wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

a lobbying firm has developed plans to destroy occupy wall street and
asserts a democratic victory in 2012 would be bad for wall street

so the RIGHT WING who thinks obama's a wall street stooge has a
problem:

http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...py-wall-street

of course they'll IGNORE THIS

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On 19/11/2011 1:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:
a lobbying firm has developed plans to destroy occupy wall street and
asserts a democratic victory in 2012 would be bad for wall street

so the RIGHT WING who thinks obama's a wall street stooge has a
problem:

http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...py-wall-street

of course they'll IGNORE THIS

So? Nothing new, we have said all along your a managed herd of
fleabaggers. And those with envy and greed of others are trivial for
unscrupulous politicians like 0bama to manage.

Ever ask yourself why Wall Street and no Whitehouse or Congress? Try
camping out in DC Whitehouse or Capitol building and see how long it lasts.

Simple, your a managed herd of sheeples.

But like dumb sheep, you will vote zero-bama.

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:35:03 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 1:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:
a lobbying firm has developed plans to destroy occupy wall street and
asserts a democratic victory in 2012 would be bad for wall street

so the RIGHT WING who thinks obama's a wall street stooge has a
problem:

http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...py-wall-street

of course they'll IGNORE THIS

So? Nothing new, we have said all along your a managed herd of
fleabaggers

that's exactly right. the right wing in america is a bunch of sheep

.. And those with envy and greed of others are trivial for
unscrupulous politicians like 0bama to manage.

HAHAHAHA envy and greed for others!!

he thinks the rich are rich because they deserve it!!


But like dumb sheep, you will vote zero-bama.

yeah. let's vote republican, right? they're wall street's enemies!
HAHAHAHAHA

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On 19/11/2011 3:33 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:35:03 -0700,
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 1:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:
a lobbying firm has developed plans to destroy occupy wall street and
asserts a democratic victory in 2012 would be bad for wall street

so the RIGHT WING who thinks obama's a wall street stooge has a
problem:

http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...py-wall-street

of course they'll IGNORE THIS

So? Nothing new, we have said all along your a managed herd of
fleabaggers

that's exactly right. the right wing in america is a bunch of sheep

. And those with envy and greed of others are trivial for
unscrupulous politicians like 0bama to manage.

HAHAHAHA envy and greed for others!!

he thinks the rich are rich because they deserve it!!


But like dumb sheep, you will vote zero-bama.

yeah. let's vote republican, right? they're wall street's enemies!
HAHAHAHAHA

But you will vote for a corrupt (Solyndra) stooge beeding corruption
moneys to Wall Street?

Man, you brain must be pretty darned disabled or small.


--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:00:19 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 3:33 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:35:03 -0700,
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 1:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:
a lobbying firm has developed plans to destroy occupy wall street and
asserts a democratic victory in 2012 would be bad for wall street

so the RIGHT WING who thinks obama's a wall street stooge has a
problem:

http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...py-wall-street

of course they'll IGNORE THIS

So? Nothing new, we have said all along your a managed herd of
fleabaggers

that's exactly right. the right wing in america is a bunch of sheep

. And those with envy and greed of others are trivial for
unscrupulous politicians like 0bama to manage.

HAHAHAHA envy and greed for others!!

he thinks the rich are rich because they deserve it!!


But like dumb sheep, you will vote zero-bama.

yeah. let's vote republican, right? they're wall street's enemies!
HAHAHAHAHA

But you will vote for a corrupt (Solyndra) stooge beeding corruption
moneys to Wall Street?

Man, you brain must be pretty darned disabled or small.

let's see

solyndra: 500M

iraq war: 1 TRILLION and 4400 dead

but the right wing loves the iraq war cuz alot of people got rich

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:35:03 -0700,
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 1:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:
a lobbying firm has developed plans to destroy occupy wall street and
asserts a democratic victory in 2012 would be bad for wall street

so the RIGHT WING who thinks obama's a wall street stooge has a
problem:

http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...py-wall-street

of course they'll IGNORE THIS
So? Nothing new, we have said all along your a managed herd of
fleabaggers
that's exactly right. the right wing in america is a bunch of sheep

.. And those with envy and greed of others are trivial for
unscrupulous politicians like 0bama to manage.
HAHAHAHA envy and greed for others!!

he thinks the rich are rich because they deserve it!!

But like dumb sheep, you will vote zero-bama.
yeah. let's vote republican, right? they're wall street's enemies!
HAHAHAHAHA


You're a moron. HAHAHAHA!!!

-HB

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On 19/11/2011 8:07 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:00:19 -0700,
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 3:33 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:35:03 -0700,
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 1:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:
a lobbying firm has developed plans to destroy occupy wall street and
asserts a democratic victory in 2012 would be bad for wall street

so the RIGHT WING who thinks obama's a wall street stooge has a
problem:

http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...py-wall-street

of course they'll IGNORE THIS

So? Nothing new, we have said all along your a managed herd of
fleabaggers

that's exactly right. the right wing in america is a bunch of sheep

. And those with envy and greed of others are trivial for
unscrupulous politicians like 0bama to manage.

