Is Obama starting WW III?
 

On 13/06/2011 3:16 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:46:17 -0600,
wrote:

On 11/06/2011 6:17 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:54:49 -0600,
wrote:



Yep, Clinton shouldn't have signed that liberal bank debt policy. A
seed that grew to a depression. Fleabagger economics.

liberal??

it was written by PHIL GRAMM

only a moron who knows zip about america would call gramm a 'liberal'

ROFLMAO

Funny, are you talking of

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm%E...0%93Bliley_Act

Yep, the law Obama will not enforce as it might toss in too many fellow
golden handshake Harvard alumni in jail?

enforce it? HAHAHAHAAH there's nothing to enforce! the right has made
bank robbery legal

Funny, is Obama a rightie? I really doubt that, just a jive talking
fleabagger, all mouth and no results.

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

Is Obama starting WW III?
 

On 14/06/2011 11:06 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:56:39 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:51:46 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:41:44 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:56:18 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:30:29 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:58:53 -0600,
wrote:

It is so Hillaryious.

gee. this has zip to do with iraq

notice how desperately the right fights any responsibility of bush in
the trillion dollar disaster of iraq?

Yeah, yeah, yeah... Isn't that why you elected the dumb ****? It's his
war now, he promised to end it and lied, now it's on him...

never voted for bush. sorry.

I am sure you voted for the 5th Bush brother.

as well as the 12th imam in your imagination


Nope, just the Bush reference. Obama is following the Bush roadmap in
the wars, the bailouts and he still has most of the same fiscal team
doing the same basic plan for the recovery. Basically they have just
thrown money at the top guys in that Wall Street/Bankster cabal and
waited for it to trickle down.
How is that working for you?

That's not completely accurate, as you know. And, it's working out
better than the neglect that took place leading to Bush/Paulson
initiating TARP.

Does not mater if it is Democrats pushing Bush or Obamanomics
corruption, more government is more problems.

So stop the insanity and vote for less government. Doing the same old
debt-corruption spend Obamanomics isn't working. Or in at least not for
99% of the people.

Hey, voting Obama was a mistake, but show your smart and dump him in 2012.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

Is Obama starting WW III?
 

On 13/06/2011 3:22 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:54:17 -0600,
wrote:

On 11/06/2011 7:36 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:27:49 -0400, wrote:

QED

You have proven nothing... Everyone knows the UN gave Iraq 6 full months
to clean up the mess.... Still, all you have is speculation by such
brainiacs as Arianna Huffington, and Jon Stewart, Michael Moore and
Ronald McDonald...snerk

again i ask

where are the WMD's??

Where are the terrorists in Afghanistan?

Oh they are in Pakistan.

And what do Canadian and US politicians do? Subsidize and send food to
a nuclear low debt nation Pakistan. One way or another, a break down in
US government intelligence.

it's called a protection racket

Yep, and fleabaggers voted for it.

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

Is Obama starting WW III?
 

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:45:28 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 13/06/2011 3:16 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:46:17 -0600,
wrote:

On 11/06/2011 6:17 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:54:49 -0600,
wrote:



Yep, Clinton shouldn't have signed that liberal bank debt policy. A
seed that grew to a depression. Fleabagger economics.

liberal??

it was written by PHIL GRAMM

only a moron who knows zip about america would call gramm a 'liberal'

ROFLMAO

Funny, are you talking of

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm%E...0%93Bliley_Act

Yep, the law Obama will not enforce as it might toss in too many fellow
golden handshake Harvard alumni in jail?

enforce it? HAHAHAHAAH there's nothing to enforce! the right has made
bank robbery legal

Funny, is Obama a rightie? I really doubt that, just a jive talking
fleabagger, all mouth and no results.

let's see...who's opposing the CFPB?

the GOP

who let CSE's exist and bankrupt the US?

the GOP

who is fighting regulation of wall street?

the GOP

apparently this idiot thinks obama's a republican!

Is Obama starting WW III?
 

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:56:39 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:51:46 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:41:44 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:56:18 -0400, wf3h wrote:


notice how desperately the right fights any responsibility of bush in
the trillion dollar disaster of iraq?

Yeah, yeah, yeah... Isn't that why you elected the dumb ****? It's his
war now, he promised to end it and lied, now it's on him...

never voted for bush. sorry.

I am sure you voted for the 5th Bush brother.

as well as the 12th imam in your imagination


Nope, just the Bush reference. Obama is following the Bush roadmap in
the wars
?
reallly? bush drew down iraq to 50k? withdrew troops from afghanistan?

were these the famous invisible troops?


, the bailouts and he still has most of the same fiscal team
doing the same basic plan for the recovery. Basically they have just
thrown money at the top guys in that Wall Street/Bankster cabal and
waited for it to trickle down.
How is that working for you?

the bailouts. for anyone who ever took economics, were necessary
because of the too big to fail problem. the right structured the
economy so that there is socialism for the rich and capitalism for the
middle class

the right ignores this, though. there's even a name for it: moral
hazard theory. but the right ignores THAT.

Is Obama starting WW III?
 

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:52:38 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


Does not mater if it is Democrats pushing Bush or Obamanomics
corruption, more government is more problems.

So stop the insanity and vote for less government.

we did have less govt. that's where CSE's come in.

how'd that work out or the economy?


Hey, voting Obama was a mistake, but show your smart and dump him in 2012.

yeah let's go with bachman

let's turn the entire US into a slave state for america's corporations

Is Obama starting WW III?
 

