| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
You have to feel sorry for entrepreneurs...
On 11/27/2011 3:14 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In , says... The obvious answer is to cap welfare benefits at two children, no exceptions. I suppose in this case we'd have to say two children per mother since it's not always clear who the father is. You didn't actually believe that, did you? It's tea party generated BS. Yeah right! Now it's all the "tea party" fault... lol! |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
You have to feel sorry for entrepreneurs...
On 11/27/11 3:18 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/27/2011 3:14 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In , says... The obvious answer is to cap welfare benefits at two children, no exceptions. I suppose in this case we'd have to say two children per mother since it's not always clear who the father is. You didn't actually believe that, did you? It's tea party generated BS. Yeah right! Now it's all the "tea party" fault... lol! It's dumb enough to be tea party propaganda. Oh, wait...*you're* a tea party dummy. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
You have to feel sorry for entrepreneurs...
On 11/27/2011 3:22 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/27/11 3:18 PM, JustWait wrote: On 11/27/2011 3:14 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In , says... The obvious answer is to cap welfare benefits at two children, no exceptions. I suppose in this case we'd have to say two children per mother since it's not always clear who the father is. You didn't actually believe that, did you? It's tea party generated BS. Yeah right! Now it's all the "tea party" fault... lol! It's dumb enough to be tea party propaganda. Oh, wait...*you're* a tea party dummy. Harry calling someone a dummy, lol!! Guy didn't even graduate high school... |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
You have to feel sorry for entrepreneurs...
On 11/27/11 5:50 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/27/2011 3:22 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/27/11 3:18 PM, JustWait wrote: On 11/27/2011 3:14 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In , says... The obvious answer is to cap welfare benefits at two children, no exceptions. I suppose in this case we'd have to say two children per mother since it's not always clear who the father is. You didn't actually believe that, did you? It's tea party generated BS. Yeah right! Now it's all the "tea party" fault... lol! It's dumb enough to be tea party propaganda. Oh, wait...*you're* a tea party dummy. Harry calling someone a dummy, lol!! Guy didn't even graduate high school... You are over your head in your delusional fantasies about me, shortstack of ****. -- http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/8272ug |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Do something to feel good! | General | |||
| I feel so much better... | General | |||
| Wow I feel better | ASA | |||
| Do you ever feel confused? | General | |||
| I feel so... | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