HAHAHAHA envy and greed for others!!

he thinks the rich are rich because they deserve it!!


But like dumb sheep, you will vote zero-bama.

yeah. let's vote republican, right? they're wall street's enemies!
HAHAHAHAHA

But you will vote for a corrupt (Solyndra) stooge beeding corruption
moneys to Wall Street?

Man, you brain must be pretty darned disabled or small.

let's see

solyndra: 500M

iraq war: 1 TRILLION and 4400 dead

but the right wing loves the iraq war cuz alot of people got rich

Funny, are democrats who voted for war conservatives?

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:15:43 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 8:07 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:00:19 -0700,
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 3:33 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:35:03 -0700,
wrote:


But you will vote for a corrupt (Solyndra) stooge beeding corruption
moneys to Wall Street?

Man, you brain must be pretty darned disabled or small.

let's see

solyndra: 500M

iraq war: 1 TRILLION and 4400 dead

but the right wing loves the iraq war cuz alot of people got rich

Funny, are democrats who voted for war conservatives?

funny are the conservatives who LIED about the WMD's...are they LIARS?

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:10:22 -0500, Honey Badger
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:35:03 -0700,
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 1:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:
a lobbying firm has developed plans to destroy occupy wall street and
asserts a democratic victory in 2012 would be bad for wall street


he thinks the rich are rich because they deserve it!!

But like dumb sheep, you will vote zero-bama.
yeah. let's vote republican, right? they're wall street's enemies!
HAHAHAHAHA


You're a moron. HAHAHAHA!!!

-HB

and you're a CONSERVATIVE!

HAHAHAHAHA

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On 11/20/2011 6:27 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:15:43 -0700,
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 8:07 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:00:19 -0700,
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 3:33 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:35:03 -0700,
wrote:


But you will vote for a corrupt (Solyndra) stooge beeding corruption
moneys to Wall Street?

Man, you brain must be pretty darned disabled or small.

let's see

solyndra: 500M

iraq war: 1 TRILLION and 4400 dead

but the right wing loves the iraq war cuz alot of people got rich

Funny, are democrats who voted for war conservatives?

funny are the conservatives who LIED about the WMD's...are they LIARS?


Bill and Hillary are not Conservatives silly liar...

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

In article ,
says...

On 11/20/2011 6:27 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:15:43 -0700,
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 8:07 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:00:19 -0700,
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 3:33 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:35:03 -0700,
wrote:


But you will vote for a corrupt (Solyndra) stooge beeding corruption
moneys to Wall Street?

Man, you brain must be pretty darned disabled or small.

let's see

solyndra: 500M

iraq war: 1 TRILLION and 4400 dead

but the right wing loves the iraq war cuz alot of people got rich

Funny, are democrats who voted for war conservatives?

funny are the conservatives who LIED about the WMD's...are they LIARS?


Bill and Hillary are not Conservatives silly liar...

Yep, there you go, no conservative can ever do wrong, no liberal can
ever do right.....

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:47:58 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

On 11/20/2011 6:27 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:15:43 -0700,
wrote:

iraq war: 1 TRILLION and 4400 dead

but the right wing loves the iraq war cuz alot of people got rich

Funny, are democrats who voted for war conservatives?

funny are the conservatives who LIED about the WMD's...are they LIARS?


Bill and Hillary are not Conservatives silly liar...

holy cow. he doesn't even know bush was president and started the iraq
war

right wingers are really ignorant

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:15:43 -0700 , Canuck57
wrote:
On 19/11/2011 8:07 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:00:19 -0700,
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 3:33 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:35:03 -0700,

wrote:

On 19/11/2011 1:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:
a lobbying firm has developed plans to destroy occupy wall
street and
asserts a democratic victory in 2012 would be bad for wall
street

so the RIGHT WING who thinks obama's a wall street stooge has
a
problem:


http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...-lobbying-firm
s-memo-spells-out-plan-to-undermine-occupy-wall-street

of course they'll IGNORE THIS

So? Nothing new, we have said all along your a managed herd of
fleabaggers

that's exactly right. the right wing in america is a bunch of
sheep

. And those with envy and greed of others are trivial for
unscrupulous politicians like 0bama to manage.

HAHAHAHA envy and greed for others!!

he thinks the rich are rich because they deserve it!!


But like dumb sheep, you will vote zero-bama.

yeah. let's vote republican, right? they're wall street's
enemies!
HAHAHAHAHA

But you will vote for a corrupt (Solyndra) stooge beeding
corruption
moneys to Wall Street?

Man, you brain must be pretty darned disabled or small.

let's see

solyndra: 500M

iraq war: 1 TRILLION and 4400 dead

but the right wing loves the iraq war cuz alot of people got rich


Funny, are democrats who voted for war conservatives?


