's see: Political contributions to US politicians by people sympathetic to Zionism: $gazillion Political contributions to US politicians by people opposed to Zionism: $3.16 Hmm. Looks like the Palestinians have a ways to go to earn our support. :-( |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So let them wage a guerilla war against Israeli SOLDIERS. (as opposed to
school kids) I have no problem with that. -W "Gary Warner" wrote in message ... I agree with all that below. You seem to think Israel is right in it's actions - can you tell me why? Don't the Palestinian's have a right to fight to protect their land? "Clams Canino" wrote in message news:52mgb.511201$cF.181837@rwcrnsc53... War mongering? All sides are slinging the word "terrorism" around too loosely ever since 9/11. I consider it terrorism to *deliberatly* target civilians in order to scare a population into doing or not doing something. Guerilla warfare isn't terrorism. Blowing up civilian busses is. There's a difference between tageting civilians and "collateral damage". I don't even see the Sept 11 *Pentagon* attack as "pure terrorism". The Pentagon *is* a legitimate military target and if you work there, you are part of the militarty structure. However the innocent people in the plane that hit the Pentagon are such high "collateral damage" as to be able to call it terrorism in light of the rest of the 9/11 attacks. If that plane was empty - I'd label the Pentagon strike as a "sucker punch". -W "Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:Jcjgb.272 Really? It's not? What would Canada call it if NY State decided Plattsburgh needed to expand north into Quebec for maybe 8 or 30 or 100 miles? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary Warner wrote:
I agree with all that below. You seem to think Israel is right in it's actions - can you tell me why? Don't the Palestinian's have a right to fight to protect their land? The land of the so-called Palestinians actually is in Jordan. The ancestors of those who call themselves Palestinians left Israel in 1948 to help their Arab brothers slaughter the Jews. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
... Gary Warner wrote: I agree with all that below. You seem to think Israel is right in it's actions - can you tell me why? Don't the Palestinian's have a right to fight to protect their land? The land of the so-called Palestinians actually is in Jordan. The ancestors of those who call themselves Palestinians left Israel in 1948 to help their Arab brothers slaughter the Jews. And what history book did you read that one in? Most Palestinians fled after the mass executions of anyone not a Jew by the fledging Israelis army and its irregulars - Stern Gang etc.. The number of Jews in Palestine was minute pre 1939, only when the mass immigration after WW2 did the numbers rise. The big problem for the Israelis is that they carved out a country using terrorism against the Brits and Palestinians - the freedom fighting Palestinians are only trying to win back their country from a rogue state. Or are they just a bunch of sub humans who dont deserve national self determination like the Jews? |