Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Dave
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pygmy and John Winters (Swift,QCC) Kayak Design Comparisons

I'm looking at building a kayak for my 14 year old son (110 lbs and
not likely to get much bigger than 140 lbs). I like John Winters canoe
and kayak designs. If I could get plans for a stitch and glue version
of the Tasman Sea, I'd buy them. I'd like a stitch and glue for this
project to keep down the frustration level of building with a easily
distracted, easily frustrated 14 year old. In addition, the stitch
and glue designs start looking like a real boat faster to keep the
interest level up. But stitch and glue plans don't exist for the
Tasman Sea so I've been looking at Pygmy stitch and glue plans and
kits (amongst others which I've started to rule out). Specifically
I'm trying to choose between the Pygmy 14' Arctic Tern or biting the
bullet with frustration and some additional cost and building the
Winters Tasman Sea design.

But can anyone shed some light on the handling differences? Granted
the Pygmy Artic Tern is a hard chined boat compared to the strip
configuration of the Winters design so there will be some obvious
handling differences, but has anyone had the opportunity to compare
the two? If not, have you been able to compare a Pygmy Osprey,
Coho,or Arctic Tern to a Swift Caspian Sea or a QCC 300 or 400 (John
Winters designed boats)? The use for this kayak will be tooling
around the chain of lakes we live on and for playing on waves on our
frequent trips to Lake Michigan. Thanks for any help you can give.

Dave
  #2   Report Post  
Jon C
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pygmy and John Winters (Swift,QCC) Kayak Design Comparisons

Dave wrote:

I'm looking at building a kayak for my 14 year old son (110 lbs and
not likely to get much bigger than 140 lbs). I like John Winters canoe
and kayak designs. If I could get plans for a stitch and glue version
of the Tasman Sea, I'd buy them. I'd like a stitch and glue for this
project to keep down the frustration level of building with a easily
distracted, easily frustrated 14 year old. In addition, the stitch
and glue designs start looking like a real boat faster to keep the
interest level up. But stitch and glue plans don't exist for the
Tasman Sea so I've been looking at Pygmy stitch and glue plans and
kits (amongst others which I've started to rule out). Specifically
I'm trying to choose between the Pygmy 14' Arctic Tern or biting the
bullet with frustration and some additional cost and building the
Winters Tasman Sea design.

But can anyone shed some light on the handling differences? Granted
the Pygmy Artic Tern is a hard chined boat compared to the strip
configuration of the Winters design so there will be some obvious
handling differences, but has anyone had the opportunity to compare
the two? If not, have you been able to compare a Pygmy Osprey,
Coho,or Arctic Tern to a Swift Caspian Sea or a QCC 300 or 400 (John
Winters designed boats)? The use for this kayak will be tooling
around the chain of lakes we live on and for playing on waves on our
frequent trips to Lake Michigan. Thanks for any help you can give.

Dave


I can't help you much with most of that, but you won't find a S&G version of
the Tasman simply because it's not that style of boat. I plan on building a
full size Arctic Tern for myself at some point when I have the money, and
the 14 looks like a much more fun version of it for a smaller paddler. I've
only seen one actual Tern being paddled, and I was impressed with its looks
and its owner was impressed with it in general.

CLC's Chesapeake 14 might be worth looking at also.

As for non-wood boats, you might want to check out Perception's 13.5 foot
Sonoma. It's not a poly boat, but it is plastic.. their very stiff, strong,
and light Airalite. The stuff is really impact resistant (the "beater" boat
the Perception rep carries around has taken lots of "whack it as hard as you
can with this hammer to see how strong it is" hits). The boat is decidedly
on the narrow side, but it should be very fast and lots of fun. I'm
probably going to paddle one in a few days and let you know how it goes.

Jon
  #3   Report Post  
William R. Watt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pygmy and John Winters (Swift,QCC) Kayak Design Comparisons

John Winters did a least one stitch and glue design and may have done
others as custom orders. You could try asking at Green Valley if he has
any. Winters is retired and not likely to do new designs.

Jon C ) writes:
Dave wrote:

I'm looking at building a kayak for my 14 year old son (110 lbs and
not likely to get much bigger than 140 lbs). I like John Winters canoe
and kayak designs. If I could get plans for a stitch and glue version
of the Tasman Sea, I'd buy them. I'd like a stitch and glue for this
project to keep down the frustration level of building with a easily
distracted, easily frustrated 14 year old. In addition, the stitch
and glue designs start looking like a real boat faster to keep the
interest level up. But stitch and glue plans don't exist for the
Tasman Sea so I've been looking at Pygmy stitch and glue plans and
kits (amongst others which I've started to rule out). Specifically
I'm trying to choose between the Pygmy 14' Arctic Tern or biting the
bullet with frustration and some additional cost and building the
Winters Tasman Sea design.

But can anyone shed some light on the handling differences? Granted
the Pygmy Artic Tern is a hard chined boat compared to the strip
configuration of the Winters design so there will be some obvious
handling differences, but has anyone had the opportunity to compare
the two? If not, have you been able to compare a Pygmy Osprey,
Coho,or Arctic Tern to a Swift Caspian Sea or a QCC 300 or 400 (John
Winters designed boats)? The use for this kayak will be tooling
around the chain of lakes we live on and for playing on waves on our
frequent trips to Lake Michigan. Thanks for any help you can give.

Dave


I can't help you much with most of that, but you won't find a S&G version of
the Tasman simply because it's not that style of boat. I plan on building a
full size Arctic Tern for myself at some point when I have the money, and
the 14 looks like a much more fun version of it for a smaller paddler. I've
only seen one actual Tern being paddled, and I was impressed with its looks
and its owner was impressed with it in general.

CLC's Chesapeake 14 might be worth looking at also.

