|
I knew it..
The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... |
I knew it..
|
I knew it..
On 10/26/11 11:40 AM, JustWait wrote:
The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... "Save our military..." What the hell are you raving about now, moron? Save it for what? Another invasion of another country that didn't attack us on 9-11? The military should be cut down incrementally to no more than half of what it is now...and then looked at again to see if it can be cut down some more. For a non-consequential, unemployable little ****, you sure have some wild and wooly opinions. |
I knew it..
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting anybody do anything about our jobs problems. You do know there is a total of 15 republican sponsored jobs bills not being allowed to be discussed or voted on in the Senate, right? Or did Jon Stewart leave out that little tidbit? Remember, your interpretation of the "mission accomplished" was proven to be miserably uninformed this morning by a Navy Veteran? Just wondering, if you knew about who really is holding up the jobs bills??? |
I knew it..
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting anybody do anything about our jobs problems. Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh? |
I knew it..
On 10/26/11 11:53 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting anybody do anything about our jobs problems. You do know there is a total of 15 republican sponsored jobs bills not being allowed to be discussed or voted on in the Senate, right? Or did Jon Stewart leave out that little tidbit? Remember, your interpretation of the "mission accomplished" was proven to be miserably uninformed this morning by a Navy Veteran? Just wondering, if you knew about who really is holding up the jobs bills??? Those "job bills" are nothing more than GOP attempts to remove even more societal safeguards against pollution, workplace safety, consumer safety, and so forth. In other words, more bills aimed at transferring more wealth to the wealthy. You're quite the Fox News viewer...you have no money, you'll never have any, and yet you side with the wealthy against your own economic interests. Idiot. |
I knew it..
On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting anybody do anything about our jobs problems. Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh? Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil. You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick with that. There must be something you know. |
I knew it..
On 10/26/2011 1:16 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting anybody do anything about our jobs problems. Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh? Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil. You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick with that. There must be something you know. as usual your whole dissertation is based on a false premise... My statement was that the oil is for France and Germany... always the liar this Krause guy... |
I knew it..
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:16:35 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting anybody do anything about our jobs problems. Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh? Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil. You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick with that. There must be something you know. He knows how to live off his wife's industry, work on motorcycles with Chinese tools and camp. |
I knew it..
On 10/26/11 1:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 1:16 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting anybody do anything about our jobs problems. Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh? Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil. You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick with that. There must be something you know. as usual your whole dissertation is based on a false premise... My statement was that the oil is for France and Germany... always the liar this Krause guy... Your theory is that the French and Germans are going to invade Libya and take it over? A rebirth of the Foreign Legion in North Africa and the Afrika Corps? Where's Rommel? |
I knew it..
On 10/26/11 2:07 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:16:35 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting anybody do anything about our jobs problems. Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh? Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil. You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick with that. There must be something you know. He knows how to live off his wife's industry, work on motorcycles with Chinese tools and camp. I thought his wife was the "brains" behind the internet reselling company. |
I knew it..
On 10/26/2011 2:36 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/26/11 2:07 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:16:35 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting anybody do anything about our jobs problems. Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh? Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil. You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick with that. There must be something you know. He knows how to live off his wife's industry, work on motorcycles with Chinese tools and camp. I thought his wife was the "brains" behind the internet reselling company. she is |
I knew it..
On Oct 26, 2:02*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote: On 10/26/11 11:53 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting anybody do anything about our jobs problems. You do know there is a total of 15 republican sponsored jobs bills not being allowed to be discussed or voted on in the Senate, right? Or did Jon Stewart leave out that little tidbit? Remember, your interpretation of the "mission accomplished" was proven to be miserably uninformed this morning by a Navy Veteran? Just wondering, if you knew about who really is holding up the jobs bills??? Those "job bills" are nothing more than GOP attempts to remove even more societal safeguards against pollution, workplace safety, consumer safety, and so forth. In other words, more bills aimed at transferring more wealth to the wealthy. You're quite the Fox News viewer...you have no money, you'll never have any, and yet you side with the wealthy against your own economic interests. Idiot.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - BINGO! |
I knew it..
|
I knew it..
