the facts about government spending
 

From an article in the Economist:

"Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes
of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount
each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size,
but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an
individual with no income at all, is $200."

and

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody’s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks—even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

the facts about government spending
 

On 7-Aug-2011, wrote:

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody’s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks—even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

People with the I.Q. of a 3 day old carp "think" your defunct country
consists of democrats and republicans, and never miss an opportunity to
prove that fact.

the facts about government spending
 

On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote:
From an article in the Economist:

"Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes
of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount
each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size,
but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an
individual with no income at all, is $200."

and

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody’s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks—even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


--
Seems like paying your bills with real money is no longer the accepted
behavior in USA. Perhaps that is the problem and not the the solution.

the facts about government spending
 

On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 22:41:14 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 7-Aug-2011, wrote:

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody’s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks—even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

People with the I.Q. of a 3 day old carp "think" your defunct country
consists of democrats and republicans, and never miss an opportunity to
prove that fact.

This "defunct" country of ours is by far the best one on the planet.
Feel free to not live here.

the facts about government spending
 

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote:
From an article in the Economist:

"Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes
of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount
each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size,
but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an
individual with no income at all, is $200."

and

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody’s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks—even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.

Hey, if you're stupid and you don't mind proving it on a daily basis,
why should I disagree!

the facts about government spending
 

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote:
From an article in the Economist:

"Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes
of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount
each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size,
but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an
individual with no income at all, is $200."

and

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody’s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks—even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

the facts about government spending
 

On 08/08/2011 7:10 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote:
From an article in the Economist:

"Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes
of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount
each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size,
but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an
individual with no income at all, is $200."

and

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody’s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks—even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Not at all, just gloating on my call of fleabagger stupidity,
anticipating it to a tee is going to make me money.
--
Seems like paying your bills with real money is no longer the accepted
behavior in USA. Perhaps that is the problem and not the the solution.

the facts about government spending
 

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 20:39:03 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 08/08/2011 7:10 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote:
From an article in the Economist:

"Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes
of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount
each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size,
but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an
individual with no income at all, is $200."

and

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody’s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks—even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Not at all, just gloating on my call of fleabagger stupidity,
anticipating it to a tee is going to make me money.

As he said, the guy who wants America destroyed...

the facts about government spending
 

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 20:39:03 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 08/08/2011 7:10 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote:
From an article in the Economist:


Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Not at all, just gloating on my call of fleabagger stupidity,
anticipating it to a tee is going to make me money.

let's see....canuck lives in the land of socialized medicine and high
union membership while condeming

socialized medicine and high union membership

aint being right wing wunnerful?

the facts about government spending
 

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote:
From an article in the Economist:

"Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes
of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount
each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size,
but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an
individual with no income at all, is $200."

and

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody?s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks?even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.

the facts about government spending
 

On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:18:07 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote:
From an article in the Economist:

"Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes
of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount
each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size,
but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an
individual with no income at all, is $200."

and

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody?s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks?even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.


Huh? So, you believe that the rich should not pay their fair share and
that any tax or imposition on them destroys America. You probably
claim to be a teagagger.

the facts about government spending
 

On 09/08/2011 5:18 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote:
From an article in the Economist:

"Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes
of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount
each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size,
but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an
individual with no income at all, is $200."

and

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody?s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks?even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.

But Obama has welfare for pedophiles polygamist FLDS. But then his dad
was polygamist. Which I find disgusting. Obama should be kicking
administration ass on that one.



--
Seems like paying your bills with real money is no longer the accepted
behavior in USA. Perhaps that is the problem and not the the solution.

the facts about government spending
 

On 09/08/2011 9:35 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:18:07 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote:
From an article in the Economist:

"Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes
of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount
each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size,
but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an
individual with no income at all, is $200."

and

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody?s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks?even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.


Huh? So, you believe that the rich should not pay their fair share and
that any tax or imposition on them destroys America. You probably
claim to be a teagagger.

