In article cb133bc9-3f62-44ed-a2d6-1d92e0261b99
@n11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.

Sure hoss. We believe you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPm8l8LXSIs

On 28/08/2011 6:15 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlecb133bc9-3f62-44ed-a2d6-1d92e0261b99
@n11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.

Sure hoss. We believe you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPm8l8LXSIs

FUD sells.

Ask yourself why the eco nuts were not livid for Japan's deliberate
washing nuclear residue into the Pacific? Where was Green Peace?

Here is a hit, it is all about politics and taxes. Sell th herd on
taxes they don't otherwise support, under the "green" label. That is
what carbon credits are, just more taxation that you and your family
will never benefit from. Kyoto was a liberal-tax-me more farce.

But desperate Obama with BP victimization for political gain...now that
sells with fleabaggers.
--
If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the
same and expecting different results?

On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:58:56 -0600,
wrote:

On 28/08/2011 6:15 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlecb133bc9-3f62-44ed-a2d6-1d92e0261b99
@n11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.

Sure hoss. We believe you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPm8l8LXSIs

FUD sells.

Yes, it does. and Faux news in the premier disseminator.

Ask yourself why the eco nuts were not livid for Japan's deliberate
washing nuclear residue into the Pacific? Where was Green Peace?

They were, but, what do you do? The Japs **** where they eat and being
great conservatives, enjoy it because that is the way things are (at
least for them). What is Greenpeace going to do, ram the goddam
island? Are you nuts?

Here is a hit, it is all about politics and taxes. Sell th herd on
taxes they don't otherwise support, under the "green" label. That is
what carbon credits are, just more taxation that you and your family
will never benefit from. Kyoto was a liberal-tax-me more farce.

Kyoto liberal. Right. That is sort of like saying Rushbo is more
liberal than Beck or whatever. What a nonsense statement you made.

But desperate Obama with BP victimization for political gain...now that
sells with fleabaggers.

Obama is probably toast and should be, too. Your feeble attempt to
associate him with BP is lame.

Funny, compare how BP was handled to Exxon and tell me why the
difference? Might I suggest one was an American company and one was not?

Plus if your out to destroy a nation like Obama is, why not curtail a
main source of energy development making USA weaker and more dependent
on Saudi oil? I am sure the Saudi like that.

Lets hope people wake up nd toast Obama in 2012.

--
If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the
same and expecting different results?

On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:20:05 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:58:56 -0600,
wrote:

On 28/08/2011 6:15 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlecb133bc9-3f62-44ed-a2d6-1d92e0261b99
@n11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.

Sure hoss. We believe you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPm8l8LXSIs

FUD sells.

Yes, it does. and Faux news in the premier disseminator.

Ask yourself why the eco nuts were not livid for Japan's deliberate
washing nuclear residue into the Pacific? Where was Green Peace?

They were, but, what do you do? The Japs **** where they eat and being
great conservatives, enjoy it because that is the way things are (at
least for them). What is Greenpeace going to do, ram the goddam
island? Are you nuts?

Here is a hit, it is all about politics and taxes. Sell th herd on
taxes they don't otherwise support, under the "green" label. That is
what carbon credits are, just more taxation that you and your family
will never benefit from. Kyoto was a liberal-tax-me more farce.

Kyoto liberal. Right. That is sort of like saying Rushbo is more
liberal than Beck or whatever. What a nonsense statement you made.

But desperate Obama with BP victimization for political gain...now that
sells with fleabaggers.

Obama is probably toast and should be, too. Your feeble attempt to
associate him with BP is lame.

Funny, compare how BP was handled to Exxon and tell me why the
difference? Might I suggest one was an American company and one was not?

Plus if your out to destroy a nation like Obama is, why not curtail a
main source of energy development making USA weaker and more dependent
on Saudi oil? I am sure the Saudi like that.

Lets hope people wake up nd toast Obama in 2012.

You are amazingly stupid! Thanks for the reminder.

On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:17:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:20:05 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:58:56 -0600,
wrote:

On 28/08/2011 6:15 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlecb133bc9-3f62-44ed-a2d6-1d92e0261b99
@n11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.

Sure hoss. We believe you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPm8l8LXSIs

FUD sells.

Yes, it does. and Faux news in the premier disseminator.

Ask yourself why the eco nuts were not livid for Japan's deliberate
washing nuclear residue into the Pacific? Where was Green Peace?

They were, but, what do you do? The Japs **** where they eat and being
great conservatives, enjoy it because that is the way things are (at
least for them). What is Greenpeace going to do, ram the goddam
island? Are you nuts?

Here is a hit, it is all about politics and taxes. Sell th herd on
taxes they don't otherwise support, under the "green" label. That is
what carbon credits are, just more taxation that you and your family
will never benefit from. Kyoto was a liberal-tax-me more farce.

Kyoto liberal. Right. That is sort of like saying Rushbo is more
liberal than Beck or whatever. What a nonsense statement you made.

But desperate Obama with BP victimization for political gain...now that
sells with fleabaggers.

Obama is probably toast and should be, too. Your feeble attempt to
associate him with BP is lame.

Funny, compare how BP was handled to Exxon and tell me why the
difference? Might I suggest one was an American company and one was not?

Plus if your out to destroy a nation like Obama is, why not curtail a
main source of energy development making USA weaker and more dependent
on Saudi oil? I am sure the Saudi like that.

Lets hope people wake up nd toast Obama in 2012.

Your simple mindedness is duly noted.

I've corrected your typo.

On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:15:02 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article cb133bc9-3f62-44ed-a2d6-1d92e0261b99
, says...

Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.

Sure hoss. We believe you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPm8l8LXSIs

Idiots like Froggy and Knuckles only believe in what Palin says. Or,
if they've got their radios on, Rush.