"Gary Warner" wrote in message
...

"Clams Canino" wrote in message
. net...
About time Israel showed more teeth.

-W


You mean that their continually grabbing land that isn't theirs - even
while supposedly "negotiating" in good faith isn't showing teeth?

Israel has lots more money, militarty, and resources. They negotiate
but all the while continue to make land grabs. Then they wonder why
terrorists attack them. Hmmmm....isn't building walls annexing people
a kind of terrorism??


No.

"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net...

"Gary Warner" wrote in message
...

"Clams Canino" wrote in message
. net...
About time Israel showed more teeth.

-W


You mean that their continually grabbing land that isn't theirs - even
while supposedly "negotiating" in good faith isn't showing teeth?

Israel has lots more money, militarty, and resources. They negotiate
but all the while continue to make land grabs. Then they wonder why
terrorists attack them. Hmmmm....isn't building walls annexing people
a kind of terrorism??


No.

Really? It's not? What would Canada call it if NY State decided Plattsburgh
needed to expand north into Quebec for maybe 8 or 30 or 100 miles?

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net...

"Gary Warner" wrote in message
...

"Clams Canino" wrote in message
. net...
About time Israel showed more teeth.

-W


You mean that their continually grabbing land that isn't theirs - even
while supposedly "negotiating" in good faith isn't showing teeth?

Israel has lots more money, militarty, and resources. They negotiate
but all the while continue to make land grabs. Then they wonder why
terrorists attack them. Hmmmm....isn't building walls annexing people
a kind of terrorism??


No.

Really? It's not? What would Canada call it if NY State decided
Plattsburgh
needed to expand north into Quebec for maybe 8 or 30 or 100 miles?


Geez, dont give Bush any ideas! If he finds out they speak French in Quebec
he'll invade to punish to France for not supporting the war to find mythical
weapons of mass destruction.

"Roger Martin" wrote in message
...


Israel has lots more money, militarty, and resources. They
negotiate
but all the while continue to make land grabs. Then they wonder why
terrorists attack them. Hmmmm....isn't building walls annexing
people
a kind of terrorism??


No.

Really? It's not? What would Canada call it if NY State decided
Plattsburgh
needed to expand north into Quebec for maybe 8 or 30 or 100 miles?


Geez, dont give Bush any ideas! If he finds out they speak French in
Quebec
he'll invade to punish to France for not supporting the war to find
mythical
weapons of mass destruction.



Yeah....like biologicalular weapons.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net...

"Gary Warner" wrote in message
...

"Clams Canino" wrote in message
. net...
About time Israel showed more teeth.

-W


You mean that their continually grabbing land that isn't theirs - even
while supposedly "negotiating" in good faith isn't showing teeth?

Israel has lots more money, militarty, and resources. They negotiate
but all the while continue to make land grabs. Then they wonder why
terrorists attack them. Hmmmm....isn't building walls annexing people
a kind of terrorism??


No.

Really? It's not? What would Canada call it if NY State decided
Plattsburgh
needed to expand north into Quebec for maybe 8 or 30 or 100 miles?

Imperialism.

War mongering? All sides are slinging the word "terrorism" around too
loosely ever since 9/11.

I consider it terrorism to *deliberatly* target civilians in order to scare
a population into doing or not doing something. Guerilla warfare isn't
terrorism. Blowing up civilian busses is. There's a difference between
tageting civilians and "collateral damage".

I don't even see the Sept 11 *Pentagon* attack as "pure terrorism".
The Pentagon *is* a legitimate military target and if you work there, you
are part of the militarty structure. However the innocent people in the
plane that hit the Pentagon are such high "collateral damage" as to be able
to call it terrorism in light of the rest of the 9/11 attacks. If that
plane was empty - I'd label the Pentagon strike as a "sucker punch".

-W

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news:Jcjgb.272

Really? It's not? What would Canada call it if NY State decided
Plattsburgh
needed to expand north into Quebec for maybe 8 or 30 or 100 miles?

I agree with all that below.

You seem to think Israel is right in it's actions - can
you tell me why? Don't the Palestinian's have a right
to fight to protect their land?



"Clams Canino" wrote in message
news:52mgb.511201$cF.181837@rwcrnsc53...
War mongering? All sides are slinging the word "terrorism" around too
loosely ever since 9/11.

I consider it terrorism to *deliberatly* target civilians in order to
scare
a population into doing or not doing something. Guerilla warfare isn't
terrorism. Blowing up civilian busses is. There's a difference between
tageting civilians and "collateral damage".

I don't even see the Sept 11 *Pentagon* attack as "pure terrorism".
The Pentagon *is* a legitimate military target and if you work there, you
are part of the militarty structure. However the innocent people in the
plane that hit the Pentagon are such high "collateral damage" as to be
able
to call it terrorism in light of the rest of the 9/11 attacks. If that
plane was empty - I'd label the Pentagon strike as a "sucker punch".

-W

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news:Jcjgb.272

Really? It's not? What would Canada call it if NY State decided
Plattsburgh
needed to expand north into Quebec for maybe 8 or 30 or 100 miles?

I agree with all that below.

You seem to think Israel is right in it's actions - can
you tell me why? Don't the Palestinian's have a right
to fight to protect their land?

Well let's see:

Political contributions to US politicians by
people sympathetic to Zionism: $gazillion

Political contributions to US politicians by
people opposed to Zionism: $3.16

Hmm. Looks like the Palestinians have a ways to go to earn our support. :-(

So let them wage a guerilla war against Israeli SOLDIERS. (as opposed to
school kids)
I have no problem with that.

-W

"Gary Warner" wrote in message
...

I agree with all that below.

You seem to think Israel is right in it's actions - can
you tell me why? Don't the Palestinian's have a right
to fight to protect their land?



"Clams Canino" wrote in message
news:52mgb.511201$cF.181837@rwcrnsc53...
War mongering? All sides are slinging the word "terrorism" around too
loosely ever since 9/11.

I consider it terrorism to *deliberatly* target civilians in order to
scare
a population into doing or not doing something. Guerilla warfare isn't
terrorism. Blowing up civilian busses is. There's a difference between
tageting civilians and "collateral damage".

I don't even see the Sept 11 *Pentagon* attack as "pure terrorism".
The Pentagon *is* a legitimate military target and if you work there,
you
are part of the militarty structure. However the innocent people in the
plane that hit the Pentagon are such high "collateral damage" as to be
able
to call it terrorism in light of the rest of the 9/11 attacks. If that
plane was empty - I'd label the Pentagon strike as a "sucker punch".

-W

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news:Jcjgb.272

Really? It's not? What would Canada call it if NY State decided
Plattsburgh
needed to expand north into Quebec for maybe 8 or 30 or 100 miles?

Gary Warner wrote:

I agree with all that below.

You seem to think Israel is right in it's actions - can
you tell me why? Don't the Palestinian's have a right
to fight to protect their land?



The land of the so-called Palestinians actually is in Jordan. The
ancestors of those who call themselves Palestinians left Israel in 1948
to help their Arab brothers slaughter the Jews.