![]() |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
....in executions:
5. Pakistan Pakistan made the Top 5 despite a moratorium on executions imposed by the ruling Pakistan Peoples Party that prevented the government from executing anyone in 2009 or 2010. In 2007, 135 people were executed and 36 were in 2008. Despite the moratorium on executions, Pakistan continued to sentence people to death – 276 in 2009 and 365 in 2010 – and thousands of people remain on death row from previous sentences, as noted by Monitor correspondent Issam Ahmed. 4. United States The US, the only country in the Americas to execute people in the past few years, executed 46 people in 2010, down from the 2009 total of 52 but still a notable increase from the 2008 total of 37. The US has executed a total of 177 since 2007. Texas, Alabama, Ohio, Virginia, and Oklahoma are the states with the most executions since since 2007. 3. Iraq Iraq executed at least 120 people in 2009, but Amnesty International has been unable to confirm how many were executed in 2010 – the 2010 tally is “1+,” meaning Amnesty only knows that at least one person was executed. That person was Ali Hassan Al-Majid, better known as “Chemical Ali,” who was hung on Jan. 24, 2010. Despite the lack of numbers in 2010, Iraq still has the third most executions on the books since 2007, with at least 188 confirmed. Iraq also sentenced more people to death in 2009 than any other country other than China and has sentenced at least 1,129 people to death since 2007. 2. Iran After carrying out more than 300 executions a year in 2007, 2008, and 2009, Iran executed at least 252 people in 2010 and at least 1,303 since 2007. A large percentage of Iranian executions are punishment for drug-related offenses. Seventeen members of Iran’s Kurdish minority are also on death row for what the report called “political offenses.” Iran is also one of the few remaining countries to sentence people to death by stoning – the punishment for “adultery while married.” While no one was executed by stoning in 2010, at least 14 people were sentenced to it at the end of the year. 1. China China is far and away the global leader in terms of the number of people executed: It executed at least 470 people in 2007 and at least 1,718 in 2008. For 2009 and 2010, Amnesty's report only lists “thousands” because of the Chinese government’s stance that such statistics are state secrets. In 2010, China executed more people than the rest of the world combined, according to Amnesty International. According to the Death Sentences and Executions report, a large number of China’s death sentences are for drug-related offenses. Swiped from the Christian Science Monitor -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 9/20/2011 5:52 PM, X ` Man wrote:
....in executions: Go away kid. You bother me. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 20/09/2011 3:52 PM, X ` Man wrote:
...in executions: 5. Pakistan Pakistan made the Top 5 despite a moratorium on executions imposed by the ruling Pakistan Peoples Party that prevented the government from executing anyone in 2009 or 2010. In 2007, 135 people were executed and 36 were in 2008. Despite the moratorium on executions, Pakistan continued to sentence people to death – 276 in 2009 and 365 in 2010 – and thousands of people remain on death row from previous sentences, as noted by Monitor correspondent Issam Ahmed. 4. United States The US, the only country in the Americas to execute people in the past few years, executed 46 people in 2010, down from the 2009 total of 52 but still a notable increase from the 2008 total of 37. The US has executed a total of 177 since 2007. Texas, Alabama, Ohio, Virginia, and Oklahoma are the states with the most executions since since 2007. 3. Iraq Iraq executed at least 120 people in 2009, but Amnesty International has been unable to confirm how many were executed in 2010 – the 2010 tally is “1+,” meaning Amnesty only knows that at least one person was executed. That person was Ali Hassan Al-Majid, better known as “Chemical Ali,” who was hung on Jan. 24, 2010. Despite the lack of numbers in 2010, Iraq still has the third most executions on the books since 2007, with at least 188 confirmed. Iraq also sentenced more people to death in 2009 than any other country other than China and has sentenced at least 1,129 people to death since 2007. 2. Iran After carrying out more than 300 executions a year in 2007, 2008, and 2009, Iran executed at least 252 people in 2010 and at least 1,303 since 2007. A large percentage of Iranian executions are punishment for drug-related offenses. Seventeen members of Iran’s Kurdish minority are also on death row for what the report called “political offenses.” Iran is also one of the few remaining countries to sentence people to death by stoning – the punishment for “adultery while married.” While no one was executed by stoning in 2010, at least 14 people were sentenced to it at the end of the year. 1. China China is far and away the global leader in terms of the number of people executed: It executed at least 470 people in 2007 and at least 1,718 in 2008. For 2009 and 2010, Amnesty's report only lists “thousands” because of the Chinese government’s stance that such statistics are state secrets. In 2010, China executed more people than the rest of the world combined, according to Amnesty International. According to the Death Sentences and Executions report, a large number of China’s death sentences are for drug-related offenses. Swiped from the Christian Science Monitor Yep, and Chinese run their system for a fraction of the cost, far fewer re-offences, and no bull**** lawyers like Gaez swindling the system. Much less crime too, it isn't Club Fed over there. -- First rule of holes: If you're in one, don't keep digging. So in the hole, why do we insanely want more debt? |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
|
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
|
