Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/25/11 11:20 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/25/2011 11:18 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/25/11 11:12 AM, wrote: On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:04:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: I believe in adequate defense at the coastline and nothing else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then we'll fight. Based on your definition, the US would have never had a war. Are you really saying we should not have even been in WWI& WWII? It's not *my* definition. The post contained the thoughts of a highly decorated U.S. Marine officer, and the important part was how and why he thought soldiers were being used to further the gains of the wealthy. Just the other day, a Bush admin official finally admitted we went to Iraq because of the oil. Well, we went into Libya for oil too, the only difference is the oil in Libya won't come here, it's for France and Germany. Still the asshole won't let us drill here.... A. We didn't go "into" Libya with any sort of military or occupying force. B. There's no indication we went into Libya for the primary purpose of getting its oil. C. The Bush Admin told one lie after another to justify its invasion of Iraq. D. Oil companies can drill here with the proper safeguards. |