In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On 7/29/2011 6:14 AM, X-Man wrote:

You have Paul, Harry, Plum, XMan... All actually Harry Krause. He posted
as Paul from his Email, did the same thing for the Plum identity a while
back... Don't be fooled...


More bull**** from Little Turd Tosk

You did get caught using the paul@byc identity, and that ain't bullsheet.

He got caught using Plum too, but the folks who like to argue with him
(probably mostly his own sock puppets) didn't seem to care or notice...

I've stated over and over that anybody that doesn't post with their real
name is a pussy. Me, North Star, slammer, jps, and plum all think so. So
go **** up a rope you little turd.

In article ,
says...

On 7/29/11 12:16 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 29/07/2011 6:54 AM, X-Man wrote:
On 7/29/11 8:40 AM, Beach Bum wrote:
On 7/29/2011 8:29 AM, Jimmy wrote:
On 7/29/2011 6:14 AM, X-Man wrote:

You have Paul, Harry, Plum, XMan... All actually Harry Krause. He
posted
as Paul from his Email, did the same thing for the Plum identity a
while
back... Don't be fooled...


More bull**** from Little Turd Tosk

You did get caught using the paul@byc identity, and that ain't
bullsheet.

I agree that HK Paul and EX-Man are one in the same. Ex-man is just a
handle change to avoid filters. He's not trying to hide anything there.
Plume is Plume. Pain in the ass know it all slut, all the way. You can't
fake that.


You agree? Hehehe. The average IQ in this newsgroup continues to drop. I
wonder if it would be worthwhile to set up a little betting pool on the
day rec.boats actually falls into the black hole of right-wing
stupidity. I'll be just beyond the event horizon, LMAO.

Yep, a lot of real dumb**** fleabags.



The overwhelming majority of posters here are boatless, right-wing
conservatrash, just like you. Ignorant, uneducated, and in some cases
(you and ingersoll, for example) unemployable. Your buddy ingersoll is a
big fan of debt...he left his local hospital holding the bag on a
$25,000 bill.

Spoofer alert!! How would I possibly know who does or does not own a
boat? Hell, I sold Yo Ho and no one here has seen any evidence that I
have another boat.

On 29/07/2011 10:33 AM, Beach Bum wrote:
On 7/29/2011 12:15 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 29/07/2011 6:40 AM, Beach Bum wrote:
On 7/29/2011 8:29 AM, Jimmy wrote:
On 7/29/2011 6:14 AM, X-Man wrote:

You have Paul, Harry, Plum, XMan... All actually Harry Krause. He
posted
as Paul from his Email, did the same thing for the Plum identity a
while
back... Don't be fooled...


More bull**** from Little Turd Tosk

You did get caught using the paul@byc identity, and that ain't
bullsheet.

I agree that HK Paul and EX-Man are one in the same. Ex-man is just a
handle change to avoid filters. He's not trying to hide anything there.
Plume is Plume. Pain in the ass know it all slut, all the way. You can't
fake that.

I tend to agree, but wtf3 I think might be defumer.

They are similar. A couple pf preprogramed idiots. They will not and
cannot listen to logic and reason. Analog folks in a digital world.
There's another word for them, "cypher"

Yep, dependents of the government, useless slugs on the dole. Just
sheep and can't figure out why they are so poor. Did the same old
debt-socialism-whine their whole lives and now screwed for it.

Yep, their brains are "cypher" and the keys got lost.

--
Obama, enslaving Americans with debt-tax slavery for a spending binge.
Doesn't even borrow real money, Bernanke just creates it like a
counterfeiter. .

On 29/07/2011 10:44 AM, X-Man wrote:
In ,
says...

In articlefPednWm01944Oq_TnZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

On 7/29/2011 6:14 AM, X-Man wrote:

You have Paul, Harry, Plum, XMan... All actually Harry Krause. He posted
as Paul from his Email, did the same thing for the Plum identity a while
back... Don't be fooled...


More bull**** from Little Turd Tosk

You did get caught using the paul@byc identity, and that ain't bullsheet.

He got caught using Plum too, but the folks who like to argue with him
(probably mostly his own sock puppets) didn't seem to care or notice...

