| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Obomba at the polls
O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). -- Flea party (leftie) fear, begets flea party smear. |
Obomba at the polls
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). Knuckles doesn't need to look for racists beyond his mirror. |
Obomba at the polls
On Aug 14, 11:21*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). Knuckles doesn't need to look for racists beyond his mirror. Low poll count's are not racist D'Plume. I believe you are gasping for air, yourself. |
Obomba at the polls
On Aug 14, 11:21*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). Knuckles doesn't need to look for racists beyond his mirror. Rasmussen is evidently racist too. Here 'y go, Obama gal... http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ..._index_history |
Obomba at the polls
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:25:22 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog
wrote: On Aug 14, 11:21*pm, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). Knuckles doesn't need to look for racists beyond his mirror. Rasmussen is evidently racist too. Here 'y go, Obama gal... http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ..._index_history rasmussen is heavily GOP oriented. and it's no surprise that everyone is disgusted with govt. right now. the GOP has become anarchist |
Obomba at the polls
On Aug 15, 4:51*am, wf3h wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:25:22 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog wrote: On Aug 14, 11:21*pm, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). Knuckles doesn't need to look for racists beyond his mirror. Rasmussen is evidently racist too. Here 'y go, Obama gal... http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ.../obama_adminis... rasmussen is heavily GOP oriented. and it's no surprise that everyone is disgusted with govt. right now. the GOP has become anarchist All polls are showing the same types of numbers, are they ALL republican? |
Obomba at the polls
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 05:51:57 -0400, wf3h wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:25:22 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog wrote: On Aug 14, 11:21*pm, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). Knuckles doesn't need to look for racists beyond his mirror. Rasmussen is evidently racist too. Here 'y go, Obama gal... http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ..._index_history rasmussen is heavily GOP oriented. and it's no surprise that everyone is disgusted with govt. right now. the GOP has become anarchist I guess they're too embarrassed to show the approval ratings for Congress. |
Obomba at the polls
|
Obomba at the polls
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:04:54 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 15/08/2011 11:15 AM, wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 05:51:57 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:25:22 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog wrote: On Aug 14, 11:21 pm, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). Knuckles doesn't need to look for racists beyond his mirror. Rasmussen is evidently racist too. Here 'y go, Obama gal... http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ..._index_history rasmussen is heavily GOP oriented. and it's no surprise that everyone is disgusted with govt. right now. the GOP has become anarchist I guess they're too embarrassed to show the approval ratings for Congress. Clean out those multi term democrat sticks in the mud. Even the old fat McCain and Gingrich. The old boys corrupt fart club. Clean out your ears. The wax buildup is taking over your brain. |
Obomba at the polls
|
Obomba at the polls
On 15/08/2011 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. I agree. I think he is capable of standing up to the nutcases, however. I just don't understand why he would think, after so much evidence to the contrary, that there is any room for compromise from these people. I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president. Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul, Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices. Need a person in the top office that knows how to kick some civil servant asses, say no to fleabag debt lovers and make things happen for the people, less back room Harvard linked corruption. The list of Harvard screw ups is a long one. -- Flea party (leftie) fear, begets flea party smear. |
Obomba at the polls
In article ,
says... On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:04:54 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 15/08/2011 11:15 AM, wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 05:51:57 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:25:22 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog wrote: On Aug 14, 11:21 pm, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). Knuckles doesn't need to look for racists beyond his mirror. Rasmussen is evidently racist too. Here 'y go, Obama gal... http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ..._index_history rasmussen is heavily GOP oriented. and it's no surprise that everyone is disgusted with govt. right now. the GOP has become anarchist I guess they're too embarrassed to show the approval ratings for Congress. Clean out those multi term democrat sticks in the mud. Even the old fat McCain and Gingrich. The old boys corrupt fart club. Clean out your ears. The wax buildup is taking over your brain. Yep, same debating skills as Harry. Nothing but insults and name calling. Sure makes you look intelligent... NOT! |
Obomba at the polls
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 04:54:13 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog
wrote: On Aug 15, 4:51*am, wf3h wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:25:22 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog wrote: On Aug 14, 11:21*pm, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). Knuckles doesn't need to look for racists beyond his mirror. Rasmussen is evidently racist too. Here 'y go, Obama gal... http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ.../obama_adminis... rasmussen is heavily GOP oriented. and it's no surprise that everyone is disgusted with govt. right now. the GOP has become anarchist All polls are showing the same types of numbers, are they ALL republican? gee looked at the numbers for the GOP lately? they'd kill for 40% |
Obomba at the polls
