|
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/14/2011 2:15 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:48:14 -0400, X ` wrote: On 9/14/11 1:06 PM, wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:28:10 -0700, wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:19:09 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:55:24 -0700, wrote: It is only disruptive if we have nazis like you and Harry are there. As you pointed out, it is not necessarily illegal to smoke in a bar in Florida anyway. It all depends on what kind of license they have. If it is a restaurant that serves liquor it is illegal. If it is a bar that serves food (AKA a cocktail lounge with a class A license) it is up to the county. By a like token, if it is a tobacco store with a liquor license (a cigar bar) it is legal too. Oh, I'm a Nazi. Thanks for clarifying! So, it's not necessarily illegal, but you don't like ANY restrictions on YOUR rights, and to hell with anyone else. I support everyone's rights. So, define MY rights to not be around a carcinogenic cloud. How do I avoid one in a restaurant. I'm seated. Some guy waltz' in from the smoking section, and puffs away. I'm supposed to do what? Wait for the bouncer? Leave myself? Yes leave, please. If enough people did that the owner would ban smoking or he would have a smoking restaurant and you and Harry would never come in. Nobody is holding a gun to your head and making you come in. Owners of cheesy restaurants probably like a facility where smoking is allowed, because it'll help conceal poor ingredients in and bad preparation of the food. Why bother when the patrons can't smell or taste what is served? Show the *******s, don't go there. This is a problem that the market can easily deal with. If every non smoker boycotted "smoking allowed" places the market would decide how many restaurants your cohort will support. Unfortunately it may not be as big a number as you want to accept. around 20% of Americans admit they smoke in surveys but sales numbers seem to imply that number might be closer to 35-40%. I know a lot of "non-smokers" who still smoke. You only have to look at the White House to see that. I do notice that the most vehement anti smoker evangelicals are former smokers themselves who can't stand being around smoke because they fear that they do not have the will power to resist sparking one up. I will agree with anyone who says this is a drug addiction and it may be harder to kick than heroin. That explains the number of people who are hooked on the gum. (another disgusting habit). The people who clean up the country club would much rather vacuum up a few cigarette butts than to be scraping gum up out of the carpet and off the bottom of the tables. I was in my early twenties when my friend was running a AA meetings and such. He always told me the worst hypocrites were ex drinkers who preached to others to quit as if they were special or better "just because they quit doing something they shouldn't have been doing in the first place"... He was right of course. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
|
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:59:48 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:06:47 -0700, wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:02:25 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:24:52 -0700, wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:06:24 -0400, wrote: OK I apologize, "all over the place" confused me. If you mean all over the inside of the bar, yes the bartender or the manager if they have one will enforce the smoking regulations or any other rules in that bar. If it is a tough place they also have bouncers.. I still don't get your question I hope you're wife is going to pay them extra for their extra effort. I can just imagine bartenders chasing after smokers... around and around the table. In the mean time, everyone else gets to breathe the smoke. Are you really that stupid or are you just trolling again? The easy way bartenders have to restore order is to cut off the offender and ban them from coming back. . So, I'm both stupid and a Nazi? How do you prevent the smoker from getting into the non-smoking section? What if they don't stub out the cig? How long do I have to sit there waiting for the cops to show up after the person refuses to leave If I was the bar owner I would have thrown you out by now for being a pain in the ass I would then have you arrested due to lack of development. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 01:14:52 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:55:46 -0700, wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:15:12 -0400, wrote: Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing. Feel free to continue to defend smoker's "rights". We are not sure what the long term effect of chewing nicotine gum is going to be. If nicotine is the poison they say it is, how can a $200 a month gum habit be all that healthy? Swallowing 40 mg of nicotine a day must do something bad to you. (10 chews) Most former smokers I know still chew the gum. It is a real problem at the club.(stuck everywhere) It's pretty bad for your teeth, gums, arteries, birth defects for babies of women's use during pregnancy... the list goes on. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/15/11 3:10 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 01:14:52 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:55:46 -0700, wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:15:12 -0400, wrote: Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing. Feel free to continue to defend smoker's "rights". We are not sure what the long term effect of chewing nicotine gum is going to be. If nicotine is the poison they say it is, how can a $200 a month gum habit be all that healthy? Swallowing 40 mg of nicotine a day must do something bad to you. (10 chews) Most former smokers I know still chew the gum. It is a real problem at the club.(stuck everywhere) It's pretty bad for your teeth, gums, arteries, birth defects for babies of women's use during pregnancy... the list goes on. You know, we may be making a tactical mistake here. Perhaps we should be encouraging all righties to smoke, chew and snort nicotine-laden tobacco products in mass quantities - in the privacy of their homes and cars, of course. In time, they'll "Darwin" themselves out of existence, and the gene pool will get a tremendous boost. -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/15/2011 1:14 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:55:46 -0700, wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:15:12 -0400, wrote: Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing. Feel free to continue to defend smoker's "rights". We are not sure what the long term effect of chewing nicotine gum is going to be. If nicotine is the poison they say it is, how can a $200 a month gum habit be all that healthy? Swallowing 40 mg of nicotine a day must do something bad to you. (10 chews) Most former smokers I know still chew the gum. It is a real problem at the club.(stuck everywhere) Those guys quit smoking, not nicotine. Might as well stick a wad between your cheek and gum. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
