On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:40:26 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:07:49 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:


AND just bailed out the rich

no wonder you're confused


Reply:
I am confused about your comments. When the tax cuts were Bush tax cuts
they were bad according to you. Now that they are Obama tax cuts they are
good according to you. Confusing, grasshopper. Damn correct we need to
raise middle class taxes. When 46% of the families in America pay no Federal
Income Tax, something is wrong. Maybe if they also had to pay, they would
require the Federal Government to live within their means. We also need to
raise the tax on the rich, and cut Federal Spending. And if you have not
had a raise in pay in 30 years, you suck as a worker.

no surprise. right wingers are confused by truth.

i didnt say the bush tax cuts were bad. i said it was bad to raise
them on the middle class since

1. the middle class is already stretched while the rich are not
2. we bailed out the rich
3. the rich can pay more taxes because their tax rates are lower than
real american's tax rates are

you're an asshole. really. you regurgitate like a sick dog this mantra
that half of taxpayers dont pay taxes

OK genius here are some facts

1. half of THOSE taxpayers are on social security.

so you gonna tax SOCIAL SECURITY recipients to pay for BILLIONAIRES??

CLASS WARFARE

2. the TOTAL amount of income in the BOTTOM FIFTY PERCENT is

1.4 TRILLION

the total income of the richest 3%

is TWO TRILLION

so the MIDDLE CLASS HAS NO MONEY

3. the rich pay 15% on their income

the middle class pays almost DOUBLE this

4. the half that 'dont pay' taxes DO pay taxes but get REFUNDS due to
DEDUCTIONS

mostly for CHILDREN

so go ahead you CLASS WARFARE fanatic

DESTROY THE MIDDLE CLASS

it's what the right wants