| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Weinergate
Another Democrat with a problem.... http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...ny-weiner.html What a wiener.... an appropriate name. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
Weinergate
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:35:20 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: Another Democrat with a problem.... http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...ny-weiner.html What a wiener.... an appropriate name. You're from Stupidgate. |
Weinergate
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:41:44 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:06:01 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:35:20 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: Another Democrat with a problem.... http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...ny-weiner.html What a wiener.... an appropriate name. You're from Stupidgate. It's good to see that you're expanding your repertoire of sophmoric remarks to extend beyond racist and moron. It's good to see that you support the right-wing fringe and criticize anyone who can't stand them. |
Weinergate
In article ,
says... On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:41:44 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:06:01 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:35:20 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: Another Democrat with a problem.... http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...ny-weiner.html What a wiener.... an appropriate name. You're from Stupidgate. It's good to see that you're expanding your repertoire of sophmoric remarks to extend beyond racist and moron. It's good to see that you support the right-wing fringe and criticize anyone who can't stand them. Weiner admitted that he lied about his sexting, blaming it on hacking, blaming it on the right-wing media. Weiner's character is flawed, very flawed. When push comes to shove, he will shove you right under the bus to save his own skin. |
Weinergate
On 6/7/11 7:59 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:41:44 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:06:01 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:35:20 -0600, wrote: Another Democrat with a problem.... http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...ny-weiner.html What a wiener.... an appropriate name. You're from Stupidgate. It's good to see that you're expanding your repertoire of sophmoric remarks to extend beyond racist and moron. It's good to see that you support the right-wing fringe and criticize anyone who can't stand them. Weiner admitted that he lied about his sexting, blaming it on hacking, blaming it on the right-wing media. Weiner's character is flawed, very flawed. When push comes to shove, he will shove you right under the bus to save his own skin. Weiner's character might be flawed, but he looks perfect when compared to all of the assholes who pollute rec.boats. If you really want to enjoy a living boating oriented forum, come visit my new Google Group. Send me a copy of your drivers license and I will approve your membership. The group continues to grow by leaps and bounds and there are always active and interesting boating topics. -- Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where personal insults are not allowed? http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing |
Weinergate
On 6/7/2011 8:03 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 6/7/11 7:59 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:41:44 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:06:01 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:35:20 -0600, wrote: Another Democrat with a problem.... http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...ny-weiner.html What a wiener.... an appropriate name. You're from Stupidgate. It's good to see that you're expanding your repertoire of sophmoric remarks to extend beyond racist and moron. It's good to see that you support the right-wing fringe and criticize anyone who can't stand them. Weiner admitted that he lied about his sexting, blaming it on hacking, blaming it on the right-wing media. Weiner's character is flawed, very flawed. When push comes to shove, he will shove you right under the bus to save his own skin. Weiner's character might be flawed, but he looks perfect when compared to all of the assholes who pollute rec.boats. Agreed. Now if all of those folks picked up their baggage and moved over your place, rec.boats could get back to the business of having thoughtful and serious boating discussions. I really can't understand why you and your tribe are still here. |
Weinergate
|
Weinergate
On Jun 7, 7:42*am, Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:13:42 -0700, wrote: It's good to see that you're expanding your repertoire of sophmoric remarks to extend beyond racist and moron. It's good to see that you support the right-wing fringe and criticize anyone who can't stand them. Nothing could be further from the truth. However limited, it is good to see that D'Plume has expanded her mental horizons. But to the group ninny, anyone who has a dim view of any liberal for any reason is on the 'right-wing fringe' Feel most fortunate that you weren't labeled as a racist/moron |
Weinergate
In article ,
says... In article , says... On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:41:44 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:06:01 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:35:20 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: Another Democrat with a problem.... http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...ny-weiner.html What a wiener.... an appropriate name. You're from Stupidgate. It's good to see that you're expanding your repertoire of sophmoric remarks to extend beyond racist and moron. It's good to see that you support the right-wing fringe and criticize anyone who can't stand them. Weiner admitted that he lied about his sexting, blaming it on hacking, blaming it on the right-wing media. Weiner's character is flawed, very flawed. When push comes to shove, he will shove you right under the bus to save his own skin. Look at the people Obama threw under the bus on the way up, it's a progressive thing I guess.. -- Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life! |
Weinergate
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 07:59:28 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:41:44 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:06:01 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:35:20 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: Another Democrat with a problem.... http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...ny-weiner.html What a wiener.... an appropriate name. You're from Stupidgate. It's good to see that you're expanding your repertoire of sophmoric remarks to extend beyond racist and moron. It's good to see that you support the right-wing fringe and criticize anyone who can't stand them. Weiner admitted that he lied about his sexting, blaming it on hacking, blaming it on the right-wing media. Weiner's character is flawed, very flawed. When push comes to shove, he will shove you right under the bus to save his own skin. Compared to Bush/Cheney, he's a saint. |