In article ,
says... On 9/15/11 3:10 AM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 01:14:52 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:55:46 -0700, wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:15:12 -0400, wrote: Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing. Feel free to continue to defend smoker's "rights". We are not sure what the long term effect of chewing nicotine gum is going to be. If nicotine is the poison they say it is, how can a $200 a month gum habit be all that healthy? Swallowing 40 mg of nicotine a day must do something bad to you. (10 chews) Most former smokers I know still chew the gum. It is a real problem at the club.(stuck everywhere) It's pretty bad for your teeth, gums, arteries, birth defects for babies of women's use during pregnancy... the list goes on. You know, we may be making a tactical mistake here. Perhaps we should be encouraging all righties to smoke, chew and snort nicotine-laden tobacco products in mass quantities - in the privacy of their homes and cars, of course. In time, they'll "Darwin" themselves out of existence, and the gene pool will get a tremendous boost. That would be MASSIVE quantities, Mr. Liberal Arts Degree. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:37:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Sep 13, 8:27*pm, X ` Man wrote: On 9/13/11 7:46 PM, BAR wrote: In articleR5GdnR9K0vwK2PLTnZ2dnUVZ_sWdn...@earthlink .com, says... On 9/13/11 7:55 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:59:07 -0700, wrote: The same technology? You want to mandate restaurants to have a glassed in section with it's own air system?? If they did, would you be happy? *I thought not. They have even offered to have two separate buildings, with the same food and the same ambiance ... nope. not good enough. Self absorbed non smokers demand access to both buildings because they think they are missing something. Yes they are ... the fun people. I was just at a party in a restaurant. After eating we smokers all went outside for a smoke. Some non-smokers tagged along to avoid boredom. Left about 2/3 of the party sitting there twiddling their thumbs. They sat in dumb silence until we got back. Then the party resumed. Anti-smokers are often a sad lot. Walk around all their lives with a stick up their ass just to live a few more years of their uptight misery. Pretty sad. *Some are okay. *They usually do other drugs. My argument all along. A longer life expectancy is the reward for a dull, very dull life. Gotta love the rationalizations of the simple-minded. I watched my great-grandmother sit in a chair in my grandmother's living room for 15 years. She watched TV, ate and slept. I don't think she was doing much more five years before we moved back east. So, for 20 years she watched TV all day long and didn't do much else. Is that how you want to spend your years from 80 to 100? There's no reason to believe your familial experience is *the* pattern for all older people. I know a few guys well into their 80's who are actively involved in intellectually complicated "mover and shaker" tasks that would be beyond the abilities of many half their age. Neither of them are "smokers." I had a relative who died at 99 after a long, healthy, active life, and she was sharp as a tack until the very end. Hey, it's perfectly ok with me if you prefer to die young. On the other hand, my grandfather started smoking "roll yer own's" at age 11 when he lived in rural Skytook OK, and always smoked Lucky's, Chesterfields, Pall Malls, or Camels. The only time he smoked a filtered cigarette was when he had to bum one or pulled the wrong knob on the vending machine. He quit those when he was 78 and went with a pipe. He quit the pipe when he was 85 and passed away at 97. BTW, the week before he died, he was mowing his lawn with a push mower. Damn, Tim, that almost makes me want to start smoking again! Here are the latest results from my "Quit Meter": This will certify that John Leo Herring has not smoked cigarettes for ten years, eight months, three weeks, 10 hours, and 54 minutes. This has resulted in 195,822 cigarettes not smoked, saving $29,373.09 and a great reduction in his Global Warming Carbon Dioxide Footprint. Al Gore is quite proud of him. Furthermore, this will provide him an additional 1 year, 44 weeks, 22 hours, and 30 minutes to spend his daughters' inheritance. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:35:23 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:10:08 -0700, wrote: Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing. Feel free to continue to defend smoker's "rights". We are not sure what the long term effect of chewing nicotine gum is going to be. If nicotine is the poison they say it is, how can a $200 a month gum habit be all that healthy? Swallowing 40 mg of nicotine a day must do something bad to you. (10 chews) Most former smokers I know still chew the gum. It is a real problem at the club.(stuck everywhere) Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing It's pretty bad for your teeth, gums, arteries, birth defects for babies of women's use during pregnancy... the list goes on. Make up your mind, You are arguing with yourself again So, now you're equating bubble gum with nicotine gum???? |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:55:05 -0400, John H
wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:37:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 13, 8:27*pm, X ` Man wrote: On 9/13/11 7:46 PM, BAR wrote: In articleR5GdnR9K0vwK2PLTnZ2dnUVZ_sWdn...@earthlink .com, says... On 9/13/11 7:55 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:59:07 -0700, wrote: The same technology? You want to mandate restaurants to have a glassed in section with it's own air system?? If they did, would you be happy? *I thought not. They have even offered to have two separate buildings, with the same food and the same ambiance ... nope. not good enough. Self absorbed non smokers demand access to both buildings because they think they are missing something. Yes they are ... the fun people. I was just at a party in a restaurant. After eating we smokers all went outside for a smoke. Some non-smokers tagged along to avoid boredom. Left about 2/3 of the party sitting there twiddling their thumbs. They sat in dumb silence until we got back. Then the party resumed. Anti-smokers are often a sad lot. Walk around all their lives with a stick up their ass just to live a few more years of their uptight misery. Pretty sad. *Some are okay. *They usually do other drugs. My argument all along. A longer life expectancy is the reward for a dull, very dull life. Gotta love the rationalizations of the simple-minded. I watched my great-grandmother sit in a chair in my grandmother's living room