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 9/21/11 1:41 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 20/09/2011 6:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:52:14 -0400, X ` wrote: ...in executions: I suppose you should also look at the population. Agreed, adjust it to the population base and US isn't even in the top 20. And you get a relatively fair trial and are criminals. Whoosh. Civilized countries and even many semi-civilized countries have done away with executions. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:20:20 -0400, Drifter wrote:
On 9/20/2011 5:52 PM, X ` Man wrote: ....in executions: Go away kid. You bother me. He fails to mention that we are number one in baby killings. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 9/21/2011 2:08 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/21/11 1:41 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 20/09/2011 6:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:52:14 -0400, X ` wrote: ...in executions: I suppose you should also look at the population. Agreed, adjust it to the population base and US isn't even in the top 20. And you get a relatively fair trial and are criminals. Whoosh. Civilized countries and even many semi-civilized countries have done away with executions. So where do they warehouse those capital offense criminals that can't be done away with? |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 9/21/2011 2:33 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:20:20 -0400, wrote: On 9/20/2011 5:52 PM, X ` Man wrote: ....in executions: Go away kid. You bother me. He fails to mention that we are number one in baby killings. I'll bet Harry is proud of that fact. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 9/21/11 2:33 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:20:20 -0400, wrote: On 9/20/2011 5:52 PM, X ` Man wrote: ....in executions: Go away kid. You bother me. He fails to mention that we are number one in baby killings. snerk What the **** do you care about fetuses? If they go full term and are born, you sure don't give a **** what happens to him. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 9/21/2011 3:07 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/21/11 2:33 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:20:20 -0400, wrote: On 9/20/2011 5:52 PM, X ` Man wrote: ....in executions: Go away kid. You bother me. He fails to mention that we are number one in baby killings. snerk What the **** do you care about fetuses? If they go full term and are born, you sure don't give a **** what happens to him. You concede that fetuses are unborn babies. Now we're cooking. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
|
Quote:
The US has a much higher violent crime rate than countries which have abolished the death penalty. That shows how ineffective it is . A huge porportion of those executed are guilty of nothing more than not having enough money to "Purchase" justice, making poverty, and not being white enough, capital offences. And they call that "Justice?" |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:08:56 -0400, wrote:
Preventing a known killer with homicidal tendencies from continuing what comes natural is not wrong... even if it involves ending his/her life. Yes, I know.... Texas is too quick on the draw...... but that doesn't make everybody wrong.... ==== And best of all, there are no repeat offenders. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 21/09/2011 4:48 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:08:56 -0400, wrote: Preventing a known killer with homicidal tendencies from continuing what comes natural is not wrong... even if it involves ending his/her life. Yes, I know.... Texas is too quick on the draw...... but that doesn't make everybody wrong.... ==== And best of all, there are no repeat offenders. Or let the liberals pay for his keep. This notion of taxing everyone for criminals and liberal ideals well, needs to end. -- First rule of holes: If you're in one, don't keep digging. So in the hole, why do we insanely want more debt? |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
X ` Man wrote:
On 9/21/11 2:33 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:20:20 -0400, wrote: On 9/20/2011 5:52 PM, X ` Man wrote: ....in executions: Go away kid. You bother me. He fails to mention that we are number one in baby killings. snerk What the **** do you care about fetuses? If they go full term and are born, you sure don't give a **** what happens to him. What's with the crazy profanity? You are one ****ed up individual, Krause! -HB |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 9/21/2011 2:33 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:20:20 -0400, wrote: On 9/20/2011 5:52 PM, X ` Man wrote: ....in executions: Go away kid. You bother me. He fails to mention that we are number one in baby killings. Babies can't vote... |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 9/21/11 8:58 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/21/2011 2:33 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:20:20 -0400, wrote: On 9/20/2011 5:52 PM, X ` Man wrote: ....in executions: Go away kid. You bother me. He fails to mention that we are number one in baby killings. Babies can't vote... Fetuses aren't babies. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 9/21/2011 4:29 PM, Brent Swain wrote:
'John H[_2_ Wrote: ;893071']On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:20:20 -0400, Drifter wrote: - On 9/20/2011 5:52 PM, X ` Man wrote:- ....in executions: - Go away kid. You bother me.