Electabiilty not important
 

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Electabiilty not important
 

On 11/11/2011 5:07 PM, X ` Man wrote:
CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

It is called democracy.

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

Electabiilty not important
 

On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.

Electabiilty not important
 

On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.

Electabiilty not important
 

On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could turn this race real quick.

Gingrich is part of the DC inner circle of corruption. Tea Party should
just beak off and form their own right now. Perry is just another clown
from the old boys network. Only two viable left are Cain and Bachmann.
And Cain needs to fight these accusations or he is out.

Sad state is shaping up in the next election. You can choose any pony
you want from the ponies presented to you from the corrupt back room
boys club.

DC needs fresh faces.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

Electabiilty not important
 

On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

Electabiilty not important
 

On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public)
has the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement.
I believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other 0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

Electabiilty not important
 

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public) has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other 0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Electabiilty not important
 

On 12/11/2011 6:07 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who
can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public) has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other 0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Less bull**** than a fleabagger like you.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

Electabiilty not important
 

On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:11:59 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah
Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the
most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since
the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT
by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by
Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen
percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most
likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority
when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one
who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the
opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees
with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who
has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to
nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.

And you base your opinion on what?


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is
innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.


Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

Electabiilty not important
 

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

You are wrong again, dumb ****. They are very reliable and fully
admissible in a court of law.

Electabiilty not important
 

On Nov 13, 10:10*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...







On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.

I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.

And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

You are wrong again, dumb ****. They are very reliable and fully
admissible in a court of law.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Huh? Maybe down in RedNeck land.

Electabiilty not important
 

In article 7ddf5f62-f4ef-4009-bdcf-5876c97e8663
@o5g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says...

On Nov 13, 10:10*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...







On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.

I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.

And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

You are wrong again, dumb ****. They are very reliable and fully
admissible in a court of law.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Huh? Maybe down in RedNeck land.

Oh, Suckling Don, stop, you're just making yourself look stupid(er). So
are you backing out of that $500 bet you proposed, coward? You know, the
one where you wanted to bet $500 that John is right in that I am Kevin?
It's fun when you yourself prove to everyone what a coward you are!

Electabiilty not important
 

On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public) has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other 0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.

Electabiilty not important
 

On 11/13/11 1:52 PM, North Star wrote:
On Nov 13, 10:10 am, wrote:
In articleytudnZJGiIaiYCPTnZ2dnUVZ_qyXn...@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...







On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.

I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.

And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

You are wrong again, dumb ****. They are very reliable and fully
admissible in a court of law.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Huh? Maybe down in RedNeck land.


In the majority of states in the US, it isn't admissible. It's
pseudoscientific bull****.

Electabiilty not important
 

On 11/13/11 2:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public) has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other 0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.


The majority of righties here are living in a parallel world of hate and
self-deception.

Electabiilty not important
 

On 13/11/2011 12:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public) has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other 0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

What? You think Rep is supposed to be pure and Dem Clinton gets a bye?

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

I figure Bachmann is keeping low, let the dirt bags destroy each other
and come up the middle. Good strategy if that is what her campaign is
up too.

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.

Including us all. Just fleabaggers are more delusional than others.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

Electabiilty not important
 

On 11/13/2011 2:58 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 2:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by
Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen
percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most
likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one
who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who
has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public)
has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other
0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.


The majority of righties here are living in a parallel world of hate and
self-deception.

Are you ****ing crazy. We have been out living life all day while you
have been her crying and whining about your miserable life all day long.
Jess took down another pro national rider today... Next year is gonna'
be a good year;)

Electabiilty not important
 

On 11/13/11 5:36 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/13/2011 2:58 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 2:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah
Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since
the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by
Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen
percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most
likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority
when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one
who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees
with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who
has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to
nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women
refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated
accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public)
has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other
0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.


The majority of righties here are living in a parallel world of hate and
self-deception.

Are you ****ing crazy. We have been out living life all day while you
have been her crying and whining about your miserable life all day long.
Jess took down another pro national rider today... Next year is gonna'
be a good year;)


Yawn.

Electabiilty not important
 

On 11/13/2011 5:42 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 5:36 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/13/2011 2:58 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 2:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah
Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the
most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since
the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT
by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by
Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen
percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most
likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority
when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one
who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees
with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who
has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to
nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women
refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated
accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public)
has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other
0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.


The majority of righties here are living in a parallel world of hate and
self-deception.

Are you ****ing crazy. We have been out living life all day while you
have been her crying and whining about your miserable life all day long.
Jess took down another pro national rider today... Next year is gonna'
be a good year;)


Yawn.

Best you stay in your basement and yawn. If you come out, it might be
your last venture... Remember that girl you called a slut? He daddy is
down in your area for a few months working and he does have your info;)

Electabiilty not important
 

On 11/13/11 5:45 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/13/2011 5:42 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 5:36 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/13/2011 2:58 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 2:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah
Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the
most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since
the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT
by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by
Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen
percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most
likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority
when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one
who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the
opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees
with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who
has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to
nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women
refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated
accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public)
has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other
0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.


The majority of righties here are living in a parallel world of hate
and
self-deception.

Are you ****ing crazy. We have been out living life all day while you
have been her crying and whining about your miserable life all day long.
Jess took down another pro national rider today... Next year is gonna'
be a good year;)


Yawn.

Best you stay in your basement and yawn. If you come out, it might be
your last venture... Remember that girl you called a slut? He daddy is
down in your area for a few months working and he does have your info;)


I doubt he's as dumb as you are. And I don't recall calling anyone a
slut. Is that what you told the guy? Hey, I thought you were her daddy.

