On 8/14/11 12:42 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/08/2011 5:21 PM, X ~ Man wrote:
...and I think it is terrific. Hope she wins the GOP nomination. She'll
be as much fun in the campaign as Christine O'Donnell, the "witch" of
Delaware, was in her run for the U.S. Senate.

We know you hate women who stand up or beside men. That is you like them
under age and submissive because your a sick fleabagger.

On 8/14/11 12:42 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/08/2011 5:21 PM, X ~ Man wrote:
...and I think it is terrific. Hope she wins the GOP nomination. She'll
be as much fun in the campaign as Christine O'Donnell, the "witch" of
Delaware, was in her run for the U.S. Senate.

We know you hate women who stand up or beside men. That is you like them
under age and submissive because your a sick fleabagger.




You're a bit confused...it's Bachmann whose religious beliefs state she
has to be submissive to her husband, the diploma mill therapist who
can't get licensed.

On 8/14/11 1:01 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:27:09 -0600,
wrote:

On 13/08/2011 7:32 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 20:58:46 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:21:51 -0400, X ~
wrote:

...and I think it is terrific. Hope she wins the GOP nomination. She'll
be as much fun in the campaign as Christine O'Donnell, the "witch" of
Delaware, was in her run for the U.S. Senate.

in america no one is too right wing to be elected...it's a real danger

Unfortunately, you're right. If McConnell gets his way, destroy the
economy, there are enough ignoramuses out there to elect someone like
her.

I loved her definition of submit when it came to her husband. I have
some devote, but not crazy, Christian friends, and even they think she
wasn't being honest with that answer.

Worried about your welfare check?

This seems to be your theme lately. Is this another one of your many
problems? I though Canada was pretty generous, but I guess even they
know you're a drain on society and have cut you loose.


Canuckles seems to have a lot of trouble with those of us who give
specific reasons for not being fans of Bachmann, Palin, Perry, or any of
the other crazies seeking the GOP nomination. He thinks I dislike her
because of her gender, which is beyond funny, because my preferred
candidate in the 2008 primary fight was...Hillary Clinton. My disdain
for Palin in that election was not based upon her gender, but on her
ignorance, demagoguery, and intellectual laziness.

Canuckles, like most conservatives here, has a real problem with
abstract thinking and those capable of it.

--
Don't forget to leave a bit of beef for rec.boat's right-wing
conservatrashers and ID spoofers to feed upon. The more they feed, the
quicker rec.boats will fall into the black hole of cyberspace and disappear.

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:40:30 -0400, X ~ Man
wrote:

On 8/14/11 1:01 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:27:09 -0600,
wrote:

On 13/08/2011 7:32 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 20:58:46 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:21:51 -0400, X ~
wrote:

...and I think it is terrific. Hope she wins the GOP nomination. She'll
be as much fun in the campaign as Christine O'Donnell, the "witch" of
Delaware, was in her run for the U.S. Senate.

in america no one is too right wing to be elected...it's a real danger

Unfortunately, you're right. If McConnell gets his way, destroy the
economy, there are enough ignoramuses out there to elect someone like
her.

I loved her definition of submit when it came to her husband. I have
some devote, but not crazy, Christian friends, and even they think she
wasn't being honest with that answer.

Worried about your welfare check?

This seems to be your theme lately. Is this another one of your many
problems? I though Canada was pretty generous, but I guess even they
know you're a drain on society and have cut you loose.


Canuckles seems to have a lot of trouble with those of us who give
specific reasons for not being fans of Bachmann, Palin, Perry, or any of
the other crazies seeking the GOP nomination. He thinks I dislike her
because of her gender, which is beyond funny, because my preferred
candidate in the 2008 primary fight was...Hillary Clinton. My disdain
for Palin in that election was not based upon her gender, but on her
ignorance, demagoguery, and intellectual laziness.

Canuckles, like most conservatives here, has a real problem with
abstract thinking and those capable of it.

I agree. I was torn between an amazingly qualified candidate, Hillary,
and someone who had an inspirational message of hope and change. As a
woman, Clinton's and Obama's candidacies reinforced my long-held
belief that it is possible to win against the forces of darkness and
evil that people like Palin represent.

