![]() |
wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:45:34 -0500, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:35:13 -0500, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:29:13 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:53:10 -0500, bpuharic wrote: oh. the GOP did. and clinton? he'd been impeached you moron. congress had his ass tied in knots even for a right wing fringe nut you're incompetent As usual you fell for an editorial from some opinion site and did not go look at the real facts from the Library of Congress. ?? since when is a public record of a congressional vote a m atter of 'opinion'? you seem not to know what an opinion is The opinion was representing that vote as THE vote on the FINAL bill. the bill lovingly shepherded through congress by the GOP leadership, ALL of whom supported it AND conservatives supoprt it TODAY even AFTER it was shown to have wrecked the economy there is NOTHING conservatives wont support, no matter what the cost...even if it destroys the US as long as the rich get richer |
wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
|
wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
|
wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
|
wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:50:27 -0500, Drifter wrote:
On 11/25/2011 12:02 AM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:03:21 -0500, wrote: Those republicans did not hold a gun to the head of 157 democrats and 2 independents to get them to vote for this bill AFTER Gramm added his amendment. As you noted, they virtually all voted against it BEFORE the Gramm amendment. It sure sounds like they supported the Gramm amendment. you guys just hate the US. I just hate lying hypocrites. Next, bob will be calling you a negro hater. negro? you just get out of a time machine from the 1950's? |
wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
|
wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:10:51 -0500, wrote:
2563.10 On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:59:27 -0500, bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:36:24 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:14:49 -0500, bpuharic wrote: Those republicans did not hold a gun to the head of 157 democrats you mean other than controllin both houses of congress and having impeached a sitting president?? That has nothing to do with the DEMOCRATS who voted for this bill, in fact only 9 voted against it. 51 republicans voted against it. You keep ignoring that part. the GOP wrote the bill the GOP leadership SUPPORTED the bill Well it turns out more democrats supported this bill than republicans but you can't handle the truth. turns out they supported the WHOLE bill of thousands of pages gee. who woulda guessed. and it was written by and for conservatives and pushed by conservatives CONSERVATIVES CONTNUE to support it EVEN THOUGH IT DESTROYED THE ECONOMY... I notice you have given up on that vote 297 thing. That was simply misleading, if not a bold faced lie when they represented it as a vote against the CFMA. The CFMA language was not even in the bill when vote 297 was taken. So much for the quality of the sites you link. yeah. i quote official govt websites That was not a "government" web site. It was a COM, not a GOV. I gave you the real activities on the bill from the Library of Congress site (thomas.loc.gov) It was very clear that not only was vote 297 on a bill that never made it to the Senate Floor, it was also a vote BEFORE the CFMA language was in the bill, yet you think it was a vote on the CFMA so you're ignoring the fact right wingers TODAY...NOW..continue to support socialism for wall street yeah. you True Believers do that. evidence shows deregulation DESTROYS economies your repsonse? great! let's do it because the rich get richer . what do they know and i notice you IGNORE the fact the right CONTINUES TO SUPPORT DEREGULATION It sure looks like more democrats supported this bill than republicans. 51 republicans voted against it only 9 democrats voted against it. The democrat in chief signed it too. yep. he signed a bill CONTAINING the CFMA...had LOTS of stuff in it and today...conservatives DEFEND the destruction of our economy in the name of the rich |
wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
|
wall street moves to destroy 'occupy wall street'
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:10:51 -0500, wrote:
2563.10 On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:59:27 -0500, bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:36:24 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:14:49 -0500, bpuharic wrote: Those republicans did not hold a gun to the head of 157 democrats you mean other than controllin both houses of congress and having impeached a sitting president?? That has nothing to do with the DEMOCRATS who voted for this bill, in fact only 9 voted against it. 51 republicans voted against it. You keep ignoring that part. the GOP wrote the bill the GOP leadership SUPPORTED the bill Well it turns out more democrats supported this bill than republicans but you can't handle the truth. CONSERVATIVES CONTNUE to support it EVEN THOUGH IT DESTROYED THE ECONOMY... I notice you have given up on that vote 297 thing. That was simply misleading, if not a bold faced lie when they represented it as a vote against the CFMA. The CFMA language was not even in the bill when vote 297 was taken. So much for the quality of the sites you link. yeah. i quote official govt websites That was not a "government" web site. It was a COM, not a GOV. I gave you the real activities on the bill from the Library of Congress site (thomas.loc.gov) It was very clear that not only was vote 297 on a bill that never made it to the Senate Floor, it was also a vote BEFORE the CFMA language was in the bill, yet you think it was a vote on the CFMA . what do they know and i notice you IGNORE the fact the right CONTINUES TO SUPPORT DEREGULATION It sure looks like more democrats supported this bill than republicans. 51 republicans voted against it only 9 democrats voted against it. The democrat in chief signed it too. Are you even 52% sure you're *not* debating with 'de'plume'? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com