And yes...
 

On Oct 1, 7:12*pm, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 7:04 PM, JustWait wrote:





On 10/1/2011 6:34 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 6:30 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/1/2011 6:04 PM, wildaboutharry wrote:
On 10/1/2011 1:09 PM, X ` Man wrote:
...Virginia is still backwards...

The Diary of Anne Frank was still being banned in 2010.
The Diary of a Young Girl: The Definitive Edition
By Anne Frank, Otto M. Frank, Mirjam Pressler, Susan Massotty
Challenged at the Culpeper County, Va. public
schools (2010) by a parent requesting that her
daughter not be required to read the book aloud.
Initially, it was reported that officials decided to
stop assigning a version of Anne Frank’s diary,
one of the most enduring symbols of the atrocities
of the Nazi regime, due to the complaint that the
book includes sexual material and homosexual
themes. The director of instruction announced
the edition published on the fiftieth anniversary
of Frank’s death in a concentration camp will not
be used in the future despite the fact the school
system did not follow its own policy for handling
complaints. The remarks set off a hailstorm of
criticism online and brought international attention
to the 7,600-student school system in rural Virginia.
The superintendent said, however, that the book
will remain a part of English classes, although it
may be taught at a different grade level.

There you go. Homosexual themes. Just what we need to get Harry
aroused.

If you read the article, they are keeping it in the system, it's just
that they are not going to start the indoctrination early enough for
progressives...

You read Harry's nonsense? How odd.

Well, I don't see it directly but I read this re-quote and saw that the
whole pretense of his post, was as usual, a lie...

Uh, school officials decided to stop assigning the reading of the diary
and, apparently, public pressure got them to partially reverse that
decision. And, the article notes, the school officials didn't even
follow their own policies for handling a parental complaint.

Anne Frank was about 16 when the Nazis killed her.

My theory is that the parent who complained was a fundamentalist. Just a
theory.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Anne Frank died from disease, not from the Nazis. She MAY have died in
their care, but not " from " them.

And yes...
 

On 10/2/11 7:55 PM, *e#c wrote:
On Oct 1, 7:12 pm, X ` wrote:
On 10/1/11 7:04 PM, JustWait wrote:





On 10/1/2011 6:34 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 6:30 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/1/2011 6:04 PM, wildaboutharry wrote:
On 10/1/2011 1:09 PM, X ` Man wrote:
...Virginia is still backwards...

The Diary of Anne Frank was still being banned in 2010.
The Diary of a Young Girl: The Definitive Edition
By Anne Frank, Otto M. Frank, Mirjam Pressler, Susan Massotty
Challenged at the Culpeper County, Va. public
schools (2010) by a parent requesting that her
daughter not be required to read the book aloud.
Initially, it was reported that officials decided to
stop assigning a version of Anne Frank’s diary,
one of the most enduring symbols of the atrocities
of the Nazi regime, due to the complaint that the
book includes sexual material and homosexual
themes. The director of instruction announced
the edition published on the fiftieth anniversary
of Frank’s death in a concentration camp will not
be used in the future despite the fact the school
system did not follow its own policy for handling
complaints. The remarks set off a hailstorm of
criticism online and brought international attention
to the 7,600-student school system in rural Virginia.
The superintendent said, however, that the book
will remain a part of English classes, although it
may be taught at a different grade level.

There you go. Homosexual themes. Just what we need to get Harry
aroused.

If you read the article, they are keeping it in the system, it's just
that they are not going to start the indoctrination early enough for
progressives...

You read Harry's nonsense? How odd.

Well, I don't see it directly but I read this re-quote and saw that the
whole pretense of his post, was as usual, a lie...

Uh, school officials decided to stop assigning the reading of the diary
and, apparently, public pressure got them to partially reverse that
decision. And, the article notes, the school officials didn't even
follow their own policies for handling a parental complaint.

Anne Frank was about 16 when the Nazis killed her.

My theory is that the parent who complained was a fundamentalist. Just a
theory.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Anne Frank died from disease, not from the Nazis. She MAY have died in
their care, but not " from " them.


Ms. Frank died from typhus in a Nazi death camp. The Nazis were
responsible for her death. Their treatment and lack of treatment killed her.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

And yes...
 

On Oct 1, 12:09*pm, X ` Man wrote:
...Virginia is still backwards...

The Diary of Anne Frank was still being banned in 2010.
The Diary of a Young Girl: The Definitive Edition
By Anne Frank, Otto M. Frank, Mirjam Pressler, Susan Massotty
Challenged at the Culpeper County, Va. public
schools (2010) by a parent requesting that her
daughter not be required to read the book aloud.
Initially, it was reported that officials decided to
stop assigning a version of Anne Frank’s diary,
one of the most enduring symbols of the atrocities
of the Nazi regime, due to the complaint that the
book includes sexual material and homosexual
themes. The director of instruction announced
the edition published on the fiftieth anniversary
of Frank’s death in a concentration camp will not
be used in the future despite the fact the school
system did not follow its own policy for handling
complaints. The remarks set off a hailstorm of
criticism online and brought international attention
to the 7,600-student school system in rural Virginia.
The superintendent said, however, that the book
will remain a part of English classes, although it
may be taught at a different grade level.
--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

Are you disappointed that they've been holding out on the 'good stuff'
for you, Krause?