--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government
is
the problem.


Good old Bob seems to know where his shift key is but he doesn't know
when to use it.

--
2012, the end of an error:-) Yee Haw!

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:47:58 -0500 , JustWait
wrote:
On 11/20/2011 6:27 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:15:43 -0700,
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 8:07 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:00:19 -0700,

wrote:

On 19/11/2011 3:33 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:35:03 -0700,

wrote:


But you will vote for a corrupt (Solyndra) stooge beeding
corruption
moneys to Wall Street?

Man, you brain must be pretty darned disabled or small.

let's see

solyndra: 500M

iraq war: 1 TRILLION and 4400 dead

but the right wing loves the iraq war cuz alot of people got
rich

Funny, are democrats who voted for war conservatives?

funny are the conservatives who LIED about the WMD's...are they
LIARS?



Bill and Hillary are not Conservatives silly liar...


Depends on who you ask.

--
2012, the end of an error:-) Yee Haw!

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On 20/11/2011 7:58 AM, Drifter wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:47:58 -0500 , JustWait
wrote:
On 11/20/2011 6:27 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:15:43 -0700,
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 8:07 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:00:19 -0700,

wrote:

On 19/11/2011 3:33 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:35:03 -0700,

wrote:


But you will vote for a corrupt (Solyndra) stooge beeding
corruption
moneys to Wall Street?

Man, you brain must be pretty darned disabled or small.

let's see

solyndra: 500M

iraq war: 1 TRILLION and 4400 dead

but the right wing loves the iraq war cuz alot of people got
rich

Funny, are democrats who voted for war conservatives?

funny are the conservatives who LIED about the WMD's...are they
LIARS?



Bill and Hillary are not Conservatives silly liar...


Depends on who you ask.


Hilary is a ditz, her devout Muslim tag along is likely a spy, or there
to make sure the Saudi know what is going in in the government. Yep,
Weiners wife. Turns out she is US born, Saudi Muslim raised and a long
time tag along of Hilary's.

Only one reason a devout Saudi Muslim married an infidel, deceit that is
furthering the Islamic cause. As Islam men can marry/have infidels but
not the other way around. Muslim women cannot marry a infidel. The
only exception is to subvert the enemy for furthering Islam.

And government of Egypt is now Muslim Brotherhood, and no democracy,
well. looks like the web of DC corruption is even bigger.

So where is 0bama's and Hilary's rant on democracy for Egypt now?

Might I suggest their actions suggest treachery.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On 11/20/2011 9:57 AM, Drifter wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:15:43 -0700 , Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/11/2011 8:07 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:00:19 -0700,
wrote:

On 19/11/2011 3:33 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:35:03 -0700,

wrote:

On 19/11/2011 1:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:
a lobbying firm has developed plans to destroy occupy wall
street and
asserts a democratic victory in 2012 would be bad for wall
street

so the RIGHT WING who thinks obama's a wall street stooge has
a
problem:


http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...-lobbying-firm
s-memo-spells-out-plan-to-undermine-occupy-wall-street

of course they'll IGNORE THIS

So? Nothing new, we have said all along your a managed herd of
fleabaggers

that's exactly right. the right wing in america is a bunch of
sheep

. And those with envy and greed of others are trivial for
unscrupulous politicians like 0bama to manage.

HAHAHAHA envy and greed for others!!

he thinks the rich are rich because they deserve it!!


But like dumb sheep, you will vote zero-bama.

yeah. let's vote republican, right? they're wall street's
enemies!
HAHAHAHAHA

But you will vote for a corrupt (Solyndra) stooge beeding
corruption
moneys to Wall Street?

Man, you brain must be pretty darned disabled or small.

let's see

solyndra: 500M

iraq war: 1 TRILLION and 4400 dead

but the right wing loves the iraq war cuz alot of people got rich


Funny, are democrats who voted for war conservatives?


--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government
is
the problem.


Good old Bob seems to know where his shift key is but he doesn't know
when to use it.


Bob is a punk kid on mommies computer. He makes up stories almost as
well as Harry Krause!

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:00:50 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

a lobbying firm has developed plans to destroy occupy wall street and
asserts a democratic victory in 2012 would be bad for wall street

so the RIGHT WING who thinks obama's a wall street stooge has a
problem:

http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...py-wall-street

of course they'll IGNORE THIS

Do you really think there are no Democrats on or involved in Wall Street? Do you think no Democrats
buy stocks, own companies, or are CEO of publicly traded companies? Do you think all Democrats are
as stupid as most of your posts sound?

Wake up.

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 17:26:25 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:00:50 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

a lobbying firm has developed plans to destroy occupy wall street and
asserts a democratic victory in 2012 would be bad for wall street

so the RIGHT WING who thinks obama's a wall street stooge has a
problem:

http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...py-wall-street

of course they'll IGNORE THIS

Do you really think there are no Democrats on or involved in Wall Street? Do you think no Democrats
buy stocks, own companies, or are CEO of publicly traded companies? Do you think all Democrats are
as stupid as most of your posts sound?

didnt say there weren't but it aint the dems telling us how wall
street is over regulated.


