Obomba at the polls
 

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:14:17 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'?

When he says that he's referring to racist **** of which you're quite
familiar.

Obomba at the polls
 

On 8/15/11 8:00 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:14:17 -0400, John
wrote:

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'?

When he says that he's referring to racist **** of which you're quite
familiar.


Amazing how the racists here stick together, like the wet dog**** they are.

Obomba at the polls
 

On 8/15/2011 8:01 PM, X ~ Man wrote:
On 8/15/11 8:00 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:14:17 -0400, John
wrote:

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'?

When he says that he's referring to racist **** of which you're quite
familiar.


Amazing how the racists here stick together, like the wet dog**** they are.


Why don't you and princess rotten crotch get a room.

Obomba at the polls
 

On Aug 15, 9:31*pm, BeachBum "not a wrote:
On 8/15/2011 8:01 PM, X ~ Man wrote:









On 8/15/11 8:00 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:14:17 -0400, John
wrote:

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:

O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'?

When he says that he's referring to racist **** of which you're quite
familiar.

Amazing how the racists here stick together, like the wet dog**** they are.

Why don't you and princess rotten crotch get a room.

I believe they already have. They seem rather comfortable while joined
at the hip.

Obomba at the polls
 

On 15/08/2011 5:14 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'?

Yep, Bail Out Barack Obama. Bobo for short.
--
Flea party (leftie) fear, begets flea party smear.

Obomba at the polls
 

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:32:06 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 15/08/2011 5:14 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'?

Yep, Bail Out Barack Obama. Bobo for short.

In your case, racist and short (ahem).

Obomba at the polls
 

In article eb368b9e-8562-475f-9f57-
, says...

On Aug 15, 9:31*pm, BeachBum "not a wrote:
On 8/15/2011 8:01 PM, X ~ Man wrote:









On 8/15/11 8:00 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:14:17 -0400, John
wrote:

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:

O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'?

When he says that he's referring to racist **** of which you're quite
familiar.

Amazing how the racists here stick together, like the wet dog**** they are.

Why don't you and princess rotten crotch get a room.

I believe they already have. They seem rather comfortable while joined
at the hip.

That made me throw up in my mouth....

Obomba at the polls
 

On 8/16/11 8:58 AM, iBoat Often wrote:
In articleeb368b9e-8562-475f-9f57-
, says...

On Aug 15, 9:31 pm, BeachBum"not a wrote:
On 8/15/2011 8:01 PM, X ~ Man wrote:









On 8/15/11 8:00 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:14:17 -0400, John
wrote:

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:

O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'?

When he says that he's referring to racist **** of which you're quite
familiar.

Amazing how the racists here stick together, like the wet dog**** they are.

Why don't you and princess rotten crotch get a room.

I believe they already have. They seem rather comfortable while joined
at the hip.

That made me throw up in my mouth....


There was room for puke with all the dicks in your mouth?

Obomba at the polls
 

In article ,
says...

On 8/16/11 8:58 AM, iBoat Often wrote:
In articleeb368b9e-8562-475f-9f57-
, says...

On Aug 15, 9:31 pm, BeachBum"not a wrote:
On 8/15/2011 8:01 PM, X ~ Man wrote:









On 8/15/11 8:00 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:14:17 -0400, John
wrote:

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:

O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'?

When he says that he's referring to racist **** of which you're quite
familiar.

Amazing how the racists here stick together, like the wet dog**** they are.

Why don't you and princess rotten crotch get a room.

I believe they already have. They seem rather comfortable while joined
at the hip.

That made me throw up in my mouth....


There was room for puke with all the dicks in your mouth?

Gee, Harry, that's SO typical of you!! You try to tell people here that
you are sophisticated, worldy, and then you do nothing but insult, call
names, and come up with low life **** like the above. I think you were
thinking about Don and projecting....

Obomba at the polls
 

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:53:29 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 15/08/2011 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

I agree. I think he is capable of standing up to the nutcases,
however. I just don't understand why he would think, after so much
evidence to the contrary, that there is any room for compromise from
these people.

I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican
nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at
least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an
election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential
for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly
greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to
take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be
closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president.

Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden
handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul,
Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices.

dont know much about perry or bachman do you?

her support for slavery

his hatred of roman catholics...

Democrat party principles cause the enslavement of people.