Rich already do pay MORE than their fair share idiot. All you do with
that line is tell us you never got of the bottom rung of society. Yep,
you are a loser.
--
Seems like paying your bills with real money is no longer the accepted
behavior in USA. Perhaps that is the problem and not the the solution.

the facts about government spending
 

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:58:01 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/08/2011 9:35 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:18:07 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote:
From an article in the Economist:

"Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes
of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount
each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size,
but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an
individual with no income at all, is $200."

and

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody?s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks?even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.


Huh? So, you believe that the rich should not pay their fair share and
that any tax or imposition on them destroys America. You probably
claim to be a teagagger.

Rich already do pay MORE than their fair share idiot. All you do with
that line is tell us you never got of the bottom rung of society. Yep,
you are a loser.

No, they don't. You're too stupid to get it, so you believe paying a
CEO 500x a regular worker who pays a higher percentage in taxes is
just fine. You are the bottom rung.

the facts about government spending
 

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:56:41 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/08/2011 5:18 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote:
From an article in the Economist:

"Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes
of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount
each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size,
but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an
individual with no income at all, is $200."

and

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody?s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks?even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.

But Obama has welfare for pedophiles polygamist FLDS. But then his dad
was polygamist. Which I find disgusting. Obama should be kicking
administration ass on that one.

**** you. You're a racist little man, who's bitter about his station
in life.

the facts about government spending
 

On 09/08/2011 10:54 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:58:01 -0600,
wrote:

On 09/08/2011 9:35 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:18:07 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote:
From an article in the Economist:

"Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes
of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount
each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size,
but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an
individual with no income at all, is $200."

and

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody?s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks?even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.


Huh? So, you believe that the rich should not pay their fair share and
that any tax or imposition on them destroys America. You probably
claim to be a teagagger.

Rich already do pay MORE than their fair share idiot. All you do with
that line is tell us you never got of the bottom rung of society. Yep,
you are a loser.

No, they don't. You're too stupid to get it, so you believe paying a
CEO 500x a regular worker who pays a higher percentage in taxes is
just fine. You are the bottom rung.

Faact is your full of **** as you never have made minimum wage for 2
weeks....before your fat ass was fired. And that assumes you got hired
once upon a time.
--
Seems like paying your bills with real money is no longer the accepted
behavior in USA. Perhaps that is the problem and not the the solution.

the facts about government spending
 

On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:18:07 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.


tell it to king george

didnt work out the way your simplistic, reader's digest view thought,
did it/

the facts about government spending
 

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:58:01 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

Rich already do pay MORE than their fair share idiot. All you do with
that line is tell us you never got of the bottom rung of society. Yep,
you are a loser.

did their taxes go up 500% in the last 30 years? nope.

they dropped

their INCOMES went up 500% though, while middle class incomes went

nowhere

so your rightwing bull**** is a fable

the facts about government spending
 

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:56:41 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


But Obama has welfare for pedophiles polygamist FLDS. But then his dad
was polygamist. Which I find disgusting. Obama should be kicking
administration ass on that one.

let's see...

jeffs got life.

canuck ignores that because obama is

black

the facts about government spending
 

On 09/08/2011 3:01 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:58:01 -0600,
wrote:

Rich already do pay MORE than their fair share idiot. All you do with
that line is tell us you never got of the bottom rung of society. Yep,
you are a loser.

did their taxes go up 500% in the last 30 years? nope.

they dropped

their INCOMES went up 500% though, while middle class incomes went

nowhere

so your rightwing bull**** is a fable

Middle class got raises, they were soaked up in the steady rise of
employment taxes. Check it out.

Fact is the only reason to work for a wage is because you haven't yet
saved enough not to work. And the more the government takes, the less
there is for the people doesn't mater which class your from.

But your just an ignorant dumb****, so I don't expect you to understand.
It is beyond your genetic capabilities.
--
Seems like paying your bills with real money is no longer the accepted
behavior in USA. Perhaps that is the problem and not the the solution.

the facts about government spending
 

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:18:01 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/08/2011 3:01 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:58:01 -0600,
wrote:

Rich already do pay MORE than their fair share idiot. All you do with
that line is tell us you never got of the bottom rung of society. Yep,
you are a loser.

did their taxes go up 500% in the last 30 years? nope.

they dropped

their INCOMES went up 500% though, while middle class incomes went

nowhere

so your rightwing bull**** is a fable

Middle class got raises, they were soaked up in the steady rise of
employment taxes. Check it out.

so the rich got a tax DECREASE

the middle class, courtesy of 30 years of right wing economics, got a
tax INCREASE

thanks. i already knew that. the mddle class ALWAYS bankrolls your
rich buddies.