Wake up.

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On 20/11/2011 8:32 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 17:26:25 -0500, John
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:00:50 -0500, wrote:

a lobbying firm has developed plans to destroy occupy wall street and
asserts a democratic victory in 2012 would be bad for wall street

so the RIGHT WING who thinks obama's a wall street stooge has a
problem:

http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...py-wall-street

of course they'll IGNORE THIS

Do you really think there are no Democrats on or involved in Wall Street? Do you think no Democrats
buy stocks, own companies, or are CEO of publicly traded companies? Do you think all Democrats are
as stupid as most of your posts sound?

didnt say there weren't but it aint the dems telling us how wall
street is over regulated.

And the reason is they are too busy insider trading. Reid, Pelosi...

Innately corrupt. It is a precondition for the job.

Of course they want to discredit Wall Street Squatters. Simple, it is
like starting a back fire on a forest fire.

Corrupt government knows people are ****ed, they also know it could be a
Pandora's box if not managed. So what a better way than to help
fleabaggers and fleabeeggars 1) protest others so they hate government
less for blame deflection 2) discredit protesting so making arrests on
middle class protesters later becomes more socially acceptable when they
go for government next.

There is a political world war going on and fleabaggers are oblivious.
They make good pawns though.

Fact is you are a managed herd. None of this is circumstantial.
Absolutely none of it.

--
All successful people have one thing in common, if even for a moment
they think rationally.

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 22:01:13 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 20/11/2011 8:32 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 17:26:25 -0500, John
wrote:


didnt say there weren't but it aint the dems telling us how wall
street is over regulated.

And the reason is they are too busy insider trading. Reid, Pelosi...

babbling. let's see...

the dems passed more regulation of wall street in 1 year than the GOP
did in 30

the GOP deregulated wall street

how'd that work out?

but notice canuck cant wrap his right wing brain around the fact the
right wing theology of deregulation destroyed the economy

so he blames it on

the

black

guy

Fact is you are a managed herd. None of this is circumstantial.
Absolutely none of it.

says the guy who lives in a country with socialized medicine

who tells us socialized medicine is evil

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:57:29 -0500, Drifter
wrote:

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:15:43 -0700 , Canuck57
wrote:
On 19/11/2011 8:07 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:00:19 -0700,
wrote:
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government
is
the problem.


Good old Bob seems to know where his shift key is but he doesn't know
when to use it.

i'm hoping to work on wall street

i'm shiftless

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 01:59:12 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 01:36:11 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

the dems passed more regulation of wall street in 1 year than the GOP
did in 30

the GOP deregulated wall street

Didn't you say that was 1997 an hour ago? Who was in the white house?
Who pimped all of that deregulation?


let's see....there was

phil gramm, author of the repeal of glass steagall

there was bill clinton who signed the bill

there was the GOP congress of 2001 and 2003 that made the deficit HUGE
by halving taxes on the rich

there was george bush who got us into a trillion dollar war w/o paying
for it

and alan greenspan with his fundamentalist laissez faire economics

that you right wing idiots havent figured out yet

DONT WORK

idiots

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 01:59:12 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 01:36:11 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

the dems passed more regulation of wall street in 1 year than the GOP
did in 30

the GOP deregulated wall street

Didn't you say that was 1997 an hour ago? Who was in the white house?
Who pimped all of that deregulation?

ever hear of phil gramm?

his enron VP wife?

know who authored the bill?

oh. you dont.

and who gutted the SEC in the last 6years? who pushed deregulation?

the GOP and the GOP.

who's protecting the banks TODAY?

the GOP

you're just too dumb to know it

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:17:21 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:20:08 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 01:59:12 -0500, wrote:


phil gramm, author of the repeal of glass steagall

there was bill clinton who signed the bill

there was the GOP congress of 2001 and 2003 that made the deficit HUGE
by halving taxes on the rich

there was george bush who got us into a trillion dollar war w/o paying
for it

and alan greenspan with his fundamentalist laissez faire economics

that you right wing idiots havent figured out yet

You forgot Summers and Rubin but it is a fair assessment. Just notice
there were plenty of democrats and democratic appointees proposing all
of this and overwhelming democratic support for all of this
deregulation in ther congress.
When you admit it was the Clinton administration who did all of this
deregulation, we will be getting somewhere.

yep the bull**** deregulation stampede had everyone fooled

but the right wing never learns. they're still pushing gravy for the
rich at the expense of the middle class

and no, it was not the 'clinton administration' that did all this. it
was a GOP CONGRESS

guess you forgot that part.

