BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Right of Way (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/137507-right-way.html)

Eisboch[_8_] August 16th 11 09:51 PM

Right of Way
 
I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

X ~ Man August 16th 11 10:54 PM

Right of Way
 
On 8/16/11 4:51 PM, Eisboch wrote:
I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI



The sailboats that show up about halfway through the video look awfully
close to that tanker.


--
Don't forget to leave a bit of beef for rec.boat's right-wing
conservatrashers and ID spoofers to feed upon. The more they feed, the
quicker rec.boats will fall into the black hole of cyberspace and disappear.

BAR[_2_] August 17th 11 12:00 AM

Right of Way
 
In article ,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter if you
are on the highway or on the water.

Canuck57[_9_] August 17th 11 12:38 AM

Right of Way
 
On 16/08/2011 2:51 PM, Eisboch wrote:
I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI


Sailboat captain error, plain and simple.

--
Flea party (leftie) fear, begets flea party smear.

North Star August 17th 11 02:44 AM

Right of Way
 
On Aug 16, 5:51*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI


Yup...around here commercial traffic are the 'stand on vessel'.

*e#c August 17th 11 02:56 AM

Right of Way
 
On Aug 16, 4:51*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI


Tonnage Rules. 'nuff said.

[email protected] August 17th 11 05:04 AM

Right of Way
 
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI


The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter if you
are on the highway or on the water.


According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.

Canuck57[_9_] August 17th 11 07:17 AM

Right of Way
 
On 16/08/2011 10:04 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter if you
are on the highway or on the water.


According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.


Wow, glad you can't afford a boat. The least maneuverable boat gets the
right of way. Also, the sailboat broke the first rule, all boaters
should avoid collisions at all costs.

Combine the two above, no way out for the stupid sailboat owner.

About the only way for the sailboat to be not at fault would be if the
sailboat was anchored out of the main channel. Under sail, it is up to
the sailboat to avoid the less maneuverable freighter.

You need to get your reading compression up a bit.

--
Flea party (leftie) fear, begets flea party smear.

BeachBum[_2_] August 17th 11 01:39 PM

Right of Way
 
On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter if you
are on the highway or on the water.


According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.


Cite please.

iBoat Often August 17th 11 02:14 PM

Right of Way
 
In article ,
says...

On 8/16/11 4:51 PM, Eisboch wrote:
I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI


The sailboats that show up about halfway through the video look awfully
close to that tanker.


As an allegedly accomplished photographer who claims to have been
published in several magazines (of course while trying to pass an owl
picture off as his own) you should know there is this phenomenon called
"depth-of-field".

X-Man[_3_] August 17th 11 02:20 PM

Right of Way
 
On 8/17/11 9:14 AM, iBoat Often wrote:
In ,
says...

On 8/16/11 4:51 PM, Eisboch wrote:
I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI


The sailboats that show up about halfway through the video look awfully
close to that tanker.


As an allegedly accomplished photographer who claims to have been
published in several magazines (of course while trying to pass an owl
picture off as his own) you should know there is this phenomenon called
"depth-of-field".


Asshole. There is something called "depth of field" and it made my hand
looked so bloated that it was attached to someone who is super morbidly
obese. I really am very trim and in perfect health, it was depth of
field that made my hand look extremely fat and pudgy.

--
Don't forget to leave a bit of beef for rec.boat's right-wing
conservatrashers and ID spoofers to feed upon. The more they feed, the
quicker rec.boats will fall into the black hole of cyberspace and
disappear.

[email protected] August 17th 11 07:06 PM

Right of Way
 
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:17:54 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 16/08/2011 10:04 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter if you
are on the highway or on the water.


According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.


Wow, glad you can't afford a boat. The least maneuverable boat gets the
right of way. Also, the sailboat broke the first rule, all boaters
should avoid collisions at all costs.

Combine the two above, no way out for the stupid sailboat owner.

About the only way for the sailboat to be not at fault would be if the
sailboat was anchored out of the main channel. Under sail, it is up to
the sailboat to avoid the less maneuverable freighter.

You need to get your reading compression up a bit.


As usual, you don't know much about anything. I just looked at the
international regulations, and tankers do not have right of way over
sail. And, generally unless there's some restriction on a vessels
maneuverability, it can't overtake another an claim right of way.
There are also crossing situations for power boats.

In the particular case in the vid, the tanker did have the right of
way. Other than that, basically, you're a moron.

Canuck57[_9_] August 17th 11 07:10 PM

Right of Way
 
On 17/08/2011 12:06 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:17:54 -0600,
wrote:

On 16/08/2011 10:04 PM,
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.