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:59:26 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 13/08/2011 7:32 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 20:58:46 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:21:51 -0400, X ~
wrote:

...and I think it is terrific. Hope she wins the GOP nomination. She'll
be as much fun in the campaign as Christine O'Donnell, the "witch" of
Delaware, was in her run for the U.S. Senate.

in america no one is too right wing to be elected...it's a real danger

Unfortunately, you're right. If McConnell gets his way, destroy the
economy, there are enough ignoramuses out there to elect someone like
her.

I loved her definition of submit when it came to her husband. I have
some devote, but not crazy, Christian friends, and even they think she
wasn't being honest with that answer.

So what? Obamanites were not honest about Obama heritage or 57, or is
that 58 state mentality. Obama's dad was a green card seeking
polygamist who knocked up his mother out of wedlock.

One term president as his bull**** always catches up with him, then time
to move on as his snake-oil bull**** works no more.

Time to get the government off the economies back, vote Tea Party and
watch REAL change and hope replace Obama chance and prayer!!!

Oh, so you're back to where he was born? Let me put your mind to rest.
he was born in Kenya. Ok. Now, you can foam at the mouth without
feeling that niggling sensation that you're an idiot.

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:03:44 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:59:26 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 13/08/2011 7:32 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 20:58:46 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:21:51 -0400, X ~
wrote:

...and I think it is terrific. Hope she wins the GOP nomination. She'll
be as much fun in the campaign as Christine O'Donnell, the "witch" of
Delaware, was in her run for the U.S. Senate.

in america no one is too right wing to be elected...it's a real danger

Unfortunately, you're right. If McConnell gets his way, destroy the
economy, there are enough ignoramuses out there to elect someone like
her.

I loved her definition of submit when it came to her husband. I have
some devote, but not crazy, Christian friends, and even they think she
wasn't being honest with that answer.

So what? Obamanites were not honest about Obama heritage or 57, or is
that 58 state mentality. Obama's dad was a green card seeking
polygamist who knocked up his mother out of wedlock.

One term president as his bull**** always catches up with him, then time
to move on as his snake-oil bull**** works no more.

Time to get the government off the economies back, vote Tea Party and
watch REAL change and hope replace Obama chance and prayer!!!

HAHAHAH tea party...more wall street greed.

I feel sorry for the people part of the teabagger movement. They've
been Astroturfed by the corps WHO ARE NOT PEOPLE.

On 14/08/2011 11:01 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:27:09 -0600,
wrote:

On 13/08/2011 7:32 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 20:58:46 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:21:51 -0400, X ~
wrote:

...and I think it is terrific. Hope she wins the GOP nomination. She'll
be as much fun in the campaign as Christine O'Donnell, the "witch" of
Delaware, was in her run for the U.S. Senate.

in america no one is too right wing to be elected...it's a real danger

Unfortunately, you're right. If McConnell gets his way, destroy the
economy, there are enough ignoramuses out there to elect someone like
her.

I loved her definition of submit when it came to her husband. I have
some devote, but not crazy, Christian friends, and even they think she
wasn't being honest with that answer.

Worried about your welfare check?

This seems to be your theme lately. Is this another one of your many
problems? I though Canada was pretty generous, but I guess even they
know you're a drain on society and have cut you loose.

Funny, the only checks I see are tax refund checks.

Don't want to pay more for fleabagg'in than you have too.
--
Flea party (left) fear, begets fleaparty smear.

On 14/08/2011 11:40 AM, X ~ Man wrote:
On 8/14/11 1:01 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:27:09 -0600,
wrote:

On 13/08/2011 7:32 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 20:58:46 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:21:51 -0400, X ~
wrote:

...and I think it is terrific. Hope she wins the GOP nomination.
She'll
be as much fun in the campaign as Christine O'Donnell, the "witch" of
Delaware, was in her run for the U.S. Senate.

in america no one is too right wing to be elected...it's a real danger

Unfortunately, you're right. If McConnell gets his way, destroy the
economy, there are enough ignoramuses out there to elect someone like
her.