for 15 years. She watched TV, ate and slept. I don't think she was doing much more five years before we moved back east. So, for 20 years she watched TV all day long and didn't do much else. Is that how you want to spend your years from 80 to 100? There's no reason to believe your familial experience is *the* pattern for all older people. I know a few guys well into their 80's who are actively involved in intellectually complicated "mover and shaker" tasks that would be beyond the abilities of many half their age. Neither of them are "smokers." I had a relative who died at 99 after a long, healthy, active life, and she was sharp as a tack until the very end. Hey, it's perfectly ok with me if you prefer to die young. On the other hand, my grandfather started smoking "roll yer own's" at age 11 when he lived in rural Skytook OK, and always smoked Lucky's, Chesterfields, Pall Malls, or Camels. The only time he smoked a filtered cigarette was when he had to bum one or pulled the wrong knob on the vending machine. He quit those when he was 78 and went with a pipe. He quit the pipe when he was 85 and passed away at 97. BTW, the week before he died, he was mowing his lawn with a push mower. Damn, Tim, that almost makes me want to start smoking again! Here are the latest results from my "Quit Meter": This will certify that John Leo Herring has not smoked cigarettes for ten years, eight months, three weeks, 10 hours, and 54 minutes. This has resulted in 195,822 cigarettes not smoked, saving $29,373.09 and a great reduction in his Global Warming Carbon Dioxide Footprint. Al Gore is quite proud of him. Furthermore, this will provide him an additional 1 year, 44 weeks, 22 hours, and 30 minutes to spend his daughters' inheritance. Your daughter must be very sad. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
|
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Sep 15, 2:02*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:55:05 -0400, John H wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:37:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 13, 8:27 pm, X ` Man wrote: On 9/13/11 7:46 PM, BAR wrote: In articleR5GdnR9K0vwK2PLTnZ2dnUVZ_sWdn...@earthlink .com, says... On 9/13/11 7:55 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:59:07 -0700, wrote: The same technology? You want to mandate restaurants to have a glassed in section with it's own air system?? If they did, would you be happy? I thought not. They have even offered to have two separate buildings, with the same food and the same ambiance ... nope. not good enough. Self absorbed non smokers demand access to both buildings because they think they are missing something. Yes they are ... the fun people. I was just at a party in a restaurant. After eating we smokers all went outside for a smoke. Some non-smokers tagged along to avoid boredom. Left about 2/3 of the party sitting there twiddling their thumbs.. They sat in dumb silence until we got back. Then the party resumed. Anti-smokers are often a sad lot. Walk around all their lives with a stick up their ass just to live a few more years of their uptight misery. Pretty sad. Some are okay. They usually do other drugs. My argument all along. A longer life expectancy is the reward for a dull, very dull life. Gotta love the rationalizations of the simple-minded. I watched my great-grandmother sit in a chair in my grandmother's living room for 15 years. She watched TV, ate and slept. I don't think she was doing much more five years before we moved back east. So, for 20 years she watched TV all day long and didn't do much else. Is that how you want to spend your years from 80 to 100? There's no reason to believe your familial experience is *the* pattern for all older people. I know a few guys well into their 80's who are actively involved in intellectually complicated "mover and shaker" tasks that would be beyond the abilities of many half their age. Neither of them are "smokers." I had a relative who died at 99 after a long, healthy, active life, and she was sharp as a tack until the very end. Hey, it's perfectly ok with me if you prefer to die young. On the other hand, my grandfather started smoking "roll yer own's" at age 11 when he lived in rural Skytook OK, and always smoked Lucky's, Chesterfields, Pall Malls, or Camels. The only time he smoked a filtered cigarette was when he had to bum one or pulled the wrong knob on the vending machine. He quit those when he was 78 and went with a pipe. He quit the pipe when he was 85 and passed away at 97. BTW, the week before he died, he was mowing his lawn with a push mower. Damn, Tim, that almost makes me want to start smoking again! Here are the latest results from my "Quit Meter": This will certify that John Leo Herring has not smoked cigarettes for ten years, eight months, three weeks, 10 hours, and 54 minutes. This has resulted in 195,822 cigarettes not smoked, saving $29,373.09 and a great reduction in his Global Warming Carbon Dioxide Footprint. Al Gore is quite proud of him. Furthermore, this will provide him an additional 1 year, 44 weeks, 22 hours, and 30 minutes to spend his daughters' inheritance. Your daughter must be very sad.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not to mention his wife! ;-) |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
|
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/15/11 2:14 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:01:57 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:35:23 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:10:08 -0700, wrote: Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing. Feel free to continue to defend smoker's "rights". We are not sure what the long term effect of chewing nicotine gum is going to be. If nicotine is the poison they say it is, how can a $200 a month gum habit be all that healthy? Swallowing 40 mg of nicotine a day must do something bad to you. (10 chews) Most former smokers I know still chew the gum. It is a real problem at the club.(stuck everywhere) Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing It's pretty bad for your teeth, gums, arteries, birth defects for babies of women's use during pregnancy... the list goes on. Make up your mind, You are arguing with yourself again So, now you're equating bubble gum with nicotine gum???? Nobody ever said bubble gum, We were talking about smokers and reformed smokers, that implies nicotine gum. It is the gum that I was talking about. The two are easy to tell apart, even stuck to the bottom of your shoe. You don't happen to eat a lot of fatty foods and drink a lot of booze, do you? -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
In article ,
