In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:55:42 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:26:13 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:52:41 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

Woman says she and Cain had 13-year affair

===

Does anyone really care? I certainly don't. You must be worried
about him however, posting all of this racist crap of yours. He may
not be qualified in other respects but at least he's not a hypocrite
like Newt.

What I take away from all of this is that everybody making excuses for
Herman Cain is also excusing Bill Clinton.

Personally, I don't think it means anything with respect to Cain or
Clinton. Cain seems to have a better handle on telling the media to
stuff it, which is the proper response. Clinton should have been smart
enough to have done the same.

However, the big thing is the incredibly obvious double standard
evolving between, your guy is immoral, wrong, and a threat to national
security, my guy, well, guys will be guys.

Who made an excuse? I've not seen it.

If Cain took advantage of his position to have sex with an employee, then he doesn't deserve the
presidency, in my opinion. The same opinion was held with regard to Clinton. With Clinton, it was a
fact. With Cain nothing has been close to proven.

Note, there are many, many liberal Christians who believe in 'family values'. Those beliefs don't
prevent ****ty behavior.

Look at Scotty's post, he's made the excuse already that it's a witch
hunt.

On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:26:00 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:58:28 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:55:42 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:26:13 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:52:41 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

Woman says she and Cain had 13-year affair

===

Does anyone really care? I certainly don't. You must be worried
about him however, posting all of this racist crap of yours. He may
not be qualified in other respects but at least he's not a hypocrite
like Newt.

What I take away from all of this is that everybody making excuses for
Herman Cain is also excusing Bill Clinton.

Personally, I don't think it means anything with respect to Cain or
Clinton. Cain seems to have a better handle on telling the media to
stuff it, which is the proper response. Clinton should have been smart
enough to have done the same.

However, the big thing is the incredibly obvious double standard
evolving between, your guy is immoral, wrong, and a threat to national
security, my guy, well, guys will be guys.

Who made an excuse? I've not seen it.

If Cain took advantage of his position to have sex with an employee, then he doesn't deserve the
presidency, in my opinion. The same opinion was held with regard to Clinton. With Clinton, it was a
fact. With Cain nothing has been close to proven.

Note, there are many, many liberal Christians who believe in 'family values'. Those beliefs don't
prevent ****ty behavior.

Who received advantages by having sex with Clinton? And what were the
perks received?

What bearing do your questions have on the post?

On 12/5/2011 3:24 PM, Black Cloud wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:26:00 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:58:28 -0500, John
wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:55:42 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:26:13 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:52:41 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

Woman says she and Cain had 13-year affair

===

Does anyone really care? I certainly don't. You must be worried
about him however, posting all of this racist crap of yours. He may
not be qualified in other respects but at least he's not a hypocrite
like Newt.

What I take away from all of this is that everybody making excuses for
Herman Cain is also excusing Bill Clinton.

Personally, I don't think it means anything with respect to Cain or
Clinton. Cain seems to have a better handle on telling the media to
stuff it, which is the proper response. Clinton should have been smart
enough to have done the same.

However, the big thing is the incredibly obvious double standard
evolving between, your guy is immoral, wrong, and a threat to national
security, my guy, well, guys will be guys.

Who made an excuse? I've not seen it.

If Cain took advantage of his position to have sex with an employee, then he doesn't deserve the
presidency, in my opinion. The same opinion was held with regard to Clinton. With Clinton, it was a
fact. With Cain nothing has been close to proven.

Note, there are many, many liberal Christians who believe in 'family values'. Those beliefs don't
prevent ****ty behavior.

Who received advantages by having sex with Clinton? And what were the
perks received?

What bearing do your questions have on the post?

None except Plume is living vicariously through Monika

--
1-20-13 The end of an error

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:52:41 -0500, X ` Man wrote:


Woman says she and Cain had 13-year affair; Cain denies accusation - CNN.com
2011-11-28T21:50:07Z

CNN.com

Atlanta, Georgia (CNN) -- An Atlanta businesswoman accused GOP
presidential hopeful Herman Cain of having had an affair with her that
lasted 13 years, an Atlanta television station reported Monday.

"I was aware that he was married, and I was also aware that I was
involved in a very inappropriate situation relationship," the woman --
identified by the station as Ginger White -- told WAGA.

The candidate upstaged his accuser's announcement, telling CNN a few
minutes beforehand that her assertion was coming and was false. "This
individual is going to accuse me of an affair for an extended period of
time," Cain said on CNN's "Situation Room."

"It is someone that I know who is an acquaintance that I thought was a
friend."

Cain said he learned about the accusation after his lawyer talked to a
reporter about it.

Cain said his wife's immediate reaction upon hearing of the accusation
was, "Here we go again."

He said he had no plans to drop out of the race. "Not as long as my wife
is behind me and as long as my wife believes I should stay in this race,
I'm staying in this race," Cain said.

"Some things are fair game, and some aren't," Cain's attorney, Lin Wood
of Atlanta, told CNN in a telephone interview, adding that this was one
of them. "You've got to draw the line somewhere."

He said in a statement to WAGA that "Cain has been informed today that
your television station plans to broadcast a story this evening in which
a female will make an accusation that she engaged in a 13-year-long
physical relationship with Mr. Cain. This is not an accusation of
harassment in the workplace -- this is not an accusation of an assault
-- which are subject matters of legitimate inquiry to a political candidate.

"Rather, this appears to be an accusation of private, alleged consensual
conduct between adults -- a subject matter which is not a proper subject
of inquiry by the media or the public. No individual, whether a private
citizen, a candidate for public office or a public official, should be
questioned about his or her private sexual life. The public's right to
know and the media's right to report has boundaries and most certainly
those boundaries end outside of one's bedroom door.

"Mr. Cain has alerted his wife to this new accusation and discussed it
with her. He has no obligation to discuss these types of accusations
publicly with the media and he will not do so even if his principled
position is viewed unfavorably by members of the media."
© 2011 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights
Reserved.

More racist **** from Krause. You're sick.