On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:59:39 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:46:04 -0700, wrote:

On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:01:41 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/09/2011 6:55 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:25:47 -0700, wrote:

On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:53:37 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 01:17:19 -0700, wrote:

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 23:10:30 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:37:45 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 8, 8:51 pm, wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...

On Sep 8, 7:18 pm, wrote:

Here's something to get your minds off of insults and name calling.

33 question Civics test.

Average score by Americans is 49%
Average score by college professors: 55%

I surprised myself. Apparently not as dumb as I thought I was. I scored
84.8%

http://www.isi.org/quiz.aspx?q=FE5C3...3-072BB31E2692

Eisboch

You answered 26 out of 33 correctly — 81.2 %

?;^ )

--------------------------------------------------------

Does this mean we can be college professors?

Eisboch

Why stop there, man. DEANS!

I am holding out for SCOTUS justice ;-)

I'd gladly endorse you to replace Clarence Thomas.

Being pro choice myself and not a sex harasser, I suppose you would.
I would certainly drag the court to the left a bit in personal
freedoms but you might not like my 2d amendment and 9/10th amendment
views. I would certainly narrow a lot of the views about what the 14th
amendment means. It is currently being used to expand federal powers
over the states in issues that have nothing to do with protecting
rights. (unless you think people have the "right" to go to federal
prison for medical marijuana)

So, you would interpret the Constitution? Wow. That's quite a
statement!

That is what the SCOTUS does.
We have a constitution that will fit in a shirt pocket and federal
laws that would not fit in the bed of a pickup truck. It is clear we
need some kind of interpretation.

No statism in simplicity or common sense. We elect lawyers and they
love complexity for profit.

Really? Like GWB? Like GHWB?

Or WJCB and BHOB ? This is the 4th Bush in a row.

As sad as it is, most politicians are lawyers. I'm surprised you
didn't mention Nixon

Umm... Nixon was a lawyer. I was talking about non-lawyers as a
rebuttal to the moron's assertion about us electing lawyers. I guess
he and you forgot about the terrible job some non-lawyers have done.

Clinton and Obama are not Bush. Not sure what sort of rhetorical
argument you're making.