I loved her definition of submit when it came to her husband. I have
some devote, but not crazy, Christian friends, and even they think she
wasn't being honest with that answer.

Worried about your welfare check?

This seems to be your theme lately. Is this another one of your many
problems? I though Canada was pretty generous, but I guess even they
know you're a drain on society and have cut you loose.


Canuckles seems to have a lot of trouble with those of us who give
specific reasons for not being fans of Bachmann, Palin, Perry, or any of
the other crazies seeking the GOP nomination. He thinks I dislike her
because of her gender, which is beyond funny, because my preferred
candidate in the 2008 primary fight was...Hillary Clinton. My disdain
for Palin in that election was not based upon her gender, but on her
ignorance, demagoguery, and intellectual laziness.

Canuckles, like most conservatives here, has a real problem with
abstract thinking and those capable of it.

Don't you mean I don't think pure selfish greed when I vote? Hey,
fleabaggers don't vote with integrity, just their fear and greed.


--
Flea party (left) fear, begets fleaparty smear.

On 14/08/2011 11:52 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:40:30 -0400, X ~
wrote:

On 8/14/11 1:01 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:27:09 -0600,
wrote:

On 13/08/2011 7:32 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 20:58:46 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:21:51 -0400, X ~
wrote:

...and I think it is terrific. Hope she wins the GOP nomination. She'll
be as much fun in the campaign as Christine O'Donnell, the "witch" of
Delaware, was in her run for the U.S. Senate.

in america no one is too right wing to be elected...it's a real danger

Unfortunately, you're right. If McConnell gets his way, destroy the
economy, there are enough ignoramuses out there to elect someone like
her.

I loved her definition of submit when it came to her husband. I have
some devote, but not crazy, Christian friends, and even they think she
wasn't being honest with that answer.

Worried about your welfare check?

This seems to be your theme lately. Is this another one of your many
problems? I though Canada was pretty generous, but I guess even they
know you're a drain on society and have cut you loose.


Canuckles seems to have a lot of trouble with those of us who give
specific reasons for not being fans of Bachmann, Palin, Perry, or any of
the other crazies seeking the GOP nomination. He thinks I dislike her
because of her gender, which is beyond funny, because my preferred
candidate in the 2008 primary fight was...Hillary Clinton. My disdain
for Palin in that election was not based upon her gender, but on her
ignorance, demagoguery, and intellectual laziness.

Canuckles, like most conservatives here, has a real problem with
abstract thinking and those capable of it.

I agree. I was torn between an amazingly qualified candidate, Hillary,
and someone who had an inspirational message of hope and change. As a
woman, Clinton's and Obama's candidacies reinforced my long-held
belief that it is possible to win against the forces of darkness and
evil that people like Palin represent.

Like Bill, Hilaryious also had her leak in office.
--
Flea party (left) fear, begets fleaparty smear.

On 14/08/2011 11:03 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:59:26 -0600,
wrote:

On 13/08/2011 7:32 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 20:58:46 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:21:51 -0400, X ~
wrote:

...and I think it is terrific. Hope she wins the GOP nomination. She'll
be as much fun in the campaign as Christine O'Donnell, the "witch" of
Delaware, was in her run for the U.S. Senate.

in america no one is too right wing to be elected...it's a real danger

Unfortunately, you're right. If McConnell gets his way, destroy the
economy, there are enough ignoramuses out there to elect someone like
her.

I loved her definition of submit when it came to her husband. I have
some devote, but not crazy, Christian friends, and even they think she
wasn't being honest with that answer.

So what? Obamanites were not honest about Obama heritage or 57, or is
that 58 state mentality. Obama's dad was a green card seeking
polygamist who knocked up his mother out of wedlock.

One term president as his bull**** always catches up with him, then time
to move on as his snake-oil bull**** works no more.

Time to get the government off the economies back, vote Tea Party and
watch REAL change and hope replace Obama chance and prayer!!!

HAHAHAH tea party...more wall street greed.

Hey, has Obama learned how many states there are yet? Getting the
missed alimentary eduction while in office?
--
Flea party (left) fear, begets fleaparty smear.