|
He's a great guy...
"jps" wrote in message ...
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 10, 4:31 pm, jps wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:35:45 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 9, 9:35 pm, jps wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:16:50 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...=3598647ebfe79... On Oct 9, 3:56 pm, jps wrote: On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:05:03 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 8, 6:40 pm, jps wrote: Let's get real, Tim. Guns are very good at what they're designed to do, kill things. I know, I use them around the farm for varmint control. They're very efficient. I'm assuming you wouldn't go out there to kill varmints with a sword, a knife or a bludgeon as long as you have an efficient weapon like a gun. If it would be more to your satisfaction, I'll bag the next groundhog with a compound bow. They work pretty good too! That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading. Ok, so now I'm getting the picture. You're wishing harm on me because I don't fit your views. Interesting..... Hey, if those varmints can mount an attack on the guy who's trying to kill 'em, I give 'em a lot of credit. I bet it'd supply the media with a fantastic story to cover for however much time it'd take to pick your bones clean. Too bad the guy in Cupertino didn't bring his bow and arrow instead. This Canadian did. http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/ar...hot-dead-with-... You're making my point for me, thanks. 1 person dead, not 2, not 3 and 7 are not wounded. Reloading a crossbow is not equal to pulling a trigger however many times a second your auto or semi-auto weapon can fire. No I didn't make your point. I did make a point that you dont' need a gun to prove someones mortality. and if one isn't available, you run what you brung. But then again, cross bows aren't illegal to own nor do they need special licensing. And have proven to be quite stealth. Maybe a weapon of choice by ganstahs and assassins, depending on circumstances. But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Yeah, haven't heard about gangstahs using crossbows a whole lot but I do hear about a crazy bunch of handguns being out there and available cheap. Probably pick up several handguns and a bunch of ammo for the price of a decent crossbow. Decent crossbow is maybe $250. Hell to find any handgun that cheap these days. Cost you $25-50 just for the government paperwork on each purchase. |
He's a great guy...
On Oct 10, 11:48*pm, jps wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 10, 4:31 pm, jps wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:35:45 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 9, 9:35 pm, jps wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:16:50 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...=3598647ebfe79... On Oct 9, 3:56 pm, jps wrote: On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:05:03 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 8, 6:40 pm, jps wrote: Let's get real, Tim. Guns are very good at what they're designed to do, kill things. I know, I use them around the farm for varmint control. They're very efficient. I'm assuming you wouldn't go out there to kill varmints with a sword, a knife or a bludgeon as long as you have an efficient weapon like a gun. If it would be more to your satisfaction, I'll bag the next groundhog with a compound bow. They work pretty good too! That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading. Ok, so now I'm getting the picture. You're wishing harm on me because I don't fit your views. Interesting..... Hey, if those varmints can mount an attack on the guy who's trying to kill 'em, I give 'em a lot of credit. I bet it'd supply the media with a fantastic story to cover for however much time it'd take to pick your bones clean. Too bad the guy in Cupertino didn't bring his bow and arrow instead.. This Canadian did. http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/ar...hot-dead-with-.... You're making my point for me, thanks. 1 person dead, not 2, not 3 and 7 are not wounded. Reloading a crossbow is not equal to pulling a trigger however many times a second your auto or semi-auto weapon can fire. No I didn't make your point. I did make a point that you dont' need a gun to prove someones mortality. and if one isn't available, you run what you brung. But then again, cross bows aren't illegal to own nor do they need special licensing. And have proven to be quite stealth. Maybe a weapon of choice by ganstahs and assassins, depending on circumstances. But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Yeah, haven't heard about gangstahs using crossbows a whole lot but I do hear about a crazy bunch of handguns being out there and available cheap. Probably pick up several handguns and a bunch of ammo for the price of a decent crossbow. keep dreaming |
He's a great guy...
On 10/10/2011 5:33 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:30:25 -0400, wrote: On 10/9/2011 4:56 PM, jps wrote: You think wider distribution and availability of weapons is a good development? Not to criminals. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? Right, it was Biden, Jay Carney and Hilary that packed those guns up for sale to Mexico. Not a bunch of yahoos at the ATF who are probably selling drugs for the cartels, like Oliver North did. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? |
He's a great guy...
On 10/11/2011 12:48 AM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 10, 4:31 pm, wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:35:45 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 9, 9:35 pm, wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:16:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...=3598647ebfe79... On Oct 9, 3:56 pm, wrote: On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:05:03 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 8, 6:40 pm, wrote: Let's get real, Tim. Guns are very good at what they're designed to do, kill things. I know, I use them around the farm for varmint control. They're very efficient. I'm assuming you wouldn't go out there to kill varmints with a sword, a knife or a bludgeon as long as you have an efficient weapon like a gun. If it would be more to your satisfaction, I'll bag the next groundhog with a compound bow. They work pretty good too! That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading. Ok, so now I'm getting the picture. You're wishing harm on me because I don't fit your views. Interesting..... Hey, if those varmints can mount an attack on the guy who's trying to kill 'em, I give 'em a lot of credit. I bet it'd supply the media with a fantastic story to cover for however much time it'd take to pick your bones clean. Too bad the guy in Cupertino didn't bring his bow and arrow instead. This Canadian did. http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/ar...hot-dead-with-... You're making my point for me, thanks. 1 person dead, not 2, not 3 and 7 are not wounded. Reloading a crossbow is not equal to pulling a trigger however many times a second your auto or semi-auto weapon can fire. No I didn't make your point. I did make a point that you dont' need a gun to prove someones mortality. and if one isn't available, you run what you brung. But then again, cross bows aren't illegal to own nor do they need special licensing. And have proven to be quite stealth. Maybe a weapon of choice by ganstahs and assassins, depending on circumstances. But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. LOL, you are funny... Yeah, haven't heard about gangstahs using crossbows a whole lot but I do hear about a crazy bunch of handguns being out there and available cheap. If you would get informed to watch the news for a change instead of cartoons, you would have seen a bunch of compound bows and crossbows in the videos of the Holder guns found in a major crime syndicate storehouse just the other day. Man, you should really try a little harder. Probably pick up several handguns and a bunch of ammo for the price of a decent crossbow. Wow, cause I can get a three hundred pound crossbow for about 90 bucks on ebay... |
He's a great guy...
