| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
[Q] Waterproof Digital Cameras
Michael Daly wrote:
On 6-May-2004, (Eric) wrote: I can't help but to think that our increasing ability to manipulate individual atoms will offer significant improvements in all manufacturing processes. You watch too much Star Trek. Indeed I do. We can only manipulate individual atoms on an extremely small scale. Manipulating atoms on the scale of something like a camera lens is not possible now or in the immediate future. I will agree, but with the caveat that I am not familiar with what is happening behind all of the tightly closed doors where such research is going on. Have you got any idea how many atoms there are in a single lens element, let alone an entire assembly? Yep. Doesn't concern me. I am willing to wait until the camera I want to purchase is made available to me. I have no desire to own a camera just for the sake of owning a camera. If this means I won't be able to take pictures, that's fine...I have gotten along without one up to now and will continue to do so. I am curious, why are people so invested in my immediate purchase of a waterproof, digital camera? I have made it perfectly clear what I am willing to purchase and that I will not settle for anything less then what I am looking for...yet, people keep on telling me that I am wrong and I should follow their advice instead. You're welcome to continue to tell me I am wrong, but keep in mind that one nifty definition of insanity is to perform the same action over and over and over again, expecting a different result. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| waterproof shaft seal? | Boat Building | |||
| digital chart questions | Cruising | |||
| Canon WP-DC800 waterproof case for PowerShot 400 camera | General | |||
| waterproof digital cameras | General | |||
Threaded Mode
