| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More failed "policy"...
On 10/19/2011 1:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On 10/19/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. This is no jobs bill.. If it was, why did the democrats vote it down? Do they not want jobs? You are going crazy!!!! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...se-pushes-for- passage-job-bill-in-face-likely-senate-defeat/ They couldn't come up with enough democratic votes to pass it, period... |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More failed "policy"...
On 10/19/2011 2:33 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On 10/19/2011 1:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. This is no jobs bill.. If it was, why did the democrats vote it down? Do they not want jobs? You are going crazy!!!! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...se-pushes-for- passage-job-bill-in-face-likely-senate-defeat/ They couldn't come up with enough democratic votes to pass it, period... No republican voted on it? Oh, wait, before you said there is no jobs bill. So just what did the democrats vote on? Another stimulus bill, expecting different results this time. Even the democrats knew that, that's why they killed it. Remember, the republicans are the ones who wanted to vote on it weeks ago until Reid pulled the "nuclear option" to stop them from bringing it up. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More failed "policy"...
In article ,
says... On 10/19/2011 2:33 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 1:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. This is no jobs bill.. If it was, why did the democrats vote it down? Do they not want jobs? You are going crazy!!!! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...se-pushes-for- passage-job-bill-in-face-likely-senate-defeat/ They couldn't come up with enough democratic votes to pass it, period... No republican voted on it? Oh, wait, before you said there is no jobs bill. So just what did the democrats vote on? Another stimulus bill, expecting different results this time. Even the democrats knew that, that's why they killed it. Remember, the republicans are the ones who wanted to vote on it weeks ago until Reid pulled the "nuclear option" to stop them from bringing it up. Have you read the bill? It's a JOBS bill, not a stimulus bill. How could a jobs bill not cost money? But wait, you said there was no bill..... |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More failed "policy"...
On 10/19/2011 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On 10/19/2011 2:33 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 1:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. This is no jobs bill.. If it was, why did the democrats vote it down? Do they not want jobs? You are going crazy!!!! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...se-pushes-for- passage-job-bill-in-face-likely-senate-defeat/ They couldn't come up with enough democratic votes to pass it, period... No republican voted on it? Oh, wait, before you said there is no jobs bill. So just what did the democrats vote on? Another stimulus bill, expecting different results this time. Even the democrats knew that, that's why they killed it. Remember, the republicans are the ones who wanted to vote on it weeks ago until Reid pulled the "nuclear option" to stop them from bringing it up. Have you read the bill? It's a JOBS bill, not a stimulus bill. How could a jobs bill not cost money? But wait, you said there was no bill..... There is no jobs bill, there is another union buy off bill... You can call a ****storm a rose, but it's still a ****storm... |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More failed "policy"...
In article ,
says... On 10/19/2011 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 2:33 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 1:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. This is no jobs bill.. If it was, why did the democrats vote it down? Do they not want jobs? You are going crazy!!!! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...se-pushes-for- passage-job-bill-in-face-likely-senate-defeat/ They couldn't come up with enough democratic votes to pass it, period... No republican voted on it? Oh, wait, before you said there is no jobs bill. So just what did the democrats vote on? Another stimulus bill, expecting different results this time. Even the democrats knew that, that's why they killed it. Remember, the republicans are the ones who wanted to vote on it weeks ago until Reid pulled the "nuclear option" to stop them from bringing it up. Have you read the bill? It's a JOBS bill, not a stimulus bill. How could a jobs bill not cost money? But wait, you said there was no bill..... There is no jobs bill, there is another union buy off bill... You can call a ****storm a rose, but it's still a ****storm... Oh, man, sorry, you are too crazy to try to carry on a conversation with! Have you read the bill? I can't possibly figure out how someone could possibly call it a union buy off!! |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More failed "policy"...
On 10/19/11 4:00 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/19/2011 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 2:33 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 1:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. This is no jobs bill.. If it was, why did the democrats vote it down? Do they not want jobs? You are going crazy!!!! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...se-pushes-for- passage-job-bill-in-face-likely-senate-defeat/ They couldn't come up with enough democratic votes to pass it, period... No republican voted on it? Oh, wait, before you said there is no jobs bill. So just what did the democrats vote on? Another stimulus bill, expecting different results this time. Even the democrats knew that, that's why they killed it. Remember, the republicans are the ones who wanted to vote on it weeks ago until Reid pulled the "nuclear option" to stop them from bringing it up. Have you read the bill? It's a JOBS bill, not a stimulus bill. How could a jobs bill not cost money? But wait, you said there was no bill..... There is no jobs bill, there is another union buy off bill... You can call a ****storm a rose, but it's still a ****storm... Obvious you haven't read it, so the answer is... Scotty doesn't know. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More failed "policy"...