But your just an ignorant dumb****, so I don't expect you to understand.
It is beyond your genetic capabilities.

HAHAHAHAH i love this. he lives in a 'socialist' paradise and
complains the US middle class isnt supporting the rich enough!

the facts about government spending
 

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:43:32 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:00:08 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:18:07 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.


tell it to king george

didnt work out the way your simplistic, reader's digest view thought,
did it/

Huh?

The people who organized the American revolution were rich men who
didn't want to pay taxes and did not have a problem with slaves,
indentured servants and overthrowing the government.

The tea party is pretty tame in comparison

john paulson made 3.7 BILLION trading CDO's as goldman sachs went into
the toilet

how'd that work out for your reader's digest view of the rich?

the facts about government spending
 

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:58:39 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:36:13 -0400, wf3h wrote:


the middle class, courtesy of 30 years of right wing economics, got a
tax INCREASE

Bull****, we have the lowest tax rates for the middle class since the
Eisenhower administration.

kind of shows you how useless right wing tax policy is, doesnt it? tax
policy is so useless that the mddle class STILL hasnt had a pay
increase in 30 years while the richest 1% have had a 500% pay
increase. the richest have had their taxes cut by over 70%. the middle
class

welll...we got a lunch at mcdonalds

the facts about government spending
 

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:10:04 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:48:50 -0400, wf3h wrote:
or.


tell it to king george

didnt work out the way your simplistic, reader's digest view thought,
did it/

Huh?

The people who organized the American revolution were rich men who
didn't want to pay taxes and did not have a problem with slaves,
indentured servants and overthrowing the government.

The tea party is pretty tame in comparison

john paulson made 3.7 BILLION trading CDO's as goldman sachs went into
the toilet

how'd that work out for your reader's digest view of the rich?

I have said many times they should have sent some of those guys to
jail but there were ZERO prosecutions from Obama.

HAHAHAHAH the WRECKED THE ECONOMY and you're sitting here telling me
how WONDERFUL the rich are

and you ASSHOLE...some HAVE been sent to jail

**** you're dumb! jesus christ, no wonder you're right wing!

You can say all you want bad about Bush but his DoJ did prosecute over
a dozen criminals from the Clinton era scams.

hey genius. your buddies....the right wing...deregulated the **** out
of bank robbery to protect the rich. the rich got a bailout, they got
a get out of jail card, all courtesy of the american right wing and
their LOVE affair with the rich

YOU are proof. the rich WRECKED this country and you STILL believe the
BULL**** about how they're the masters of the universe

the facts about government spending
 

On 09/08/2011 4:36 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:18:01 -0600,
wrote:

On 09/08/2011 3:01 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:58:01 -0600,
wrote:

Rich already do pay MORE than their fair share idiot. All you do with
that line is tell us you never got of the bottom rung of society. Yep,
you are a loser.

did their taxes go up 500% in the last 30 years? nope.

they dropped

their INCOMES went up 500% though, while middle class incomes went

nowhere

so your rightwing bull**** is a fable

Middle class got raises, they were soaked up in the steady rise of
employment taxes. Check it out.

so the rich got a tax DECREASE

the middle class, courtesy of 30 years of right wing economics, got a
tax INCREASE

thanks. i already knew that. the mddle class ALWAYS bankrolls your
rich buddies.


But your just an ignorant dumb****, so I don't expect you to understand.
It is beyond your genetic capabilities.

HAHAHAHAH i love this. he lives in a 'socialist' paradise and
complains the US middle class isnt supporting the rich enough!

Bull****. Top 20% of the earners pay 80% of he taxes. You little
fleabeggars get a free lunch. But then when their are no more rich, you
can all share having nothing.

