|
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 17:46:13 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:30:30 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 09/06/2011 6:19 PM, wf3h wrote: On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:10:46 -0600, wrote: On 08/06/2011 4:29 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... Rumor has it Obama is itching for a national sales tax. In about the 8% range. Nothing like leftie-statism greed. you guys got lots of rumors. hell i wouldnt be surprised if you thought the rumor was he was a martian Hey, all ths Obama debt spend has to be paid for somehow. let's see...the largest components of the deficit are 1. the bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 2. the trillion dollar iraq war obama had nothing to do with either Obama continued both. He tried and is continuing to try to end tax breaks for the rich and for corps. Who's blocking him? The GOP. He's trying to end the Iraq/Afg. wars. I know. Reality hurts sometimes. but, of course, the kluxer blames the black guy "The black guy" as you call him affixed his signature to bills. He could have stopped both but he didn't have the intestinal fortitude to stand up and say no. Yes, he didn't want to tank the US/World economies, so he stabilized the financial system. Unless of course he is going to declare the USA bankrupt and eat the heat that the USA is a failed world currency do to US-Euro banking corruption. Euro is probably walking dead, we will see, Greece looks like it is going to welsh big. Iceland is watching people trying to emigrate after their welshing. hell why not blame obama for them, too? Obama's policies would continues the destructive behavior. They only do so in the short term, because there's no other rational choice. |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:16:54 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:08:54 -0400, I_am_Tosk wrote: No, you're just an idiot. Holy ****, do you ever say anything else? You are like a broken record with no point, ever. Darn good parrot however - good "plumage" also. I thought you wanted to talk about boats? No, you're just a wannabe nobody. |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:02:10 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:51:20 -0400, I_am_Tosk wrote: In article , says... a nobel prize winning economist that's what the right is doing to the US Trying to slow down Obama and Reid, good for them... yeah. by eliminating nobel prize winners on the fed good move. never let it be said the GOP ever tried to do what's right for the country You keep bringing up the Nobel prize, is that supposed to impress me? About as much as the crown on the head of the king of the Jr. Prom back in '75... let's see....which university has the most nobels in economics? oh....the right wing u. of chicago. milton friedman the chicago school but you're right wing so dont even know your own histor ry |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:14:52 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 11/06/2011 10:02 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... a nobel prize winning economist that's what the right is doing to the US Trying to slow down Obama and Reid, good for them... yeah. by eliminating nobel prize winners on the fed good move. never let it be said the GOP ever tried to do what's right for the country You keep bringing up the Nobel prize, is that supposed to impress me? About as much as the crown on the head of the king of the Jr. Prom back in '75... Obama's nobel prize was a flipping joke. HAHAHAHAAH he doesn't know the difference between the nobel for ECONOMICS and PEACE!!! |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:15:04 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:30:30 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: Hey, all ths Obama debt spend has to be paid for somehow. let's see...the largest components of the deficit are 1. the bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 2. the trillion dollar iraq war obama had nothing to do with either but, of course, the kluxer blames the black guy Unless of course he is going to declare the USA bankrupt and eat the heat that the USA is a failed world currency do to US-Euro banking corruption. Euro is probably walking dead, we will see, Greece looks like it is going to welsh big. Iceland is watching people trying to emigrate after their welshing. hell why not blame obama for them, too? You keep deflecting with your red herring "race"... It's nothing to do with Obama, it's Pelosi and Reid who refused to allow anything to happen during Bush, HAHAAHAHHA let's see..i notice you said NOTHING about points 1 and 2 above. you IGNORED them and that's why you're a racist and declared themselves "the do nothing Congress" when Obama took over. They have lived up to their self made reputation by doing nothing about jobs, economy, foreign relations, or anything else concerning a budget since they took over congress during the Bush admin.. Now the republicans have one house, barely, and you expect them to fix it when the Obama admin has openly shut them out... stupid... uh...which house passes the budget?? oh. the representatives controlled by the GOP how they doing? what cuts have they made? oh. none. |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 17:46:13 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:30:30 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: Hey, all ths Obama debt spend has to be paid for somehow. let's see...the largest components of the deficit are 1. the bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 2. the trillion dollar iraq war obama had nothing to do with either Obama continued both. let's see...number of troops in iraq under bush 150,000 under obama: zero in december. that's some continuance. and the tax cuts? oh. you forgot obama wanted to continue them for the productive middle class and eliminate them for the leeches. |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:10:33 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 11/06/2011 3:46 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... hell why not blame obama for them, too? Obama's policies would continues the destructive behavior. But Obama out spent Bush in about a year. Almost 8 times faster. proof? oh. none. another right wing lie |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:29:11 