On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:44:14 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:39:16 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 15/11/2011 11:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:


http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/tv/60-M...7/60-Minutes,-
11.13.11/videos?skipTo=136&cmpid=FCST_hero_tv


Oh, bout the title.

If he the Wall Street Squatters are against government corruption, then
why are they on Wall Street and not in Washington DC?

Because Wall Street is just as corrupt. They are the one's giving the
stocks to the pols.


You have that backwards. If DC was not so corrupt it would be illegal
to bribe them with stocks and the things Wall Street are doing would
be better regulated.

no conservative...none..supports tighter wall street regulation

I agree with Nook, why aren't these guys occupying the park in front
of the Capitol?

because washington is irreleevant

On 17/11/2011 1:44 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:44:14 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:39:16 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

On 15/11/2011 11:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:


http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/tv/60-M...7/60-Minutes,-
11.13.11/videos?skipTo=136&cmpid=FCST_hero_tv


Oh, bout the title.

If he the Wall Street Squatters are against government corruption, then
why are they on Wall Street and not in Washington DC?

Because Wall Street is just as corrupt. They are the one's giving the
stocks to the pols.


You have that backwards. If DC was not so corrupt it would be illegal
to bribe them with stocks and the things Wall Street are doing would
be better regulated.

no conservative...none..supports tighter wall street regulation

I agree with Nook, why aren't these guys occupying the park in front
of the Capitol?

because washington is irreleevant

If they didn't sting you with taxes, I would agree. Not even sure
really that Americans need Washington DC really.

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:13:08 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 17/11/2011 1:44 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:44:14 -0500, wrote:


You have that backwards. If DC was not so corrupt it would be illegal
to bribe them with stocks and the things Wall Street are doing would
be better regulated.

no conservative...none..supports tighter wall street regulation

I agree with Nook, why aren't these guys occupying the park in front
of the Capitol?

because washington is irreleevant

If they didn't sting you with taxes, I would agree. Not even sure
really that Americans need Washington DC really.

they simply do what wall street tells them. no more. no less

On 17/11/2011 8:52 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:13:08 -0700,
wrote:

On 17/11/2011 1:44 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:44:14 -0500, wrote:


You have that backwards. If DC was not so corrupt it would be illegal
to bribe them with stocks and the things Wall Street are doing would
be better regulated.

no conservative...none..supports tighter wall street regulation

I agree with Nook, why aren't these guys occupying the park in front
of the Capitol?

because washington is irreleevant

If they didn't sting you with taxes, I would agree. Not even sure
really that Americans need Washington DC really.

they simply do what wall street tells them. no more. no less

But you voted for 0bama, does he not give a **** about you? Probably
doesn't, he is giving your grand kids economic liberty to the corrupt.

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:57:46 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 17/11/2011 8:52 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:13:08 -0700,
wrote:
cupying the park in front
of the Capitol?

because washington is irreleevant

If they didn't sting you with taxes, I would agree. Not even sure
really that Americans need Washington DC really.

they simply do what wall street tells them. no more. no less

But you voted for 0bama, does he not give a **** about you? Probably
doesn't, he is giving your grand kids economic liberty to the corrupt.

lesser of 2 evils. the GOP is totally wall street suck ass. the dems
mostly.

you're too stupid to know the difference

On 17/11/2011 11:14 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:23:54 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:57:46 -0700,
wrote:

On 17/11/2011 8:52 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:13:08 -0700,
wrote:
cupying the park in front
of the Capitol?

because washington is irreleevant

If they didn't sting you with taxes, I would agree. Not even sure
really that Americans need Washington DC really.

they simply do what wall street tells them. no more. no less

But you voted for 0bama, does he not give a **** about you? Probably
doesn't, he is giving your grand kids economic liberty to the corrupt.

lesser of 2 evils. the GOP is totally wall street suck ass. the dems
mostly.

you're too stupid to know the difference

Wall Street gave more money to Obama than they gave McCain.
The money was well spent

They knew 0bama was an easy bribe. Even GM did while they were in
government control. Yep, Government Motors lobby group in DC with
taxpayers money.

Now how corrupt can you get when government business is funding the
candidates.

Sure isn't the America I learned growing up.

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:17:28 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 17/11/2011 11:14 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:23:54 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:57:46 -0700,
wrote:
lesser of 2 evils. the GOP is totally wall street suck ass. the dems
mostly.

you're too stupid to know the difference

Wall Street gave more money to Obama than they gave McCain.
The money was well spent

They knew 0bama was an easy bribe. Even GM did while they were in
government control. Yep, Government Motors lobby group in DC with
taxpayers money.

canuck gets his news from fox so doesnt know that wall street now
gives the GOP money by 3:1 over the dems

oh well...when you're a klanster, the facts dont matter

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 01:14:02 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:23:54 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:57:46 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:
you're too stupid to know the difference

Wall Street gave more money to Obama than they gave McCain.
The money was well spent

which i suppose, is why wall street money is now flooding the GOP
instead of the dems

oh. you dont keep up with current news. fox has been h iding this from
you

On 18/11/2011 4:39 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 01:14:02 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:23:54 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:57:46 -0700,
wrote:
you're too stupid to know the difference

Wall Street gave more money to Obama than they gave McCain.
The money was well spent

which i suppose, is why wall street money is now flooding the GOP
instead of the dems

oh. you dont keep up with current news. fox has been h iding this from
you

Hey, even the crooked don' like 0bama any more.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 01:08:55 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:30:24 -0500, wrote:


Bob? What's the matter, did Olbermann lie to you again or was it Thom
Hartman?

notice how the right denies we're in a depression? after all, the rich
are doing great!