Wow, glad you can't afford a boat. The least maneuverable boat gets the
right of way. Also, the sailboat broke the first rule, all boaters
should avoid collisions at all costs.

Combine the two above, no way out for the stupid sailboat owner.

About the only way for the sailboat to be not at fault would be if the
sailboat was anchored out of the main channel. Under sail, it is up to
the sailboat to avoid the less maneuverable freighter.

You need to get your reading compression up a bit.


As usual, you don't know much about anything. I just looked at the
international regulations, and tankers do not have right of way over
sail. And, generally unless there's some restriction on a vessels
maneuverability, it can't overtake another an claim right of way.
There are also crossing situations for power boats.

In the particular case in the vid, the tanker did have the right of
way. Other than that, basically, you're a moron.


Like I said, I am glad you can't afford a boat.
--
Flea party (leftie) fear, begets flea party smear.

John H[_2_] August 17th 11 07:23 PM

Right of Way
 
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:51:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI


Yes. There *are* stupid people.

BAR[_2_] August 18th 11 12:27 AM

Right of Way
 
In article m, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter if you
are on the highway or on the water.


According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.


Cite please.


God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.

Wayne B August 18th 11 01:02 AM

Right of Way
 
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:27:42 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article m, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.


Cite please.


God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.


==============

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18


BeachBum[_2_] August 18th 11 01:03 AM

Right of Way
 
On 8/17/2011 7:27 PM, BAR wrote:
In aweb.com, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.


Cite please.


God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.


She didn't provide a cite so she must be full of ****.

JustWait August 18th 11 01:32 AM

Right of Way
 
On 8/17/2011 8:02 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:27:42 -0400, wrote:

In aweb.com, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.

Cite please.


God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.


==============

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18


You know blow boaters... They all think they have the right of, well,
pretty much everything... ;)

Wayne B August 18th 11 02:14 AM

Right of Way
 
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:32:24 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 8/17/2011 8:02 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:27:42 -0400, wrote:

In aweb.com, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.

Cite please.

God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.


==============

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18


You know blow boaters... They all think they have the right of, well,
pretty much everything... ;)


=======

A lot of sailboaters are not familiar with the implications of Rule 18
although it largely falls under the rule of common sense. There was a
widely publicized incident in San Diego a number of years ago. A well
known sailor named Lowell North (founder of the North Sails loft), cut
very close to the front of a freighter during a race. There was no
collission but it was way to close for comfort. The freighter captain
complained to USCG, a hearing was conducted, and North was fined some
large amount of money for his recklessness.


[email protected] August 18th 11 03:03 AM

Right of Way
 
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:10:26 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 17/08/2011 12:06 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:17:54 -0600,
wrote:

On 16/08/2011 10:04 PM,
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.

Wow, glad you can't afford a boat. The least maneuverable boat gets the
right of way. Also, the sailboat broke the first rule, all boaters
should avoid collisions at all costs.

Combine the two above, no way out for the stupid sailboat owner.

About the only way for the sailboat to be not at fault would be if the
sailboat was anchored out of the main channel. Under sail, it is up to
the sailboat to avoid the less maneuverable freighter.

You need to get your reading compression up a bit.


As usual, you don't know much about anything. I just looked at the
international regulations, and tankers do not have right of way over
sail. And, generally unless there's some restriction on a vessels
maneuverability, it can't overtake another an claim right of way.
There are also crossing situations for power boats.

In the particular case in the vid, the tanker did have the right of
way. Other than that, basically, you're a moron.


Like I said, I am glad you can't afford a boat.


Like I said, you're a moron. You don't own a boat bozo.

[email protected] August 18th 11 03:05 AM

Right of Way
 
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:02:51 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:27:42 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article m, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.

Cite please.


God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.


==============

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18


And, I never said otherwise.

However, in international waters, that wouldn't be the case, so when
BAR claimed that the bigger you are means you have more rights, he's
wrong in several cases.

[email protected] August 18th 11 03:05 AM

Right of Way
 
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:23:18 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:51:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI


Yes. There *are* stupid people.


Yes, and you're one of them.

Canuck57[_9_] August 18th 11 04:09 AM

Right of Way
 
On 17/08/2011 6:03 PM, BeachBum wrote:
On 8/17/2011 7:27 PM, BAR wrote:
In aweb.com, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right
of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter
if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.

Cite please.


God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.


She didn't provide a cite so she must be full of ****.


Yep, deplume is always full of ****. A simpleton fleabag waiting for
the welfare checks and food stamps.
--
Flea party (leftie) fear, begets flea party smear.

