Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pygmy and John Winters (Swift,QCC) Kayak Design Comparisons
I'm looking at building a kayak for my 14 year old son (110 lbs and
not likely to get much bigger than 140 lbs). I like John Winters canoe and kayak designs. If I could get plans for a stitch and glue version of the Tasman Sea, I'd buy them. I'd like a stitch and glue for this project to keep down the frustration level of building with a easily distracted, easily frustrated 14 year old. In addition, the stitch and glue designs start looking like a real boat faster to keep the interest level up. But stitch and glue plans don't exist for the Tasman Sea so I've been looking at Pygmy stitch and glue plans and kits (amongst others which I've started to rule out). Specifically I'm trying to choose between the Pygmy 14' Arctic Tern or biting the bullet with frustration and some additional cost and building the Winters Tasman Sea design. But can anyone shed some light on the handling differences? Granted the Pygmy Artic Tern is a hard chined boat compared to the strip configuration of the Winters design so there will be some obvious handling differences, but has anyone had the opportunity to compare the two? If not, have you been able to compare a Pygmy Osprey, Coho,or Arctic Tern to a Swift Caspian Sea or a QCC 300 or 400 (John Winters designed boats)? The use for this kayak will be tooling around the chain of lakes we live on and for playing on waves on our frequent trips to Lake Michigan. Thanks for any help you can give. Dave |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General |