On 10/11/2011 2:41 AM, Califbill wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 10, 4:31 pm, jps wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:35:45 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 9, 9:35 pm, jps wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:16:50 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...=3598647ebfe79... On Oct 9, 3:56 pm, jps wrote: On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:05:03 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 8, 6:40 pm, jps wrote: Let's get real, Tim. Guns are very good at what they're designed to do, kill things. I know, I use them around the farm for varmint control. They're very efficient. I'm assuming you wouldn't go out there to kill varmints with a sword, a knife or a bludgeon as long as you have an efficient weapon like a gun. If it would be more to your satisfaction, I'll bag the next groundhog with a compound bow. They work pretty good too! That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading. Ok, so now I'm getting the picture. You're wishing harm on me because I don't fit your views. Interesting..... Hey, if those varmints can mount an attack on the guy who's trying to kill 'em, I give 'em a lot of credit. I bet it'd supply the media with a fantastic story to cover for however much time it'd take to pick your bones clean. Too bad the guy in Cupertino didn't bring his bow and arrow instead. This Canadian did. http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/ar...hot-dead-with-... You're making my point for me, thanks. 1 person dead, not 2, not 3 and 7 are not wounded. Reloading a crossbow is not equal to pulling a trigger however many times a second your auto or semi-auto weapon can fire. No I didn't make your point. I did make a point that you dont' need a gun to prove someones mortality. and if one isn't available, you run what you brung. But then again, cross bows aren't illegal to own nor do they need special licensing. And have proven to be quite stealth. Maybe a weapon of choice by ganstahs and assassins, depending on circumstances. But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Yeah, haven't heard about gangstahs using crossbows a whole lot but I do hear about a crazy bunch of handguns being out there and available cheap. Probably pick up several handguns and a bunch of ammo for the price of a decent crossbow. Decent crossbow is maybe $250. Hell to find any handgun that cheap these days. Cost you $25-50 just for the government paperwork on each purchase. Well, when was the last time JPS actually checked a fact before spewing it here to support his latest lies?? |
He's a great guy...
On 10/11/2011 7:58 AM, Tim wrote:
On Oct 10, 11:48 pm, wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 10, 4:31 pm, wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:35:45 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 9, 9:35 pm, wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:16:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...=3598647ebfe79... On Oct 9, 3:56 pm, wrote: On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:05:03 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 8, 6:40 pm, wrote: Let's get real, Tim. Guns are very good at what they're designed to do, kill things. I know, I use them around the farm for varmint control. They're very efficient. I'm assuming you wouldn't go out there to kill varmints with a sword, a knife or a bludgeon as long as you have an efficient weapon like a gun. If it would be more to your satisfaction, I'll bag the next groundhog with a compound bow. They work pretty good too! That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading. Ok, so now I'm getting the picture. You're wishing harm on me because I don't fit your views. Interesting..... Hey, if those varmints can mount an attack on the guy who's trying to kill 'em, I give 'em a lot of credit. I bet it'd supply the media with a fantastic story to cover for however much time it'd take to pick your bones clean. Too bad the guy in Cupertino didn't bring his bow and arrow instead. This Canadian did. http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/ar...hot-dead-with-... You're making my point for me, thanks. 1 person dead, not 2, not 3 and 7 are not wounded. Reloading a crossbow is not equal to pulling a trigger however many times a second your auto or semi-auto weapon can fire. No I didn't make your point. I did make a point that you dont' need a gun to prove someones mortality. and if one isn't available, you run what you brung. But then again, cross bows aren't illegal to own nor do they need special licensing. And have proven to be quite stealth. Maybe a weapon of choice by ganstahs and assassins, depending on circumstances. But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Yeah, haven't heard about gangstahs using crossbows a whole lot but I do hear about a crazy bunch of handguns being out there and available cheap. Probably pick up several handguns and a bunch of ammo for the price of a decent crossbow. keep dreaming The guy is totally full of ****.. Wonder when he will call "us" all liars:) |
He's a great guy...
On 10/11/2011 8:36 AM, Jimmy wrote:
On 10/10/2011 5:33 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:30:25 -0400, wrote: On 10/9/2011 4:56 PM, jps wrote: You think wider distribution and availability of weapons is a good development? Not to criminals. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? Right, it was Biden, Jay Carney and Hilary that packed those guns up for sale to Mexico. Not a bunch of yahoos at the ATF who are probably selling drugs for the cartels, like Oliver North did. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? To support the destruction of Democracy they are pushing around the world... |
He's a great guy...
