On Jun 13, 7:18*pm, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:58:08 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:









On 13/06/2011 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:41:44 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 8:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:11:35 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 7:38 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. *Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos..
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.

Yep, like Clinton, lied about it.

Not like you. You're too small, apparently.

Getting all worked up are ya?

You're the small guy whacking off in front of your computer.

I leave that for you. *I prefer more conventional man and woman
relationship. *I mean a real women, not skanks like you.

You'd prefer a conventional relationship, but since you can't perform,
it really doesn't matter what you'd "prefer." Basically, you're a
little man with little or no performance. Evidence: Your fixation on
men's genitalia.

Not getting any lately, D'Plume?

On 13/06/2011 6:18 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:58:08 -0600,
wrote:

On 13/06/2011 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:41:44 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 8:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:11:35 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 7:38 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.

Yep, like Clinton, lied about it.

Not like you. You're too small, apparently.

Getting all worked up are ya?

You're the small guy whacking off in front of your computer.

I leave that for you. I prefer more conventional man and woman
relationship. I mean a real women, not skanks like you.

You'd prefer a conventional relationship, but since you can't perform,
it really doesn't matter what you'd "prefer." Basically, you're a
little man with little or no performance. Evidence: Your fixation on
men's genitalia.

Bet you want a 16" cock....8" of pleasure and 8" to get by the fat.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:15:46 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 13/06/2011 6:18 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:58:08 -0600,
wrote:

On 13/06/2011 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:41:44 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 8:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:11:35 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 7:38 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.

Yep, like Clinton, lied about it.

Not like you. You're too small, apparently.

Getting all worked up are ya?

You're the small guy whacking off in front of your computer.

I leave that for you. I prefer more conventional man and woman
relationship. I mean a real women, not skanks like you.

You'd prefer a conventional relationship, but since you can't perform,
it really doesn't matter what you'd "prefer." Basically, you're a
little man with little or no performance. Evidence: Your fixation on
men's genitalia.

Bet you want a 16" cock....8" of pleasure and 8" to get by the fat.

If I did, I certainly wouldn't look to you. You're all of what...
about 2 flaccid inches.

On Jun 15, 4:08*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:15:46 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:









On 13/06/2011 6:18 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:58:08 -0600,
wrote:

On 13/06/2011 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:41:44 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 8:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:11:35 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 7:38 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. *Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers..
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.

Yep, like Clinton, lied about it.

Not like you. You're too small, apparently.

Getting all worked up are ya?

You're the small guy whacking off in front of your computer.

I leave that for you. *I prefer more conventional man and woman
relationship. *I mean a real women, not skanks like you.

You'd prefer a conventional relationship, but since you can't perform,
it really doesn't matter what you'd "prefer." Basically, you're a
little man with little or no performance. Evidence: Your fixation on
men's genitalia.

Bet you want a 16" cock....8" of pleasure and 8" to get by the fat.

If I did, I certainly wouldn't look to you. You're all of what...
about 2 flaccid inches.

"If [you] did" D'Plume? We're sure you do, and you would.