Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know if I'm talking only to Larry Cable here, but on the
off-chance that somebody else is lurking or willing to post... Last fall I bought a new AIRE Lynx to replace my 1993 model, which is still in service though with many patches on the floor bottom. After several trips I have concluded that I agree with Larry about the new seat. We don't like it! It's nice that it unbuckles easily, leaving the boat open for sleeping, and it makes an OK camp chair. However the sides interfere with rudder strokes, and it just feels sloppy. I liked the old-style (uncovered coated-nylon) seat that came with my 1993 boat. It cradled my butt, giving a feeling of more control and greater power. What can be done? Thwarts are relatively uncomfortable and don't solve the control/power problem. Maybe I should experiment with buckling in my old-style seat? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Bill Tuthill
writes: I don't know if I'm talking only to Larry Cable here, but on the off-chance that somebody else is lurking or willing to post... Last fall I bought a new AIRE Lynx to replace my 1993 model, which is still in service though with many patches on the floor bottom. After several trips I have concluded that I agree with Larry about the new seat. We don't like it! It's nice that it unbuckles easily, leaving the boat open for sleeping, and it makes an OK camp chair. However the sides interfere with rudder strokes, and it just feels sloppy. I liked the old-style (uncovered coated-nylon) seat that came with my 1993 boat. It cradled my butt, giving a feeling of more control and greater power. My take is still that the thwart is the best way to go. It actually gives better back support and it lowers your center of gravity. Best of all, it is out of the way of your paddle strokes. It does eat up a lot of room, not an issue here where we run mainly day trips, and I don't have mine so that it can be removed, although I don't see why you couldn't mount it with the same type strap system as the seat. BTW, two great days of creeking on the Cumberland Plateau. A sweet little creek called Upper Whites Creek (Rhea County, TN) on Saturday and Crab Orchard on the Emory/Obed System on Sunday. Whites is a little micro that you can only run at extremely high water, and we had plenty Saturday. This little gem drops about 100 ft a mile, the first 2.5 miles are a continous Class III rapid (continous as in no pools). If Upper Whites was Down Hill, then Crab Orchard is Slalom. A nice Class II/III+ Creek, we ran it at moderate level of 1.5'. Saturday was 35 degrees and sunny, Sunday started out at 55 and sunny, the rained and dropped cold about the last hour of the trip. Do you have the new Lynx with the increased rise and narrow front end? SYOTR Larry C. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Cable wrote:
My take is still that the thwart is the best way to go. It actually gives better back support and it lowers your center of gravity. Best of all, it is out of the way of your paddle strokes. It does eat up a lot of room, not an issue here where we run mainly day trips, and I don't have mine so that it can be removed, although I don't see why you couldn't mount it with the same type strap system as the seat. Have you seen the pillow-style thwart used in the Caracal and Tomcat? It detracts little from gear storage space. Personally I don't think thwarts are as comfortable as the early-1990s Lynx chair. When I did the Escalante, I loaned out my Lynx, and put my spare old-Lynx chair in a 2-person Maravia Challenger for myself. That's because I knew the Challenger thwart is too uncomfortable for an 8-day expedition. AIRE's pillow-thwart is a bit more comfortable than that one. By the way, I recommend against the round-your-boat cam strap that AIRE documents, expecially for low water, because it can get trapped in rocks, causing a flip or other potentially dangerous situations. Do you have the new Lynx with the increased rise and narrow front end? Yes. I now believe that it's superior to the old hull design for running big hydraulics. It slices & dices waves better, and takes on less water. Its hull speed is a tad faster, and stability also seems somewhat improved, due to aforementioned slicing, but perhaps more so because of a more hydrodynamic side-tube profile. In other words, when big waves slosh over the side, they don't exert as much force. I loaned out the new Lynx on a Middle Fork Salmon trip last July, and a rookie took it thru Impassible Canyon at moderately high flow with only one swim, early on in a nothing rapid. On the downside, I found that when running ultra-low-water Camp creek, http://creekin.net/camp.htm the back end got caught more in rocks. That could have been because my seat was too far back. I've since moved it forward, but haven't done any ultra-low-water creeks since then. BTW, two great days of creeking on the Cumberland Plateau... Sounds great, I'm moving! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Cable wrote:
Have you tried the Force or Force XL yet? Yes, both, although not on class 4. My feeling is that you might as well get a hardshell, because they are less expensive, won't puncture when dragged over rocks, and have more gear storage capacity. Heck, my friend who paddles a Force XL even made me carry his lunch! The LiquidLogic Gus is one example of a hardshell kayak with adequate capacity and performance for camping trips. AIRE used to make the Force XL in "Expedition" format without inflatable backrest and footrest (now discontinued), but it's hard to see the point. It just looks like a Lynx without bow rise. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTB: Signature Deluxe RIGHT CORNER pontoon seat in BLUE | Marketplace | |||
Setting up a Malibu Two for Solo with Center Seat | General | |||
Kneeling thwart height | General | |||
aire super lynx | General | |||
Self righting "car" seat type PFD? | General |