On 10/11/2011 12:56 AM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:44:22 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:54:43 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 21:16:11 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 06:07:44 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 7, 1:50 am, wrote: On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:13:15 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 6, 9:59 am, wrote: The more guns that are in people's hands, the higher the potential for their use. Period. ... and maybe more innocent people could be spared. Good thing the kid had a shotgun... http://www.iowapolitics.com/index.iml?Article=242322 It's a bad idea, Tim. More guns will mean more people ending up dead or maimed. Our society simply doesn't mix well with guns. Canada has just as many guns per capita but 1/10th of the incidents. Simply put, we're not a good match for guns. Obviously most murders are because of guns because, let's be honest, before guns no one was murdered, no one was hurt, and there were no wars. Yeah, that's it. Let's close our eyes, say "Ommm" over and over again and beleive crap like what Maher is spewing here. The intelligence oozes from him like puss from a zit. People who want to kill, will simply do that, and all you are doing by making stricter gun control laws is either forcing them to go on the black market (because who ever said…"gee i better not rob this 7-11 cause my gun ain't legal"), or use an alternate method to commit their crime (a knife, perhaps?) Or should we just legislate away anything that could possibly be used as an instrument of harm? Cars? butter knives? chalupas? Let's look at some of the great massacre's in human history. 9-11? No guns. Pearl Harbor? No Guns. Jonestown? 907 of the 909 dead via poison. If you don't want to own a gun, no one is forcing you, but it sure seems like there are a lot of ways to kill or hurt someone not involving guns. Tired, specious argument. The guy in Cupertino could not have dispatched and harmed as many people... if he didn't have a gun. If he had a knife, someone could have stopped him with a broomstick. Let's get real, Tim. Guns are very good at what they're designed to do, kill things. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dumped poison in the coffee pot. Would most likely killed all or most all. Yours in the specious argument. Yeah, that's what folks do when they get real ****ed off, they poison people. I've been hearing a lot of examples of that recently, not. I don't think Jim Jones or the Hale Bopp guys had the stomach to kill themselves with guns. ================================ He was nuts. He was going to kill the coworkers somehow. Maybe a propane bomb like the Columbine shooters had. Guns were just a tool. Best would have been poison and got all of them. Sort of like Jim Jones. Killing to a real excess. Guns are not the problem, upbringing and attitude are the problem. You are more likely to die by shooting in Detroit and you are to die by violence in Afghanistan or Iraq. And a whole lot more guns per capita there than in Detroit. I suppose you can back that up with data, eh? ----------------------------------------------------------------- Yup. Just google number of murders in Detroit and the number of soldiers killed in the middle east. We don't have soldiers in the middle east. Nice try. What the **** kind of bat**** crazy **** is that. Tell that to the guys who have had their lives blown to pieces over there.. You are a total ****ing asshole, just make sure you stay under a desk cause you wouldn't want even your pussy friends to know how stupid you are... |
He's a great guy...
On 10/11/2011 8:59 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/11/2011 12:56 AM, jps wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:44:22 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:54:43 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 21:16:11 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 06:07:44 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 7, 1:50 am, wrote: On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:13:15 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 6, 9:59 am, wrote: The more guns that are in people's hands, the higher the potential for their use. Period. ... and maybe more innocent people could be spared. Good thing the kid had a shotgun... http://www.iowapolitics.com/index.iml?Article=242322 It's a bad idea, Tim. More guns will mean more people ending up dead or maimed. Our society simply doesn't mix well with guns. Canada has just as many guns per capita but 1/10th of the incidents. Simply put, we're not a good match for guns. Obviously most murders are because of guns because, let's be honest, before guns no one was murdered, no one was hurt, and there were no wars. Yeah, that's it. Let's close our eyes, say "Ommm" over and over again and beleive crap like what Maher is spewing here. The intelligence oozes from him like puss from a zit. People who want to kill, will simply do that, and all you are doing by making stricter gun control laws is either forcing them to go on the black market (because who ever said…"gee i better not rob this 7-11 cause my gun ain't legal"), or use an alternate method to commit their crime (a knife, perhaps?) Or should we just legislate away anything that could possibly be used as an instrument of harm? Cars? butter knives? chalupas? Let's look at some of the great massacre's in human history. 9-11? No guns. Pearl Harbor? No Guns. Jonestown? 907 of the 909 dead via poison. If you don't want to own a gun, no one is forcing you, but it sure seems like there are a lot of ways to kill or hurt someone not involving guns. Tired, specious argument. The guy in Cupertino could not have dispatched and harmed as many people... if he didn't have a gun. If he had a knife, someone could have stopped him with a broomstick. Let's get real, Tim. Guns are very good at what they're designed to do, kill things. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dumped poison in the coffee pot. Would most likely killed all or most all. Yours in the specious argument. Yeah, that's what folks do when they get real ****ed off, they poison people. I've been hearing a lot of examples of that recently, not. I don't think Jim Jones or the Hale Bopp guys had the stomach to kill themselves with guns. ================================ He was nuts. He was going to kill the coworkers somehow. Maybe a propane bomb like the Columbine shooters had. Guns were just a tool. Best would have been poison and got all of them. Sort of like Jim Jones. Killing to a real excess. Guns are not the problem, upbringing and attitude are the problem. You are more likely to die by shooting in Detroit and you are to die by violence in Afghanistan or Iraq. And a whole lot more guns per capita there than in Detroit. I suppose you can back that up with data, eh? ----------------------------------------------------------------- Yup. Just google number of murders in Detroit and the number of soldiers killed in the middle east. We don't have soldiers in the middle east. Nice try. What the **** kind of bat**** crazy **** is that. Tell that to the guys who have had their lives blown to pieces over there.. You are a total ****ing asshole, just make sure you stay under a desk cause you wouldn't want even your pussy friends to know how stupid you are... JPS is into fire water. That explains his lunacy. |
He's a great guy...
On 11/10/2011 6:36 AM, Jimmy wrote:
On 10/10/2011 5:33 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:30:25 -0400, wrote: On 10/9/2011 4:56 PM, jps wrote: You think wider distribution and availability of weapons is a good development? Not to criminals. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? Right, it was Biden, Jay Carney and Hilary that packed those guns up for sale to Mexico. Not a bunch of yahoos at the ATF who are probably selling drugs for the cartels, like Oliver North did. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? Justifies bigger government. Create the problem, then fund the perception of a solution. Typical government inefficiency. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But we have big huge government we can't afford... -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
He's a great guy...
On 11/10/2011 6:58 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/11/2011 8:36 AM, Jimmy wrote: On 10/10/2011 5:33 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:30:25 -0400, wrote: On 10/9/2011 4:56 PM, jps wrote: You think wider distribution and availability of weapons is a good development? Not to criminals. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? Right, it was Biden, Jay Carney and Hilary that packed those guns up for sale to Mexico. Not a bunch of yahoos at the ATF who are probably selling drugs for the cartels, like Oliver North did. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? To support the destruction of Democracy they are pushing around the world... Take Egypt and the Obama supported toss out of elected Mumbarak. September came and went, no elections and now the Islam dictatorship isn't enforcing law on aggression against Christians. A little cleansing going on, yet Obama be nice an quiet as he is all for a united radical Islam. Sure not many happy people with Obama-Bernanke abroad, USA policy right now is just ****ing everyone off except for the Muslim Brotherhood. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But we have big huge government we can't afford... -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
He's a great guy...