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 09/06/2011 8:59 PM, wf3h wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:17:26 -0400, I_am_Tosk wrote: and this is more right wing bull**** 14.5 trillion where? how? oh. you just heard it somewhere. lemme know when you get some facts, OK? Open a newspaper... the debt is 14.5 T... Duh... gee. and almost none of this is due to obama but he's black, you see.... Funny, the day Bush left it was $9.67T, now it is approaching $14.5T, that means Obama was in office for over $4.5T of it. bush's last budget deficit: 1.2 trillion obama's are about 1.3 uh huh. seems that, since there's no difference the only reason you hate obama is... |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:37:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 11/06/2011 10:04 AM, wf3h wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:09:00 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 23:01:12 -0400, wrote: but he says the middle class is overpaid and undertaxed while the rich are taking it on the chin Might be more accurate to say th rich left in the last 3 years. And are still doing so. really? proof? oh. none. Some of the companies I own are relocating offshore. Greedy government taxes. In todays world it is easy to move offshore. greedy govt taxes? you mean that the US has the lowest corporate taxes in the OECD and companies are so greedy this isnt good enough for them? good. let 'em go |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:40:36 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 11/06/2011 10:04 AM, wf3h wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:52:10 -0400, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... hmmm...tax cuts for the rich in 2001 and 2003 the GOP controlled the congress and the presidency t while now that Obama is in office, it's the House of Reps, with it's minor majority and no Senate or Oval office behind them that's responsible.. You are a dip****, your hypocrisy is only surpassed by the likes of John and Harry Krause... you know zip about contemporary affairs And you could care less about truth, just talking points... and you dont even care about the truth Tosk is right. Your argument is basted on bu11sh1t and fiction. Fact is, the bubble has burst and fleabaggers fear what needs to be done to fix it.' gee. all you have to do is prove me wrong go ahead. i'll wait A massive downsize of government for starters. 50% reduction in size minimum. The footprint of current government is far too big to support by the society. Now it can either do it voluntarily and save a lot of grief, or it can be forced. meaningless. and, of course, your method was tried it was called the depression of 29 ever hear of it?? |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:34:25 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 09/06/2011 7:59 PM, wf3h wrote: On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:46:02 -0600, wrote: the real problem is that the right believes supply side mythology so insists you can cut taxes and balance the budget Actually yes. Study the elasticity in pricing, taxes too have elasticity. Too low or too high and the benefits to society diminish. Trouble now is that it is too high. Look at any nation having trouble, some toxic mix of debt and taxes is the issue. Look at any economy doing well, debt and taxes are much much less. HAHAHAHAH american taxes are teh lowest they've been in FOURTY YEARS!! he doesnt even know what the tax rate is in the US! That is the growing economies of the world have less debt and less taxes. more reader's digest bull**** |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:52:55 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 10/06/2011 12:22 AM, wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:13:37 -0400, wrote: ummm...if they're insignifican why does ALL GOP policy focus on cutting their taxes? if the amount is so small, why does the GOP refuse to cut taxes unless they're rincluded?? They are idiots too. We really needed Obama to veto the whole renewal bill And the result would have been even more pain for people least able to handle it. Actually true. As Mr Rich might move the business elsewhere and the people who need to work get unemployed. great. THIS is the economy with the rich running it. let 'em go and let the middle class reclaim america I have never hidden why I left USA in 2004, it was economical to do so. And I was right... and you went to canada socialized medicine more bank regulations than the US golly. |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:54:32 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 11/06/2011 10:06 AM, wf3h wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:13:37 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 23:53:16 - sure is. healthcare for the middle class...financial regulation...as much as the GOP will let him get obama proposed a tax cut ONLY for those making less than 250K The $250k and above tax may be nice symbolism but it is insignificant. gee. then why does the GOP say only THEY can drive the economy and only THEY deserve a tax cut? Roman empire fell when they targeted the rich. Smart ones left, the others perished and good time were over for everyone. HAHAHAHA the rich owned egypt how'd that work out? |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:03:12 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 09/06/2011 8:03 PM, wf3h wrote: On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:00:35 -0600, wrote: Now 0.1% is 1:1000. Only about 100M taxpayers. That means the claim is 100,000 people make over $3M/year. First, I seriously question that number as being far too high, but lets go with it. 100,000 * .5M is only $50B so.... with a $1600B overspend, where do you suggest the other $1550B comes from? hey you tell me. you guys cut taxes on the 0.1% and let the normal working people die on the vine Hey, you vote for debt, statism and more debt, you have to take what comes along with it. No road paved with debt comes wealth. never voted for bush, his last budget was 1.2 TRILLION in debt No nation or individual before has succeeded with more debt. Not a one. What makes you fleabaggers think your exempt from reality? wrong. the US debt at the end of WW2 was higher, as a percentage of GDP, than it is now right wing liar bull****ter |
the success of the bush tax cuts
|
the success of the bush tax cuts
In article ,