As for Canada, you would be surprised how much like the USA it real is.
But you can't experience living in 4 countries because of prior
criminal records and welfare residency requirements.
--
Seems like paying your bills with real money is no longer the accepted
behavior in USA. Perhaps that is the problem and not the the solution.

the facts about government spending
 

On 09/08/2011 8:39 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:10:04 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:48:50 -0400, wrote:
or.


tell it to king george

didnt work out the way your simplistic, reader's digest view thought,
did it/

Huh?

The people who organized the American revolution were rich men who
didn't want to pay taxes and did not have a problem with slaves,
indentured servants and overthrowing the government.

The tea party is pretty tame in comparison

john paulson made 3.7 BILLION trading CDO's as goldman sachs went into
the toilet

how'd that work out for your reader's digest view of the rich?

I have said many times they should have sent some of those guys to
jail but there were ZERO prosecutions from Obama.

HAHAHAHAH the WRECKED THE ECONOMY and you're sitting here telling me
how WONDERFUL the rich are

and you ASSHOLE...some HAVE been sent to jail

**** you're dumb! jesus christ, no wonder you're right wing!

You can say all you want bad about Bush but his DoJ did prosecute over
a dozen criminals from the Clinton era scams.

hey genius. your buddies....the right wing...deregulated the **** out
of bank robbery to protect the rich. the rich got a bailout, they got
a get out of jail card, all courtesy of the american right wing and
their LOVE affair with the rich

YOU are proof. the rich WRECKED this country and you STILL believe the
BULL**** about how they're the masters of the universe

Yea, and democrats and Obama gave it to them. What is your point?
Obama sell your ass out?

--
Seems like paying your bills with real money is no longer the accepted
behavior in USA. Perhaps that is the problem and not the the solution.

the facts about government spending
 

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:53:09 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/08/2011 10:54 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:58:01 -0600,
wrote:

On 09/08/2011 9:35 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:18:07 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote:
From an article in the Economist:

"Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes
of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount
each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size,
but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an
individual with no income at all, is $200."

and

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody?s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks?even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.


Huh? So, you believe that the rich should not pay their fair share and
that any tax or imposition on them destroys America. You probably
claim to be a teagagger.

Rich already do pay MORE than their fair share idiot. All you do with
that line is tell us you never got of the bottom rung of society. Yep,
you are a loser.

No, they don't. You're too stupid to get it, so you believe paying a
CEO 500x a regular worker who pays a higher percentage in taxes is
just fine. You are the bottom rung.

Faact is your full of **** as you never have made minimum wage for 2
weeks....before your fat ass was fired. And that assumes you got hired
once upon a time.

Faaaaact is you live in a single-wide, scratching what you presume are
you balls but are in fact plump fleas.

the facts about government spending
 

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:43:32 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:00:08 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:18:07 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.


tell it to king george

didnt work out the way your simplistic, reader's digest view thought,
did it/

Huh?

The people who organized the American revolution were rich men who
didn't want to pay taxes and did not have a problem with slaves,
indentured servants and overthrowing the government.

The tea party is pretty tame in comparison

Firstly, many of the American rev. DID have a problem with slaves.

But, yes, by comparison they're pretty tame. The difference of course
is that the teagaggers are mostly middle class, and were hoodwinked by
the very rich and connected to get THEIR taxes lowered. They tend to
have a poor understand of what gov't does, think it's evil, right up
until they're affected. Given the made up crisis of the debt ceiling,
the S&P downgrade, the market drop, they'll find out shortly that
they're the ones most affected.

the facts about government spending
 

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:10:04 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:48:50 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:43:32 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:00:08 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:18:07 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.


tell it to king george

didnt work out the way your simplistic, reader's digest view thought,
did it/

Huh?

The people who organized the American revolution were rich men who
didn't want to pay taxes and did not have a problem with slaves,
indentured servants and overthrowing the government.

The tea party is pretty tame in comparison

john paulson made 3.7 BILLION trading CDO's as goldman sachs went into
the toilet

how'd that work out for your reader's digest view of the rich?

I have said many times they should have sent some of those guys to
jail but there were ZERO prosecutions from Obama.
You can say all you want bad about Bush but his DoJ did prosecute over
a dozen criminals from the Clinton era scams.

