.....it looks like they're finally getting smart!

http://tinyurl.com/3t9g8cw

And, from the Washington Post no less.

On 8/12/11 8:54 AM, John H wrote:
....it looks like they're finally getting smart!

http://tinyurl.com/3t9g8cw

And, from the Washington Post no less.

If only you had a clue.

The USPS has had ****-poor upper management and labor relations for
decades and decades.

--
Don't forget to leave a bit of beef for rec.boat's right-wing
conservatrashers and ID spoofers to feed upon. The more they feed, the
quicker rec.boats will fall into the black hole of cyberspace and disappear.

"X ~ Man" wrote in message ...

On 8/12/11 8:54 AM, John H wrote:
....it looks like they're finally getting smart!

http://tinyurl.com/3t9g8cw

And, from the Washington Post no less.

If only you had a clue.

The USPS has had ****-poor upper management and labor relations for
decades and decades.

--
Don't forget to leave a bit of beef for rec.boat's right-wing
conservatrashers and ID spoofers to feed upon. The more they feed, the
quicker rec.boats will fall into the black hole of cyberspace and disappear.


Reply:
Agreed. **** poor management that allowed excess pay and retirement
bennies.

On 12/08/2011 1:58 PM, Califbill wrote:
"X ~ Man" wrote in message ...

On 8/12/11 8:54 AM, John H wrote:
....it looks like they're finally getting smart!

http://tinyurl.com/3t9g8cw

And, from the Washington Post no less.

If only you had a clue.

The USPS has had ****-poor upper management and labor relations for
decades and decades.


It is government, why make it efficient, effective and get earnings when
you can be inefficient, just collect more taxes to cover, waste lots, be
a Dilbert like screw up and get over paid for it with impunity?

Maybe time to roll back and freeze their wages until they get efficient
enough to give them a raise.
--
Seems like paying your bills with real money is no longer the accepted
behavior in USA. Perhaps that is the problem and not the the solution.

On 8/12/11 4:43 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/08/2011 1:58 PM, Califbill wrote:
"X ~ Man" wrote in message ...

On 8/12/11 8:54 AM, John H wrote:
....it looks like they're finally getting smart!

http://tinyurl.com/3t9g8cw

And, from the Washington Post no less.

If only you had a clue.

The USPS has had ****-poor upper management and labor relations for
decades and decades.


It is government, why make it efficient, effective and get earnings when
you can be inefficient, just collect more taxes to cover, waste lots, be
a Dilbert like screw up and get over paid for it with impunity?

Maybe time to roll back and freeze their wages until they get efficient
enough to give them a raise.


The USPS is a highly efficient operation. You just have no understanding
of it.

You come across as a sorrowful schmuck who never held any more than
low-level lower management jobs, and you couldn't hang onto any of them.
You wish your life of failure on others, especially those still with jobs.


-

--
Don't forget to leave a bit of beef for rec.boat's right-wing
conservatrashers and ID spoofers to feed upon. The more they feed, the
quicker rec.boats will fall into the black hole of cyberspace and disappear.

On Aug 12, 4:01*pm, X ~ Man wrote:
On 8/12/11 4:43 PM, Canuck57 wrote:









On 12/08/2011 1:58 PM, Califbill wrote:
"X ~ Man" wrote in ...

On 8/12/11 8:54 AM, John H wrote:
....it looks like they're finally getting smart!

http://tinyurl.com/3t9g8cw

And, from the Washington Post no less.

If only you had a clue.

The USPS has had ****-poor upper management and labor relations for
decades and decades.

It is government, why make it efficient, effective and get earnings when
you can be inefficient, just collect more taxes to cover, waste lots, be
a Dilbert like screw up and get over paid for it with impunity?

Maybe time to roll back and freeze their wages until they get efficient
enough to give them a raise.

The USPS is a highly efficient operation. You just have no understanding
of it.

You come across as a sorrowful schmuck who never held any more than
low-level lower management jobs, and you couldn't hang onto any of them.
You wish your life of failure on others, especially those still with jobs..


Highly efficient operations don't (or are not forced to) lay off that
volume of personnel.

On 12/08/2011 3:01 PM, X ~ Man wrote:
On 8/12/11 4:43 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/08/2011 1:58 PM, Califbill wrote:
"X ~ Man" wrote in message ...

On 8/12/11 8:54 AM, John H wrote:
....it looks like they're finally getting smart!

http://tinyurl.com/3t9g8cw

And, from the Washington Post no less.

If only you had a clue.

The USPS has had ****-poor upper management and labor relations for
decades and decades.


It is government, why make it efficient, effective and get earnings when
you can be inefficient, just collect more taxes to cover, waste lots, be
a Dilbert like screw up and get over paid for it with impunity?

Maybe time to roll back and freeze their wages until they get efficient
enough to give them a raise.


The USPS is a highly efficient operation. You just have no understanding
of it.

You come across as a sorrowful schmuck who never held any more than
low-level lower management jobs, and you couldn't hang onto any of them.
You wish your life of failure on others, especially those still with jobs.

Compared to what? The Whitehouse and Congress? I would agree. Compared
to most businesses, nope.


--
Seems like paying your bills with real money is no longer the accepted
behavior in USA. Perhaps that is the problem and not the the solution.

On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:01:08 -0400, X ~ Man
wrote:

On 8/12/11 4:43 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/08/2011 1:58 PM, Califbill wrote:
"X ~ Man" wrote in message ...

On 8/12/11 8:54 AM, John H wrote:
....it looks like they're finally getting smart!

http://tinyurl.com/3t9g8cw

And, from the Washington Post no less.

If only you had a clue.

The USPS has had ****-poor upper management and labor relations for
decades and decades.


It is government, why make it efficient, effective and get earnings when
you can be inefficient, just collect more taxes to cover, waste lots, be
a Dilbert like screw up and get over paid for it with impunity?

Maybe time to roll back and freeze their wages until they get efficient
enough to give them a raise.


The USPS is a highly efficient operation. You just have no understanding
of it.

You come across as a sorrowful schmuck who never held any more than
low-level lower management jobs, and you couldn't hang onto any of them.
You wish your life of failure on others, especially those still with jobs.


-

Well, he's really, really stupid. You were expecting something else?

In article ,
says...

On 8/12/11 4:43 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/08/2011 1:58 PM, Califbill wrote:
"X ~ Man" wrote in message ...

On 8/12/11 8:54 AM, John H wrote:
....it looks like they're finally getting smart!

http://tinyurl.com/3t9g8cw

And, from the Washington Post no less.

If only you had a clue.

The USPS has had ****-poor upper management and labor relations for
decades and decades.


It is government, why make it efficient, effective and get earnings when
you can be inefficient, just collect more taxes to cover, waste lots, be
a Dilbert like screw up and get over paid for it with impunity?

Maybe time to roll back and freeze their wages until they get efficient
enough to give them a raise.


The USPS is a highly efficient operation. You just have no understanding
of it.

You come across as a sorrowful schmuck who never held any more than
low-level lower management jobs, and you couldn't hang onto any of them.
You wish your life of failure on others, especially those still with jobs.


-

You do realize that UPS handles more packages per year than the post
office, and is profitable, don't you?

In article ,
says...

On 8/12/11 8:54 AM, John H wrote:
....it looks like they're finally getting smart!

http://tinyurl.com/3t9g8cw

And, from the Washington Post no less.

If only you had a clue.

The USPS has had ****-poor upper management and labor relations for
decades and decades.

The rot comes from the bottom.