On 10/11/11 2:24 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/10/2011 6:58 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/11/2011 8:36 AM, Jimmy wrote: On 10/10/2011 5:33 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:30:25 -0400, wrote: On 10/9/2011 4:56 PM, jps wrote: You think wider distribution and availability of weapons is a good development? Not to criminals. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? Right, it was Biden, Jay Carney and Hilary that packed those guns up for sale to Mexico. Not a bunch of yahoos at the ATF who are probably selling drugs for the cartels, like Oliver North did. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? To support the destruction of Democracy they are pushing around the world... Take Egypt and the Obama supported toss out of elected Mumbarak. September came and went, no elections and now the Islam dictatorship isn't enforcing law on aggression against Christians. A little cleansing going on, yet Obama be nice an quiet as he is all for a united radical Islam. Sure not many happy people with Obama-Bernanke abroad, USA policy right now is just ****ing everyone off except for the Muslim Brotherhood. Please supply your list of "everyone," Mr. No-Knowledge or Understanding of Econ or Geopolitics. |
He's a great guy...
|
He's a great guy...
On 11/10/2011 12:26 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/11/11 2:24 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 11/10/2011 6:58 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/11/2011 8:36 AM, Jimmy wrote: On 10/10/2011 5:33 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:30:25 -0400, wrote: On 10/9/2011 4:56 PM, jps wrote: You think wider distribution and availability of weapons is a good development? Not to criminals. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? Right, it was Biden, Jay Carney and Hilary that packed those guns up for sale to Mexico. Not a bunch of yahoos at the ATF who are probably selling drugs for the cartels, like Oliver North did. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? To support the destruction of Democracy they are pushing around the world... Take Egypt and the Obama supported toss out of elected Mumbarak. September came and went, no elections and now the Islam dictatorship isn't enforcing law on aggression against Christians. A little cleansing going on, yet Obama be nice an quiet as he is all for a united radical Islam. Sure not many happy people with Obama-Bernanke abroad, USA policy right now is just ****ing everyone off except for the Muslim Brotherhood. Please supply your list of "everyone," Mr. No-Knowledge or Understanding of Econ or Geopolitics. Name me a non-Islam country that is as happy with the USA than they were in say 2008. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But we have big huge government we can't afford... -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
He's a great guy...
On 10/11/11 3:03 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/10/2011 12:26 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/11/11 2:24 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 11/10/2011 6:58 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/11/2011 8:36 AM, Jimmy wrote: On 10/10/2011 5:33 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:30:25 -0400, wrote: On 10/9/2011 4:56 PM, jps wrote: You think wider distribution and availability of weapons is a good development? Not to criminals. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? Right, it was Biden, Jay Carney and Hilary that packed those guns up for sale to Mexico. Not a bunch of yahoos at the ATF who are probably selling drugs for the cartels, like Oliver North did. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? To support the destruction of Democracy they are pushing around the world... Take Egypt and the Obama supported toss out of elected Mumbarak. September came and went, no elections and now the Islam dictatorship isn't enforcing law on aggression against Christians. A little cleansing going on, yet Obama be nice an quiet as he is all for a united radical Islam. Sure not many happy people with Obama-Bernanke abroad, USA policy right now is just ****ing everyone off except for the Muslim Brotherhood. Please supply your list of "everyone," Mr. No-Knowledge or Understanding of Econ or Geopolitics. Name me a non-Islam country that is as happy with the USA than they were in say 2008. Are you kidding? You really are in the dark. |
He's a great guy...
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:58:53 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Oct 10, 11:48*pm, jps wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 10, 4:31 pm, jps wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:35:45 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 9, 9:35 pm, jps wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:16:50 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...=3598647ebfe79... On Oct 9, 3:56 pm, jps wrote: On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:05:03 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 8, 6:40 pm, jps wrote: Let's get real, Tim. Guns are very good at what they're designed to do, kill things. I know, I use them around the farm for varmint control. They're very efficient. I'm assuming you wouldn't go out there to kill varmints with a sword, a knife or a bludgeon as long as you have an efficient weapon like a gun. If it would be more to your satisfaction, I'll bag the next groundhog with a compound bow. They work pretty good too! That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading. Ok, so now I'm getting the picture. You're wishing harm on me because I don't fit your views. Interesting..... Hey, if those varmints can mount an attack on the guy who's trying to kill 'em, I give 'em a lot of credit. I bet it'd supply the media with a fantastic story to cover for however much time it'd take to pick your bones clean. Too bad the guy in Cupertino didn't bring his bow and arrow instead. This Canadian did. http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/ar...hot-dead-with-... You're making my point for me, thanks. 1 person dead, not 2, not 3 and 7 are not wounded. Reloading a crossbow is not equal to pulling a trigger however many times a second your auto or semi-auto weapon can fire. No I didn't make your point. I did make a point that you dont' need a gun to prove someones mortality. and if one isn't available, you run what you brung. But then again, cross bows aren't illegal to own nor do they need special licensing. And have proven to be quite stealth. Maybe a weapon of choice by ganstahs and assassins, depending on circumstances. But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Yeah, haven't heard about gangstahs using crossbows a whole lot but I do hear about a crazy bunch of handguns being out there and available cheap. Probably pick up several handguns and a bunch of ammo for the price of a decent crossbow. keep dreaming Really? How's the market for stolen crossbows? It's screaming brilliant in stolen handguns and they're butt cheap. No dreaming necessary. |
He's a great guy...