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On 21/11/2011 10:22 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:41:41 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 01:59:12 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 01:36:11 -0500, wrote:

the dems passed more regulation of wall street in 1 year than the GOP
did in 30

the GOP deregulated wall street

Didn't you say that was 1997 an hour ago? Who was in the white house?
Who pimped all of that deregulation?

ever hear of phil gramm?



you're just too dumb to know it

The president can veto a bill but Clintons people Rubin and Summers
were cheering Grarmm on.

You are too dumb to admit it.
Have you seen Clinton signing ALL 3 deregulation bills?
He gave a speech at each signing telling us this was the best thing
since sliced bread. They are on you tube if you are smart enough to
figure that out.

He has fleabagger disease, denial and short memories is a cherished
trait of the fleabaggers. Also why they never learn and mature. Just
greedy, envious and selffish children in the head of a lazy adult.
--
All successful people have one thing in common, if even for a moment
they think rationally.

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:24:09 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:51:34 -0500, bpuharic wrote:


You forgot Summers and Rubin but it is a fair assessment. Just notice
there were plenty of democrats and democratic appointees proposing all
of this and overwhelming democratic support for all of this
deregulation in ther congress.
When you admit it was the Clinton administration who did all of this
deregulation, we will be getting somewhere.

yep the bull**** deregulation stampede had everyone fooled

but the right wing never learns. they're still pushing gravy for the
rich at the expense of the middle class

and no, it was not the 'clinton administration' that did all this. it
was a GOP CONGRESS

guess you forgot that part.


Do I need to post the votes again? Did you forget?

More republicans voted against the CFMA than democrats.

let's look at history, shall we?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodi...ry_of_the_CFMA

At the same time, Senator Phil Gramm (R-TX), the Chair of the Senate
Banking Committee, was quoted as insisting that any bill brought to
the Senate Floor would need to be expanded to include prohibitions on
SEC regulation of the swaps market.[55]

Democratic members of Congress later described a period in late
September through early October during which they were excluded from
negotiations over reconciling the three committee versions of H.R.
4541, followed by involvement in reaching an acceptable compromise
that left some Republicans unhappy with the final version of the bill
and some Democrats upset over the “process”, particularly the
involvement of Sen. Gramm and House Republican leadership in the
negotiations.[56]

After the House passed H.R. 4541, press reports indicated Sen. Gramm
was blocking Senate action based on his continued insistence that the
bill be expanded to prevent the SEC from regulating swaps, and the
desire to broaden the protections against CFTC regulation for “bank
products

When Congress returned into session for two days in mid-November, the
sponsor of H.R. 4541, Representative Thomas Ewing (R-IL), described
Senator Gramm as the “one man” blocking Senate passage of H.R. 4541.

and regarding the 'enron loophole' exempting energy products from
regulation, the DEMOCRATIC senate, overrode bush's veto to close this
in 2008.

AND the AUTHOR of the 2000 CFMA for the HOUSE was rep. thomas ewing,
REPUBLICAN of IL along with 3 REPUBLICAN cosponsors

AND BOTH houses were GOP controlled; ALL the committee chairman...ALL
REPUBLICANS...supported the CFMA.

AND if you go he

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2000-273

you see that the REPUBLICANS passed this bill. ONLY THREE DEMOCRATS
voted for it.


so this dolchstoss for american has CONSERVATIVE written all over it.

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:22:02 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:41:41 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 01:59:12 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 01:36:11 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

the dems passed more regulation of wall street in 1 year than the GOP
did in 30

the GOP deregulated wall street

Didn't you say that was 1997 an hour ago? Who was in the white house?
Who pimped all of that deregulation?

ever hear of phil gramm?



you're just too dumb to know it

The president can veto a bill but Clintons people Rubin and Summers
were cheering Grarmm on.

meaningless babble. no one knows what this means, other than some
drivel you heard on faux news.


You are too dumb to admit it.
Have you seen Clinton signing ALL 3 deregulation bills?
He gave a speech at each signing telling us this was the best thing
since sliced bread. They are on you tube if you are smart enough to
figure that out.

guess you should go he

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2000-273

and find out who VOTED for it.

oh. the GOP did.

and clinton? he'd been impeached you moron. congress had his ass tied
in knots

even for a right wing fringe nut you're incompetent

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:58:21 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 21/11/2011 10:22 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:41:41 -0500, wrote:


figure that out.

He has fleabagger disease, denial and short memories is a cherished
trait of the fleabaggers. Also why they never learn and mature. Just
greedy, envious and selffish children in the head of a lazy adult.

says the guy who moved to a country with socialized medicine so he
could tell us how evil socialized medicine is

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:22:38 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:51:25 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:24:09 -0500, wrote:

AND BOTH houses were GOP controlled; ALL the committee chairman...ALL
REPUBLICANS...supported the CFMA.

AND if you go he

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2000-273

you see that the REPUBLICANS passed this bill. ONLY THREE DEMOCRATS
voted for it.


so this dolchstoss for american has CONSERVATIVE written all over it.