Electabiilty not important
 

On Nov 13, 6:45*pm, JustWait wrote:
On 11/13/2011 5:42 PM, X ` Man wrote:





On 11/13/11 5:36 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/13/2011 2:58 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 2:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah
Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the
most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since
the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT
by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by
Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen
percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most
likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority
when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one
who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.

I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees
with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who
has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to
nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.

And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women
refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated
accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public)
has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other
0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.

Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.

The majority of righties here are living in a parallel world of hate and
self-deception.

Are you ****ing crazy. We have been out living life all day while you
have been her crying and whining about your miserable life all day long.
Jess took down another pro national rider today... Next year is gonna'
be a good year;)

Yawn.

Best you stay in your basement and yawn. If you come out, it might be
your last venture... Remember that girl you called a slut? He daddy is
down in your area for a few months working and he does have your info;)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Another post to keep for the police.

Electabiilty not important
 

On Nov 13, 6:52*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 11/13/11 5:45 PM, JustWait wrote:





On 11/13/2011 5:42 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 5:36 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/13/2011 2:58 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 2:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah
Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the
most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since
the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT
by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by
Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen
percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most
likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority
when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one
who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the
opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.

I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees
with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who
has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to
nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.

And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women
refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated
accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public)
has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement.. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other
0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.

Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.

The majority of righties here are living in a parallel world of hate
and
self-deception.

Are you ****ing crazy. We have been out living life all day while you
have been her crying and whining about your miserable life all day long.
Jess took down another pro national rider today... Next year is gonna'
be a good year;)

Yawn.

Best you stay in your basement and yawn. If you come out, it might be
your last venture... Remember that girl you called a slut? He daddy is
down in your area for a few months working and he does have your info;)

I doubt he's as dumb as you are. And I don't recall calling anyone a
slut. Is that what you told the guy? *Hey, I thought you were her daddy..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If these so called 'full patch' bikers ever found out Snotty was lying
to them and then using them in an effort to harass and intimidate
others....... it wouldn't be good for him. Those guys don't like
posers and liars.

Electabiilty not important
 

On 11/13/2011 8:43 PM, North Star wrote:
On Nov 13, 6:45 pm, wrote:
On 11/13/2011 5:42 PM, X ` Man wrote:





On 11/13/11 5:36 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/13/2011 2:58 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 2:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah
Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the
most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since
the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT
by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by
Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen
percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most
likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority
when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one
who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.

I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees
with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who
has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to
nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.

And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women
refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated
accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public)
has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other
0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.

Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.

The majority of righties here are living in a parallel world of hate and
self-deception.

Are you ****ing crazy. We have been out living life all day while you
have been her crying and whining about your miserable life all day long.
Jess took down another pro national rider today... Next year is gonna'
be a good year;)

Yawn.

Best you stay in your basement and yawn. If you come out, it might be
your last venture... Remember that girl you called a slut? He daddy is
down in your area for a few months working and he does have your info;)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Another post to keep for the police.

Yeah, you go tell on him;)

where can i purchase lexapro Erie

cheap generic lexapro Columbia
- purchase lexapro Topeka
where can i purchase lexapro Alabama

Electabiilty not important
 

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 11/13/11 1:52 PM, North Star wrote:
On Nov 13, 10:10 am, wrote:
In articleytudnZJGiIaiYCPTnZ2dnUVZ_qyXn...@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...







On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.

I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.

And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

You are wrong again, dumb ****. They are very reliable and fully
admissible in a court of law.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Huh? Maybe down in RedNeck land.


In the majority of states in the US, it isn't admissible. It's
pseudoscientific bull****.

Bull****! In just about every state in the US, polygraphs are admissible
in civil matters, and about half the states admissible in criminal
courts.

Electabiilty not important
 

In article 0ccf47e7-6efd-43d8-9e3e-
,
says...

On Nov 13, 6:45*pm, JustWait wrote:
On 11/13/2011 5:42 PM, X ` Man wrote:





On 11/13/11 5:36 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/13/2011 2:58 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 2:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah
Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the
most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since
the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT
by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by
Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen
percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most
likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority
when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one
who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.

I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees
with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who
has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to
nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.

And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women
refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated
accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public)
has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other
0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.

Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.

The majority of righties here are living in a parallel world of hate and
self-deception.

Are you ****ing crazy. We have been out living life all day while you
have been her crying and whining about your miserable life all day long.
Jess took down another pro national rider today... Next year is gonna'
be a good year;)

Yawn.

Best you stay in your basement and yawn. If you come out, it might be
your last venture... Remember that girl you called a slut? He daddy is
down in your area for a few months working and he does have your info;)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Another post to keep for the police.

Says Suckling Don the Coward.

Electabiilty not important
 

In article ,
says...

On 11/13/2011 8:43 PM, North Star wrote:
On Nov 13, 6:45 pm, wrote:
On 11/13/2011 5:42 PM, X ` Man wrote:





On 11/13/11 5:36 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/13/2011 2:58 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 2:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah
Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the
most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since
the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT
by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by
Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen
percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most
likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority
when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one
who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.

I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees
with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who
has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to
nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.

And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women
refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated
accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public)
has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other
0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.

Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.

The majority of righties here are living in a parallel world of hate and
self-deception.

Are you ****ing crazy. We have been out living life all day while you
have been her crying and whining about your miserable life all day long.
Jess took down another pro national rider today... Next year is gonna'
be a good year;)

Yawn.

Best you stay in your basement and yawn. If you come out, it might be
your last venture... Remember that girl you called a slut? He daddy is
down in your area for a few months working and he does have your info;)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Another post to keep for the police.

Yeah, you go tell on him;)

They will, because they are cowards.