Canuck57[_9_] August 18th 11 04:35 AM

Right of Way
 
On 17/08/2011 8:05 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:02:51 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:27:42 -0400, wrote:

In aweb.com, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM,
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.

Cite please.

God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.


==============

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18


And, I never said otherwise.

However, in international waters, that wouldn't be the case, so when
BAR claimed that the bigger you are means you have more rights, he's
wrong in several cases.


Like I said, best you are **** poor and can't afford a boat.

Always wrong deplume.
--
Flea party (leftie) fear, begets flea party smear.

[email protected] August 18th 11 05:51 AM

Right of Way
 
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:35:44 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 17/08/2011 8:05 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:02:51 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:27:42 -0400, wrote:

In aweb.com, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM,
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.

Cite please.

God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.

==============

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18


And, I never said otherwise.

However, in international waters, that wouldn't be the case, so when
BAR claimed that the bigger you are means you have more rights, he's
wrong in several cases.


Like I said, best you are **** poor and can't afford a boat.

Always wrong deplume.


Like I said, you're stupid, and you couldn't afford even a rowboat.

[email protected] August 18th 11 05:51 AM

Right of Way
 
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:09:46 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 17/08/2011 6:03 PM, BeachBum wrote:
On 8/17/2011 7:27 PM, BAR wrote:
In aweb.com, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right
of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter
if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.

Cite please.

God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.


She didn't provide a cite so she must be full of ****.


Yep, deplume is always full of ****. A simpleton fleabag waiting for
the welfare checks and food stamps.


Well, you are certainly an expert when it comes to being full of ****.

BeachBum[_2_] August 18th 11 01:50 PM

Right of Way
 
On 8/17/2011 11:35 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 17/08/2011 8:05 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:02:51 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:27:42 -0400, wrote:

In aweb.com, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM,
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right
of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter
if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.

Cite please.

God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't
supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.

==============

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18


And, I never said otherwise.

However, in international waters, that wouldn't be the case, so when
BAR claimed that the bigger you are means you have more rights, he's
wrong in several cases.


Like I said, best you are **** poor and can't afford a boat.

Always wrong deplume.


What ever happened to that dream boat you and several of your friends
were going to chip in on?

JustWait August 18th 11 02:40 PM

Right of Way
 
On 8/18/2011 8:50 AM, BeachBum wrote:
On 8/17/2011 11:35 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 17/08/2011 8:05 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:02:51 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:27:42 -0400, wrote:

In aweb.com, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM,
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right
of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter
if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of
the
time.

Cite please.

God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't
supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.

==============

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18

And, I never said otherwise.

However, in international waters, that wouldn't be the case, so when
BAR claimed that the bigger you are means you have more rights, he's
wrong in several cases.


Like I said, best you are **** poor and can't afford a boat.

Always wrong deplume.


What ever happened to that dream boat you and several of your friends
were going to chip in on?


That was Harry's way of bringing in a new sock puppet...

Wayne B August 18th 11 07:02 PM

Right of Way
 
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:40:42 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18

And, I never said otherwise.

However, in international waters, that wouldn't be the case


==============

The rules in international waters are exactly the same with respect to
that situation. See rule 18(b) of the international COLREGS:

http://www.boatingsafety.com/colregs.htm




John H[_2_] August 18th 11 08:04 PM

Right of Way
 
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:50:57 -0400, BeachBum "not a wrote:

On 8/17/2011 11:35 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 17/08/2011 8:05 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:02:51 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:27:42 -0400, wrote:

In aweb.com, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM,
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right
of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter
if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.

Cite please.

God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't
supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.

==============

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18

And, I never said otherwise.

However, in international waters, that wouldn't be the case, so when
BAR claimed that the bigger you are means you have more rights, he's
wrong in several cases.


Like I said, best you are **** poor and can't afford a boat.

Always wrong deplume.


What ever happened to that dream boat you and several of your friends
were going to chip in on?


I was discussing this with a friend a few days ago. The plume started off with a tale about a sail
boat investment with some friends. Sounded great.

Then we all became moronic, assholish, racist homophobes.

[email protected] August 18th 11 08:31 PM

Right of Way
 
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:02:50 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:40:42 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18

And, I never said otherwise.

However, in international waters, that wouldn't be the case


==============

The rules in international waters are exactly the same with respect to
that situation. See rule 18(b) of the international COLREGS:

http://www.boatingsafety.com/colregs.htm



Tankers and large vessels are required by international law to avoid
collisions. They are not necessarily restricted in maneuverability,
since there are nothing preventing them from moving to one side or the
other. There is no such rule that says a tanker can run down a smaller
boat.