Bob I am not sure what they are really talking about. The vote you
reference was taken in June. That was before anything happened to it
in the Senate.

both the house AND senate were GOP controlled

ALL the committee chairs in BOTH houses supported the bill

The final vote on that bill was taken 12/15/2000 6:38pm: (vote 603)
That is glossed over in your article as "differences resolved"

Don't you remember your allegation of Gramm stuffing an amendment into
this bill in December?
Lets look at vote 603
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2000/roll603.xml

This is the Library of Congress,. not another opinion site that you
googled up.

an opinion site?? uh..since when is a record of which members of
congress voted for/against a bill an 'opinion'?

do you know what an opinion IS??

and let's look at what the consensus of economic opinion is regarding
the financial meltdown is, shall we??

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Gramm


In its 2008 coverage of the financial crisis, The Washington Post
named Gramm one of seven "Key Players In the Battle Over Regulating
Derivatives", for having "[p]ushed through several major bills to
deregulate the banking and investment industries, including the 1999
Gramm-Leach-Bliley act that brought down the walls separating the
commercial banking, investment and insurance industries".[16]

2008 Nobel Laureate in Economics Paul Krugman, a supporter of Barack
Obama and former President Bill Clinton, described Gramm during the
2008 presidential race as "the high priest of deregulation," and has
listed him as the number two person responsible for the economic
crisis of 2008 behind only Alan Greenspan.[17][18] On October 14,
2008, CNN ranked Gramm number seven in its list of the 10 individuals
most responsible for the current economic crisis.[19]

In January 2009 Guardian City editor Julia Finch identified Gramm as
one of twenty-five people who were at the heart of the financial
meltdown.[20] Time included Gramm in its list of the top 25 people to
blame for the economic crisis.[21]


you can run but you can't hide. the fact is this dolchstoss had the
greedy right wing...gramm and greenspan, as its authors

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:29:13 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:53:10 -0500, bpuharic wrote:


meaningless babble. no one knows what this means, other than some
drivel you heard on faux news.


You are too dumb to admit it.
Have you seen Clinton signing ALL 3 deregulation bills?
He gave a speech at each signing telling us this was the best thing
since sliced bread. They are on you tube if you are smart enough to
figure that out.

guess you should go he

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2000-273

and find out who VOTED for it.

oh. the GOP did.

and clinton? he'd been impeached you moron. congress had his ass tied
in knots

even for a right wing fringe nut you're incompetent


As usual you fell for an editorial from some opinion site and did not
go look at the real facts from the Library of Congress.

?? since when is a public record of a congressional vote a m atter of
'opinion'? you seem not to know what an opinion is


The final vote on the bill had 51 republicans voting against it vs
9 democrats. The vote you link was just on the original house bill, in
June, before the Senate ever saw it. They basically gutted that bill
and rewrote major parts of it. Your vote was meaningless. It wasn't on
the bill that was finally passed

your vote was meaningless since it included ONLY the senate AND you
dont indicate what phase of the congressional reconcilement you're
discussing


But you don't know that because you are too lazy to do your own
research

you seem not to know there are 2 houses of congress.

guess what. there are

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:38:30 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:33:32 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:22:38 -0500, wrote:

This is the Library of Congress,. not another opinion site that you
googled up.

an opinion site?? uh..since when is a record of which members of
congress voted for/against a bill an 'opinion'?

Bob the vote you referenced was NOT the bill that passed the senate.
Read the activity. Whole sections of that June bill were thrown away
and replaced with Senate language.,
BTW it is interesting that the DEMOCRATS voted overwhelmingly positive
AFTER the Bob Gramm amendment was added and, as you pointed out, they
voted against the bill BEFORE the Gramm amendment.

it's interesting to note you ignore the wholesale sponsor of the bill
by republican conservatives, the support given to it by conservatives,
the fact it was part of a MUCH larger bill AND the continued support
of deregulation...a failed policy, BY conservatives.

conservatives are completely immune to evidence


do you know what an opinion IS??

I know what spin is. They want you to believe the democrats voted
against the bill when they voted FOR the FINAL bill in greater numbers
than the republicans. That is simply a lie that you gobbled up.

the lie is that deregulation works.

it doesnt. the facts are quite clear to everyone EXCEPT conservatives
who are quite willing to sacrifice the US as long as the rich stay
rich

and let's look at what the consensus of economic opinion is regarding
the financial meltdown is, shall we??

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Gramm

Changing the subject again?

gee. kind of like saying you're in favor of rat poison as long as it's
proven not to hurt anyone

ignoring the consequences of your ideolgy, arent you?



