BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Electabiilty not important (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/141682-electabiilty-not-important.html)

X ` Man[_3_] November 12th 11 12:07 AM

Electabiilty not important
 
CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Canuck57[_9_] November 12th 11 07:00 AM

Electabiilty not important
 
On 11/11/2011 5:07 PM, X ` Man wrote:
CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.


It is called democracy.

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

jps November 12th 11 09:43 AM

Electabiilty not important
 
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.


Game, set, match.

X ` Man November 12th 11 12:37 PM

Electabiilty not important
 
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.


Game, set, match.



I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.



Canuck57[_9_] November 12th 11 09:01 PM

Electabiilty not important
 
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.


Game, set, match.



I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.



And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could turn this race real quick.

Gingrich is part of the DC inner circle of corruption. Tea Party should
just beak off and form their own right now. Perry is just another clown
from the old boys network. Only two viable left are Cain and Bachmann.
And Cain needs to fight these accusations or he is out.

Sad state is shaping up in the next election. You can choose any pony
you want from the ponies presented to you from the corrupt back room
boys club.

DC needs fresh faces.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

X ` Man[_3_] November 12th 11 11:11 PM

Electabiilty not important
 
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.



I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.



And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.


Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

Canuck57[_9_] November 13th 11 12:58 AM

Electabiilty not important
 
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.



And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.


Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.


While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public)
has the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement.
I believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other 0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

X ` Man[_3_] November 13th 11 01:07 AM

Electabiilty not important
 
On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.


Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.


While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public) has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other 0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canuck57[_9_] November 13th 11 01:16 AM

Electabiilty not important
 
On 12/11/2011 6:07 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who
can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.


While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public) has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other 0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.


Less bull**** than a fleabagger like you.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

drifter November 13th 11 01:42 PM

Electabiilty not important
 
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:11:59 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah

Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the

most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,

according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since

the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT

by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by

Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen

percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most

likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority

when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more

important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one

who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the

opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees

with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who

has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to

nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And you base your opinion on what?


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is

innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.



Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com