On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:13:56 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:45:4

The fact is the top 5% pay 40% of the taxes.

you're so full of right wing bull**** i can smell it in PA

No, Philadelphia always smells like that. ;-)

Perhaps you would believe the IRS web site ... but I doubt it.

You can go here and crunch the numbers yourself
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/09in12ms.xls

you can go here, to the congressional budget office report:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/f.../201117pap.pdf

and find that between 1979 and 2007 the income of the richest 1% grew
by

TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE percent

did their taxes go up that much?

nope. in fact they went DOWN

Since there was no change in the tax law between 2007 and 2009, how do
you explain that.

it's YOUR contention cutting capital gains taxes creates jobs

we DID cut capital gains by 50% during bush's term

WHERE ARE THE JOBS??

you IGNORE this question. you keep BLEATING that bankrupting the
middle class by giving ALL our money to the rich will create jobs

OK. we did that

WHERE ARE THE JOBS???


BTW why make a statement that is not supported by the link you post.
Do you think I won't read it and take your 275% numbers at face value

i gave you the link to the CBO study. can't help it if faux news keeps
feeding you ****.

the very fact you keep bleating WRONG information tells us about the
bull**** kool aid you drink from the True Believer fountain at wall
street


Your article seems to make it sound like Wall Street INVESTORS took
the worst hit.

"house prices declined 17 percent and the Wilshire 5000 index of
publicly
traded equities fell 39 percent."

Yet you think it is all gravy for us.

gee. middle class unemployment DOUBLED

AND we BAILED YOU OUT

NOW you want MORE money to continue to destroy our country

how ****ing GREEDY can you get?

On 25/11/2011 12:38 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:13:56 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:45:4

The fact is the top 5% pay 40% of the taxes.

you're so full of right wing bull**** i can smell it in PA

No, Philadelphia always smells like that. ;-)

Perhaps you would believe the IRS web site ... but I doubt it.

You can go here and crunch the numbers yourself
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/09in12ms.xls

you can go here, to the congressional budget office report:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/f.../201117pap.pdf

and find that between 1979 and 2007 the income of the richest 1% grew
by

TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE percent

did their taxes go up that much?

nope. in fact they went DOWN

Since there was no change in the tax law between 2007 and 2009, how do
you explain that.

it's YOUR contention cutting capital gains taxes creates jobs

we DID cut capital gains by 50% during bush's term

WHERE ARE THE JOBS??

you IGNORE this question. you keep BLEATING that bankrupting the
middle class by giving ALL our money to the rich will create jobs

OK. we did that

WHERE ARE THE JOBS???


BTW why make a statement that is not supported by the link you post.
Do you think I won't read it and take your 275% numbers at face value

i gave you the link to the CBO study. can't help it if faux news keeps
feeding you ****.

the very fact you keep bleating WRONG information tells us about the
bull**** kool aid you drink from the True Believer fountain at wall
street


Your article seems to make it sound like Wall Street INVESTORS took
the worst hit.

"house prices declined 17 percent and the Wilshire 5000 index of
publicly
traded equities fell 39 percent."

Yet you think it is all gravy for us.

gee. middle class unemployment DOUBLED

AND we BAILED YOU OUT

NOW you want MORE money to continue to destroy our country

how ****ing GREEDY can you get?

Even if you believe your bull****....ask yourself then why 0bama signed
the $6 trillion in checks? Sold you out? Treating you like a dumb****
sheep? Laughing at your gullibility and stupidity?


--
All successful people have one thing in common, if even for a moment
they think rationally.

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:29:41 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 25/11/2011 12:38 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0500, wrote:

AND we BAILED YOU OUT

NOW you want MORE money to continue to destroy our country

how ****ing GREEDY can you get?

Even if you believe your bull****....ask yourself then why 0bama signed
the $6 trillion in checks? Sold you out? Treating you like a dumb****
sheep? Laughing at your gullibility and stupidity?

ever hear of too big to fail

oh. you didn't. i forgot. you're cosnervative and therefore
illiterate

On 25/11/2011 5:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:29:41 -0700,
wrote:

On 25/11/2011 12:38 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0500, wrote:

AND we BAILED YOU OUT

NOW you want MORE money to continue to destroy our country

how ****ing GREEDY can you get?