And yes...
 

On Oct 2, 6:53*pm, "*e#c" wrote:
On Oct 1, 6:11*pm, TopBassDog wrote:

On Oct 1, 5:04*pm, wildaboutharry wrote:

On 10/1/2011 1:09 PM, X ` Man wrote:
...Virginia is still backwards...

There you go. Homosexual themes. Just what we need to get Harry aroused.

* Is this the same Krause, who supposedly hates all bigotry yet dwells
in the state which is the home of the "Klan?"

Gee, I didnt know Harry lived in Mississippi, or Georgia !

Expand your knowledge and look up Rising Sun, Maryland.

And yes...
 

On Oct 3, 12:28*am, TopBassDog wrote:
On Oct 2, 6:53*pm, "*e#c" wrote:

On Oct 1, 6:11*pm, TopBassDog wrote:

On Oct 1, 5:04*pm, wildaboutharry wrote:

On 10/1/2011 1:09 PM, X ` Man wrote:
...Virginia is still backwards...

There you go. Homosexual themes. Just what we need to get Harry aroused.

* Is this the same Krause, who supposedly hates all bigotry yet dwells
in the state which is the home of the "Klan?"

Gee, I didnt know Harry lived in Mississippi, or Georgia !

Expand your knowledge and look up Rising Sun, Maryland.

We got the "progressives" up here too. Me and Jess just got uninvited
from a local private track because we brought her trainer out there
one day, and the locals didn't like his, uh, "tan"...

And yes...
 

On 10/3/2011 12:22 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Oct 1, 12:09 pm, X ` wrote:
...Virginia is still backwards...

The superintendent said, however, that the book
will remain a part of English classes, although it
may be taught at a different grade level.
--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

Are you disappointed that they've been holding out on the 'good stuff'
for you, Krause?

Well, if you read the article you will see that Virginia isn't backwards
at all, it just isn't ready to indoctrinate 8 year olds to homosexuality
soon enough for the "regressives" here... Remember, "compromise" to a
regressive is only a dishonest deal made as a means to an end...

--
I don't know why they call themselves "Progressive". "Hoping for Change"
from a democratic republic, to a 14th century type aristocratic
theocracy is actually quite "regressive".

And yes...
 

On 10/3/11 1:59 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/3/2011 12:22 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Oct 1, 12:09 pm, X ` wrote:
...Virginia is still backwards...

The superintendent said, however, that the book
will remain a part of English classes, although it
may be taught at a different grade level.
--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

Are you disappointed that they've been holding out on the 'good stuff'
for you, Krause?

Well, if you read the article you will see that Virginia isn't backwards
at all, it just isn't ready to indoctrinate 8 year olds to homosexuality
soon enough for the "regressives" here... Remember, "compromise" to a
regressive is only a dishonest deal made as a means to an end...


You haven't read the book in question, and you never will. Your comments
on the book reflect your ignorance of it.



--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

And yes...
 

On 10/3/2011 6:25 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/3/11 1:59 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/3/2011 12:22 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Oct 1, 12:09 pm, X ` wrote:
...Virginia is still backwards...

The superintendent said, however, that the book
will remain a part of English classes, although it
may be taught at a different grade level.
--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

Are you disappointed that they've been holding out on the 'good stuff'
for you, Krause?

Well, if you read the article you will see that Virginia isn't backwards
at all, it just isn't ready to indoctrinate 8 year olds to homosexuality
soon enough for the "regressives" here... Remember, "compromise" to a
regressive is only a dishonest deal made as a means to an end...


You haven't read the book in question, and you never will. Your comments
on the book reflect your ignorance of it.




Have you read Chapman's?

And yes...
 

On 10/3/2011 1:01 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Oct 3, 12:28 am, wrote:
On Oct 2, 6:53 pm, wrote:

On Oct 1, 6:11 pm, wrote:

On Oct 1, 5:04 pm, wrote:

On 10/1/2011 1:09 PM, X ` Man wrote:
...Virginia is still backwards...

There you go. Homosexual themes. Just what we need to get Harry aroused.

Is this the same Krause, who supposedly hates all bigotry yet dwells
in the state which is the home of the "Klan?"

Gee, I didnt know Harry lived in Mississippi, or Georgia !

Expand your knowledge and look up Rising Sun, Maryland.

We got the "progressives" up here too. Me and Jess just got uninvited
from a local private track because we brought her trainer out there
one day, and the locals didn't like his, uh, "tan"...

Are you kidding? That whole corner of the U.S. is rife with those dregs
of society.

And yes...
 

In article ,
says...

On 10/3/2011 12:22 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Oct 1, 12:09 pm, X ` wrote:
...Virginia is still backwards...

The superintendent said, however, that the book
will remain a part of English classes, although it
may be taught at a different grade level.
--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

Are you disappointed that they've been holding out on the 'good stuff'
for you, Krause?

Well, if you read the article you will see that Virginia isn't backwards
at all, it just isn't ready to indoctrinate 8 year olds to homosexuality
soon enough for the "regressives" here... Remember, "compromise" to a
regressive is only a dishonest deal made as a means to an end...

Oh, man, you are insane!! And the funny part is, that you think that
banning books, therefore choosing what books YOU want MY child to read,
that that's NOT "indoctrination"???