You're right.. Holder should have indicted Cheney.

the facts about government spending
 

On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:48:07 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:11:57 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:58:39 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:36:13 -0400, wf3h wrote:


the middle class, courtesy of 30 years of right wing economics, got a
tax INCREASE

Bull****, we have the lowest tax rates for the middle class since the
Eisenhower administration.

kind of shows you how useless right wing tax policy is, doesnt it? tax
policy is so useless that the mddle class STILL hasnt had a pay
increase in 30 years while the richest 1% have had a 500% pay
increase. the richest have had their taxes cut by over 70%. the middle
class

welll...we got a lunch at mcdonalds

Those Eisenhower tax rates are deceptive. Rich people never paid
anything like what the rate would indicate because they had a lot more
tax shelters and things they could deduct.
The biggest reform of those tax shelters happened under Reagan (1986)

who raised taxes 11 times. bush's 2 tax cuts created much of our
deficit

the facts about government spending
 

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:04:24 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/08/2011 4:36 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:18:01 -0600,
wrote:

so the rich got a tax DECREASE

the middle class, courtesy of 30 years of right wing economics, got a
tax INCREASE

thanks. i already knew that. the mddle class ALWAYS bankrolls your
rich buddies.


But your just an ignorant dumb****, so I don't expect you to understand.
It is beyond your genetic capabilities.

HAHAHAHAHli love this. he lives in a 'socialist' paradise and
complains the US middle class isnt supporting the rich enough!

Bull****. Top 20% of the earners pay 80% of he taxes. You little
fleabeggars get a free lunch. But then when their are no more rich, you
can all share having nothing.

bull****. the richest 1% has assets 22,500% greater than the middle
class

http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/23/pf/r...n_bin&hpt=Sbin

they had a 27% decline in net asset while the MIDDLE CLASS had a 41%
decline

and the US federal tax system is only SLIGHTLY Progressive

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/20...-pay-in-taxes/

so stop your right wing bull**** whining about how tough they have it.
THEY destroyed this economy. NOT the middle class you hate so much

and you can't win, moron. I KNOW the facts. YOU worship talk radio


As for Canada, you would be surprised how much like the USA it real is.
But you can't experience living in 4 countries because of prior
criminal records and welfare residency requirements.


HAHAHAHAH this is what he right considers facts!

the facts about government spending
 

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:25:16 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/08/2011 8:39 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:10:04 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:48:50 -0400, wrote:
or.


YOU are proof. the rich WRECKED this country and you STILL believe the
BULL**** about how they're the masters of the universe

Yea, and democrats and Obama gave it to them. What is your point?
Obama sell your ass out?

sorry sport. more bull**** from the right

the RIGHT cut taxes on the rich in 2001 and 2003. the RIGHT
deregulated the banks. the RIGHT continues to insist banks are over
regulated. YOU guys wrecked the western world

the US is the only country that has a right wing movement so
conservative that, when an oil company destroys the environment and
puts 23,000 people out of work....they insist the president APOLOGIZES
to the oil company

the facts about government spending
 

On 8/10/2011 12:55 AM, wrote:
**snip**
You always know when you score by the degradation in your opponents
language.

**snip**

Ain't that the truth.
Plume and the rest of the fleabaggers are the proof.
Plume talks like a drunken sailor on liberty with nary a whorehouse in
sight. Maybe, if she cleaned up her act, the rest would follow.

the facts about government spending
 

wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:58:39 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:36:13 -0400, wrote:


the middle class, courtesy of 30 years of right wing economics, got a
tax INCREASE

Bull****, we have the lowest tax rates for the middle class since the
Eisenhower administration.
kind of shows you how useless right wing tax policy is, doesnt it? tax
policy is so useless that the mddle class STILL hasnt had a pay
increase in 30 years while the richest 1% have had a 500% pay
increase. the richest have had their taxes cut by over 70%. the middle
class

welll...we got a lunch at mcdonalds
You are delusional, Bobby.

the facts about government spending
 

On 8-Aug-2011, wrote:

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

People with the I.Q. of a 3 day old carp "think" your defunct country
consists of democrats and republicans, and never miss an opportunity to
prove that fact.

This "defunct" country of ours is by far the best one on the planet.
Feel free to not live here.