On 11/10/2011 1:17 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/11/11 3:03 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 11/10/2011 12:26 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/11/11 2:24 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 11/10/2011 6:58 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/11/2011 8:36 AM, Jimmy wrote: On 10/10/2011 5:33 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:30:25 -0400, wrote: On 10/9/2011 4:56 PM, jps wrote: You think wider distribution and availability of weapons is a good development? Not to criminals. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? Right, it was Biden, Jay Carney and Hilary that packed those guns up for sale to Mexico. Not a bunch of yahoos at the ATF who are probably selling drugs for the cartels, like Oliver North did. Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals? To support the destruction of Democracy they are pushing around the world... Take Egypt and the Obama supported toss out of elected Mumbarak. September came and went, no elections and now the Islam dictatorship isn't enforcing law on aggression against Christians. A little cleansing going on, yet Obama be nice an quiet as he is all for a united radical Islam. Sure not many happy people with Obama-Bernanke abroad, USA policy right now is just ****ing everyone off except for the Muslim Brotherhood. Please supply your list of "everyone," Mr. No-Knowledge or Understanding of Econ or Geopolitics. Name me a non-Islam country that is as happy with the USA than they were in say 2008. Are you kidding? You really are in the dark. Not at all, but from your response means you can't answer up. But it is an Obamanation. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But we have big huge government we can't afford... -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
He's a great guy...
On Oct 11, 2:54*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:58:53 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 10, 11:48 pm, jps wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 10, 4:31 pm, jps wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:35:45 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 9, 9:35 pm, jps wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:16:50 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...=3598647ebfe79... On Oct 9, 3:56 pm, jps wrote: On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:05:03 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 8, 6:40 pm, jps wrote: Let's get real, Tim. Guns are very good at what they're designed to do, kill things. I know, I use them around the farm for varmint control. They're very efficient. I'm assuming you wouldn't go out there to kill varmints with a sword, a knife or a bludgeon as long as you have an efficient weapon like a gun. If it would be more to your satisfaction, I'll bag the next groundhog with a compound bow. They work pretty good too! That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading. Ok, so now I'm getting the picture. You're wishing harm on me because I don't fit your views. Interesting..... Hey, if those varmints can mount an attack on the guy who's trying to kill 'em, I give 'em a lot of credit. I bet it'd supply the media with a fantastic story to cover for however much time it'd take to pick your bones clean. Too bad the guy in Cupertino didn't bring his bow and arrow instead. This Canadian did. http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/ar...hot-dead-with-... You're making my point for me, thanks. 1 person dead, not 2, not 3 and 7 are not wounded. Reloading a crossbow is not equal to pulling a trigger however many times a second your auto or semi-auto weapon can fire. No I didn't make your point. I did make a point that you dont' need a gun to prove someones mortality. and if one isn't available, you run what you brung. But then again, cross bows aren't illegal to own nor do they need special licensing. And have proven to be quite stealth. Maybe a weapon of choice by ganstahs and assassins, depending on circumstances. But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Yeah, haven't heard about gangstahs using crossbows a whole lot but I do hear about a crazy bunch of handguns being out there and available cheap. Probably pick up several handguns and a bunch of ammo for the price of a decent crossbow. keep dreaming Really? *How's the market for stolen crossbows? *It's screaming brilliant in stolen handguns and they're butt cheap. No dreaming necessary. A stolen .357 on the streets of NYC can be worth up to $2-500.00 +. A44 mag can bring up to $1000.00 Crossbows? $150 will get you a new one. |
He's a great guy...
On 10/11/11 8:42 PM, Tim wrote:
On Oct 11, 2:54 pm, wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:58:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 10, 11:48 pm, wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 10, 4:31 pm, wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:35:45 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 9, 9:35 pm, wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:16:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...=3598647ebfe79... On Oct 9, 3:56 pm, wrote: On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:05:03 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 8, 6:40 pm, wrote: Let's get real, Tim. Guns are very good at what they're designed to do, kill things. I know, I use them around the farm for varmint control. They're very efficient. I'm assuming you wouldn't go out there to kill varmints with a sword, a knife or a bludgeon as long as you have an efficient weapon like a gun. If it would be more to your satisfaction, I'll bag the next groundhog with a compound bow. They work pretty good too! That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading. Ok, so now I'm getting the picture. You're wishing harm on me because I don't fit your views. Interesting..... Hey, if those varmints can mount an attack on the guy who's trying to kill 'em, I give 'em a lot of credit. I bet it'd supply the media with a fantastic story to cover for however much time it'd take to pick your bones clean. Too bad the guy in Cupertino didn't bring his bow and arrow instead. This Canadian did. http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/ar...hot-dead-with-... You're making my point for me, thanks. 1 person dead, not 2, not 3 and 7 are not wounded. Reloading a crossbow is not equal to pulling a trigger however many times a second your auto or semi-auto weapon can fire. No I didn't make your point. I did make a point that you dont' need a gun to prove someones mortality. and if one isn't available, you run what you brung. But then again, cross bows aren't illegal to own nor do they need special licensing. And have proven to be quite stealth. Maybe a weapon of choice by ganstahs and assassins, depending on circumstances. But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Yeah, haven't heard about gangstahs using crossbows a whole lot but I do hear about a crazy bunch of handguns being out there and available cheap. Probably pick up several handguns and a bunch of ammo for the price of a decent crossbow. keep dreaming Really? How's the market for stolen crossbows? It's screaming brilliant in stolen handguns and they're butt cheap. No dreaming necessary. A stolen .357 on the streets of NYC can be worth up to $2-500.00 +. A44 mag can bring up to $1000.00 Crossbows? $150 will get you a new one. Wow...a junky .357 revolver fetches that kinda dough? |
He's a great guy...