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:53:29 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 15/08/2011 12:08 PM, wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. I agree. I think he is capable of standing up to the nutcases, however. I just don't understand why he would think, after so much evidence to the contrary, that there is any room for compromise from these people. I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president. Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul, Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices. Need a person in the top office that knows how to kick some civil servant asses, say no to fleabag debt lovers and make things happen for the people, less back room Harvard linked corruption. The list of Harvard screw ups is a long one. Sorry, but three nutcases don't add up to a half brain. |
Obomba at the polls
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:47:45 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 15/08/2011 11:25 AM, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. Well put. It is almost as if deliberate, what a better way to destroy a country by pandering to and selling the greed and envy of debt. Fortunately, you have no say in what happens in this great country. You're banned from entering. |
Obomba at the polls
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:04:54 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 15/08/2011 11:15 AM, wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 05:51:57 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:25:22 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog wrote: On Aug 14, 11:21 pm, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). Knuckles doesn't need to look for racists beyond his mirror. Rasmussen is evidently racist too. Here 'y go, Obama gal... http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ..._index_history rasmussen is heavily GOP oriented. and it's no surprise that everyone is disgusted with govt. right now. the GOP has become anarchist I guess they're too embarrassed to show the approval ratings for Congress. Clean out those multi term democrat sticks in the mud. Even the old fat McCain and Gingrich. The old boys corrupt fart club. i agree. we should fire every rep and replace them with members of the opposite party |
Obomba at the polls
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:53:29 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 15/08/2011 12:08 PM, wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. I agree. I think he is capable of standing up to the nutcases, however. I just don't understand why he would think, after so much evidence to the contrary, that there is any room for compromise from these people. I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president. Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul, Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices. dont know much about perry or bachman do you? her support for slavery his hatred of roman catholics... |
Obomba at the polls
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:33:11 -0400, wf3h wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 04:54:13 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog wrote: On Aug 15, 4:51*am, wf3h wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:25:22 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog wrote: On Aug 14, 11:21*pm, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). Knuckles doesn't need to look for racists beyond his mirror. Rasmussen is evidently racist too. Here 'y go, Obama gal... http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ.../obama_adminis... rasmussen is heavily GOP oriented. and it's no surprise that everyone is disgusted with govt. right now. the GOP has become anarchist All polls are showing the same types of numbers, are they ALL republican? gee looked at the numbers for the GOP lately? they'd kill for 40% You probably shouldn't use the word kill. It gets the rednecks excited. |
Obomba at the polls
|
Obomba at the polls
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:14:17 -0400, John H
wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'? When he says that he's referring to racist **** of which you're quite familiar. |
Obomba at the polls
On 8/15/11 8:00 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:14:17 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'? When he says that he's referring to racist **** of which you're quite familiar. Amazing how the racists here stick together, like the wet dog**** they are. |
Obomba at the polls
On 8/15/2011 8:01 PM, X ~ Man wrote:
On 8/15/11 8:00 PM, wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:14:17 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'? When he says that he's referring to racist **** of which you're quite familiar. Amazing how the racists here stick together, like the wet dog**** they are. Why don't you and princess rotten crotch get a room. |
Obomba at the polls
On Aug 15, 9:31*pm, BeachBum "not a wrote:
On 8/15/2011 8:01 PM, X ~ Man wrote: On 8/15/11 8:00 PM, wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:14:17 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'? When he says that he's referring to racist **** of which you're quite familiar. Amazing how the racists here stick together, like the wet dog**** they are. Why don't you and princess rotten crotch get a room. I believe they already have. They seem rather comfortable while joined at the hip. |
Obomba at the polls
On 15/08/2011 5:14 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'? Yep, Bail Out Barack Obama. Bobo for short. -- Flea party (leftie) fear, begets flea party smear. |
Obomba at the polls
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:32:06 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 15/08/2011 5:14 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'? Yep, Bail Out Barack Obama. Bobo for short. In your case, racist and short (ahem). |
Obomba at the polls
In article eb368b9e-8562-475f-9f57-
, says... On Aug 15, 9:31*pm, BeachBum "not a wrote: On 8/15/2011 8:01 PM, X ~ Man wrote: On 8/15/11 8:00 PM, wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:14:17 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'? When he says that he's referring to racist **** of which you're quite familiar. Amazing how the racists here stick together, like the wet dog**** they are. Why don't you and princess rotten crotch get a room. I believe they already have. They seem rather comfortable while joined at the hip. That made me throw up in my mouth.... |
Obomba at the polls
On 8/16/11 8:58 AM, iBoat Often wrote:
In articleeb368b9e-8562-475f-9f57- , says... On Aug 15, 9:31 pm, BeachBum"not a wrote: On 8/15/2011 8:01 PM, X ~ Man wrote: On 8/15/11 8:00 PM, wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:14:17 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'? When he says that he's referring to racist **** of which you're quite familiar. Amazing how the racists here stick together, like the wet dog**** they are. Why don't you and princess rotten crotch get a room. I believe they already have. They seem rather comfortable while joined at the hip. That made me throw up in my mouth.... There was room for puke with all the dicks in your mouth? |
