| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
There is commonality..
In article ,
says... On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote: On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote: ...between the United States and Pakistan: *Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and extremism in the country. Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial. Who was wrong? (Let's see some hypocrisy shine!) Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them. Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen? Your hypocrisy is showing. Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period. Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing. And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the treasury for himself and his cronies... You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest groups? |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is commonality..
On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote: On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote: ...between the United States and Pakistan: *Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and extremism in the country. Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial. Who was wrong? (Let's see some hypocrisy shine!) Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them. Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen? Your hypocrisy is showing. Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period. Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing. And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the treasury for himself and his cronies... You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest groups? Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off cronies since the day he got elected.. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is commonality..
In article ,
says... On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote: On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote: ...between the United States and Pakistan: *Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and extremism in the country. Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial. Who was wrong? (Let's see some hypocrisy shine!) Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them. Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen? Your hypocrisy is showing. Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period. Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing. And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the treasury for himself and his cronies... You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest groups? Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off cronies since the day he got elected.. And no other president bailed out any companies? Is that what you are saying? |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is commonality..
On 10/2/2011 11:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote: On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote: ...between the United States and Pakistan: *Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and extremism in the country. Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial. Who was wrong? (Let's see some hypocrisy shine!) Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them. Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen? Your hypocrisy is showing. Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period. Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing. And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the treasury for himself and his cronies... You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest groups? Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off cronies since the day he got elected.. And no other president bailed out any companies? Is that what you are saying? Not talking about Bush, but Obama has taken it to another level.. Bundle a hundred thousand to Obama, and you get back a half a billion... pretty good investment of others money, don't 'cha think? |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is commonality..
In article ,
says... On 10/2/2011 11:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote: On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote: ...between the United States and Pakistan: *Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and extremism in the country. Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial. Who was wrong? (Let's see some hypocrisy shine!) Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them. Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen? Your hypocrisy is showing. Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period. Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing. And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the treasury for himself and his cronies... You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest groups? Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off cronies since the day he got elected.. And no other president bailed out any companies? Is that what you are saying? Not talking about Bush, but Obama has taken it to another level.. Bundle a hundred thousand to Obama, and you get back a half a billion... pretty good investment of others money, don't 'cha think? Prove that. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is commonality..
On 10/2/2011 1:49 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On 10/2/2011 11:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote: On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote: ...between the United States and Pakistan: *Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and extremism in the country. Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial. Who was wrong? (Let's see some hypocrisy shine!) Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them. Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen? Your hypocrisy is showing. Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period. Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing. And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the treasury for himself and his cronies... You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest groups? Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off cronies since the day he got elected.. And no other president bailed out any companies? Is that what you are saying? Not talking about Bush, but Obama has taken it to another level.. Bundle a hundred thousand to Obama, and you get back a half a billion... pretty good investment of others money, don't 'cha think? Prove that. Pffffttt. that all you got.. You know good well what's been going on. Even the dem pundits aren't denying it anymore, just saying it's "politics as usual" which of course means, we get away with it and you don't, just ask Tom Delay...snerk Anyway, you have just proven you are either uninformed, or lying like so many others here do when the facts don't line up for them.. Sorry, but you will have to play with someone else... |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is commonality..
On Oct 2, 10:23*am, JustWait wrote:
On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote: On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote: ...between the United States and Pakistan: *Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and extremism in the country. Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial. Who was wrong? (Let's see some hypocrisy shine!) Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them. Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen? Your hypocrisy is showing. Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period. Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing. And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the treasury for himself and his cronies... You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest groups? Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off cronies since the day he got elected.. Now that you've mentioned "crony -ism, " it looks like Madame Pelosi must defend her brother-in-law. Actually, she must defend herself BEFORE the allegations and indictments come oozing to the surface. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...lar-plant.html |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is commonality..
On 10/2/2011 2:19 PM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Oct 2, 10:23 am, wrote: On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote: On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote: ...between the United States and Pakistan: *Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and extremism in the country. Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial. Who was wrong? (Let's see some hypocrisy shine!) Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them. Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen? Your hypocrisy is showing. Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period. Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing. And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the treasury for himself and his cronies... You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest groups? Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off cronies since the day he got elected.. Now that you've mentioned "crony -ism, " it looks like Madame Pelosi must defend her brother-in-law. Actually, she must defend herself BEFORE the allegations and indictments come oozing to the surface. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...lar-plant.html Yup, and they snuck it out on the last day, just under the wire when they know already the technology is going to fail, with a 100% certainty but hey, you know those California Congresswomen have a golden goose here and they have no intention of stopping.. even after we vote them out... |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is commonality..
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 11:19:11 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog wrote:
On Oct 2, 10:23*am, JustWait wrote: On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote: On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote: ...between the United States and Pakistan: *Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and extremism in the country. Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial. Who was wrong? (Let's see some hypocrisy shine!) Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them. Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen? Your hypocrisy is showing. Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period. Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing. And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the treasury for himself and his cronies... You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest groups? Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off cronies since the day he got elected.. Now that you've mentioned "crony -ism, " it looks like Madame Pelosi must defend her brother-in-law. Actually, she must defend herself BEFORE the allegations and indictments come oozing to the surface. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...lar-plant.html Funny how that story never made it to NBC, CBS, or ABC. Didn't see it in the Washington Post either. Heard it on the radio a few days ago. |
Hybrid Mode