says... On 9/15/11 2:14 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:01:57 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:35:23 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:10:08 -0700, wrote: Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing. Feel free to continue to defend smoker's "rights". We are not sure what the long term effect of chewing nicotine gum is going to be. If nicotine is the poison they say it is, how can a $200 a month gum habit be all that healthy? Swallowing 40 mg of nicotine a day must do something bad to you. (10 chews) Most former smokers I know still chew the gum. It is a real problem at the club.(stuck everywhere) Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing It's pretty bad for your teeth, gums, arteries, birth defects for babies of women's use during pregnancy... the list goes on. Make up your mind, You are arguing with yourself again So, now you're equating bubble gum with nicotine gum???? Nobody ever said bubble gum, We were talking about smokers and reformed smokers, that implies nicotine gum. It is the gum that I was talking about. The two are easy to tell apart, even stuck to the bottom of your shoe. You don't happen to eat a lot of fatty foods and drink a lot of booze, do you? That sounds as if you are talking about yourself. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
In article ,
says... On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:02:45 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:55:05 -0400, John H Here are the latest results from my "Quit Meter": This will certify that John Leo Herring has not smoked cigarettes for ten years, eight months, three weeks, 10 hours, and 54 minutes. This has resulted in 195,822 cigarettes not smoked, saving $29,373.09 and a great reduction in his Global Warming Carbon Dioxide Footprint. Al Gore is quite proud of him. Furthermore, this will provide him an additional 1 year, 44 weeks, 22 hours, and 30 minutes to spend his daughters' inheritance. Your daughter must be very sad. What a sorry excuse for a person you are. Here is a guy with a success story and you are still posting snarky comments. I think it is time for you to go back on my ignore list. She's almost as childish as Harry and Don. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:14:52 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:01:57 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:35:23 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:10:08 -0700, wrote: Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing. Feel free to continue to defend smoker's "rights". We are not sure what the long term effect of chewing nicotine gum is going to be. If nicotine is the poison they say it is, how can a $200 a month gum habit be all that healthy? Swallowing 40 mg of nicotine a day must do something bad to you. (10 chews) Most former smokers I know still chew the gum. It is a real problem at the club.(stuck everywhere) Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing It's pretty bad for your teeth, gums, arteries, birth defects for babies of women's use during pregnancy... the list goes on. Make up your mind, You are arguing with yourself again So, now you're equating bubble gum with nicotine gum???? Nobody ever said bubble gum, We were talking about smokers and reformed smokers, that implies nicotine gum. It is the gum that I was talking about. The two are easy to tell apart, even stuck to the bottom of your shoe. Ok. I never made that connection. In any case, it doesn't contradict anything I said. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:18:03 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:02:45 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:55:05 -0400, John H Here are the latest results from my "Quit Meter": This will certify that John Leo Herring has not smoked cigarettes for ten years, eight months, three weeks, 10 hours, and 54 minutes. This has resulted in 195,822 cigarettes not smoked, saving $29,373.09 and a great reduction in his Global Warming Carbon Dioxide Footprint. Al Gore is quite proud of him. Furthermore, this will provide him an additional 1 year, 44 weeks, 22 hours, and 30 minutes to spend his daughters' inheritance. Your daughter must be very sad. What a sorry excuse for a person you are. Here is a guy with a success story and you are still posting snarky comments. I think it is time for you to go back on my ignore list. You are not the arbiter of my comments. Feel free to ignore me. His "success story" includes smoking and shortening his life, making snarky comments about something he knows little or cares little about, and generally being a jerk. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:14:52 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:01:57 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:35:23 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:10:08 -0700, wrote: Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing. Feel free to continue to defend smoker's "rights". We are not sure what the long term effect of chewing nicotine gum is going to be. If nicotine is the poison they say it is, how can a $200 a month gum habit be all that healthy? Swallowing 40 mg of nicotine a day must do something bad to you. (10 chews) Most former smokers I know still chew the gum. It is a real problem at the club.(stuck everywhere) Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing It's pretty bad for your teeth, gums, arteries, birth defects for babies of women's use during pregnancy... the list goes on. Make up your mind, You are arguing with yourself again So, now you're equating bubble gum with nicotine gum???? Nobody ever said bubble gum, We were talking about smokers and reformed smokers, that implies nicotine gum. It is the gum that I was talking about. The two are easy to tell apart, even stuck to the bottom of your shoe. I believe the directions for Nicorette calls for a cessation in the chewing of it within six months - maybe less. I spent about two years on the stuff. Mostly I was addicted to having something in my mouth. Now I chew Orbit in the orange package. Still addicted to having something to chew on. I was buying my Nicorette from an outfit in Australia for about 1/3 the price it sells for here. And, whenever my friends from Holland came over, they would bring a bunch. Again, it sells for about half there of what it goes for locally. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/15/11 8:31 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:18:34 -0400, X ` wrote: On 9/15/11 2:14 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:01:57 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:35:23 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:10:08 -0700, wrote: Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing. Feel free to continue to defend smoker's "rights". We are not sure what the long term effect of chewing nicotine gum is going to be. If nicotine is the poison they say it is, how can a $200 a month gum habit be all that healthy? Swallowing 40 mg of nicotine a day must do something bad to you. (10 chews) Most former smokers I know still chew the gum. It is a real problem at the club.