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:53:56 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 13/06/2011 3:22 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:54:17 -0600,
wrote:

On 11/06/2011 7:36 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:27:49 -0400, wrote:

QED

Where are the terrorists in Afghanistan?

Oh they are in Pakistan.

And what do Canadian and US politicians do? Subsidize and send food to
a nuclear low debt nation Pakistan. One way or another, a break down in
US government intelligence.

it's called a protection racket

Yep, and fleabaggers voted for it.

really? they voted for bush?

who knew!!

Is Obama starting WW III?
 

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:46:48 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:40:32 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:56:39 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:51:46 -0400, wf3h wrote:

I am sure you voted for the 5th Bush brother.

as well as the 12th imam in your imagination


Nope, just the Bush reference. Obama is following the Bush roadmap in
the wars
?
reallly? bush drew down iraq to 50k? withdrew troops from afghanistan?

were these the famous invisible troops?

The current plan was the Bush plan.
The dates just slipped a bit since Obama took office

now let's see.

the current eonomic situation was bush's

but it's obama's fault

the current drawdown in iraq is being done by obama

but bush gets the credit

gee. why is anyone surprised when the racism of the right is exposed?


the bailouts. for anyone who ever took economics, were necessary
because of the too big to fail problem. the right structured the
economy so that there is socialism for the rich and capitalism for the
middle class


I don't understand why you think giving over a trillion dollars to the
same people who caused the crash with no strings attached was the
right thing to do. I suppose it is because Obama told you so.

HAHAHAH you ever hear of the 29 depression? ever take a course in
economics?

the problem with the right is they want this to CONTINUE. you're kinda
stupiid and dont know much history so fall right into their trap

Is Obama starting WW III?
 

On 12-Jun-2011, wrote:

Reagan, droped a trillion in debt, didn't increase government spending
but much and had recession results in 10 months.

Fact is, while fleabaggers in delusional think it is possible, you can
never debt-spend your way to economic property. No one has ever seen it
work, and US today is no exception. Just more debt.

Or the possibility, in secret Obama wants to ruin the USA with debt.
Part of Obama's hidden agenda.

I find it highly entertaining when two morons agree... dumb and

You're referring to the current and 2 previous presidents and vice
presidents, right?

What the majority of the legitimate U.S. population (perhaps 50 million)
hardly notice and the vast majority have no clue about is that the factors
that define a country no longer exist in the United States - it has failed,
and will collapse within 5 to 7 years. There is no common purpose, culture,
language, economic focus, nothing to define what constitutes the former
United States except nostalgic maps.

In addition to of that, the core economic base is GONE. There is no
"recession;" what has occurred over the past 15 years is a transition to a
secondary colony providing raw materials to productive countries (Japan,
Korea, China, India) and providing a marketplace for shoddy goods sold at US
prices. That has created the greatly diminished wages, unemployment, and
lower standards of living.

The final nail in the coffin is a corrupt government, hell-bent on ****ing
unimaginable amounts of money into boondoggles to expand the size of their
empire at the expense of the peasants........i.e., you.

Putting it simple to the Toyota and Kia drivers loading their cars with red
Chinese junk - you're screwed. Middle class jobs are devastated and will
not return - your habits are sinking the tiny ship that remains; US core
industries will not return for generations (until your wages and living
standards are equal to that of China and India); the US treasury cannot make
adjustments to reverse the financial meltdown - your money is worth less
which is why prices are higher for commodities. Functional countries that
ship oil, machinery etc. to you demand more bogus dollars than before.
Priorities of "Americans" now are their play phones, moronic TV shows, $8.00
a gallon bottled water and free "health care" (no such thing, they mean
medical services but that's all part of the delusion) Bogus securities are
wagers on paper - that sort of scam has been called "investment" for 30
years.

To relate that to the subject of the thread: The US cannot participate in an
actual war - money would be needed from other countries, and other countries
are not that stupid. The meals-on-wheels actions in Iraq and Afghanistan and
Obama's 2 new military ventures are all accelerating the eminent collapse -
the ROE is lame. WWIII certainly might, and most likely, will occur - the US
will be a bystander after the first few weeks. Grow food, and stay away
from my land.

Is Obama starting WW III?
 

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:40:32 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:56:39 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:51:46 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:41:44 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:56:18 -0400, wf3h wrote:


notice how desperately the right fights any responsibility of bush in
the trillion dollar disaster of iraq?

Yeah, yeah, yeah... Isn't that why you elected the dumb ****? It's his
war now, he promised to end it and lied, now it's on him...

never voted for bush. sorry.

I am sure you voted for the 5th Bush brother.

as well as the 12th imam in your imagination


Nope, just the Bush reference. Obama is following the Bush roadmap in
the wars
?
reallly? bush drew down iraq to 50k? withdrew troops from afghanistan?

were these the famous invisible troops?

The current plan was the Bush plan.
The dates just slipped a bit since Obama took office


, the bailouts and he still has most of the same fiscal team
doing the same basic plan for the recovery. Basically they have just
thrown money at the top guys in that Wall Street/Bankster cabal and
waited for it to trickle down.
How is that working for you?

the bailouts. for anyone who ever took economics, were necessary
because of the too big to fail problem. the right structured the
economy so that there is socialism for the rich and capitalism for the
middle class


I don't understand why you think giving over a trillion dollars to the
same people who caused the crash with no strings attached was the
right thing to do. I suppose it is because Obama told you so.
It is interesting that he changed everything he believed in 2007, as
soon as the big money bribes got to him.
That was when he became the 5th Bush brother.

Bought and paid for...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!