Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is
allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that." Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , naled24511
@mypacks.net says... There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that." Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail. With rules like that, we'd be just like China! While I don't like to buy Chinese goods, I do like that style of government. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:42:12 -0400, Harryk
wrote: There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that." Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail. Ronny Raygun used the same, dottering-old-fool tactic when he testified. It's standard practice for scumbags over 80. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/20/2011 2:13 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:42:12 -0400, wrote: There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that." Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail. Ronny Raygun used the same, dottering-old-fool tactic when he testified. It's standard practice for scumbags over 80. He had a debilitating illness. What's your excuse? |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:05:10 -0400, Florida Jim
wrote: On 7/20/2011 2:13 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:42:12 -0400, wrote: There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that." Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail. Ronny Raygun used the same, dottering-old-fool tactic when he testified. It's standard practice for scumbags over 80. He had a debilitating illness. What's your excuse? He used it as a tool to escape scrutiny. What's your excuse? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/20/11 4:23 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:05:10 -0400, Florida wrote: On 7/20/2011 2:13 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:42:12 -0400, wrote: There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that." Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail. Ronny Raygun used the same, dottering-old-fool tactic when he testified. It's standard practice for scumbags over 80. He had a debilitating illness. What's your excuse? He used it as a tool to escape scrutiny. What's your excuse? Flajim couldn't get past the open admissions test* at Orlando Community College so he joined the navy and became a skilled shower boy. * The test consisted of fogging a mirror. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/20/2011 4:27 PM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/20/11 4:23 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:05:10 -0400, Florida wrote: On 7/20/2011 2:13 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:42:12 -0400, wrote: There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that." Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail. Ronny Raygun used the same, dottering-old-fool tactic when he testified. It's standard practice for scumbags over 80. He had a debilitating illness. What's your excuse? He used it as a tool to escape scrutiny. What's your excuse? Flajim couldn't get past the open admissions test* at Orlando Community College so he joined the navy and became a skilled shower boy. * The test consisted of fogging a mirror. You learned some form of the English language and basket weaving. What motivated you to attend college was the fear of being drafted. You couldn't handle any of the sciences, so you settled for the e-a-s-i-e-s-t courses. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/20/2011 4:23 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:05:10 -0400, Florida wrote: On 7/20/2011 2:13 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:42:12 -0400, wrote: There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that." Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail. Ronny Raygun used the same, dottering-old-fool tactic when he testified. It's standard practice for scumbags over 80. He had a debilitating illness. What's your excuse? He used it as a tool to escape scrutiny. What's your excuse? Screwdriver boy thinks he has all the answers. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/20/11 4:55 PM, Florida Jim wrote:
On 7/20/2011 4:23 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:05:10 -0400, Florida wrote: On 7/20/2011 2:13 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:42:12 -0400, wrote: There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that." Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail. Ronny Raygun used the same, dottering-old-fool tactic when he testified. It's standard practice for scumbags over 80. He had a debilitating illness. What's your excuse? He used it as a tool to escape scrutiny. What's your excuse? Screwdriver boy thinks he has all the answers. More correct answers than you and your gang of conservatrash here have, for sure. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:55:58 -0400, Florida Jim
wrote: On 7/20/2011 4:23 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:05:10 -0400, Florida wrote: On 7/20/2011 2:13 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:42:12 -0400, wrote: There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that." Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail. Ronny Raygun used the same, dottering-old-fool tactic when he testified. It's standard practice for scumbags over 80. He had a debilitating illness. What's your excuse? He used it as a tool to escape scrutiny. What's your excuse? Screwdriver boy thinks he has all the answers. I've headed a high tech company for 20 years selling to multi-national brands who rely on our products and services to control mission critical facilities and all you can cite to disparage me is that I favor German made screwdrivers? I expect you'd be forced to use the senility defense if you were summoned to testify on behalf of anything. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Krause Rule... | General | |||
It's govern - not rule... | General | |||
Help me with Rule 30 of the colregs please | ASA | |||
Rule 12 - Sailing Rule | ASA |