(stuck everywhere) Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing It's pretty bad for your teeth, gums, arteries, birth defects for babies of women's use during pregnancy... the list goes on. Make up your mind, You are arguing with yourself again So, now you're equating bubble gum with nicotine gum???? Nobody ever said bubble gum, We were talking about smokers and reformed smokers, that implies nicotine gum. It is the gum that I was talking about. The two are easy to tell apart, even stuck to the bottom of your shoe. You don't happen to eat a lot of fatty foods and drink a lot of booze, do you? Not so much on the booze but I probably eat more red meat than my doctor would like. He still says my cholesterol and triglycerides are OK. I am scheduled to go see him again soon, I will get you the numbers if you like. As long as your doc is happy with the numbers, you're OK. Had a nuclear stress test at my last physical...no blockages... :) -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:31:28 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:18:34 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 9/15/11 2:14 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:01:57 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:35:23 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:10:08 -0700, wrote: Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing. Feel free to continue to defend smoker's "rights". We are not sure what the long term effect of chewing nicotine gum is going to be. If nicotine is the poison they say it is, how can a $200 a month gum habit be all that healthy? Swallowing 40 mg of nicotine a day must do something bad to you. (10 chews) Most former smokers I know still chew the gum. It is a real problem at the club.(stuck everywhere) Which bad habit kills people with regularity? Not gum chewing It's pretty bad for your teeth, gums, arteries, birth defects for babies of women's use during pregnancy... the list goes on. Make up your mind, You are arguing with yourself again So, now you're equating bubble gum with nicotine gum???? Nobody ever said bubble gum, We were talking about smokers and reformed smokers, that implies nicotine gum. It is the gum that I was talking about. The two are easy to tell apart, even stuck to the bottom of your shoe. You don't happen to eat a lot of fatty foods and drink a lot of booze, do you? Not so much on the booze but I probably eat more red meat than my doctor would like. He still says my cholesterol and triglycerides are OK. I am scheduled to go see him again soon, I will get you the numbers if you like. You shouldn't listen to your doctor! He's got a medical degree, but you have common sense... or some bs like that. |
Grocery carts - was Wally-Mart...
wrote in message ...
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:44:10 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: Not really. The original case of letting a kid fall out of the grocery cart because of no seat belt were my neighbors in the mid 50's. The let the kid fall out of the Safeway Stores grocery cart. They got $50k plus a college fund for the kid. Was not Safeway's fault they let the kid fall out. Cars did not even have seat belts. Started a flood of windfall suits over the years. I think it is stupid that they ALLOW kids to ride in the same cart you put your food in. I never put anything I will eat in that top tray. Leaky diaper, fresh produce (that most people put up there) what could possibly go wrong ? That tray is for bleach, poisons and bathroom cleaners that I also don't want mixed with my food. Fortunately I seldom actually see kids in carts. They have those race car carts for kids. I think they should just eliminate the leg holes. ------------------------------------------- Hell, the carts are dirty from just being outside and the people pushing the cart. I normally put the bring your own bag in the cart these days to put the food in. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
wrote in message ...
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:11:06 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:42:00 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:13:56 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:31:59 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:23:19 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 08/09/2011 11:12 AM, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:21:07 -0400, wrote: You seriously believe that all costs are passed along to the consumer? All costs? Feel free to try and defend that statement. As I actually said, the "insurance claims are.. a tiny piece of the pie." Ultimately yep, all costs will be passed on to the consumer. Take oil, go ahead, slap a $90/barrel tax on oil and watch the pump prices double or more. A classic example was the massive judgement against the cigarette companies. Shortly after that Altria posted record profits. I doubt there's much causation between the two. Feel free to provide some facts that support this causation. They certainly passed all the costs on to the customer, plus a huge profit. The cost being lung cancer. Of course, they don't need to be regulated, right? The consumer should be able to figure it out without any help from the gov't. Why they can just stop, and if they can't, they must be weak-minded and deserve to get sick. - this is the mantra of the right, including Ron (non-St.) Paul. People who smoke know it is dangerous, everyone has known that for 40 years. They are hooked on the drug and they keep doing it. You can say the same thing about a lot of drugs, legal and illegal. It is really none of our business. If you are worried about the cost of Medicare you should like smokers. A lot of them will die before they ever even get to 65. Most avoid going to the doctor and they die fairly cheaply compared to a "healthy" person who lives to 85, getting artificial hips, organ transplants, cataract operations and tons of expensive drugs. It sounds cruel but it is the choice they made. My non-smoking grandfather lived to 100 and cost Medicare a bundle. My smoking parents both died young and didn't have any significant medical bills at all. My smoking sister is pretty much on her death bed and still not on medicare. (Dec 01, 11 based on her husband's age) --------------------------------------------- Smoking has been known to be bad for you a longer the 40 years. My mom, who died last year at 95, and did not smoke, and was an RN said they called them "cancer Sticks" in the late 1930's or earlier. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
In article ,