As for non-wood boats, you might want to check out Perception's 13.5 foot
Sonoma. It's not a poly boat, but it is plastic.. their very stiff, strong,
and light Airalite. The stuff is really impact resistant (the "beater" boat
the Perception rep carries around has taken lots of "whack it as hard as you
can with this hammer to see how strong it is" hits). The boat is decidedly
on the narrow side, but it should be very fast and lots of fun. I'm
probably going to paddle one in a few days and let you know how it goes.

Jon



--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network
homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm
warning: non-FreeNet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned
  #4   Report Post  
Rich Bailey
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pygmy and John Winters (Swift,QCC) Kayak Design Comparisons

I built an Osprey 13" for my then 8 yr old daughter 2 years ago. I can't
vouch for the handling as I am too big for it (~180 lbs & can barely get in
to the cockpit), but Emma has a blast with it on local rivers (Michigan
also: the Grand & Red Cedar) and on smaller lakes. The boat is quite quick.
She has no problems keeping up with a group on rivers. It was my first boat
build & went well. I took about 2 months to build it, not counting the
varnish work. Pygmy provides very good detailed instructions. Just now I
have an Arctic Tern 17' in the garage under construction. I have the planks
glued up & the wires out of the hull and am preping for glass on the
outside. I should have that done by the weekend.

Rich Bailey


"Dave" wrote in message
om...
I'm looking at building a kayak for my 14 year old son (110 lbs and
not likely to get much bigger than 140 lbs). I like John Winters canoe
and kayak designs. If I could get plans for a stitch and glue version
of the Tasman Sea, I'd buy them. I'd like a stitch and glue for this
project to keep down the frustration level of building with a easily
distracted, easily frustrated 14 year old. In addition, the stitch
and glue designs start looking like a real boat faster to keep the
interest level up. But stitch and glue plans don't exist for the
Tasman Sea so I've been looking at Pygmy stitch and glue plans and
kits (amongst others which I've started to rule out). Specifically
I'm trying to choose between the Pygmy 14' Arctic Tern or biting the
bullet with frustration and some additional cost and building the
Winters Tasman Sea design.

But can anyone shed some light on the handling differences? Granted
the Pygmy Artic Tern is a hard chined boat compared to the strip
configuration of the Winters design so there will be some obvious
handling differences, but has anyone had the opportunity to compare
the two? If not, have you been able to compare a Pygmy Osprey,
Coho,or Arctic Tern to a Swift Caspian Sea or a QCC 300 or 400 (John
Winters designed boats)? The use for this kayak will be tooling
around the chain of lakes we live on and for playing on waves on our
frequent trips to Lake Michigan. Thanks for any help you can give.

Dave



  #5   Report Post  
John Fereira
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pygmy and John Winters (Swift,QCC) Kayak Design Comparisons

Jon C wrote in
:

Dave wrote:

I'm looking at building a kayak for my 14 year old son (110 lbs and
not likely to get much bigger than 140 lbs). I like John Winters canoe
and kayak designs. If I could get plans for a stitch and glue version
of the Tasman Sea, I'd buy them. I'd like a stitch and glue for this
project to keep down the frustration level of building with a easily
distracted, easily frustrated 14 year old. In addition, the stitch
and glue designs start looking like a real boat faster to keep the
interest level up. But stitch and glue plans don't exist for the
Tasman Sea so I've been looking at Pygmy stitch and glue plans and
kits (amongst others which I've started to rule out). Specifically
I'm trying to choose between the Pygmy 14' Arctic Tern or biting the
bullet with frustration and some additional cost and building the
Winters Tasman Sea design.

But can anyone shed some light on the handling differences? Granted
the Pygmy Artic Tern is a hard chined boat compared to the strip
configuration of the Winters design so there will be some obvious
handling differences, but has anyone had the opportunity to compare
the two? If not, have you been able to compare a Pygmy Osprey,
Coho,or Arctic Tern to a Swift Caspian Sea or a QCC 300 or 400 (John
Winters designed boats)? The use for this kayak will be tooling
around the chain of lakes we live on and for playing on waves on our
frequent trips to Lake Michigan. Thanks for any help you can give.

Dave


I can't help you much with most of that, but you won't find a S&G
version of the Tasman simply because it's not that style of boat. I
plan on building a full size Arctic Tern for myself at some point when
I have the money, and the 14 looks like a much more fun version of it
for a smaller paddler. I've only seen one actual Tern being paddled,
and I was impressed with its looks and its owner was impressed with it
in general.


I've paddle a full size Arctic Tern and thought that is was too wide and too
high in volume for what is supposed to be a greenland style kayak. Of the
Pygmy boats I prefer the Coho.

CLC's Chesapeake 14 might be worth looking at also.

As for non-wood boats, you might want to check out Perception's 13.5
foot Sonoma. It's not a poly boat, but it is plastic.. their very
stiff, strong, and light Airalite. The stuff is really impact
resistant (the "beater" boat the Perception rep carries around has
taken lots of "whack it as hard as you can with this hammer to see how
strong it is" hits). The boat is decidedly on the narrow side, but it
should be very fast and lots of fun. I'm probably going to paddle one
in a few days and let you know how it goes.


I was at a demo day last year and saw lots of beginner trying out the
Sonoma. I saw more people capsize in that boat that any other by a wide
margin. It's unecessarily tippy and doesn't have strong secondary stability
to compensate. It also is a fairly high volume boat and would likely be
much too big for a 145lb paddler.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ [email protected] General 0 June 28th 04 07:43 PM
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ [email protected] General 0 April 17th 04 12:28 PM
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ [email protected] General 0 March 18th 04 09:15 AM
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ [email protected] General 0 February 16th 04 10:02 AM
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ [email protected] General 0 January 16th 04 09:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017