Even if you believe your bull****....ask yourself then why 0bama signed
the $6 trillion in checks? Sold you out? Treating you like a dumb****
sheep? Laughing at your gullibility and stupidity?

ever hear of too big to fail

oh. you didn't. i forgot. you're cosnervative and therefore
illiterate

Yep, and the first thing that comes to mind is the USA government.

Too big and corrupt to save.

--
All successful people have one thing in common, if even for a moment
they think rationally.

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 17:20:39 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 25/11/2011 5:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:29:41 -0700,
wrote:

On 25/11/2011 12:38 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0500, wrote:

AND we BAILED YOU OUT

NOW you want MORE money to continue to destroy our country

how ****ing GREEDY can you get?

Even if you believe your bull****....ask yourself then why 0bama signed
the $6 trillion in checks? Sold you out? Treating you like a dumb****
sheep? Laughing at your gullibility and stupidity?

ever hear of too big to fail

oh. you didn't. i forgot. you're cosnervative and therefore
illiterate

Yep, and the first thing that comes to mind is the USA government.

Too big and corrupt to save.

gee. any govts that arent?

you're a cliche factory

On 11/25/2011 7:20 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 25/11/2011 5:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:29:41 -0700,
wrote:

On 25/11/2011 12:38 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0500, wrote:

AND we BAILED YOU OUT

NOW you want MORE money to continue to destroy our country

how ****ing GREEDY can you get?

Even if you believe your bull****....ask yourself then why 0bama signed
the $6 trillion in checks? Sold you out? Treating you like a dumb****
sheep? Laughing at your gullibility and stupidity?

ever hear of too big to fail

oh. you didn't. i forgot. you're cosnervative and therefore
illiterate

Yep, and the first thing that comes to mind is the USA government.

Too big and corrupt to save.


Wow, you still playing with this mouth breather?

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 00:47:23 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:38:13 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0500, wrote:

you can go here, to the congressional budget office report:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/f.../201117pap.pdf

and find that between 1979 and 2007 the income of the richest 1% grew
by

TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE percent

did their taxes go up that much?

nope. in fact they went DOWN

Since there was no change in the tax law between 2007 and 2009, how do
you explain that.

it's YOUR contention cutting capital gains taxes creates jobs

we DID cut capital gains by 50% during bush's term

WHERE ARE THE JOBS??

The cut the tax in 2001 and the job,ess rate dropped to about 5% by
2006. In the construction trades it was closer to 1%

oh. so the rich created a bubble to sell financial instruments like
CDS's and we LOST ALL THE JOBS created in the last 10 years

so proof of your assertion is that we LOST jobs but that proves we
GAINED jobs??

WHERE ARE THE JOBS?? have you LOOKED at unemployment?

This is actually the first time you brought this up, changing the
subject again..


hardly. because it's right wing theology that cutting taxes on the
rich creates jobs

YOU just showed it creates a bubble which DESTROYS jobs

THEN you call this a SUCCESS. is there ANYTHING you would call a
failure?? the EVIDENCE shows cutting taxes does NOT create jobs. you
yourself show this because your analysis stops at 2006.

so tell me right winger, how we doing TODAY after cutting taxes on the
rich??

we LOST ALL THE JOBS created in the last DECADE AFTER we cut taxes on
the rich. to right wingers that's a SUCCESS!!

HAHAHAHAH



you IGNORE this question. you keep BLEATING that bankrupting the
middle class by giving ALL our money to the rich will create jobs

OK. we did that

WHERE ARE THE JOBS???


BTW why make a statement that is not supported by the link you post.
Do you think I won't read it and take your 275% numbers at face value

i gave you the link to the CBO study. can't help it if faux news keeps
feeding you ****.

That 275% number was not in that article, did you read it?

aw gee. wrong link. here you go. here's the GOVERNMENT SITE WITH A
CHART...make it easier for you right whiner?

http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/124xx/doc1248...holdIncome.pdf

gee. what does this show?

THE WEALTHIEST BLEW OUT THE ECONOMY BECAUSE THEY TOOK ALL THE MONEY

the richest 1% had an income growth of about 9% PER YEAR

while normal people had about 1.5% per year.


NOW you want MORE money to continue to destroy our country

how ****ing GREEDY can you get?

OK have it your way

Keep sending me the money, you are my bitch.

gee. that's the same thing marie antoinette said

how'd that work out for her?