|
Activist judge in Nashville
|
Activist judge in Nashville
On Nov 1, 5:42*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote: On 11/1/11 4:37 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:14:04 -0700, *wrote: Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's constitutional rights... Wonder if that'll filter up to the SCOTUS. A federal judge Monday afternoon ordered Tennessee to stop enforcing new rules that restricted “Occupy Nashville” demonstrators’ ability to protest in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN). “The state cannot arbitrarily create restrictive policies just because it does not like how people are using a public space,” said ACLU-TN Legal Director Tricia Herzfeld. “Today’s decision is the first step in restoring demonstrators’ free speech rights.” The protesters had been camped at Legislative Plaza in downtown Nashville to protest the economic and political consolidation of power since October 9. But on October 27, Tennessee enacted new rules without any public review process that eliminated their right to gather after 4:00 p.m. and implemented a 10:00 pm curfew on the plaza. The state also required protesters to pay use and security fees and to obtain $1,000,000 in liability insurance coverage prior to engaging in any assembly activity. Those rules make damn good sense. Shouldn't be any bitchin' about 'em either! You would have been happy as an Aryan in Germany between 1935 and 1945...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Are you sure he wasn't? |
Activist judge in Nashville
On 01/11/2011 5:03 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:28:24 -0600, wrote: On 31/10/2011 8:14 PM, jps wrote: Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's constitutional rights... Maybe, maybe not. What if productive people withheld income tax from DC in peaceful protest. What then? Would fleabaggers support that? the productive people..ie the middle class...already pay the taxes. the rich...beloved of the right...pay no taxes You only think that because you have never invested in yourself to get a good job and saved to become "rich". Just a homey couch slug with a mouth waiting for a handout. -- The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is the problem. |
Activist judge in Nashville
In article ,
says... On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 00:50:27 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:14:04 -0700, jps wrote: Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's constitutional rights... Wonder if that'll filter up to the SCOTUS. A federal judge Monday afternoon ordered Tennessee to stop enforcing new rules that restricted ?Occupy Nashville? demonstrators? ability to protest in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN). ?The state cannot arbitrarily create restrictive policies just because it does not like how people are using a public space,? said ACLU-TN Legal Director Tricia Herzfeld. ?Today?s decision is the first step in restoring demonstrators? free speech rights.? We probably have a better test case going on in Ft Myers. There is a long standing law against camping in the park and pretty much anywhere but a designated (zoned) camp ground within the city. You also need a permit to do much more than visit the park and it closes at night. It is going to be interesting when they try to make the case that "camping" is "speech". If the protesters win, the result might be chilling. It would say that if you have something to gripe about, you can camp anywhere you want. It does make me wonder how long these people would last in Lafayette Park, right outside Obama's front door, in DC. And I suppose I would be allowed to camp at Lake Anna State Park if I have a gripe or two. Sounds good to me! So you like the jackboot Nazi type of government, huh? |
Activist judge in Nashville
|
Activist judge in Nashville
In article , dump-on-
says... On 11/1/11 7:02 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 06:15:09 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 10/31/11 10:43 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 31/10/2011 8:14 PM, jps wrote: Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's constitutional rights... Maybe, maybe not. What if productive people withheld income tax from DC in peaceful protest. What then? Would fleabaggers support that? Who is John Gault. If you had read the book, you'd know it was Galt, not Gault. Supply siders who haven't a ****ing clue from whence they came. Clueless, low information voter. Glad to see the two of you wasting your time reading my drivel. Atlas Shrugged is entirely too long, complex and dull a book for an ex-marine who was posted stateside to read. You seem to be the designated fill-in for Ingersoll, whose house was damaged in the storm, and his now-obvious sockpuppet, iLoogy the "non-boaterer." Hey, Harry, where did you get the idea that I'm a non-boater? And where did you get the idea that I'm loogy? |
Activist judge in Nashville
On 11/2/2011 8:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , dump-on- says... On 11/1/11 7:02 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 06:15:09 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 10/31/11 10:43 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 31/10/2011 8:14 PM, jps wrote: Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's constitutional rights... Maybe, maybe not. What if productive people withheld income tax from DC in peaceful protest. What then? Would fleabaggers support that? Who is John Gault. If you had read the book, you'd know it was Galt, not Gault. Supply siders who haven't a ****ing clue from whence they came. Clueless, low information voter. Glad to see the two of you wasting your time reading my drivel. Atlas Shrugged is entirely too long, complex and dull a book for an ex-marine who was posted stateside to read. You seem to be the designated fill-in for Ingersoll, whose house was damaged in the storm, and his now-obvious sockpuppet, iLoogy the "non-boaterer." Hey, Harry, where did you get the idea that I'm a non-boater? And where did you get the idea that I'm loogy? He's fishing for a confession. Keep him guessing. He isn't all that bright. -- 1-20-13 The end of an error |
Activist judge in Nashville
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:38:30 -0400, Drifter wrote:
On 11/1/2011 4:37 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:14:04 -0700, wrote: Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's constitutional rights... Wonder if that'll filter up to the SCOTUS. A federal judge Monday afternoon ordered Tennessee to stop enforcing new rules that restricted “Occupy Nashville” demonstrators’ ability to protest in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN). “The state cannot arbitrarily create restrictive policies just because it does not like how people are using a public space,” said ACLU-TN Legal Director Tricia Herzfeld. “Today’s decision is the first step in restoring demonstrators’ free speech rights.” The protesters had been camped at Legislative Plaza in downtown Nashville to protest the economic and political consolidation of power since October 9. But on October 27, Tennessee enacted new rules without any public review process that eliminated their right to gather after 4:00 p.m. and implemented a 10:00 pm curfew on the plaza. The state also required protesters to pay use and security fees and to obtain $1,000,000 in liability insurance coverage prior to engaging in any assembly activity. Those rules make damn good sense. Shouldn't be any bitchin' about 'em either! A miliun dollas? I supose there goin ta ask there parunts to post da bond, eh? By the way, Have you heard specifically, what they are protesting? The government. I'm speaking of the one headed by BamBam. |
Activist judge in Nashville
On 11/2/2011 5:33 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:38:30 -0400, wrote: On 11/1/2011 4:37 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:14:04 -0700, wrote: Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's constitutional rights... Wonder if that'll filter up to the SCOTUS. A federal judge Monday afternoon ordered Tennessee to stop enforcing new rules that restricted “Occupy Nashville” demonstrators’ ability to protest in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN). “The state cannot arbitrarily create restrictive policies just because it does not like how people are using a public space,” said ACLU-TN Legal Director Tricia Herzfeld. “Today’s decision is the first step in restoring demonstrators’ free speech rights.” The protesters had been camped at Legislative Plaza in downtown Nashville to protest the economic and political consolidation of power since October 9. But on October 27, Tennessee enacted new rules without any public review process that eliminated their right to gather after 4:00 p.m. and implemented a 10:00 pm curfew on the plaza. The state also required protesters to pay use and security fees and to obtain $1,000,000 in liability insurance coverage prior to engaging in any assembly activity. Those rules make damn good sense. Shouldn't be any bitchin' about 'em either! A miliun dollas? I supose there goin ta ask there parunts to post da bond, eh? By the way, Have you heard specifically, what they are protesting? The government. I'm speaking of the one headed by BamBam. Bam who? -- 1-20-13 The end of an error |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com