I've stated over and over that anybody that doesn't post with their real
name is a pussy. Me, North Star, slammer, jps, and plum all think so. So
go **** up a rope you little turd.

**** up your own rope in your own face. Those names are no more real
than the others you are bashing. Your just a haryyk pretentious dick.

--
Obama, enslaving Americans with debt-tax slavery for a spending binge.
Doesn't even borrow real money, Bernanke just creates it like a
counterfeiter. .

On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:12:17 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 28/07/2011 7:27 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:05:07 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:22:48 -0600,
wrote:

or http://tinyurl.com/3kqdb4o

Well, if the pattern persists and it should, gold should go to at least
$3500 before it peeks.

Gold is not an investment it is a trade.

You buy it when we have a recession and sell it when you see a real
change in how the economy s going.
In the 70s that $100 gold ended up peaking shortly after Reagan was
elected at almost $700. The next time was when we had the Reagan
recession and gold was $300 and crested around $600 when the recession
broke.
This time the "buy" was when the economy was growing around 2001,
again around $300. I am not sure where the top is but it will
certainly be after the US gets a handle on its unemployment problems
and corrals the debt. I fear we will be waiting for western Europe
too.
$3500 may be a bit high but $2000 is likely and $2500 not
unreasonable.
The strange thing is the gold bugs seem to know the housing boom was
not real. Look at the gold chart for the 2000s.

I have some silver coin at 5x face but not the pickup truck load I
should have bought

Awww... the guru screwed up.

Making little positive mistakes between big successes sure beats being a
loser all the time.

Yes, we know you're a loser all the time!

On Jul 27, 11:22*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
On 27/07/2011 7:58 PM, wrote:

Here's a nice link for those who think gold is such a great thing...

http://www.fintrend.com/inflation/im...ld_inflation_c...

and, the stock market...

http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=%5EDJI#symbol=^dji;range=my;compare=;ind icator=volume;charttype=area;crosshair=on;ohlcvalu *es=0;logscale=off;source=;

orhttp://tinyurl.com/3kqdb4o

Well, if the pattern persists and it should, gold should go to at least
$3500 *before it peeks*.

snip...

huh... what's it going to "peek" at???

On Jul 29, 1:17*am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:05:07 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:22:48 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

orhttp://tinyurl.com/3kqdb4o

Well, if the pattern persists and it should, gold should go to at least
$3500 before it peeks.

Wow, did Pike peek?

All this talk of peeking seems a little risque to me. ;-)

In article d3827385-837d-4632-abab-e15aac1127e0
@bl1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jul 27, 11:22*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
On 27/07/2011 7:58 PM, wrote:

Here's a nice link for those who think gold is such a great thing...

http://www.fintrend.com/inflation/im...ld_inflation_c...

and, the stock market...

http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=%5EDJI#symbol=^dji;range=my;compare=;ind icator=volume;charttype=area;crosshair=on;ohlcvalu *es=0;logscale=off;source=;

orhttp://tinyurl.com/3kqdb4o

Well, if the pattern persists and it should, gold should go to at least
$3500 *before it peeks*.

snip...

huh... what's it going to "peek" at???

Boy, I wish you'd catch those typos like that over at my google group!
Of course, everyone has noticed that you don't pick out mine. And I know
that it's because you and I have a special relationship....

In article a011792e-9a03-46b8-b7ea-
,
says...

On Jul 29, 1:17*am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:05:07 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:22:48 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

orhttp://tinyurl.com/3kqdb4o

Well, if the pattern persists and it should, gold should go to at least
$3500 before it peeks.

Wow, did Pike peek?

All this talk of peeking seems a little risque to me. ;-)

It would to you.

On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:18:05 -0700 (PDT), North Star
wrote:

On Jul 29, 1:17*am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:05:07 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:22:48 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

orhttp://tinyurl.com/3kqdb4o

Well, if the pattern persists and it should, gold should go to at least
$3500 before it peeks.

Wow, did Pike peek?

All this talk of peeking seems a little risque to me. ;-)

I've never seen gold peek before. I didn't even realize it had eyes.