On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:59:53 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:40:50 -0400, BAR wrote:


When my father retired in 1984 as an O-5 in the US Navy, as a graduate
of the USNA and holding a MS from the US Navy PG School, I was earning
the same as he was. I was 25 years old and had no degree from anywhere.

why does the right wing think their little bull**** stories have
anything to o with reality? have you ****ers looked out a window
lately?

really?

Did my father's income predict my income.

more readers digest bull**** stories. the right wing thinks that
evidence doesnt matter. the right wing thinks as long as they know
SOMEONE who got rich, everything is OK. one girl survivied rabies the
other day with no vaccination. to the right wing that means rabies is
as deadly as the common cold

morons


-the US has lower social mobility than SWEDEN

Again what is social mobility?

if you dont know what it is

and are truly too stupid to google it

then you're right wing

Did you get turned down for membership at "the good marina?" Was your
lineage from the wrong side of the tracks?

more elitist rantings from the readers digest crowd

AKA the 'american dream'

ever hear of it, right wnger?

I have succeeded in the American dream. I have done better than my
parents. ]

no one gives a **** about your norman rockewll fantasies


how's wall street doing for us? the US doing OK

you really are stupid, arent you? and PROUD of it!!

I just checked my 401k and it is up 6% for the year.

HAHAHAA guess you dont follow the news, right winger, do you?

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:50:32 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


Obama-debt bubble is breaking.

says the ku klux clown

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:48:03 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/06/2011 5:20 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:24:05 -0400, wrote:


and yes, borrow and spend does work. in fact it's how the 29
depression ended.

what wrecked us is wall street taking money and turning into a non
productive liquidity trap

I have money to invest. Tell me how I should invest it?

I need a laugh.

i work for a living. sorry, parasite. you're gonna have to work that
one on your own

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:38:22 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:48:03 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/06/2011 5:20 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:24:05 -0400, wrote:


and yes, borrow and spend does work. in fact it's how the 29
depression ended.

what wrecked us is wall street taking money and turning into a non
productive liquidity trap

I have money to invest. Tell me how I should invest it?

I need a laugh.

i work for a living. sorry, parasite. you're gonna have to work that
one on your own

No pun intended I'm sure.

On 14/06/2011 8:40 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:19:49 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:22:44 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:02:05 -0400, wrote:


spend out of it. In 1933 they realized after the 1932 crash that
fleabagger debt spend does not work. Took 6 years of restraint to cover
the debts and recovery was slow.

really?

uh...why did the depression end in 39?

did something happen in 39? uh yeah...the US started to spend for ww2

canuck's moronic view of economics is exceeded only by his ignorance
of history

It was something called lend lease that got the factories moving again.

That was when the rest of the world was borrowing from us.

Bob, do you see the difference?


Greg, do you see that the US gov't was injecting money into the
economy? Do you see why it doesn't make much difference how it does it
and that via a war isn't exactly the best way to do that... unless you
don't mind killing a lot of people in the name of profit of course.

Never mind. You're hiding. I forgot.

It is funny that when some try to tell us that the only way to make
money is to spend money. Yet it just never seems to work with
governments. They more the spend the more debt they create for everyone.

It's funny that you don't know anything about how an economy works.

Governments do not generate wealth. The only thing governments are good
at with respect to money is waste, fraud and corruption.

Wealth isn't the issue. It's the middle class who are getting screwed
and they're not interested in wealth. They're interested in short term
survival.

You really are stupid. Did you get past G9 K9?
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

On 15/06/2011 5:47 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:19:49 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:22:44 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:02:05 -0400, wrote:


spend out of it. In 1933 they realized after the 1932 crash that
fleabagger debt spend does not work. Took 6 years of restraint to cover
the debts and recovery was slow.

really?

uh...why did the depression end in 39?

did something happen in 39? uh yeah...the US started to spend for ww2

canuck's moronic view of economics is exceeded only by his ignorance
of history

It was something called lend lease that got the factories moving again.

That was when the rest of the world was borrowing from us.

Bob, do you see the difference?


Greg, do you see that the US gov't was injecting money into the
economy? Do you see why it doesn't make much difference how it does it
and that via a war isn't exactly the best way to do that... unless you
don't mind killing a lot of people in the name of profit of course.

Never mind. You're hiding. I forgot.

It is funny that when some try to tell us that the only way to make
money is to spend money. Yet it just never seems to work with
governments. They more the spend the more debt they create for everyone.

It's funny that you don't know anything about how an economy works.

Governments do not generate wealth. The only thing governments are good
at with respect to money is waste, fraud and corruption.

Wealth isn't the issue. It's the middle class who are getting screwed
and they're not interested in wealth. They're interested in short term
survival.