On Oct 11, 8:03*pm, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/11/11 8:42 PM, Tim wrote: On Oct 11, 2:54 pm, *wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:58:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 10, 11:48 pm, *wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 10, 4:31 pm, *wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:35:45 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 9, 9:35 pm, *wrote: On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:16:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...=3598647ebfe79... On Oct 9, 3:56 pm, *wrote: On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:05:03 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 8, 6:40 pm, *wrote: Let's get real, Tim. Guns are very good at what they're designed to do, kill things. I know, I use them around the farm for varmint control. They're very efficient. I'm assuming you wouldn't go out there to kill varmints with a sword, a knife or a bludgeon as long as you have an efficient weapon like a gun. If it would be more to your satisfaction, I'll bag the next groundhog with a compound bow. They work pretty good too! That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading. Ok, so now I'm getting the picture. You're wishing harm on me because I don't fit your views. Interesting..... Hey, if those varmints can mount an attack on the guy who's trying to kill 'em, I give 'em a lot of credit. I bet it'd supply the media with a fantastic story to cover for however much time it'd take to pick your bones clean. Too bad the guy in Cupertino didn't bring his bow and arrow instead. This Canadian did. http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/ar...hot-dead-with-... You're making my point for me, thanks. 1 person dead, not 2, not 3 and 7 are not wounded. Reloading a crossbow is not equal to pulling a trigger however many times a second your auto or semi-auto weapon can fire. No I didn't make your point. I did make a point that you dont' need a gun to prove someones mortality. and if one isn't available, you run what you brung. But then again, cross bows aren't illegal to own nor do they need special licensing. And have proven to be quite stealth. Maybe a weapon of choice by ganstahs and assassins, depending on circumstances. But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Yeah, haven't heard about gangstahs using crossbows a whole lot but I do hear about a crazy bunch of handguns being out there and available cheap. Probably pick up several handguns and a bunch of ammo for the price of a decent crossbow. keep dreaming Really? *How's the market for stolen crossbows? *It's screaming brilliant in stolen handguns and they're butt cheap. No dreaming necessary. A stolen .357 on the streets of NYC can be worth up to $2-500.00 +. A44 mag can bring up to $1000.00 Crossbows? $150 will get you a new one. Wow...a junky .357 revolver fetches that kinda dough? Hot on the NYC streets. Yep. |
He's a great guy...
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...lled-deer.html |
He's a great guy...
On Oct 12, 1:10*am, jps wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. *Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...10/11/ns-farme... A deer isn't a groundhog. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8PfY3M3yly4 |
He's a great guy...
On Oct 12, 9:18*am, Tim wrote:
On Oct 12, 1:10*am, jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. *Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...10/11/ns-farme... A deer isn't a groundhog. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8PfY3M3yly4 Did you guys see this video? Looks like the wildlife have had enough! http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/835...wls-over-biker |
He's a great guy...
On 10/12/2011 2:10 AM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...lled-deer.html Beastiality gone wrong? |
He's a great guy...
On Oct 12, 9:38*am, Drifter wrote:
On 10/12/2011 2:10 AM, jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. *Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...10/11/ns-farme... Beastiality gone wrong? Wow, Stinky One...... shows where your mind dwells. All those Wavy Navy years did have an effect on you. |
He's a great guy...
On 10/12/2011 8:33 AM, North Star wrote:
On Oct 12, 9:18 am, wrote: On Oct 12, 1:10 am, wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...10/11/ns-farme... A deer isn't a groundhog. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8PfY3M3yly4 Did you guys see this video? Looks like the wildlife have had enough! http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/835...wls-over-biker Wild animals in Africa attackind humans. Who ever heard of such a thing. |
He's a great guy...
On 10/12/2011 8:48 AM, North Star wrote:
On Oct 12, 9:38 am, wrote: On 10/12/2011 2:10 AM, jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...10/11/ns-farme... Beastiality gone wrong? Wow, Stinky One...... shows where your mind dwells. All those Wavy Navy years did have an effect on you. Ya know Donny. Yur head was designed to be a butt plug. Any time you try to use it for something else, you fail to measure up to our standards. |
He's a great guy...
In article bfb81b1d-e065-4ef2-8731-47d243a413ac@
20g2000prg.googlegroups.com, says... On Oct 12, 9:38*am, Drifter wrote: On 10/12/2011 2:10 AM, jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. *Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...10/11/ns-farme... Beastiality gone wrong? Wow, Stinky One...... shows where your mind dwells. All those Wavy Navy years did have an effect on you. At least he's not Harry's personal butt plug like you, Suckling Don. |
He's a great guy...
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:18:19 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Oct 12, 1:10*am, jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. *Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...10/11/ns-farme... A deer isn't a groundhog. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8PfY3M3yly4 I would've expected a little sense of humor, but no. You take our interaction a little too seriously. I have strong feelings about guns but I have absolutely no desire for you to get attacked by groundhogs. Although I think it'd be funny. |
He's a great guy...
On Oct 12, 12:29*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:18:19 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 1:10*am, jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. *Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...10/11/ns-farme.... A deer isn't a groundhog. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8PfY3M3yly4 I would've expected a little sense of humor, but no. *You take our interaction a little too seriously. *I have strong feelings about guns but I have absolutely no desire for you to get attacked by groundhogs. Although I think it'd be funny. I have no desire for you to get shot either. And now would it be appropriate to use your line of - "Although I think it'd be funny."??? |
He's a great guy...
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:41:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Oct 12, 12:29*pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:18:19 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 1:10*am, jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. *Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...10/11/ns-farme... A deer isn't a groundhog. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8PfY3M3yly4 I would've expected a little sense of humor, but no. *You take our interaction a little too seriously. *I have strong feelings about guns but I have absolutely no desire for you to get attacked by groundhogs. Although I think it'd be funny. I have no desire for you to get shot either. And now would it be appropriate to use your line of - "Although I think it'd be funny."??? There's no humor in someone getting shot, unless it's Dick Cheney and I'd categorize that as joy. However, a rodent killer getting his comeuppance via groundhogs sounds like a pretty entertaining scene. I could see it winning funniest home video if the groundhogs just chased the guy away. I don't want to see your bones picked clean by any herbivore, it'd upset their digestive systems for days. |
He's a great guy...