On 26/10/2011 9:40 AM, JustWait wrote:
The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... Destroy the military? DC already spends more than the other 25 top nations in the world combined!!! As if USA is at war with the entire world. Fact is the military is more than 5 times the size that is needed. Good place to save serious is to hack $500 billion from the $800 billion military budget. No setup, fact is USA no longer pays its bills with real money and Monopoly Bernanke can't keep printing 0bama's debt spend forver. Zimbawe tried that, and now a $100 trillion note is toilet paper. Germany, Argentina, all who tried the money print ended up the same way, even the Roman Empire going to tin coin replacing silver and gold. Fact is DC is broke and overspending. 50% of what DC spends is debt-money-print spend. Do you or your your wife continuously spend twice as much as comes in? It eventually leads to assured bankruptcy. Too big to fail? Tell that to the countries that have tried this before. Including the Roman Empire. Fact is USA is gong to see third world status as the banking and currency system no longer have any integrity. Once Europe has crashed, USA will not be far behind. -- The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is the problem. |
I knew it..
On 26/10/2011 9:53 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting anybody do anything about our jobs problems. You do know there is a total of 15 republican sponsored jobs bills not being allowed to be discussed or voted on in the Senate, right? Or did Jon Stewart leave out that little tidbit? Remember, your interpretation of the "mission accomplished" was proven to be miserably uninformed this morning by a Navy Veteran? Just wondering, if you knew about who really is holding up the jobs bills??? Need more Tea Party in th senate to fix things so they move again. Too many old time senators have long time ties with special interests to get anything meaningful done. Trouble witht he old farts int he senate, is they all want back room deals and port for doing the right things. Time to clean up the senate in 2012. Get new faces that are not so corrupt. -- The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is the problem. |
I knew it..
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:36:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: On 10/26/11 2:07 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:16:35 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting anybody do anything about our jobs problems. Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh? Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil. You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick with that. There must be something you know. He knows how to live off his wife's industry, work on motorcycles with Chinese tools and camp. I thought his wife was the "brains" behind the internet reselling company. I don't think there's another brain in the family, unless the kids were lucky enough to get a larger share of their mother's dna. |
I knew it..
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:34:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: On 10/26/11 1:43 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/26/2011 1:16 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting anybody do anything about our jobs problems. Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh? Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil. You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick with that. There must be something you know. as usual your whole dissertation is based on a false premise... My statement was that the oil is for France and Germany... always the liar this Krause guy... Your theory is that the French and Germans are going to invade Libya and take it over? A rebirth of the Foreign Legion in North Africa and the Afrika Corps? Where's Rommel? To Snotty, a dissertation is anything more than one complete sentence. |
I knew it..
On 10/26/11 4:18 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:34:13 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 10/26/11 1:43 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/26/2011 1:16 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting anybody do anything about our jobs problems. Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh? Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil. You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick with that. There must be something you know. as usual your whole dissertation is based on a false premise... My statement was that the oil is for France and Germany... always the liar this Krause guy... Your theory is that the French and Germans are going to invade Libya and take it over? A rebirth of the Foreign Legion in North Africa and the Afrika Corps? Where's Rommel? To Snotty, a dissertation is anything more than one complete sentence. Oh, dear. Libya will sell its oil to anyone it wants, at market prices. |
I knew it..
North Star wrote:
On Oct 26, 2:02 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 10/26/11 11:53 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing.... It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting anybody do anything about our jobs problems. You do know there is a total of 15 republican sponsored jobs bills not being allowed to be discussed or voted on in the Senate, right? Or did Jon Stewart leave out that little tidbit? Remember, your interpretation of the "mission accomplished" was proven to be miserably uninformed this morning by a Navy Veteran? Just wondering, if you knew about who really is holding up the jobs bills??? Those "job bills" are nothing more than GOP attempts to remove even more societal safeguards against pollution, workplace safety, consumer safety, and so forth. In other words, more bills aimed at transferring more wealth to the wealthy. You're quite the Fox News viewer...you have no money, you'll never have any, and yet you side with the wealthy against your own economic interests. Idiot.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - BINGO! So you can identify with that? It explains your house, but not the state of the crap in your yard, boyfriend! -HB |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com