Wrong, wealth is the issue. Without generating new wealth you are just
moving the same money around.

Do you know where wealth comes from? It comes from natural resources.

deplume thinks wealth is dysfunctional flea bag'in.

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:10:17 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/06/2011 8:40 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:19:49 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:22:44 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:02:05 -0400, wrote:


spend out of it. In 1933 they realized after the 1932 crash that
fleabagger debt spend does not work. Took 6 years of restraint to cover
the debts and recovery was slow.

really?

uh...why did the depression end in 39?

did something happen in 39? uh yeah...the US started to spend for ww2

canuck's moronic view of economics is exceeded only by his ignorance
of history

It was something called lend lease that got the factories moving again.

That was when the rest of the world was borrowing from us.

Bob, do you see the difference?


Greg, do you see that the US gov't was injecting money into the
economy? Do you see why it doesn't make much difference how it does it
and that via a war isn't exactly the best way to do that... unless you
don't mind killing a lot of people in the name of profit of course.

Never mind. You're hiding. I forgot.

It is funny that when some try to tell us that the only way to make
money is to spend money. Yet it just never seems to work with
governments. They more the spend the more debt they create for everyone.

It's funny that you don't know anything about how an economy works.

Governments do not generate wealth. The only thing governments are good
at with respect to money is waste, fraud and corruption.

Wealth isn't the issue. It's the middle class who are getting screwed
and they're not interested in wealth. They're interested in short term
survival.

You really are stupid. Did you get past G9 K9?

You are certainly made up of K9sh*t.

On Jun 15, 7:59*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:54:58 -0700, "Califbill"









wrote:
"Canuck57" *wrote in ...

On 14/06/2011 5:20 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:24:05 -0400, *wrote:

In ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:02:05 -0400, wrote:

yep. typical LIBERAL KEYNESIAN economcis

-borrow and spend in bad times
-pay back in good

thanks. i already knew that

That is national suicide and we are seeing it occur right in front of
our eyes.

We have borrowed and spent our self to near insolvency.

actually what we did is transfer a massive amount of wealth to the
already rich

and yes, borrow and spend does work. in fact it's how the 29
depression ended.

what wrecked us is wall street taking money and turning into a non
productive liquidity trap

I have money to invest. *Tell me how I should invest it?

I need a laugh.

Therefore, Pelosi is evil?

Pelosi is your twin.

wf3h wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:45:39 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message ...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:56:34 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

meaningless. and he IS a kluxer


He seems to have a better understanding of Econ

101 than 95% of the rest of the politicians and most of the public also.
He
will not be President, but would make one hell of an advisor. Probably the
best candidate and will also not get the nod, is Newt G. He was the one
who
balanced Clinton's budgets. The Contract with America was one of the best
things that happened to WJC.

the contract ON america you mean. the continued war of the right
against the ameircan middle class


Reply:
No the war on the middle class is the insane overspending by almost all the
Congress's for 50 years. And the inflation that it has caused. 1968, a
middle class family had an income of about $14k. Could buy a house and car
and decent vacation. 43 years later, that is 1/2 of poverty level. The
Contract with America was to allow those middle class to have the value of
the money they earned. Not having to keep sending more to Washington, D,C.
to pay for bloated government. One of the only places in the USA that has
not seen a housing bust is the DC area. Lots of money there.

funny the rich seem to be doing OK. they had a 500% pay increase in
the last 30 years.

so why are they doing fine and the rest of us are headed for poverty?

answer: that's what the right wing wants for the US

It's actually related to education and work ethic - both that don't
come easy. I'll pay you to wash and wax my $60K cars if that helps.

On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:03:54 -0400, L G
wrote:

wf3h wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:45:39 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

Reply:
No the war on the middle class is the insane overspending by almost all the
Congress's for 50 years. And the inflation that it has caused. 1968, a
middle class family had an income of about $14k. Could buy a house and car
and decent vacation. 43 years later, that is 1/2 of poverty level. The
Contract with America was to allow those middle class to have the value of
the money they earned. Not having to keep sending more to Washington, D,C.
to pay for bloated government. One of the only places in the USA that has
not seen a housing bust is the DC area. Lots of money there.

funny the rich seem to be doing OK. they had a 500% pay increase in
the last 30 years.

so why are they doing fine and the rest of us are headed for poverty?

answer: that's what the right wing wants for the US

It's actually related to education and work ethic - both that don't
come easy. I'll pay you to wash and wax my $60K cars if that helps.

gee. any proof of that beyond right wing bull****?

nope. social mobility in the US is worse than it is in sweden

but the right wing has their fairy tales...

why are you guys ALWAYS wrong?