says... On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:48:00 -0700, wrote: You shouldn't listen to your doctor! He's got a medical degree, but you have common sense... or some bs like that. Like I said you are a miserable excuse for a person. Since you don't have a boat and nobody really wants to talk to you, why are you here? Don't go away mad, just go away. Well, she can go back to talking mostly with Canuck. He's always willing to talk to her so she can call him more names. What a pair. Which only proves.....misery loves company. She's the only person I've seen here who is better at alienating people than Krause and the Freak. But she's not as fast. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:49:02 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:48:00 -0700, wrote: You shouldn't listen to your doctor! He's got a medical degree, but you have common sense... or some bs like that. Like I said you are a miserable excuse for a person. Since you don't have a boat and nobody really wants to talk to you, why are you here? Don't go away mad, just go away. Too bad for you isn't it. Seems you can't help yourself? Just keep in mind that you're here with me. I'm not here with you. Why don't you call me a Nazi again. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:41:41 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:11:06 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:42:00 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:13:56 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:31:59 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:23:19 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 08/09/2011 11:12 AM, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:21:07 -0400, wrote: You seriously believe that all costs are passed along to the consumer? All costs? Feel free to try and defend that statement. As I actually said, the "insurance claims are.. a tiny piece of the pie." Ultimately yep, all costs will be passed on to the consumer. Take oil, go ahead, slap a $90/barrel tax on oil and watch the pump prices double or more. A classic example was the massive judgement against the cigarette companies. Shortly after that Altria posted record profits. I doubt there's much causation between the two. Feel free to provide some facts that support this causation. They certainly passed all the costs on to the customer, plus a huge profit. The cost being lung cancer. Of course, they don't need to be regulated, right? The consumer should be able to figure it out without any help from the gov't. Why they can just stop, and if they can't, they must be weak-minded and deserve to get sick. - this is the mantra of the right, including Ron (non-St.) Paul. People who smoke know it is dangerous, everyone has known that for 40 years. They are hooked on the drug and they keep doing it. You can say the same thing about a lot of drugs, legal and illegal. It is really none of our business. If you are worried about the cost of Medicare you should like smokers. A lot of them will die before they ever even get to 65. Most avoid going to the doctor and they die fairly cheaply compared to a "healthy" person who lives to 85, getting artificial hips, organ transplants, cataract operations and tons of expensive drugs. It sounds cruel but it is the choice they made. My non-smoking grandfather lived to 100 and cost Medicare a bundle. My smoking parents both died young and didn't have any significant medical bills at all. My smoking sister is pretty much on her death bed and still not on medicare. (Dec 01, 11 based on her husband's age) --------------------------------------------- Smoking has been known to be bad for you a longer the 40 years. My mom, who died last year at 95, and did not smoke, and was an RN said they called them "cancer Sticks" in the late 1930's or earlier. Therefore, gov't has no role in protecting innocent people's lives, or some such bs. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Sep 15, 11:46*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:49:02 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:48:00 -0700, wrote: You shouldn't listen to your doctor! He's got a medical degree, but you have common sense... or some bs like that. Like I said you are a miserable excuse for a person. Since you don't have a boat and nobody really wants to talk to you, why are you here? Don't go away mad, just go away. Too bad for you isn't it. Seems you can't help yourself? Just keep in mind that you're here with me. I'm not here with you. Why don't you call me a Nazi again. Why insult Hitler? |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/15/11 11:49 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:48:00 -0700, wrote: You shouldn't listen to your doctor! He's got a medical degree, but you have common sense... or some bs like that. Like I said you are a miserable excuse for a person. Since you don't have a boat and nobody really wants to talk to you, why are you here? Don't go away mad, just go away. If you are going to go after those who either have no boats or have no interest in boats, there are plenty here on your side of the aisle from which to choose. -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful. |
Grocery carts - was Wally-Mart...
On Sep 16, 1:39*am, "Califbill" wrote:
wrote in messagenews:hjlk679tp31rg9opt00o1cqeft8gh0tnk6@4ax .com... On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:44:10 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: Not really. *The original case of letting a kid fall out of the grocery cart because of no seat belt were my neighbors in the mid 50's. The let the kid fall out of the Safeway Stores grocery cart. *They got $50k plus a college fund for the kid. *Was not Safeway's fault they let the kid fall out. *Cars did not even have seat belts. *Started a flood of windfall suits over the years. I think it is stupid that they ALLOW kids to ride in the same cart you put your food in. I never put anything I will eat in that top tray. Leaky diaper, fresh produce (that most people put up there) what could possibly go wrong ? That tray is for bleach, poisons and bathroom cleaners that I also don't want mixed with my food. Fortunately I seldom actually see kids in carts. They have those race car carts for kids. I think they should just eliminate the leg holes. ------------------------------------------- Hell, the carts are dirty from just being outside and the people pushing the cart. *I normally put the bring your own bag in the cart these days to put the food in. Civilized up here. One of our local chains provides those anti- bacterial wipes that I use to disinfect the shopping cart handle. You never know when a Looney or a Freak just used that cart and left unspeakable debris all over it. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Sep 16, 8:43*am, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/15/11 11:49 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:48:00 -0700, wrote: You shouldn't listen to your doctor! He's got a medical degree, but you have common sense... or some bs like that. Like I said you are a miserable excuse for a person. Since you don't have a boat and nobody really wants to talk to you, why are you here? Don't go away mad, just go away. If you are going to go after those who either have no boats or have no interest in boats, there are plenty here on your side of the aisle from which to choose. -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful. I'd say the majority of non boaters in here are dopers or doper wanna be's |
Grocery carts - was Wally-Mart...
