the success of the bush tax cuts
 

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:04:16 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

no wonder you dont care about 'popularity' contests

Still more bull****. The democrats have had majorities in the three
corners of washington for the last 40 years.... So, you are still full
of ****..

really? 22 years of GOP presidents in the last 30 is a majority?

gee. who could have imagined!

Please look back and see who controlled congress during those terms.
Rarely did the repubs even hold two sides of the triangle, never all
three like the dems have done several times... You don't get it I know,
cause if you did, you would even call me more names.

again, who controlled the presidency

the dems rarely controlled BOTH houses of congress like the GOP did
for 6 years under bush

and look what they did with it.

bankrupted the country.

Your are full of ****. Look at control for the last 40 years...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:01:07 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:22:54 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 11/06/2011 6:31 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:40:36 -0600,
wrote:

meaningless.

and, of course, your method was tried

it was called the depression of 29

ever hear of it??

Actually, you dumbsh1t fleabaggers

says the right winger with a reader's digest view of economics


should read. In 1929 they tried to
spend out of it. In 1933 they realized after the 1932 crash that
fleabagger debt spend does not work. Took 6 years of restraint to cover
the debts and recovery was slow.

really?

uh...why did the depression end in 39?

did something happen in 39? uh yeah...the US started to spend for ww2

canuck's moronic view of economics is exceeded only by his ignorance
of history

It was something called lend lease that got the factories moving again.

So, money was spent by the US gov't. This stabilized the economy.
Thanks for the confirmation.

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:01:38 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:25:20 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 10:37 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:15:39 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:33:22 -0400, wrote:

HAHAHAHAH american taxes are teh lowest they've been in FOURTY YEARS!!


Yet you support a half trillion dollar Obama tax cut.

Is it just because he isn't white?

yep. because the middle class hasnt had a pay increase in 30 years

while the richest 1% have had their wages go up by 500%

want to know why we're in a depression?

read those numbers

When government gets bigger, people get smaller.

hey moron

then why have the richest 1% gotten so much bigger?

DUH!!

They are smarter than you.


Nope. About 1/2 of the wealthiest inherited it. And, many of those who
earned it, gave a lot of it to their kids to buy things like homes.

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

On 13/06/2011 3:29 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:06:27 -0600,
wrote:

On 11/06/2011 7:40 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

'years ago'

means when the right controlled the bull****. now that it's shown the
right is bankrupt you guys complain about the prize

go figure

You are delusional...

Good part about cutting government welfare, is wf3h will be gone when
the electricity is disconnected for non-payment.

let's see...canuck hates socialized medicine in the US. says w'ere
headed for disaster

where does he live?t

canada. what does canada have?

oh. socialized medicine....

shall we compare costs to see how SOCIALIZED medicine compares to FREE
MARKET medicine?? guess which is cheaper?

SOCIALIZED MEDICINE!!

http://dailydish.typepad.com/.a/6a00...a62f970c-popup

Just know how screwed up it left Canada and Obamacare is just a huge tax
grab. Dumbsh1t Obama doesn't seem to get it.

And dumbsh1ts like you don't either. Want to double your taxes and add
rationing and long waits? Then you should move to Canada. But wait,
you can't get into Canada. US insured care is far superior to Canada's
HC in many ways.

Pretty obvious Obamacare was a knee jerk CF.

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

On 13/06/2011 3:30 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:04:16 -0600,
wrote:

On 11/06/2011 6:24 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:15:04 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:


uh...which house passes the budget??

oh. the representatives

controlled by the GOP

how they doing? what cuts have they made?

oh. none.

Jury is on on this, are they going to expand the debt past $14.5 trillion?

there is no choice. it's already been spent. it's just admitting it
has to be paid for


If I were the GOP, I would let 75% of the government shut down for 3
months. And only expand it a bit forcing the issue, debt spend less now
or be off work every 3 months.

they did that once before. they almost disappeared in the next
election.

So? Sometimes you have to do the RIGHT thing and not the GRREDY
fleabagger thing.

But honor, integrity and rationality are not fleabagger long suits.
Watched Rep presidential candidates. Good selection....

But one thing they all got wrong, I strongly believe a woman owns her
own womb. Pro lifers, bunch of fanatics. Sad these zealots can't let
that go. But a small question.