says... On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:14:52 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 11/06/2011 10:02 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... a nobel prize winning economist that's what the right is doing to the US Trying to slow down Obama and Reid, good for them... yeah. by eliminating nobel prize winners on the fed good move. never let it be said the GOP ever tried to do what's right for the country You keep bringing up the Nobel prize, is that supposed to impress me? About as much as the crown on the head of the king of the Jr. Prom back in '75... Obama's nobel prize was a flipping joke. HAHAHAHAAH he doesn't know the difference between the nobel for ECONOMICS and PEACE!!! Ha, hahahahahaha, who ****ing cares.. You still have a joke prize given to a joke president... -- Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life! |
the success of the bush tax cuts
|
the success of the bush tax cuts
In article ,
says... On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:10:33 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 11/06/2011 3:46 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... hell why not blame obama for them, too? Obama's policies would continues the destructive behavior. But Obama out spent Bush in about a year. Almost 8 times faster. proof? oh. none. another right wing lie Just because you refuse to look at the figures, well, except the ones the Huffignton Hoax posts, is not our fault... -- Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life! |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On 6/11/11 9:01 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In , says... On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:02:10 -0400, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:51:20 -0400, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... a nobel prize winning economist that's what the right is doing to the US Trying to slow down Obama and Reid, good for them... yeah. by eliminating nobel prize winners on the fed good move. never let it be said the GOP ever tried to do what's right for the country You keep bringing up the Nobel prize, is that supposed to impress me? About as much as the crown on the head of the king of the Jr. Prom back in '75... let's see....which university has the most nobels in economics? oh....the right wing u. of chicago. milton friedman the chicago school but you're right wing so dont even know your own histor ry So, are you suggesting that because it was a great honor years ago, that it couldn't have changed to something else lately? That's either short sighted, or dishonest.. Oh wait, don't tell me.... It's the height of irony when the dumbest, least educated poster in rec.boats passes judgment on Nobel laureates. -- Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where personal insults are not allowed? http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:01:12 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote: In article , says... yeah. by eliminating nobel prize winners on the fed good move. never let it be said the GOP ever tried to do what's right for the country You keep bringing up the Nobel prize, is that supposed to impress me? About as much as the crown on the head of the king of the Jr. Prom back in '75... let's see....which university has the most nobels in economics? oh....the right wing u. of chicago. milton friedman the chicago school but you're right wing so dont even know your own histor ry So, are you suggesting that because it was a great honor years ago, that it couldn't have changed to something else lately? That's either short sighted, or dishonest.. Oh wait, don't tell me.... 'years ago' means when the right controlled the bull****. now that it's shown the right is bankrupt you guys complain about the prize go figure |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:05:45 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:10:33 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 11/06/2011 3:46 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... hell why not blame obama for them, too? Obama's policies would continues the destructive behavior. But Obama out spent Bush in about a year. Almost 8 times faster. proof? oh. none. another right wing lie Just because you refuse to look at the figures, well, except the ones the Huffignton Hoax posts, is not our fault... let's see... your proof that obama outspent bush is....nothing then you spin this into proof that he's bankrupting the US uh huh |
the success of the bush tax cuts
|
the success of the bush tax cuts
In article ,
says... On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:05:45 -0400, I_am_Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:10:33 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 11/06/2011 3:46 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... hell why not blame obama for them, too? Obama's policies would continues the destructive behavior. But Obama out spent Bush in about a year. Almost 8 times faster. proof? oh. none. another right wing lie Just because you refuse to look at the figures, well, except the ones the Huffignton Hoax posts, is not our fault... let's see... your proof that obama outspent bush is....nothing then you spin this into proof that he's bankrupting the US uh huh Now you are just making up stuff as you go along.. Bye, bye... -- Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life! |
the success of the bush tax cuts
|
the success of the bush tax cuts