On Oct 12, 8:44*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:41:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 12:29*pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:18:19 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 1:10*am, jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. *Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...10/11/ns-farme... A deer isn't a groundhog. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8PfY3M3yly4 I would've expected a little sense of humor, but no. *You take our interaction a little too seriously. *I have strong feelings about guns but I have absolutely no desire for you to get attacked by groundhogs. Although I think it'd be funny. I have no desire for you to get shot either. And now would it be appropriate to use your line of - *"Although I think it'd be funny."??? There's no humor in someone getting shot, unless it's Dick Cheney and I'd categorize that as joy. However, a rodent killer getting his comeuppance via groundhogs sounds like a pretty entertaining scene. *I could see it winning funniest home video if the groundhogs just chased the guy away. I don't want to see your bones picked clean by any herbivore, it'd upset their digestive systems for days. Thanks for keeping up your tradition of wishing harm on me. |
He's a great guy...
|
He's a great guy...
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:34:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Oct 12, 8:44*pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:41:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 12:29*pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:18:19 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 1:10*am, jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. *Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...10/11/ns-farme... A deer isn't a groundhog. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8PfY3M3yly4 I would've expected a little sense of humor, but no. *You take our interaction a little too seriously. *I have strong feelings about guns but I have absolutely no desire for you to get attacked by groundhogs. Although I think it'd be funny. I have no desire for you to get shot either. And now would it be appropriate to use your line of - *"Although I think it'd be funny."??? There's no humor in someone getting shot, unless it's Dick Cheney and I'd categorize that as joy. However, a rodent killer getting his comeuppance via groundhogs sounds like a pretty entertaining scene. *I could see it winning funniest home video if the groundhogs just chased the guy away. I don't want to see your bones picked clean by any herbivore, it'd upset their digestive systems for days. Thanks for keeping up your tradition of wishing harm on me. Hot air, Tim. I don't wish harm on you and have said so but that's not going to keep you from saying so. Repetitive slurs are among conservative's most oft used tools these days so I understand how you've come to using this tactic. Have a most pleasant evening. |
He's a great guy...
On 10/12/2011 10:34 PM, Tim wrote:
On Oct 12, 8:44 pm, wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:41:20 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 12, 12:29 pm, wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:18:19 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 12, 1:10 am, wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...10/11/ns-farme... A deer isn't a groundhog. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8PfY3M3yly4 I would've expected a little sense of humor, but no. You take our interaction a little too seriously. I have strong feelings about guns but I have absolutely no desire for you to get attacked by groundhogs. Although I think it'd be funny. I have no desire for you to get shot either. And now would it be appropriate to use your line of - "Although I think it'd be funny."??? There's no humor in someone getting shot, unless it's Dick Cheney and I'd categorize that as joy. However, a rodent killer getting his comeuppance via groundhogs sounds like a pretty entertaining scene. I could see it winning funniest home video if the groundhogs just chased the guy away. I don't want to see your bones picked clean by any herbivore, it'd upset their digestive systems for days. Thanks for keeping up your tradition of wishing harm on me. You, Cheney, and anybody who isn't a cowardly fleabagger like him... |
He's a great guy...
On Oct 12, 9:41*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:34:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 8:44 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:41:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 12:29 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:18:19 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 1:10 am, jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...10/11/ns-farme... A deer isn't a groundhog. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8PfY3M3yly4 I would've expected a little sense of humor, but no. You take our interaction a little too seriously. I have strong feelings about guns but I have absolutely no desire for you to get attacked by groundhogs. Although I think it'd be funny. I have no desire for you to get shot either. And now would it be appropriate to use your line of - "Although I think it'd be funny."??? There's no humor in someone getting shot, unless it's Dick Cheney and I'd categorize that as joy. However, a rodent killer getting his comeuppance via groundhogs sounds like a pretty entertaining scene. I could see it winning funniest home video if the groundhogs just chased the guy away. I don't want to see your bones picked clean by any herbivore, it'd upset their digestive systems for days. Thanks for keeping up your tradition of wishing harm on me. Hot air, Tim. *I don't wish harm on you and have said so but that's not going to keep you from saying so. "That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading. " Repetitive slurs are among conservative's most oft used tools these days so I understand how you've come to using this tactic. You mean, line nom-de-plumes constant and repetitive "you're a moron" line? hmmm, I didn't know she was a conservative... Have a most pleasant evening. I definitely plan on it. We had an excellent mid-week church service this evening, looked up some sacred voodoo religious verses, and sacrificed a groundhog to our Rambo Jesus, you know, the Jewish guy that died (that is if he ever existed?) But tonight it wasn't one of those conclave things, so i left my white "hoodie" at home. but we did discuss the how we were going to abort another abortionist ... Yes, most pleasant evening... ?;^ ) |
He's a great guy...
On 10/12/2011 11:31 PM, Tim wrote:
Have a most pleasant evening. I definitely plan on it. We had an excellent mid-week church service this evening, looked up some sacred voodoo religious verses, and sacrificed a groundhog to our Rambo Jesus, you know, the Jewish guy that died (that is if he ever existed?) But tonight it wasn't one of those conclave things, so i left my white "hoodie" at home. but we did discuss the how we were going to abort another abortionist ... Yes, most pleasant evening... ?;^ ) LOL. we prayed to the God of filter oil this week, and our prayers were answered. For four years JL Pinkx has been chasing her mentor/idol, a locally based WMA Pro National rider.. This week during a training session with Jenna (at her request), Jess paced her for three laps, never letting the girl out of her sights. She didn't quite "put a tire under her" but she didn't lose a beat to that Blue Plate Pro rider, who was riding a $30,000 bike;). (Note: practice is different than racing, but we'll take it on our bone stocker... well almost:). Team Smith (the girl noted above) approached us after the Southwick Nationals last month and offered to train with *us*, Jessica was scouted by a Factory Sponsored Pro camp over the summer (she was on a short list of four girls), and a local club is courting us to come race for them next season. She already has two sponsors, not to mention suspension provided by Factory Connection, and an 1100 dollar Titanium Header/exhaust provided by Pro Circuit, a personal trainer, a former Pro GPX racer is her pt coach, she does her own engine work, and I mean, deep engine work. Last week we were introduced to the club noted above at a pre-race meeting, and before the race the announcer (who knows Jessi well through her good friend, WMA Pro rider, sixth in points for the season, and rookie of the year, Marissa Markelon) introduced us as "the Ingersoll family, a great family out of Hartford will be helping with the safety crew tonight. You can be assured your riders will be in good hands with these experienced racers on the team. Jessica, with the pink hair over in the paddock area (the announcer pointed from the officials stand) we feel is the next up and coming WMA pro rider to come from our area, we look forward to having the Ingersolls as a part of our organization next season and helping her achieve her goal..." I could go on, there is so much more like the gym work and the diet too. Well, I gotta' go do some suspension work on our pretty much stock "minibike", after I put on my green pants and fancy Peter Pan hat;) Later, see you on TV.. oh, I figure two to three years...;) Yes, a most pleasant, and productive life. Thanks to God, we are truly blessed to have such focus at such a young age...;) |
He's a great guy...