Nothing in 18b talks about this situation.

Take the limiting case of two tankers. The one overtaking is 700 ft
long. The one being overtaken is 300 ft long. Your claim that the
smaller one must get out of the way of the bigger one is nonsense.

In the case of a crossing situation, I've heard the term the boat on
the right is right... just like when two cars come to stop signs at
the same time.

Inland and in restricted situations, such as a channel, they are
restricted by draft, for example.

[email protected] August 18th 11 08:34 PM

Right of Way
 
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:04:59 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:50:57 -0400, BeachBum "not a wrote:

On 8/17/2011 11:35 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 17/08/2011 8:05 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:02:51 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:27:42 -0400, wrote:

In aweb.com, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM,
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right
of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter
if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.

Cite please.

God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't
supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.

==============

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18

And, I never said otherwise.

However, in international waters, that wouldn't be the case, so when
BAR claimed that the bigger you are means you have more rights, he's
wrong in several cases.

Like I said, best you are **** poor and can't afford a boat.

Always wrong deplume.


What ever happened to that dream boat you and several of your friends
were going to chip in on?


I was discussing this with a friend a few days ago. The plume started off with a tale about a sail
boat investment with some friends. Sounded great.

Then we all became moronic, assholish, racist homophobes.


So, I guess when you bought your boat (you have a big boat right?),
you just bought the first thing you saw, no questions asked. Since you
were born knowing how to sail (or run a 40 ft motor boat), you didn't
bother to take lessons or make any plans to figure out how to do that.
You didn't "become" a moronic, assholish, racist, homophobe. You were
one all along.

Canuck57[_9_] August 18th 11 08:41 PM

Right of Way
 
On 18/08/2011 1:31 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:02:50 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:40:42 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18

And, I never said otherwise.

However, in international waters, that wouldn't be the case


==============

The rules in international waters are exactly the same with respect to
that situation. See rule 18(b) of the international COLREGS:

http://www.boatingsafety.com/colregs.htm



Tankers and large vessels are required by international law to avoid
collisions. They are not necessarily restricted in maneuverability,
since there are nothing preventing them from moving to one side or the
other. There is no such rule that says a tanker can run down a smaller
boat.

Nothing in 18b talks about this situation.

Take the limiting case of two tankers. The one overtaking is 700 ft
long. The one being overtaken is 300 ft long. Your claim that the
smaller one must get out of the way of the bigger one is nonsense.

In the case of a crossing situation, I've heard the term the boat on
the right is right... just like when two cars come to stop signs at
the same time.

Inland and in restricted situations, such as a channel, they are
restricted by draft, for example.


Fact si your a dumb**** know nothing idiot fleabeggar.

--
Flea party (leftie) fear, begets flea party smear.

iBoat Often August 18th 11 08:42 PM

Right of Way
 
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:50:57 -0400, BeachBum "not a wrote:

On 8/17/2011 11:35 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 17/08/2011 8:05 PM,
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:02:51 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:27:42 -0400, wrote:

In aweb.com, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM,
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right
of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter
if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.

Cite please.

God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't
supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.

==============

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18

And, I never said otherwise.

However, in international waters, that wouldn't be the case, so when
BAR claimed that the bigger you are means you have more rights, he's
wrong in several cases.

Like I said, best you are **** poor and can't afford a boat.

Always wrong deplume.


What ever happened to that dream boat you and several of your friends
were going to chip in on?


I was discussing this with a friend a few days ago. The plume started off with a tale about a sail
boat investment with some friends. Sounded great.

Then we all became moronic, assholish, racist homophobes.


That's racist, you moron.

[email protected] August 18th 11 08:55 PM

Right of Way
 
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:41:35 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 18/08/2011 1:31 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:02:50 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:40:42 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18

And, I never said otherwise.

However, in international waters, that wouldn't be the case

==============

The rules in international waters are exactly the same with respect to
that situation. See rule 18(b) of the international COLREGS:

http://www.boatingsafety.com/colregs.htm



Tankers and large vessels are required by international law to avoid
collisions. They are not necessarily restricted in maneuverability,
since there are nothing preventing them from moving to one side or the
other. There is no such rule that says a tanker can run down a smaller
boat.

Nothing in 18b talks about this situation.

Take the limiting case of two tankers. The one overtaking is 700 ft
long. The one being overtaken is 300 ft long. Your claim that the
smaller one must get out of the way of the bigger one is nonsense.