- He fails to mention that we are number one in baby killings. A fetus is not a baby. How many memories do you have from before you were born? How many mass murders do you commit every time you masturbate? The US has a much higher violent crime rate than countries which have abolished the death penalty. That shows how ineffective it is . A huge porportion of those executed are guilty of nothing more than not having enough money to "Purchase" justice, making poverty, and not being white enough, capital offences. And they call that "Justice?" Yeah, and save all the puppies too!! and the teachers, and the police men, and the doctors (but not all of them, just the ones who help helpless children... oh, and puppies)... |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 21/09/2011 12:08 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/21/11 1:41 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 20/09/2011 6:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:52:14 -0400, X ` wrote: ...in executions: I suppose you should also look at the population. Agreed, adjust it to the population base and US isn't even in the top 20. And you get a relatively fair trial and are criminals. Whoosh. Civilized countries and even many semi-civilized countries have done away with executions. Agreed. They give you 3 cement walls with the other as bars, fresh meat is available if you catch it in your feces, and otherwise wait for you to die from whatever. In others, they take you out, cane whip until crippled, but you live. Some just chop of hands or limbs. Many just die from tooth decay. But nothing is soft Club Fed like Canada or the USA. Canada even sends them to lodges, R&R and college. Fact is US inmate have it good. -- First rule of holes: If you're in one, don't keep digging. So in the hole, why do we insanely want more debt? |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 9/21/11 6:50 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 21/09/2011 4:48 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:08:56 -0400, wrote: Preventing a known killer with homicidal tendencies from continuing what comes natural is not wrong... even if it involves ending his/her life. Yes, I know.... Texas is too quick on the draw...... but that doesn't make everybody wrong.... ==== And best of all, there are no repeat offenders. Or let the liberals pay for his keep. This notion of taxing everyone for criminals and liberal ideals well, needs to end. And once again, just when I think I've seen the depths of your stupidity, you sink even lower. I guess going through life is pretty easy for someone like you, someone without a real thought or a real concern in his head. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 9/22/2011 8:23 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/21/11 6:50 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 21/09/2011 4:48 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:08:56 -0400, wrote: Preventing a known killer with homicidal tendencies from continuing what comes natural is not wrong... even if it involves ending his/her life. Yes, I know.... Texas is too quick on the draw...... but that doesn't make everybody wrong.... ==== And best of all, there are no repeat offenders. Or let the liberals pay for his keep. This notion of taxing everyone for criminals and liberal ideals well, needs to end. And once again, just when I think I've seen the depths of your stupidity, you sink even lower. I guess going through life is pretty easy for someone like you, someone without a real thought or a real concern in his head. Capital punishment ends a career criminals career. Do you have a better way to do it? |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:29:10 +0100, Brent Swain wrote:
'John H[_2_ Wrote: ;893071']On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:20:20 -0400, Drifter wrote: - On 9/20/2011 5:52 PM, X ` Man wrote:- ....in executions: - Go away kid. You bother me.- He fails to mention that we are number one in baby killings. A fetus is not a baby. How many memories do you have from before you were born? How many mass murders do you commit every time you masturbate? The US has a much higher violent crime rate than countries which have abolished the death penalty. That shows how ineffective it is . A huge porportion of those executed are guilty of nothing more than not having enough money to "Purchase" justice, making poverty, and not being white enough, capital offences. And they call that "Justice?" Some really stupid statements and questions there, by one who obviously knows little and cares less. Must be a liberal. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 9/22/11 10:06 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:29:10 +0100, Brent wrote: 'John H[_2_ Wrote: ;893071']On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:20:20 -0400, Drifter wrote: - On 9/20/2011 5:52 PM, X ` Man wrote:- ....in executions: - Go away kid. You bother me.- He fails to mention that we are number one in baby killings. A fetus is not a baby. How many memories do you have from before you were born? How many mass murders do you commit every time you masturbate? The US has a much higher violent crime rate than countries which have abolished the death penalty. That shows how ineffective it is . A huge porportion of those executed are guilty of nothing more than not having enough money to "Purchase" justice, making poverty, and not being white enough, capital offences. And they call that "Justice?" Some really stupid statements and questions there, by one who obviously knows little and cares less. Must be a liberal. Translation of Herring's remarks: "I'm a right-wing bigot and racist, and you shouldn't take any of my opinions seriously. Oh...the only teachings of my church that I believe are the right-wing teachings." -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On Sep 21, 9:03*pm, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/21/11 8:58 PM, JustWait wrote: On 9/21/2011 2:33 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:20:20 -0400, wrote: On 9/20/2011 5:52 PM, X ` Man wrote: ....in executions: Go away kid. You bother me. He fails to mention that we are number one in baby killings. Babies can't vote... Fetuses aren't babies. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. As in, "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another worthless fetus." Right. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
|