In its 2008 coverage of the financial crisis, The Washington Post
named Gramm one of seven "Key Players In the Battle Over Regulating
Derivatives", for having "[p]ushed through several major bills to
deregulate the banking and investment industries, including the 1999
Gramm-Leach-Bliley act that brought down the walls separating the
commercial banking, investment and insurance industries".[16]

True but the DEMOCRATS voted overwhelmingly to support BOTH bills
after Gramm was done with them.

the bill was sponsored by conservatives

cosponsored by conservatives

supported by conservatives AND

even though we are living TODAY...right NOW with the consequences

conservatives STILL SUPPORT deregulation



Snip more opinion

you can run but you can't hide. the fact is this dolchstoss had the
greedy right wing...gramm and greenspan, as its authors

Gramm, Greenspan, Rubin and Summers. Three of 4 of those were Clinton
appointees.

and who did greenspan work for after clinton?

oh. george bush

kinda forgot that didnt you?

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:45:34 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:35:13 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:29:13 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:53:10 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

oh. the GOP did.

and clinton? he'd been impeached you moron. congress had his ass tied
in knots

even for a right wing fringe nut you're incompetent


As usual you fell for an editorial from some opinion site and did not
go look at the real facts from the Library of Congress.

?? since when is a public record of a congressional vote a m atter of
'opinion'? you seem not to know what an opinion is

The opinion was representing that vote as THE vote on the FINAL bill.

the bill lovingly shepherded through congress by the GOP leadership,
ALL of whom supported it

AND conservatives supoprt it TODAY even AFTER it was shown to have
wrecked the economy

there is NOTHING conservatives wont support, no matter what the
cost...even if it destroys the US

as long as the rich get richer

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:30:11 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:58:06 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

BTW it is interesting that the DEMOCRATS voted overwhelmingly positive
AFTER the Bob Gramm amendment was added and, as you pointed out, they
voted against the bill BEFORE the Gramm amendment.

it's interesting to note you ignore the wholesale sponsor of the bill
by republican conservatives, the support given to it by conservatives,
the fact it was part of a MUCH larger bill AND the continued support
of deregulation...a failed policy, BY conservatives.

conservatives are completely immune to evidence

You are the one who denies that the house democrats voted against the
bill in June until it got the Gramm language, then they voted for i in
higher numbers than the republicans.(in December)

who was gramm?

oh. a republican

who supported it in the GOP congress?

oh. ALL the committee leaders...ALL of whom happened to be republicans

who opposes regulations TODAY...after the greatest depression since
29...who opposes regulating banks?

the republicans.

you guys just hate the US.

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:02:36 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:03:21 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

conservatives are completely immune to evidence

You are the one who denies that the house democrats voted against the
bill in June until it got the Gramm language, then they voted for i in
higher numbers than the republicans.(in December)

who was gramm?

oh. a republican

who supported it in the GOP congress?

oh. ALL the committee leaders...ALL of whom happened to be republicans

who opposes regulations TODAY...after the greatest depression since
29...who opposes regulating banks?

the republicans.


Those republicans did not hold a gun to the head of 157 democrats

you mean other than controllin both houses of congress and having
impeached a sitting president??

and
2 independents to get them to vote for this bill AFTER Gramm added his
amendment. As you noted, they virtually all voted against it BEFORE
the Gramm amendment.

It sure sounds like they supported the Gramm amendment.


you guys just hate the US.

I just hate lying hypocrites.

then commit suicide if you hate yourself so much

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On 11/25/2011 12:02 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:03:21 -0500, wrote:

conservatives are completely immune to evidence

You are the one who denies that the house democrats voted against the
bill in June until it got the Gramm language, then they voted for i in
higher numbers than the republicans.(in December)

who was gramm?

oh. a republican

who supported it in the GOP congress?

oh. ALL the committee leaders...ALL of whom happened to be republicans

who opposes regulations TODAY...after the greatest depression since
29...who opposes regulating banks?

the republicans.


Those republicans did not hold a gun to the head of 157 democrats and
2 independents to get them to vote for this bill AFTER Gramm added his
amendment. As you noted, they virtually all voted against it BEFORE
the Gramm amendment.

It sure sounds like they supported the Gramm amendment.


you guys just hate the US.

I just hate lying hypocrites.
Next, bob will be calling you a negro hater.

--
1-20-13 The end of an error

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:50:27 -0500, Drifter wrote:

On 11/25/2011 12:02 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:03:21 -0500, wrote:


Those republicans did not hold a gun to the head of 157 democrats and
2 independents to get them to vote for this bill AFTER Gramm added his
amendment. As you noted, they virtually all voted against it BEFORE
the Gramm amendment.

It sure sounds like they supported the Gramm amendment.


you guys just hate the US.

I just hate lying hypocrites.
Next, bob will be calling you a negro hater.

negro? you just get out of a time machine from the 1950's?

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:36:24 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:14:49 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

Those republicans did not hold a gun to the head of 157 democrats

you mean other than controllin both houses of congress and having
impeached a sitting president??