In the case of a crossing situation, I've heard the term the boat on
the right is right... just like when two cars come to stop signs at
the same time.

Inland and in restricted situations, such as a channel, they are
restricted by draft, for example.


Fact si your a dumb**** know nothing idiot fleabeggar.


Whatever you say Mr. PeeWee.

X ~ Man August 18th 11 08:57 PM

Right of Way
 
On 8/18/11 3:04 PM, John H wrote:


Then we all became moronic, assholish, racist homophobes.


Well, that didn't take any effort on your part.


BeachBum[_2_] August 18th 11 09:04 PM

Right of Way
 
On 8/18/2011 3:34 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:04:59 -0400, John
wrote:

On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:50:57 -0400, BeachBum"not a wrote:

On 8/17/2011 11:35 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 17/08/2011 8:05 PM,
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:02:51 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:27:42 -0400, wrote:

In aweb.com, "not a
says...

On 8/17/2011 12:04 AM,
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:00:06 -0400, wrote:

In article8OGdnUEBcLTORdfTnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

I suspect this sailboat captain is rethinking who has the "Right
of Way".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tUoUxzt9sI

The bigger you are the more right of way you have. Doesn't matter
if you
are on the highway or on the water.

According to the regulation I've read, this is incorrect a lot of the
time.

Cite please.

God doesn't isn't going to accept your argument that you aren't
supposed
to be at the pearly gates because you had the right of way and you
should be sent back.

==============

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18

And, I never said otherwise.

However, in international waters, that wouldn't be the case, so when
BAR claimed that the bigger you are means you have more rights, he's
wrong in several cases.

Like I said, best you are **** poor and can't afford a boat.

Always wrong deplume.

What ever happened to that dream boat you and several of your friends
were going to chip in on?


I was discussing this with a friend a few days ago. The plume started off with a tale about a sail
boat investment with some friends. Sounded great.

Then we all became moronic, assholish, racist homophobes.


So, I guess when you bought your boat (you have a big boat right?),
you just bought the first thing you saw, no questions asked. Since you
were born knowing how to sail (or run a 40 ft motor boat), you didn't
bother to take lessons or make any plans to figure out how to do that.
You didn't "become" a moronic, assholish, racist, homophobe. You were
one all along.


What John was talking about makes perfect sense now. Thanks for clearing
up the " I'm gonna buy a boat" mystery.

BeachBum[_2_] August 18th 11 09:12 PM

Right of Way
 
On 8/18/2011 3:31 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:02:50 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:40:42 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

The sailboat did not have the right of way. The skipper took a
foolish risk and lost the bet.

Rule 18(b)

(b) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of:

a vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=Rule18

And, I never said otherwise.

However, in international waters, that wouldn't be the case


==============

The rules in international waters are exactly the same with respect to
that situation. See rule 18(b) of the international COLREGS:

http://www.boatingsafety.com/colregs.htm



Tankers and large vessels are required by international law to avoid
collisions. They are not necessarily restricted in maneuverability,
since there are nothing preventing them from moving to one side or the
other. There is no such rule that says a tanker can run down a smaller
boat.

Nothing in 18b talks about this situation.

Take the limiting case of two tankers. The one overtaking is 700 ft
long. The one being overtaken is 300 ft long. Your claim that the
smaller one must get out of the way of the bigger one is nonsense.

In the case of a crossing situation, I've heard the term the boat on
the right is right... just like when two cars come to stop signs at
the same time.

Inland and in restricted situations, such as a channel, they are
restricted by draft, for example.


In this situation, it is perfectly clear that the sailor ****ed up. You
will learn, as you mature, that all your book learnin and Goggling is
trumped by common sense and good judgement.

[email protected] August 18th 11 10:26 PM

Right of Way
 
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:57:37 -0400, X ~ Man
wrote:

On 8/18/11 3:04 PM, John H wrote:


Then we all became moronic, assholish, racist homophobes.


Well, that didn't take any effort on your part.


LOL!!!!

BAR[_2_] August 18th 11 11:24 PM

Right of Way
 

However, in international waters, that wouldn't be the case, so when
BAR claimed that the bigger you are means you have more rights, he's
wrong in several cases.


You missed my point completely. It doesn't matter if you have the right
of way if you die in the process of expecting the other boat, car or 18-
wheeler to yield to your right of way.

When there are ships or barges transiting the Potomac river everyone has
to get out of their way. Even in the Chesapeake Bay you need to get out
of the way of ships and barges when they are in the channel. due to the
fact that outside of the channel it can get extremely shallow quickly.

If you can defend your right of way from the grave good luck on coming
back and boating in this world again.






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com