On 6/12/2011 8:38 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In , says... On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:27:31 -0400, wrote: 1. the bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 2. the trillion dollar iraq war obama had nothing to do with either Obama continued both. let's see...number of troops in iraq under bush 150,000 under obama: zero in december. that's some continuance. Actually it will be about 50,000. The quibble about whether they are "combat" soldiers is ridiculous when most are killed by road side bombs, not combat. Oh, is that what she was dribbling about with the "zero"? Is that kind of like the "not war" we are fighting in Libya? and the tax cuts? oh. you forgot obama wanted to continue them for the productive middle class and eliminate them for the leeches. 83% of the cost of the Bush tax cut was the people who made less than $250k. The amount of money that would be recovered if they raised the taxes of the $250k and up people was doubled by the 14% payroll tax cut. The total cost of the Obama tax cut is over a half trillion dollars a year. That alone is close to half or our deficit. In two years and she claims Obama isn't a big spender.. The woman is just dishonest, period... I assume it's plume you're talking about. We've hasd some decent woman contributors over the years. Peggy brought sanitation systems expertise. Delores brought knowledge from her power squadron. Karen held her own with the best of them when discussing outboard design and engineering. They all upstaged Harry and it ****ed him off. Plume is a different story. She brings zip zero nothing to Rec.boats except for a bad attitude. She, like Harry, Jps, Bob, and Don are as useless to rec.boats as tits on a bull. Out of that group, Bob is the only one who occasionally will ask for help or discuss boating adventures. |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:40:01 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:02:02 -0400, I_am_Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:14:52 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: Ha, hahahahahaha, who ****ing cares.. You still have a joke prize given to a joke president... the right doesnt care because it shows you guys are a lost cause What, because we don't care about a popularity contest? Pfffftt. You obviously don't have any real argument... let's see...you guys run the country no wonder you dont care about 'popularity' contests |
the success of the bush tax cuts
|
the success of the bush tax cuts
|
the success of the bush tax cuts
|
the success of the bush tax cuts
|
the success of the bush tax cuts
|
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:37:37 -0400, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:15:39 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:33:22 -0400, wf3h wrote: HAHAHAHAH american taxes are teh lowest they've been in FOURTY YEARS!! Yet you support a half trillion dollar Obama tax cut. Is it just because he isn't white? yep. because the middle class hasnt had a pay increase in 30 years while the richest 1% have had their wages go up by 500% want to know why we're in a depression? read those numbers Reality is too much for him. |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:38:26 -0400, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:18:20 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:37:22 -0400, wf3h wrote: No nation or individual before has succeeded with more debt. Not a one. What makes you fleabaggers think your exempt from reality? wrong. the US debt at the end of WW2 was higher, as a percentage of GDP, than it is now Apples and oranges. If we could bomb the rest of the world back to the stone age like we did in WWII while remaining the biggest industrial power on the planet it would be significant. wrong, as usual. we're comparing debt to debt. i realize that you, being right wing, arent a logical thinker, but DO try to stay on track Unemployment was higher in the 80s. And, we had stagflation. But, the world is ending now... May 22... oh wait. |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:00:09 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:38:26 -0400, wf3h wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:18:20 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:37:22 -0400, wf3h wrote: No nation or individual before has succeeded with more debt. Not a one. What makes you fleabaggers think your exempt from reality? wrong. the US debt at the end of WW2 was higher, as a percentage of GDP, than it is now Apples and oranges. If we could bomb the rest of the world back to the stone age like we did in WWII while remaining the biggest industrial power on the planet it would be significant. wrong, as usual. we're comparing debt to debt. i realize that you, being right wing, arent a logical thinker, but DO try to stay on track You can't compare debt to debt without comparing the growth of GDP and productivity. Are you really trying to say the US is in as good a competitive shape as it was in 1946? In 1946 there was no industry in Germany, Japan, India or China. Brazil was a jungle and SE Asia was still trying to get out of a grass skirt and coconut based economy. Another important thing is, in 1946 virtually all of that debt was held by AMERICANS. If this doesn't make sense to you I guess you have to go in the bozo bin with plume. According to Jack Welsh, a Republican, times were much worse in the 1980s. Feel free to pretend to ignore my posts. You've shown yourself to be rather thin skinned and refuse or are unable to defend your nonsensical arguments. |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On 6/12/2011 2:51 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:00:09 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:38:26 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:18:20 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:37:22 -0400, wrote: No nation or individual before has succeeded with more debt. Not a one. What makes you fleabaggers think your exempt from reality? wrong. the US debt at the end of WW2 was higher, as a percentage of GDP, than it is now Apples and oranges. If we could bomb the rest of the world back to the stone age like we did in WWII while remaining the biggest industrial power on the planet it would be significant. wrong, as usual. we're comparing debt to debt. i realize that you, being right wing, arent a logical thinker, but DO try to stay on track You can't compare debt to debt without comparing the growth of GDP and productivity. Are you really trying to say the US is in as good a competitive shape as it was in 1946? In 1946 there was no industry in Germany, Japan, India or China. Brazil was a jungle and SE Asia was still trying to get out of a grass skirt and coconut based economy. Another important thing is, in 1946 virtually all of that debt was held by AMERICANS. If this doesn't make sense to you I guess you have to go in the bozo bin with plume. According to Jack Welsh, a Republican, times were much worse in the 1980s. Feel free to pretend to ignore my posts. You've shown yourself to be rather thin skinned and refuse or are unable to defend your nonsensical arguments. Greg in his infinite wisdom has learned that arguing with you is an exercise in futility |
the success of the bush tax cuts
In article , says...