That has nothing to do with the DEMOCRATS who voted for this bill, in
fact only 9 voted against it. 51 republicans voted against it. You
keep ignoring that part.

the GOP wrote the bill

the GOP leadership SUPPORTED the bill

CONSERVATIVES CONTNUE to support it EVEN THOUGH IT DESTROYED THE
ECONOMY...


I notice you have given up on that vote 297 thing. That was simply
misleading, if not a bold faced lie when they represented it as a vote
against the CFMA. The CFMA language was not even in the bill when vote
297 was taken. So much for the quality of the sites you link.

yeah. i quote official govt websites

what do they know

and i notice you IGNORE the fact the right CONTINUES TO SUPPORT
DEREGULATION

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:10:51 -0500, wrote:

2563.10 On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:59:27 -0500, bpuharic
wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:36:24 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:14:49 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

Those republicans did not hold a gun to the head of 157 democrats

you mean other than controllin both houses of congress and having
impeached a sitting president??

That has nothing to do with the DEMOCRATS who voted for this bill, in
fact only 9 voted against it. 51 republicans voted against it. You
keep ignoring that part.

the GOP wrote the bill

the GOP leadership SUPPORTED the bill

Well it turns out more democrats supported this bill than republicans
but you can't handle the truth.

turns out they supported the WHOLE bill of thousands of pages

gee. who woulda guessed.

and it was written by and for conservatives and pushed by
conservatives


CONSERVATIVES CONTNUE to support it EVEN THOUGH IT DESTROYED THE
ECONOMY...


I notice you have given up on that vote 297 thing. That was simply
misleading, if not a bold faced lie when they represented it as a vote
against the CFMA. The CFMA language was not even in the bill when vote
297 was taken. So much for the quality of the sites you link.

yeah. i quote official govt websites

That was not a "government" web site. It was a COM, not a GOV.
I gave you the real activities on the bill from the Library of
Congress site (thomas.loc.gov)
It was very clear that not only was vote 297 on a bill that never made
it to the Senate Floor, it was also a vote BEFORE the CFMA language
was in the bill, yet you think it was a vote on the CFMA

so you're ignoring the fact right wingers TODAY...NOW..continue to
support socialism for wall street

yeah. you True Believers do that. evidence shows deregulation DESTROYS
economies

your repsonse? great! let's do it because the rich get richer


.

what do they know

and i notice you IGNORE the fact the right CONTINUES TO SUPPORT
DEREGULATION

It sure looks like more democrats supported this bill than
republicans. 51 republicans voted against it only 9 democrats voted
against it.
The democrat in chief signed it too.

yep. he signed a bill CONTAINING the CFMA...had LOTS of stuff in it

and today...conservatives DEFEND the destruction of our economy in the
name of the rich

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:17:45 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:59:27 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

yeah. i quote official govt websites

No you don't

From that "hobby" site's "about us" page

Launched in 2004 as a hobby of Joshua Tauberer, GovTrack.us was the
first website worldwide whose primary goal was to provide free
comprehensive legislative tracking for everyday citizens and to
embrace Web 2.0 and open data for government information.


My question, why not just use the LOC site? Too stupid to actually
think for yourself and see the facts without having them spoon fed to
you? thomas.loc.gov will give you the actual congressional activities
as reported to the Library of Congress, not some regurgitated excerpts
that someone wants you to read.

this is the guy who says, after looking at unemployment figures, that
cutting taxes on the rich CREATED jobs!!

wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
 

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:10:51 -0500, wrote:

2563.10 On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:59:27 -0500, bpuharic
wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:36:24 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:14:49 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

Those republicans did not hold a gun to the head of 157 democrats

you mean other than controllin both houses of congress and having
impeached a sitting president??

That has nothing to do with the DEMOCRATS who voted for this bill, in
fact only 9 voted against it. 51 republicans voted against it. You
keep ignoring that part.

the GOP wrote the bill

the GOP leadership SUPPORTED the bill

Well it turns out more democrats supported this bill than republicans
but you can't handle the truth.


CONSERVATIVES CONTNUE to support it EVEN THOUGH IT DESTROYED THE
ECONOMY...


I notice you have given up on that vote 297 thing. That was simply
misleading, if not a bold faced lie when they represented it as a vote
against the CFMA. The CFMA language was not even in the bill when vote
297 was taken. So much for the quality of the sites you link.

yeah. i quote official govt websites

That was not a "government" web site. It was a COM, not a GOV.
I gave you the real activities on the bill from the Library of
Congress site (thomas.loc.gov)
It was very clear that not only was vote 297 on a bill that never made
it to the Senate Floor, it was also a vote BEFORE the CFMA language
was in the bill, yet you think it was a vote on the CFMA

.

what do they know

and i notice you IGNORE the fact the right CONTINUES TO SUPPORT
DEREGULATION

It sure looks like more democrats supported this bill than
republicans. 51 republicans voted against it only 9 democrats voted
against it.
The democrat in chief signed it too.

Are you even 52% sure you're *not* debating with 'de'plume'?