the success of the bush tax cuts
 

wf3h wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:03:54 -0400, L
wrote:


wf3h wrote:

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:45:39 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:


Reply:
No the war on the middle class is the insane overspending by almost all the
Congress's for 50 years. And the inflation that it has caused. 1968, a
middle class family had an income of about $14k. Could buy a house and car
and decent vacation. 43 years later, that is 1/2 of poverty level. The
Contract with America was to allow those middle class to have the value of
the money they earned. Not having to keep sending more to Washington, D,C.
to pay for bloated government. One of the only places in the USA that has
not seen a housing bust is the DC area. Lots of money there.


funny the rich seem to be doing OK. they had a 500% pay increase in
the last 30 years.

so why are they doing fine and the rest of us are headed for poverty?

answer: that's what the right wing wants for the US


It's actually related to education and work ethic - both that don't
come easy. I'll pay you to wash and wax my $60K cars if that helps.


gee. any proof of that beyond right wing bull****?

nope. social mobility in the US is worse than it is in sweden

but the right wing has their fairy tales...

why are you guys ALWAYS wrong?

It worked for me.

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:52:27 -0400, L G
wrote:

wf3h wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:03:54 -0400, L
wrote:

the last 30 years.

so why are they doing fine and the rest of us are headed for poverty?

answer: that's what the right wing wants for the US


It's actually related to education and work ethic - both that don't
come easy. I'll pay you to wash and wax my $60K cars if that helps.


gee. any proof of that beyond right wing bull****?

nope. social mobility in the US is worse than it is in sweden

but the right wing has their fairy tales...

why are you guys ALWAYS wrong?

It worked for me.

gee. a girl survived rabies the other day

guess that means rabies is 100% survivable, right?

is that how right wingers think?

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

"L G" wrote in message
...

wf3h wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:45:39 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:56:34 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

meaningless. and he IS a kluxer


He seems to have a better understanding of Econ

101 than 95% of the rest of the politicians and most of the public also.
He
will not be President, but would make one hell of an advisor. Probably
the
best candidate and will also not get the nod, is Newt G. He was the one
who
balanced Clinton's budgets. The Contract with America was one of the
best
things that happened to WJC.

the contract ON america you mean. the continued war of the right
against the ameircan middle class


Reply:
No the war on the middle class is the insane overspending by almost all
the
Congress's for 50 years. And the inflation that it has caused. 1968, a
middle class family had an income of about $14k. Could buy a house and
car
and decent vacation. 43 years later, that is 1/2 of poverty level. The
Contract with America was to allow those middle class to have the value
of
the money they earned. Not having to keep sending more to Washington,
D,C.
to pay for bloated government. One of the only places in the USA that
has
not seen a housing bust is the DC area. Lots of money there.

funny the rich seem to be doing OK. they had a 500% pay increase in
the last 30 years.

so why are they doing fine and the rest of us are headed for poverty?

answer: that's what the right wing wants for the US

It's actually related to education and work ethic - both that don't
come easy. I'll pay you to wash and wax my $60K cars if that helps.


Reply:
Actually not. More related to how closely tied to big government you are.
Tyson Foods donates lots of campaign money, along with ADM getting lots of
subsidies from government. Wall Street is an advisor to the government, so
they make the rules they need to rip of the rest of the people. Look at
Obama and the too big to fail banks. He and his advisors, that come from
those firms have made them bigger.

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:16:42 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"L G" wrote in message
...

wf3h wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:45:39 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:56:34 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

meaningless. and he IS a kluxer


He seems to have a better understanding of Econ

101 than 95% of the rest of the politicians and most of the public also.
He
will not be President, but would make one hell of an advisor. Probably
the
best candidate and will also not get the nod, is Newt G. He was the one
who
balanced Clinton's budgets. The Contract with America was one of the
best
things that happened to WJC.

the contract ON america you mean. the continued war of the right
against the ameircan middle class


Reply:
No the war on the middle class is the insane overspending by almost all
the
Congress's for 50 years. And the inflation that it has caused. 1968, a
middle class family had an income of about $14k. Could buy a house and
car
and decent vacation. 43 years later, that is 1/2 of poverty level. The
Contract with America was to allow those middle class to have the value
of
the money they earned. Not having to keep sending more to Washington,
D,C.
to pay for bloated government. One of the only places in the USA that
has
not seen a housing bust is the DC area. Lots of money there.

funny the rich seem to be doing OK. they had a 500% pay increase in
the last 30 years.

so why are they doing fine and the rest of us are headed for poverty?

answer: that's what the right wing wants for the US

It's actually related to education and work ethic - both that don't
come easy. I'll pay you to wash and wax my $60K cars if that helps.