On 6/12/2011 2:51 PM, wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:00:09 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:38:26 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:18:20 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:37:22 -0400, wrote: No nation or individual before has succeeded with more debt. Not a one. What makes you fleabaggers think your exempt from reality? wrong. the US debt at the end of WW2 was higher, as a percentage of GDP, than it is now Apples and oranges. If we could bomb the rest of the world back to the stone age like we did in WWII while remaining the biggest industrial power on the planet it would be significant. wrong, as usual. we're comparing debt to debt. i realize that you, being right wing, arent a logical thinker, but DO try to stay on track You can't compare debt to debt without comparing the growth of GDP and productivity. Are you really trying to say the US is in as good a competitive shape as it was in 1946? In 1946 there was no industry in Germany, Japan, India or China. Brazil was a jungle and SE Asia was still trying to get out of a grass skirt and coconut based economy. Another important thing is, in 1946 virtually all of that debt was held by AMERICANS. If this doesn't make sense to you I guess you have to go in the bozo bin with plume. According to Jack Welsh, a Republican, times were much worse in the 1980s. Feel free to pretend to ignore my posts. You've shown yourself to be rather thin skinned and refuse or are unable to defend your nonsensical arguments. Greg in his infinite wisdom has learned that arguing with you is an exercise in futility How do you argue with a liar? -- Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life! |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On 11/06/2011 6:23 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:14:52 -0600, wrote: On 11/06/2011 10:02 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... a nobel prize winning economist that's what the right is doing to the US Trying to slow down Obama and Reid, good for them... yeah. by eliminating nobel prize winners on the fed good move. never let it be said the GOP ever tried to do what's right for the country You keep bringing up the Nobel prize, is that supposed to impress me? About as much as the crown on the head of the king of the Jr. Prom back in '75... Obama's nobel prize was a flipping joke. HAHAHAHAAH he doesn't know the difference between the nobel for ECONOMICS and PEACE!!! Never questioned how Obama got one yet did nothing yet but promise and bu11sh1t a lot? -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On 11/06/2011 6:24 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:15:04 -0400, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:30:30 -0600, wrote: Hey, all ths Obama debt spend has to be paid for somehow. let's see...the largest components of the deficit are 1. the bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 2. the trillion dollar iraq war obama had nothing to do with either but, of course, the kluxer blames the black guy Unless of course he is going to declare the USA bankrupt and eat the heat that the USA is a failed world currency do to US-Euro banking corruption. Euro is probably walking dead, we will see, Greece looks like it is going to welsh big. Iceland is watching people trying to emigrate after their welshing. hell why not blame obama for them, too? You keep deflecting with your red herring "race"... It's nothing to do with Obama, it's Pelosi and Reid who refused to allow anything to happen during Bush, HAHAAHAHHA let's see..i notice you said NOTHING about points 1 and 2 above. you IGNORED them and that's why you're a racist and declared themselves "the do nothing Congress" when Obama took over. They have lived up to their self made reputation by doing nothing about jobs, economy, foreign relations, or anything else concerning a budget since they took over congress during the Bush admin.. Now the republicans have one house, barely, and you expect them to fix it when the Obama admin has openly shut them out... stupid... uh...which house passes the budget?? oh. the representatives controlled by the GOP how they doing? what cuts have they made? oh. none. Jury is on on this, are they going to expand the debt past $14.5 trillion? If I were the GOP, I would let 75% of the government shut down for 3 months. And only expand it a bit forcing the issue, debt spend less now or be off work every 3 months. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
the success of the bush tax cuts
On 11/06/2011 6:25 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:50:56 -0600, wrote: So you voted for Obama because he was black in the ruse that you wanted to prove you were not racist. Ok, I can live with that. But prove your not an idiot and in 2012 vote for anyone but Obama. let's seee bush's last budget was 1.2 TRILLION In debt a 1 TRILLION war HUGE Tax cuts for the rich and he thinks we voted for obama 'cuz he's black! Sure did for Hank Johnson, I can think of no other reason to vote for that fool. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com