You would have to be a fool to plan on living in your country (or become
part of the growing welfare "couch-class"), and worse yet, to try to produce
a product in your country. That's why you clowns have wages equal to the mid
to late 70's. You've been thumped by Asia, that was enabled by the slime you
"elected" and secured by your inept population. Sorry that the facts hurt
but soon the ignorant masses need to understand the ramifications of their
behavior.

the facts about government spending
 

On 11/08/2011 8:28 AM, Haywood Jablomie wrote:
On 8-Aug-2011, wrote:

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

People with the I.Q. of a 3 day old carp "think" your defunct country
consists of democrats and republicans, and never miss an opportunity to
prove that fact.

This "defunct" country of ours is by far the best one on the planet.
Feel free to not live here.

You would have to be a fool to plan on living in your country (or become
part of the growing welfare "couch-class"), and worse yet, to try to produce
a product in your country. That's why you clowns have wages equal to the mid
to late 70's. You've been thumped by Asia, that was enabled by the slime you
"elected" and secured by your inept population. Sorry that the facts hurt
but soon the ignorant masses need to understand the ramifications of their
behavior.

Well deplume, wtf3 and harryk are definitely stamp collecting couch class.
--
Seems like paying your bills with real money is no longer the accepted
behavior in USA. Perhaps that is the problem and not the the solution.

the facts about government spending
 

On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:28:45 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 8-Aug-2011, wrote:

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

People with the I.Q. of a 3 day old carp "think" your defunct country
consists of democrats and republicans, and never miss an opportunity to
prove that fact.

This "defunct" country of ours is by far the best one on the planet.
Feel free to not live here.

You would have to be a fool to plan on living in your country (or become
part of the growing welfare "couch-class"), and worse yet, to try to produce
a product in your country. That's why you clowns have wages equal to the mid
to late 70's. You've been thumped by Asia, that was enabled by the slime you
"elected" and secured by your inept population. Sorry that the facts hurt
but soon the ignorant masses need to understand the ramifications of their
behavior.

Feel free never to visit. We don't need you. BTW, stop using the
Internet. It was invented here.

the facts about government spending
 

On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:34:28 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 11/08/2011 8:28 AM, Haywood Jablomie wrote:
On 8-Aug-2011, wrote:

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

People with the I.Q. of a 3 day old carp "think" your defunct country
consists of democrats and republicans, and never miss an opportunity to
prove that fact.

This "defunct" country of ours is by far the best one on the planet.
Feel free to not live here.

You would have to be a fool to plan on living in your country (or become
part of the growing welfare "couch-class"), and worse yet, to try to produce
a product in your country. That's why you clowns have wages equal to the mid
to late 70's. You've been thumped by Asia, that was enabled by the slime you
"elected" and secured by your inept population. Sorry that the facts hurt
but soon the ignorant masses need to understand the ramifications of their
behavior.

Well deplume, wtf3 and harryk are definitely stamp collecting couch class.

You're in the stupid class. At the bottom..

the facts about government spending
 

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:28:45 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 8-Aug-2011, wrote:

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

People with the I.Q. of a 3 day old carp "think" your defunct country
consists of democrats and republicans, and never miss an opportunity to
prove that fact.

This "defunct" country of ours is by far the best one on the planet.
Feel free to not live here.

You would have to be a fool to plan on living in your country (or become
part of the growing welfare "couch-class"), and worse yet, to try to produce
a product in your country. That's why you clowns have wages equal to the mid
to late 70's. You've been thumped by Asia, that was enabled by the slime you
"elected" and secured by your inept population. Sorry that the facts hurt
but soon the ignorant masses need to understand the ramifications of their
behavior.

Feel free never to visit. We don't need you. BTW, stop using the
Internet. It was invented here.

It was? And who is "we"?

the facts about government spending
 

On 11-Aug-2011, wrote:

soon the ignorant masses need to understand the ramifications of their
behavior.

Feel free never to visit. We don't need you. BTW, stop using the
Internet. It was invented here.

Hahhahaahha - Albert Gore Junior - is that you??? How's the Ozone treating
you?

BTW - I never visit except to see how my exports are selling to your
overpaying masses.