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

On 13/06/2011 3:41 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:22:54 -0600,
wrote:

On 11/06/2011 6:31 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:40:36 -0600,
wrote:

meaningless.

and, of course, your method was tried

it was called the depression of 29

ever hear of it??

Actually, you dumbsh1t fleabaggers

says the right winger with a reader's digest view of economics


should read. In 1929 they tried to
spend out of it. In 1933 they realized after the 1932 crash that
fleabagger debt spend does not work. Took 6 years of restraint to cover
the debts and recovery was slow.

really?

uh...why did the depression end in 39?

did something happen in 39? uh yeah...the US started to spend for ww2

canuck's moronic view of economics is exceeded only by his ignorance
of history

I know more than you, your just a piece of trailer trash pretending to
know much more than you actually do. We can see your ignorance.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

On 13/06/2011 3:43 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:25:20 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 10:37 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:15:39 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:33:22 -0400, wrote:

HAHAHAHAH american taxes are teh lowest they've been in FOURTY YEARS!!


Yet you support a half trillion dollar Obama tax cut.

Is it just because he isn't white?

yep. because the middle class hasnt had a pay increase in 30 years

while the richest 1% have had their wages go up by 500%

want to know why we're in a depression?

read those numbers

When government gets bigger, people get smaller.

hey moron

then why have the richest 1% gotten so much bigger?

DUH!!

Because they are not SHEEP, like you. Get two self made people
together, the conversation isn't trailer trash idiots shooting off and
worship of Obama or any other political idiot. It gets down to hard
core numbers and analysis. Cold reality and not fleabagger emotional
basket case chirp.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:34:20 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 13/06/2011 3:29 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:06:27 -0600,
wrote:

On 11/06/2011 7:40 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

'years ago'

means when the right controlled the bull****. now that it's shown the
right is bankrupt you guys complain about the prize

go figure

You are delusional...

Good part about cutting government welfare, is wf3h will be gone when
the electricity is disconnected for non-payment.

let's see...canuck hates socialized medicine in the US. says w'ere
headed for disaster

where does he live?t

canada. what does canada have?

oh. socialized medicine....

shall we compare costs to see how SOCIALIZED medicine compares to FREE
MARKET medicine?? guess which is cheaper?

SOCIALIZED MEDICINE!!

http://dailydish.typepad.com/.a/6a00...a62f970c-popup

Just know how screwed up it left Canada and Obamacare is just a huge tax
grab. Dumbsh1t Obama doesn't seem to get it.

And dumbsh1ts like you don't either. Want to double your taxes and add
rationing and long waits? Then you should move to Canada. But wait,
you can't get into Canada. US insured care is far superior to Canada's
HC in many ways.

Pretty obvious Obamacare was a knee jerk CF.

Well, heck... you know about knee jerk Cluster F*cks! You're an
expert. You are a NJCF.

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:05:46 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:04:44 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:33:44 -0400, wrote:


That would encourage more long term investment.
I think I would but an extra tax on any financial instrument that was
kept less than a month to make flash trading less attractive.

let's get one thing straight

we dont need more INVESTMENT

we need more CONSUMPTION.

although investment is a form of consumption, ONLY MIDDLE CLASS
CONSUMPTION can pull us out of the depression

and wall street is NOT gonna let that happen

You can't get consumption without jobs and the only way we get that is
by expansion. It is clear the stimulus money just went into rich
people's pockets and not much actually got invested in expanded
industry. (thanks for a "no stimulus" stimulus bill)

There are plenty of stim projects underway, even if you don't believe
it or think they're working. They are working. We need more of them.

the success of the bush tax cuts
 

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:02:05 -0400, wrote:


spend out of it. In 1933 they realized after the 1932 crash that
fleabagger debt spend does not work. Took 6 years of restraint to cover
the debts and recovery was slow.

really?

uh...why did the depression end in 39?

did something happen in 39? uh yeah...the US started to spend for ww2

canuck's moronic view of economics is exceeded only by his ignorance
of history

It was something called lend lease that got the factories moving again.

That was when the rest of the world was borrowing from us.

Bob, do you see the difference?


Greg, do you see that the US gov't was injecting money into the
economy? Do you see why it doesn't make much difference how it does it
and that via a war isn't exactly the best way to do that... unless you
don't mind killing a lot of people in the name of profit of course.

Never mind. You're hiding. I forgot.