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Oct 12, 9:41*pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:34:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 8:44 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:41:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 12:29 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:18:19 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 1:10 am, jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...10/11/ns-farme... A deer isn't a groundhog. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8PfY3M3yly4 I would've expected a little sense of humor, but no. You take our interaction a little too seriously. I have strong feelings about guns but I have absolutely no desire for you to get attacked by groundhogs. Although I think it'd be funny. I have no desire for you to get shot either. And now would it be appropriate to use your line of - "Although I think it'd be funny."??? There's no humor in someone getting shot, unless it's Dick Cheney and I'd categorize that as joy. However, a rodent killer getting his comeuppance via groundhogs sounds like a pretty entertaining scene. I could see it winning funniest home video if the groundhogs just chased the guy away. I don't want to see your bones picked clean by any herbivore, it'd upset their digestive systems for days. Thanks for keeping up your tradition of wishing harm on me. Hot air, Tim. *I don't wish harm on you and have said so but that's not going to keep you from saying so. "That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading. You are far too literal my friend. It was a funny premise (a la Caddy Shack) that was reflective of what happened in Cupertino. There was no way in hell for anyone to tackle that son of a bitch before he squeezed off several more rounds taking 3 people's lives and wounding several more. Crossbows don't reload so quick and folks might have had a good chance to get to him after his very first victim. The shocking part of this for me is that you refuse to acknowledge the common sense here. Whatever, if you think you're being straight with yourself, that's all that matters. I understand how you'd lose electronic rec.boats face if you dared agree with a liberal gun hater. Repetitive slurs are among conservative's most oft used tools these days so I understand how you've come to using this tactic. You mean, line nom-de-plumes constant and repetitive "you're a moron" line? hmmm, I didn't know she was a conservative... Have a most pleasant evening. I definitely plan on it. We had an excellent mid-week church service this evening, looked up some sacred voodoo religious verses, and sacrificed a groundhog to our Rambo Jesus, you know, the Jewish guy that died (that is if he ever existed?) But tonight it wasn't one of those conclave things, so i left my white "hoodie" at home. but we did discuss the how we were going to abort another abortionist ... Yes, most pleasant evening... ?;^ ) No one here mistakes you for one of the above loons. There's at least a handful of sane Christians in America and you're certainly one. And, someday you'll come to the conclusion that I was right about guns and American society not mixing well. In the meanwhile, you might want to check out the crossbow incident that just happened in Seal Beach, CA. |
He's a great guy...
On Oct 12, 11:00*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 9:41 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:34:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 8:44 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:41:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 12:29 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:18:19 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 12, 1:10 am, jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:23:37 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are herbivores. That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their family members or close friends. Just for you. Herbivores evidently do get ****ed off... http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br...10/11/ns-farme... A deer isn't a groundhog. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8PfY3M3yly4 I would've expected a little sense of humor, but no. You take our interaction a little too seriously. I have strong feelings about guns but I have absolutely no desire for you to get attacked by groundhogs. Although I think it'd be funny. I have no desire for you to get shot either. And now would it be appropriate to use your line of - "Although I think it'd be funny."??? There's no humor in someone getting shot, unless it's Dick Cheney and I'd categorize that as joy. However, a rodent killer getting his comeuppance via groundhogs sounds like a pretty entertaining scene. I could see it winning funniest home video if the groundhogs just chased the guy away. I don't want to see your bones picked clean by any herbivore, it'd upset their digestive systems for days. Thanks for keeping up your tradition of wishing harm on me. Hot air, Tim. I don't wish harm on you and have said so but that's not going to keep you from saying so. "That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading. You are far too literal my friend. *It was a funny premise (a la Caddy Shack) that was reflective of what happened in Cupertino. *There was no way in hell for anyone to tackle that son of a bitch before he squeezed off several more rounds taking 3 people's lives and wounding several more. *Crossbows don't reload so quick and folks might have had a good chance to get to him after his very first victim. The shocking part of this for me is that you refuse to acknowledge the common sense here. *Whatever, if you think you're being straight with yourself, that's all that matters. *I understand how you'd lose electronic rec.boats face if you dared agree with a liberal gun hater. Repetitive slurs are among conservative's most oft used tools these days so I understand how you've come to using this tactic. You mean, line nom-de-plumes constant and repetitive "you're a moron" line? hmmm, I didn't know she was a conservative... Have a most pleasant evening. I definitely plan on it. We had an excellent mid-week church service this evening, looked up some sacred voodoo religious verses, and sacrificed a groundhog to our *Rambo Jesus, you know, the Jewish guy that died (that is if he ever existed?) *But tonight it wasn't one of those conclave things, so i left my white "hoodie" at home. but we did discuss the how we were going to abort another abortionist ... Yes, most pleasant evening... ?;^ ) No one here mistakes you for one of the above loons. *There's at least a handful of sane Christians in America and you're certainly one. And, someday you'll come to the conclusion that I was right about guns and American society not mixing well. In the meanwhile, you might want to check out the crossbow incident that just happened in Seal Beach, CA. Like people have been saying;. Murder is extremely evil, but you don't have to have a gun to kill people. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com