|
the facts about government spending
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:18:01 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 09/08/2011 3:01 PM, wf3h wrote: On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:58:01 -0600, wrote: Rich already do pay MORE than their fair share idiot. All you do with that line is tell us you never got of the bottom rung of society. Yep, you are a loser. did their taxes go up 500% in the last 30 years? nope. they dropped their INCOMES went up 500% though, while middle class incomes went nowhere so your rightwing bull**** is a fable Middle class got raises, they were soaked up in the steady rise of employment taxes. Check it out. so the rich got a tax DECREASE the middle class, courtesy of 30 years of right wing economics, got a tax INCREASE thanks. i already knew that. the mddle class ALWAYS bankrolls your rich buddies. But your just an ignorant dumb****, so I don't expect you to understand. It is beyond your genetic capabilities. HAHAHAHAH i love this. he lives in a 'socialist' paradise and complains the US middle class isnt supporting the rich enough! |
the facts about government spending
|
the facts about government spending
|
the facts about government spending
|
the facts about government spending
On 09/08/2011 4:36 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:18:01 -0600, wrote: On 09/08/2011 3:01 PM, wf3h wrote: On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:58:01 -0600, wrote: Rich already do pay MORE than their fair share idiot. All you do with that line is tell us you never got of the bottom rung of society. Yep, you are a loser. did their taxes go up 500% in the last 30 years? nope. they dropped their INCOMES went up 500% though, while middle class incomes went nowhere so your rightwing bull**** is a fable Middle class got raises, they were soaked up in the steady rise of employment taxes. Check it out. so the rich got a tax DECREASE the middle class, courtesy of 30 years of right wing economics, got a tax INCREASE thanks. i already knew that. the mddle class ALWAYS bankrolls your rich buddies. But your just an ignorant dumb****, so I don't expect you to understand. It is beyond your genetic capabilities. HAHAHAHAH i love this. he lives in a 'socialist' paradise and complains the US middle class isnt supporting the rich enough! Bull****. Top 20% of the earners pay 80% of he taxes. You little fleabeggars get a free lunch. But then when their are no more rich, you can all share having nothing. As for Canada, you would be surprised how much like the USA it real is. But you can't experience living in 4 countries because of prior criminal records and welfare residency requirements. -- Seems like paying your bills with real money is no longer the accepted behavior in USA. Perhaps that is the problem and not the the solution. |
the facts about government spending
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:53:09 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 09/08/2011 10:54 AM, wrote: On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:58:01 -0600, wrote: On 09/08/2011 9:35 AM, wrote: On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:18:07 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600, wrote: On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote: From an article in the Economist: "Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size, but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an individual with no income at all, is $200." and "Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend to spend them immediately. When Moody?s Analytics assessed different forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective, increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent. Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days, however, is of cutbacks?even for the hungry." Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about the poor. Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama which means they don' care about America. says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are protected....and are white Destroying the rich, destroys the poor. Huh? So, you believe that the rich should not pay their fair share and that any tax or imposition on them destroys America. You probably claim to be a teagagger. Rich already do pay MORE than their fair share idiot. All you do with that line is tell us you never got of the bottom rung of society. Yep, you are a loser. No, they don't. You're too stupid to get it, so you believe paying a CEO 500x a regular worker who pays a higher percentage in taxes is just fine. You are the bottom rung. Faact is your full of **** as you never have made minimum wage for 2 weeks....before your fat ass was fired. And that assumes you got hired once upon a time. Faaaaact is you live in a single-wide, scratching what you presume are you balls but are in fact plump fleas. |
the facts about government spending
|
the facts about government spending
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:10:04 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:48:50 -0400, wf3h wrote: On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:43:32 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:00:08 -0400, wf3h wrote: On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:18:07 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama which means they don' care about America. says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are protected....and are white Destroying the rich, destroys the poor. tell it to king george didnt work out the way your simplistic, reader's digest view thought, did it/ Huh? The people who organized the American revolution were rich men who didn't want to pay taxes and did not have a problem with slaves, indentured servants and overthrowing the government. The tea party is pretty tame in comparison john paulson made 3.7 BILLION trading CDO's as goldman sachs went into the toilet how'd that work out for your reader's digest view of the rich? I have said many times they should have sent some of those guys to jail but there were ZERO prosecutions from Obama. You can say all you want bad about Bush but his DoJ did prosecute over a dozen criminals from the Clinton era scams. You're right.. Holder should have indicted Cheney. |
the facts about government spending
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:48:07 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:11:57 -0400, wf3h wrote: On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:58:39 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:36:13 -0400, wf3h wrote: the middle class, courtesy of 30 years of right wing economics, got a tax INCREASE Bull****, we have the lowest tax rates for the middle class since the Eisenhower administration. kind of shows you how useless right wing tax policy is, doesnt it? tax policy is so useless that the mddle class STILL hasnt had a pay increase in 30 years while the richest 1% have had a 500% pay increase. the richest have had their taxes cut by over 70%. the middle class welll...we got a lunch at mcdonalds Those Eisenhower tax rates are deceptive. Rich people never paid anything like what the rate would indicate because they had a lot more tax shelters and things they could deduct. The biggest reform of those tax shelters happened under Reagan (1986) who raised taxes 11 times. bush's 2 tax cuts created much of our deficit |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com