Finally, the USA makes the top five...
 

On 22/09/2011 6:02 PM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:56:37 -0400, Wayne wrote:

On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:57:15 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

Babies can't vote...

Fetuses aren't babies.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

As in, "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another
worthless fetus."

Right.

========

And that is yet another religious discussion in a boating newsgroup.

No religion involved. Killing is killing. Some deserve it, babies don't.

-
"That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another
worthless fetus."

Simple solution if it is the man telling the woman what to do with her
womb. Transplant the fetus to the man. In theory it should work. Take
some hormones for the breast milk and a C-section for delivery.

I figure it this way. For the first 16 weeks, the woman has the
exclusive choice. After that there needs to be medical reason.

But oh know, the religious idiots will not respect peoples rights. Only
conformity.

Well, resistance is not futile.

--
First rule of holes: If you're in one, don't keep digging.
So in the hole, why do we insanely want more debt?

Finally, the USA makes the top five...
 

On 9/22/2011 9:00 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/09/2011 6:02 PM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:56:37 -0400, Wayne
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:57:15 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

Babies can't vote...

Fetuses aren't babies.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

As in, "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another
worthless fetus."

Right.

========

And that is yet another religious discussion in a boating newsgroup.

No religion involved. Killing is killing. Some deserve it, babies don't.

-
"That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another
worthless fetus."

Simple solution if it is the man telling the woman what to do with her
womb. Transplant the fetus to the man. In theory it should work. Take
some hormones for the breast milk and a C-section for delivery.

I figure it this way. For the first 16 weeks, the woman has the
exclusive choice. After that there needs to be medical reason.

But oh know, the religious idiots will not respect peoples rights. Only
conformity.

Well, resistance is not futile.


Well, if you want to go with the fringe, so be it. I am religious and I
vote for a womans right to choose. I trust the Lord will decide if she
did the right thing as I expect he will with me...

Finally, the USA makes the top five...
 

On Sep 22, 11:12*pm, JustWait wrote:
On 9/22/2011 9:00 PM, Canuck57 wrote:





On 22/09/2011 6:02 PM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:56:37 -0400, Wayne
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:57:15 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

Babies can't vote...

Fetuses aren't babies.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

As in, "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another
worthless fetus."

Right.

========

And that is yet another religious discussion in a boating newsgroup.

No religion involved. Killing is killing. Some deserve it, babies don't.

Finally, the USA makes the top five...
 

On 9/22/11 10:12 PM, JustWait wrote:

I am religious

What are you, a pagan?




--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

Finally, the USA makes the top five...
 

In article d9d48428-577a-41ac-999c-
,
says...

On Sep 22, 11:12*pm, JustWait wrote:
On 9/22/2011 9:00 PM, Canuck57 wrote:





On 22/09/2011 6:02 PM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:56:37 -0400, Wayne
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:57:15 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

Babies can't vote...

Fetuses aren't babies.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

As in, "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another
worthless fetus."

Right.

========

And that is yet another religious discussion in a boating newsgroup.

No religion involved. Killing is killing. Some deserve it, babies don't.

-
"That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another
worthless fetus."

Simple solution if it is the man telling the woman what to do with her
womb. Transplant the fetus to the man. In theory it should work. Take
some hormones for the breast milk and a C-section for delivery.

I figure it this way. For the first 16 weeks, the woman has the
exclusive choice. After that there needs to be medical reason.

But oh know, the religious idiots will not respect peoples rights. Only
conformity.

Well, resistance is not futile.

Well, if you want to go with the fringe, so be it. I am religious and I
vote for a womans right to choose. I trust the Lord will decide if she
did the right thing as I expect he will with me...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh.. He's gonna have a good time when he gets his hands on you!
"religious" indeed!

You too, Suckling Don.

Finally, the USA makes the top five...
 

In article ,
says...

On 9/22/11 7:56 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:57:15 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

Babies can't vote...

Fetuses aren't babies.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

As in, "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another
worthless fetus."

Right.

========

And that is yet another religious discussion in a boating newsgroup.

Boating newsgroup? Rec.Boats hasn't been a boating newsgroup for years
and years.

Then what are you doing here except acting like the coward you are?