In article ,
says... In article , says... On 10/19/2011 2:33 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 1:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. This is no jobs bill.. If it was, why did the democrats vote it down? Do they not want jobs? You are going crazy!!!! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...se-pushes-for- passage-job-bill-in-face-likely-senate-defeat/ They couldn't come up with enough democratic votes to pass it, period... No republican voted on it? Oh, wait, before you said there is no jobs bill. So just what did the democrats vote on? Another stimulus bill, expecting different results this time. Even the democrats knew that, that's why they killed it. Remember, the republicans are the ones who wanted to vote on it weeks ago until Reid pulled the "nuclear option" to stop them from bringing it up. Have you read the bill? It's a JOBS bill, not a stimulus bill. How could a jobs bill not cost money? But wait, you said there was no bill..... The title may say "Jobs Bill" but the content is an election year ear mark. You do know that the "Jobs Bill" only pays for one years worth of jobs and then the responsibility of continued funding of those jobs falls onto the state and local governments. Just more unfunded mandates. This is suspiciously like Clinton's 100,000 more police officers which only lasted for 1 year. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More failed "policy"...
On 10/19/2011 7:28 PM, BAR wrote:
In , says... In , says... On 10/19/2011 2:33 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 1:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. This is no jobs bill.. If it was, why did the democrats vote it down? Do they not want jobs? You are going crazy!!!! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...se-pushes-for- passage-job-bill-in-face-likely-senate-defeat/ They couldn't come up with enough democratic votes to pass it, period... No republican voted on it? Oh, wait, before you said there is no jobs bill. So just what did the democrats vote on? Another stimulus bill, expecting different results this time. Even the democrats knew that, that's why they killed it. Remember, the republicans are the ones who wanted to vote on it weeks ago until Reid pulled the "nuclear option" to stop them from bringing it up. Have you read the bill? It's a JOBS bill, not a stimulus bill. How could a jobs bill not cost money? But wait, you said there was no bill..... The title may say "Jobs Bill" but the content is an election year ear mark. You do know that the "Jobs Bill" only pays for one years worth of jobs and then the responsibility of continued funding of those jobs falls onto the state and local governments. Just more unfunded mandates. This is suspiciously like Clinton's 100,000 more police officers which only lasted for 1 year. Not to mention about 17% of the moneys put aside for "teachers" actyally went to teachers. The rest went to buying IPods for students and "administrative" costs... |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More failed "policy"...
In article ,
says... On 10/19/2011 7:28 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... On 10/19/2011 2:33 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 1:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. This is no jobs bill.. If it was, why did the democrats vote it down? Do they not want jobs? You are going crazy!!!! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...se-pushes-for- passage-job-bill-in-face-likely-senate-defeat/ They couldn't come up with enough democratic votes to pass it, period... No republican voted on it? Oh, wait, before you said there is no jobs bill. So just what did the democrats vote on? Another stimulus bill, expecting different results this time. Even the democrats knew that, that's why they killed it. Remember, the republicans are the ones who wanted to vote on it weeks ago until Reid pulled the "nuclear option" to stop them from bringing it up. Have you read the bill? It's a JOBS bill, not a stimulus bill. How could a jobs bill not cost money? But wait, you said there was no bill..... The title may say "Jobs Bill" but the content is an election year ear mark. You do know that the "Jobs Bill" only pays for one years worth of jobs and then the responsibility of continued funding of those jobs falls onto the state and local governments. Just more unfunded mandates. This is suspiciously like Clinton's 100,000 more police officers which only lasted for 1 year. Not to mention about 17% of the moneys put aside for "teachers" actyally went to teachers. The rest went to buying IPods for students and "administrative" costs... I'm guessing you have proof of this? May I see it, please? |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| " Butt Plug Junior" Ingersoll...rec boats latest "stalker " | General | |||
| Would Sotomayor Exonerate Bill Richardson & His "Moving AmericaForward" "Latino Voter Registration" Scam? | General | |||
| "Jeffrey Boyd" is an anagram of "Midget Runt" in Japanese | ASA | |||
| Battery with "Double the Power" or that takes up "Half the Space" | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