On 9/16/11 8:37 AM, North Star wrote:
On Sep 16, 1:39 am, wrote: wrote in messagenews:hjlk679tp31rg9opt00o1cqeft8gh0tnk6@4ax .com... On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:44:10 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: Not really. The original case of letting a kid fall out of the grocery cart because of no seat belt were my neighbors in the mid 50's. The let the kid fall out of the Safeway Stores grocery cart. They got $50k plus a college fund for the kid. Was not Safeway's fault they let the kid fall out. Cars did not even have seat belts. Started a flood of windfall suits over the years. I think it is stupid that they ALLOW kids to ride in the same cart you put your food in. I never put anything I will eat in that top tray. Leaky diaper, fresh produce (that most people put up there) what could possibly go wrong ? That tray is for bleach, poisons and bathroom cleaners that I also don't want mixed with my food. Fortunately I seldom actually see kids in carts. They have those race car carts for kids. I think they should just eliminate the leg holes. ------------------------------------------- Hell, the carts are dirty from just being outside and the people pushing the cart. I normally put the bring your own bag in the cart these days to put the food in. Civilized up here. One of our local chains provides those anti- bacterial wipes that I use to disinfect the shopping cart handle. You never know when a Looney or a Freak just used that cart and left unspeakable debris all over it. Couple of grocery chains down here do the same in the anti-bacterial wipes. Can't be too careful when it comes to avoiding Loogy/Freak diseases! -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/16/11 8:40 AM, North Star wrote:
On Sep 16, 8:43 am, X ` wrote: On 9/15/11 11:49 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:48:00 -0700, wrote: You shouldn't listen to your doctor! He's got a medical degree, but you have common sense... or some bs like that. Like I said you are a miserable excuse for a person. Since you don't have a boat and nobody really wants to talk to you, why are you here? Don't go away mad, just go away. If you are going to go after those who either have no boats or have no interest in boats, there are plenty here on your side of the aisle from which to choose. -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful. I'd say the majority of non boaters in here are dopers or doper wanna be's I'm skipping over virtually all the posts of loogywannabe, flajim, bottomlickerbass, et cetera. I confess to looking at the posts of Ingersoll, because I'm hoping to see him have a total mental/emotional breakdown right here in rec.boats. He came close the other day with his death wish for Andy Borowitz. -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/15/2011 11:49 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:48:00 -0700, wrote: You shouldn't listen to your doctor! He's got a medical degree, but you have common sense... or some bs like that. Like I said you are a miserable excuse for a person. Since you don't have a boat and nobody really wants to talk to you, why are you here? Don't go away mad, just go away. I don't have a problem talking to her/it, but no one in their right mind attempts to talk with her. It's kind of like carrying on a conversation with a walnut. Eventually people will begin to think you are a little strange. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On Sep 16, 9:44*am, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/16/11 8:40 AM, North Star wrote: On Sep 16, 8:43 am, X ` *wrote: On 9/15/11 11:49 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:48:00 -0700, wrote: You shouldn't listen to your doctor! He's got a medical degree, but you have common sense... or some bs like that. Like I said you are a miserable excuse for a person. Since you don't have a boat and nobody really wants to talk to you, why are you here? Don't go away mad, just go away. If you are going to go after those who either have no boats or have no interest in boats, there are plenty here on your side of the aisle from which to choose. -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful. I'd say the majority of non boaters in here are dopers or doper wanna be's I'm skipping over virtually all the posts of loogywannabe, flajim, bottomlickerbass, et cetera. I confess to looking at the posts of Ingersoll, because I'm hoping to see him have a total mental/emotional breakdown right here in rec.boats. He came close the other day with his death wish for Andy Borowitz. -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Was that the person he wanted to "run down"?? What a nutcase... I hope The Mouse and Terry have an escape plan when the 'big one' hits. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/16/2011 7:43 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/15/11 11:49 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:48:00 -0700, wrote: You shouldn't listen to your doctor! He's got a medical degree, but you have common sense... or some bs like that. Like I said you are a miserable excuse for a person. Since you don't have a boat and nobody really wants to talk to you, why are you here? Don't go away mad, just go away. If you are going to go after those who either have no boats or have no interest in boats, there are plenty here on your side of the aisle from which to choose. There is a little more to it than the boat issue. After all, you have a canoe and you still suck. Having a boat isn't all that necessary to have conversations with boaters, but respect is. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/16/2011 12:47 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:41:41 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:11:06 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:42:00 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:13:56 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:31:59 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:23:19 -0600, wrote: On 08/09/2011 11:12 AM, wrote: On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:21:07 -0400, wrote: You seriously believe that all costs are passed along to the consumer? All costs? Feel free to try and defend that statement. As I actually said, the "insurance claims are.. a tiny piece of the pie." Ultimately yep, all costs will be passed on to the consumer. Take oil, go ahead, slap a $90/barrel tax on oil and watch the pump prices double or more. A classic example was the massive judgement against the cigarette companies. Shortly after that Altria posted record profits. I doubt there's much causation between the two. Feel free to provide some facts that support this causation. They certainly passed all the costs on to the customer, plus a huge profit. The cost being lung cancer. Of course, they don't need to be regulated, right? The consumer should be able to figure it out without any help from the gov't. Why they can just stop, and if they can't, they must be weak-minded and deserve to get sick.- this is the mantra of the right, including Ron (non-St.) Paul. People who smoke know it is dangerous, everyone has known that for 40 years. They are hooked on the drug and they keep doing it. You can say the same thing about a lot of drugs, legal and illegal. It is really none of our business. If you are worried about the cost of Medicare you should like smokers. A lot of them will die before they ever even get to 65. Most avoid going to the doctor and they die fairly cheaply compared to a "healthy" person who lives to 85, getting artificial hips, organ transplants, cataract operations and tons of expensive drugs. It sounds cruel but it is the choice they made. My non-smoking grandfather lived to 100 and cost Medicare a bundle. My smoking parents both died young and didn't have any significant medical bills at all. My smoking sister is pretty much on her death bed and still not on medicare. (Dec 01, 11 based on her husband's age) --------------------------------------------- Smoking has been known to be bad for you a longer the 40 years. My mom, who died last year at 95, and did not smoke, and was an RN said they called them "cancer Sticks" in the late 1930's or earlier. Therefore, gov't has no role in protecting innocent people's lives, or some such bs. Promote the common welfare not legislate it, you ****ing moron. |
Grocery carts - was Wally-Mart...