Obomba at the polls
In article ,
says... On 8/16/11 8:58 AM, iBoat Often wrote: In articleeb368b9e-8562-475f-9f57- , says... On Aug 15, 9:31 pm, BeachBum"not a wrote: On 8/15/2011 8:01 PM, X ~ Man wrote: On 8/15/11 8:00 PM, wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:14:17 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'? When he says that he's referring to racist **** of which you're quite familiar. Amazing how the racists here stick together, like the wet dog**** they are. Why don't you and princess rotten crotch get a room. I believe they already have. They seem rather comfortable while joined at the hip. That made me throw up in my mouth.... There was room for puke with all the dicks in your mouth? Gee, Harry, that's SO typical of you!! You try to tell people here that you are sophisticated, worldy, and then you do nothing but insult, call names, and come up with low life **** like the above. I think you were thinking about Don and projecting.... |
Obomba at the polls
In article ,
says... On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:53:29 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 15/08/2011 12:08 PM, wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. I agree. I think he is capable of standing up to the nutcases, however. I just don't understand why he would think, after so much evidence to the contrary, that there is any room for compromise from these people. I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president. Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul, Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices. dont know much about perry or bachman do you? her support for slavery his hatred of roman catholics... Democrat party principles cause the enslavement of people. |
Obomba at the polls
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:52:24 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:53:29 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president. Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul, Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices. dont know much about perry or bachman do you? her support for slavery his hatred of roman catholics... Democrat party principles cause the enslavement of people. more bobblehead cliches. ever TRY to think for yourself? |
Obomba at the polls
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:52:24 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:53:29 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 15/08/2011 12:08 PM, wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. I agree. I think he is capable of standing up to the nutcases, however. I just don't understand why he would think, after so much evidence to the contrary, that there is any room for compromise from these people. I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president. Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul, Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices. dont know much about perry or bachman do you? her support for slavery his hatred of roman catholics... Democrat party principles cause the enslavement of people. Maybe on your tiny, one-man planet in your tiny brain. |
Obomba at the polls
|
Obomba at the polls
|
Obomba at the polls
|
Obomba at the polls
On 17/08/2011 6:10 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. Barack "It's everyone else's fault" Obama Well put. A fleabagger disease symptom, denial and always someone else's fault. -- Flea party (leftie) fear, begets flea party smear. |
Obomba at the polls
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:10:55 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:52:24 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:53:29 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president. Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul, Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices. dont know much about perry or bachman do you? her support for slavery his hatred of roman catholics... Democrat party principles cause the enslavement of people. more bobblehead cliches. ever TRY to think for yourself? Who should benefit from your labor? You or the state? Both. |
Obomba at the polls
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:58:07 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 17/08/2011 6:10 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, wrote: O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook. Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero). He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough balls to actually do it. Barack "It's everyone else's fault" Obama Well put. A fleabagger disease symptom, denial and always someone else's fault. Two racist morons agree that it's the black guy's fault no matter what. Call CNN! |
Obomba at the polls
On 17/08/2011 12:07 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:10:55 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:52:24 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:53:29 -0600, wrote: I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president. Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul, Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices. dont know much about perry or bachman do you? her support for slavery his hatred of roman catholics... Democrat party principles cause the enslavement of people. more bobblehead cliches. ever TRY to think for yourself? Who should benefit from your labor? You or the state? Both. To a point, how about you fleabeggars define exactly how much is a fair rate to the government? Precisely how much of a persons income should be shielded from all forms of taxation? You make a $1, you pay 30% in taxes, then you buy gas...$1 - 30 - 30 = 40 cents. 60% aggregate taxes without going into tax compounding. Fact is the bigger government gets, the less the people get. -- Flea party (leftie) fear, begets flea party smear. |
Obomba at the polls
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:10:55 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:52:24 -0400, BAR wrote: dont know much about perry or bachman do you? her support for slavery his hatred of roman catholics... Democrat party principles cause the enslavement of people. more bobblehead cliches. ever TRY to think for yourself? Who should benefit from your labor? You or the state? know what mercantiism is? we have a mercantilst economy...a plutocracy. your question is meaningless |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:43 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com