Reply:
Actually not. More related to how closely tied to big government you are.
Tyson Foods donates lots of campaign money, along with ADM getting lots of
subsidies from government. Wall Street is an advisor to the government, so
they make the rules they need to rip of the rest of the people. Look at
Obama and the too big to fail banks. He and his advisors, that come from
those firms have made them bigger.

That would be Bush and his advisors, since TARP was envisioned and
implemented initially during Bush's administration.

The authority of the United States Department of the Treasury to
establish and manage TARP under a newly created Office of Financial
Stability became law October 3, 2008.

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:16:42 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:


Reply:
Actually not. More related to how closely tied to big government you are.
Tyson Foods donates lots of campaign money, along with ADM getting lots of
subsidies from government. Wall Street is an advisor to the government, so
they make the rules they need to rip of the rest of the people. Look at
Obama and the too big to fail banks. He and his advisors, that come from
those firms have made them bigger.

unfortunately the right winger forgot it was paulson and bush who
turned 80% of america's assets over

to

10

banks

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

On 16/06/2011 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:03:54 -0400, L
wrote:

wf3h wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:45:39 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

Reply:
No the war on the middle class is the insane overspending by almost all the
Congress's for 50 years. And the inflation that it has caused. 1968, a
middle class family had an income of about $14k. Could buy a house and car
and decent vacation. 43 years later, that is 1/2 of poverty level. The
Contract with America was to allow those middle class to have the value of
the money they earned. Not having to keep sending more to Washington, D,C.
to pay for bloated government. One of the only places in the USA that has
not seen a housing bust is the DC area. Lots of money there.

funny the rich seem to be doing OK. they had a 500% pay increase in
the last 30 years.

so why are they doing fine and the rest of us are headed for poverty?

answer: that's what the right wing wants for the US

It's actually related to education and work ethic - both that don't
come easy. I'll pay you to wash and wax my $60K cars if that helps.

gee. any proof of that beyond right wing bull****?

nope. social mobility in the US is worse than it is in sweden

but the right wing has their fairy tales...

why are you guys ALWAYS wrong?

Funny, worked for me. Went from dirt poor to independent. So where did
you go wrong?
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

In article , says...

On 16/06/2011 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:03:54 -0400, L
wrote:

wf3h wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:45:39 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

Reply:
No the war on the middle class is the insane overspending by almost all the
Congress's for 50 years. And the inflation that it has caused. 1968, a
middle class family had an income of about $14k. Could buy a house and car
and decent vacation. 43 years later, that is 1/2 of poverty level. The
Contract with America was to allow those middle class to have the value of
the money they earned. Not having to keep sending more to Washington, D,C.
to pay for bloated government. One of the only places in the USA that has
not seen a housing bust is the DC area. Lots of money there.

funny the rich seem to be doing OK. they had a 500% pay increase in
the last 30 years.

so why are they doing fine and the rest of us are headed for poverty?

answer: that's what the right wing wants for the US

It's actually related to education and work ethic - both that don't
come easy. I'll pay you to wash and wax my $60K cars if that helps.

gee. any proof of that beyond right wing bull****?

nope. social mobility in the US is worse than it is in sweden

but the right wing has their fairy tales...

why are you guys ALWAYS wrong?

Funny, worked for me. Went from dirt poor to independent. So where did
you go wrong?

He has spent his entire life whining about what he hasn't been able to
achieve while everyone else had their head down working hard and earning
money and moving themselves upward on the social and economic scales.

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

"wf3h" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:16:42 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:


Reply:
Actually not. More related to how closely tied to big government you are.
Tyson Foods donates lots of campaign money, along with ADM getting lots of
subsidies from government. Wall Street is an advisor to the government, so
they make the rules they need to rip of the rest of the people. Look at
Obama and the too big to fail banks. He and his advisors, that come from
those firms have made them bigger.

unfortunately the right winger forgot it was paulson and bush who
turned 80% of america's assets over

to

10

banks


Reply:
Was Clinton a GOP POTUS? He signed the bill, with glowing words also.
http://www.nydailynews.com/money/top... l_crisis.html

Derivatives?
http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madr...s-wrong-listen

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:56:34 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 16/06/2011 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:03:54 -0400, L
wrote:


It's actually related to education and work ethic - both that don't
come easy. I'll pay you to wash and wax my $60K cars if that helps.

gee. any proof of that beyond right wing bull****?

nope. social mobility in the US is worse than it is in sweden

but the right wing has their fairy tales...

why are you guys ALWAYS wrong?

Funny, worked for me. Went from dirt poor to independent. So where did
you go wrong?

the moron hasnt figured out that no one gives a **** about his readers
digest view of reality. large countries are composed of lots of people

most of whom arent idiots like the moron canuck

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:58:27 -0400, BAR wrote:


He has spent his entire life whining about what he hasn't been able to
achieve while everyone else had their head down working hard and earning
money and moving themselves upward on the social and economic scales.


what's funny is the right wing loonies pretend there's no depression
going on and that everything is OK