On 9/16/2011 8:37 AM, North Star wrote:
On Sep 16, 1:39 am, wrote: wrote in messagenews:hjlk679tp31rg9opt00o1cqeft8gh0tnk6@4ax .com... On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:44:10 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: Not really. The original case of letting a kid fall out of the grocery cart because of no seat belt were my neighbors in the mid 50's. The let the kid fall out of the Safeway Stores grocery cart. They got $50k plus a college fund for the kid. Was not Safeway's fault they let the kid fall out. Cars did not even have seat belts. Started a flood of windfall suits over the years. I think it is stupid that they ALLOW kids to ride in the same cart you put your food in. I never put anything I will eat in that top tray. Leaky diaper, fresh produce (that most people put up there) what could possibly go wrong ? That tray is for bleach, poisons and bathroom cleaners that I also don't want mixed with my food. Fortunately I seldom actually see kids in carts. They have those race car carts for kids. I think they should just eliminate the leg holes. ------------------------------------------- Hell, the carts are dirty from just being outside and the people pushing the cart. I normally put the bring your own bag in the cart these days to put the food in. Civilized up here. One of our local chains provides those anti- bacterial wipes that I use to disinfect the shopping cart handle. Ah yes. Some of the good hygienic practices in wide use in America eventually get introduced to Canadians on a limited basis. |
Grocery carts - was Wally-Mart...
On 9/16/2011 8:41 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/16/11 8:37 AM, North Star wrote: On Sep 16, 1:39 am, wrote: wrote in messagenews:hjlk679tp31rg9opt00o1cqeft8gh0tnk6@4ax .com... On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:44:10 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: Not really. The original case of letting a kid fall out of the grocery cart because of no seat belt were my neighbors in the mid 50's. The let the kid fall out of the Safeway Stores grocery cart. They got $50k plus a college fund for the kid. Was not Safeway's fault they let the kid fall out. Cars did not even have seat belts. Started a flood of windfall suits over the years. I think it is stupid that they ALLOW kids to ride in the same cart you put your food in. I never put anything I will eat in that top tray. Leaky diaper, fresh produce (that most people put up there) what could possibly go wrong ? That tray is for bleach, poisons and bathroom cleaners that I also don't want mixed with my food. Fortunately I seldom actually see kids in carts. They have those race car carts for kids. I think they should just eliminate the leg holes. ------------------------------------------- Hell, the carts are dirty from just being outside and the people pushing the cart. I normally put the bring your own bag in the cart these days to put the food in. Civilized up here. One of our local chains provides those anti- bacterial wipes that I use to disinfect the shopping cart handle. You never know when a Looney or a Freak just used that cart and left unspeakable debris all over it. Couple of grocery chains down here do the same in the anti-bacterial wipes. Can't be too careful when it comes to avoiding Loogy/Freak diseases! You got bigger health problems with that sink next to your coffeemaker. |
Wally-Mart in trouble locally
On 9/16/11 8:52 AM, North Star wrote:
On Sep 16, 9:44 am, X ` wrote: On 9/16/11 8:40 AM, North Star wrote: On Sep 16, 8:43 am, X ` wrote: On 9/15/11 11:49 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:48:00 -0700, wrote: You shouldn't listen to your doctor! He's got a medical degree, but you have common sense... or some bs like that. Like I said you are a miserable excuse for a person. Since you don't have a boat and nobody really wants to talk to you, why are you here? Don't go away mad, just go away. If you are going to go after those who either have no boats or have no interest in boats, there are plenty here on your side of the aisle from which to choose. -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful. I'd say the majority of non boaters in here are dopers or doper wanna be's I'm skipping over virtually all the posts of loogywannabe, flajim, bottomlickerbass, et cetera. I confess to looking at the posts of Ingersoll, because I'm hoping to see him have a total mental/emotional breakdown right here in rec.boats. He came close the other day with his death wish for Andy Borowitz. -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Was that the person he wanted to "run down"?? What a nutcase... I hope The Mouse and Terry have an escape plan when the 'big one' hits. Yup...it was Andy who Ingersoll wanted to run down. -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com