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:57:15 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote: Babies can't vote... Fetuses aren't babies. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. As in, "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another worthless fetus." Right. ======== And that is yet another religious discussion in a boating newsgroup. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:56:37 -0400, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:57:15 -0700 (PDT), John H wrote: Babies can't vote... Fetuses aren't babies. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. As in, "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another worthless fetus." Right. ======== And that is yet another religious discussion in a boating newsgroup. No religion involved. Killing is killing. Some deserve it, babies don't. - "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another worthless fetus." |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 9/22/11 7:56 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:57:15 -0700 (PDT), John H wrote: Babies can't vote... Fetuses aren't babies. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. As in, "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another worthless fetus." Right. ======== And that is yet another religious discussion in a boating newsgroup. Boating newsgroup? Rec.Boats hasn't been a boating newsgroup for years and years. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 22/09/2011 6:02 PM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:56:37 -0400, Wayne wrote: On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:57:15 -0700 (PDT), John H wrote: Babies can't vote... Fetuses aren't babies. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. As in, "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another worthless fetus." Right. ======== And that is yet another religious discussion in a boating newsgroup. No religion involved. Killing is killing. Some deserve it, babies don't. - "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another worthless fetus." Simple solution if it is the man telling the woman what to do with her womb. Transplant the fetus to the man. In theory it should work. Take some hormones for the breast milk and a C-section for delivery. I figure it this way. For the first 16 weeks, the woman has the exclusive choice. After that there needs to be medical reason. But oh know, the religious idiots will not respect peoples rights. Only conformity. Well, resistance is not futile. -- First rule of holes: If you're in one, don't keep digging. So in the hole, why do we insanely want more debt? |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 9/22/2011 9:00 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/09/2011 6:02 PM, John H wrote: On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:56:37 -0400, Wayne wrote: On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:57:15 -0700 (PDT), John H wrote: Babies can't vote... Fetuses aren't babies. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. As in, "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another worthless fetus." Right. ======== And that is yet another religious discussion in a boating newsgroup. No religion involved. Killing is killing. Some deserve it, babies don't. - "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another worthless fetus." Simple solution if it is the man telling the woman what to do with her womb. Transplant the fetus to the man. In theory it should work. Take some hormones for the breast milk and a C-section for delivery. I figure it this way. For the first 16 weeks, the woman has the exclusive choice. After that there needs to be medical reason. But oh know, the religious idiots will not respect peoples rights. Only conformity. Well, resistance is not futile. Well, if you want to go with the fringe, so be it. I am religious and I vote for a womans right to choose. I trust the Lord will decide if she did the right thing as I expect he will with me... |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On Sep 22, 11:12*pm, JustWait wrote:
On 9/22/2011 9:00 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 22/09/2011 6:02 PM, John H wrote: On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:56:37 -0400, Wayne wrote: On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:57:15 -0700 (PDT), John H wrote: Babies can't vote... Fetuses aren't babies. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. As in, "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another worthless fetus." Right. ======== And that is yet another religious discussion in a boating newsgroup. No religion involved. Killing is killing. Some deserve it, babies don't. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
On 9/22/11 10:12 PM, JustWait wrote:
I am religious What are you, a pagan? -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
In article d9d48428-577a-41ac-999c-
, says... On Sep 22, 11:12*pm, JustWait wrote: On 9/22/2011 9:00 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 22/09/2011 6:02 PM, John H wrote: On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:56:37 -0400, Wayne wrote: On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:57:15 -0700 (PDT), John H wrote: Babies can't vote... Fetuses aren't babies. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. As in, "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another worthless fetus." Right. ======== And that is yet another religious discussion in a boating newsgroup. No religion involved. Killing is killing. Some deserve it, babies don't. - "That's not a baby kicking, dear bride, it's just another worthless fetus." Simple solution if it is the man telling the woman what to do with her womb. Transplant the fetus to the man. In theory it should work. Take some hormones for the breast milk and a C-section for delivery. I figure it this way. For the first 16 weeks, the woman has the exclusive choice. After that there needs to be medical reason. But oh know, the religious idiots will not respect peoples rights. Only conformity. Well, resistance is not futile. Well, if you want to go with the fringe, so be it. I am religious and I vote for a womans right to choose. I trust the Lord will decide if she did the right thing as I expect he will with me...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh.. He's gonna have a good time when he gets his hands on you! "religious" indeed! You too, Suckling Don. |
Finally, the USA makes the top five...
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com