Weinergate
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 08:42:23 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:13:42 -0700, wrote: It's good to see that you're expanding your repertoire of sophmoric remarks to extend beyond racist and moron. It's good to see that you support the right-wing fringe and criticize anyone who can't stand them. Nothing could be further from the truth. So, you lie also. Wow. That's shocking news. |
Weinergate
On 6/7/11 8:42 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:13:42 -0700, wrote: It's good to see that you're expanding your repertoire of sophmoric remarks to extend beyond racist and moron. It's good to see that you support the right-wing fringe and criticize anyone who can't stand them. Nothing could be further from the truth. Let's be real here, w'hine. Your morality extends no further than your pocketbook. If you had been a german during WWII, you would have invested in the companies that owned the production rights to Zyklon B. -- Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where personal insults are not allowed? http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing |
Weinergate
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 13:10:58 -0400, Harryk
wrote: On 6/7/11 8:42 AM, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:13:42 -0700, wrote: It's good to see that you're expanding your repertoire of sophmoric remarks to extend beyond racist and moron. It's good to see that you support the right-wing fringe and criticize anyone who can't stand them. Nothing could be further from the truth. Let's be real here, w'hine. Your morality extends no further than your pocketbook. If you had been a german during WWII, you would have invested in the companies that owned the production rights to Zyklon B. I'd like to hear Wayne defend the social safety net. That would be a good start to convince me he's telling the truth. |
Weinergate
In article ,
says... On 6/7/11 8:42 AM, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:13:42 -0700, wrote: It's good to see that you're expanding your repertoire of sophmoric remarks to extend beyond racist and moron. It's good to see that you support the right-wing fringe and criticize anyone who can't stand them. Nothing could be further from the truth. Let's be real here, w'hine. Your morality extends no further than your pocketbook. If you had been a german during WWII, you would have invested in the companies that owned the production rights to Zyklon B. That's our Harry, knocking someone for working hard and therefore making it. Then he'll turn around and lie about how much HE'S worth..... |
Weinergate
In article , says...
On 6/7/2011 1:45 PM, wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 13:10:58 -0400, wrote: On 6/7/11 8:42 AM, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:13:42 -0700, wrote: It's good to see that you're expanding your repertoire of sophmoric remarks to extend beyond racist and moron. It's good to see that you support the right-wing fringe and criticize anyone who can't stand them. Nothing could be further from the truth. Let's be real here, w'hine. Your morality extends no further than your pocketbook. If you had been a german during WWII, you would have invested in the companies that owned the production rights to Zyklon B. I'd like to hear Wayne defend the social safety net. That would be a good start to convince me he's telling the truth. Would you please grab your little buddy Krause by the shortarm and drag him back to his own group. That place is as dead as can be. Harry only has Don and slammer. |
Weinergate
On 07/06/2011 5:59 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:41:44 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:06:01 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:35:20 -0600, wrote: Another Democrat with a problem.... http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...ny-weiner.html What a wiener.... an appropriate name. You're from Stupidgate. It's good to see that you're expanding your repertoire of sophmoric remarks to extend beyond racist and moron. It's good to see that you support the right-wing fringe and criticize anyone who can't stand them. Weiner admitted that he lied about his sexting, blaming it on hacking, blaming it on the right-wing media. Weiner's character is flawed, very flawed. When push comes to shove, he will shove you right under the bus to save his own skin. Just like Clinton, lie, deny, blame others, then lie some more -- the liberal way of lies. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
Weinergate
On 07/06/2011 1:47 PM, iBoat wrote:
In , says... On 6/7/2011 1:45 PM, wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 13:10:58 -0400, wrote: On 6/7/11 8:42 AM, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:13:42 -0700, wrote: It's good to see that you're expanding your repertoire of sophmoric remarks to extend beyond racist and moron. It's good to see that you support the right-wing fringe and criticize anyone who can't stand them. Nothing could be further from the truth. Let's be real here, w'hine. Your morality extends no further than your pocketbook. If you had been a german during WWII, you would have invested in the companies that owned the production rights to Zyklon B. I'd like to hear Wayne defend the social safety net. That would be a good start to convince me he's telling the truth. Would you please grab your little buddy Krause by the shortarm and drag him back to his own group. That place is as dead as can be. Harry only has Don and slammer. That is all? Didn't defumer go? -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
Weinergate
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:35:20 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: Another Democrat with a problem.... http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...ny-weiner.html What a wiener.... an appropriate name. mebbe he can get lessons from vitter or craig oh..wait...they were republicans. |
Weinergate
Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:06:01 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:35:20 -0600, wrote: Another Democrat with a problem.... http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...ny-weiner.html What a wiener.... an appropriate name. You're from Stupidgate. It's good to see that you're expanding your repertoire of sophmoric remarks to extend beyond racist and moron. The alleged attorney has outed her/his self again. |
Weinergate
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:49:14 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:26:57 -0700, wrote: Interesting that you claim you're not a right winger.... It's not a claim, it's a fact. If pressed to declare some sort of political allegiance, I usually tell people that I'm a social liberal and fiscal conservative. That's pretty close. Maybe a libertarian? I'm also a strong constitutionalist however you want to interpret that. It seems quite unlikely that our founding fathers, who actually wrote the constitution, quite anticipated the type of government that we have evolved into. Frankly though I'd rather talk about boats and boating. I have yet to see you say anything that would indicate you're other than way right of center. Libertarian? Like Ron Paul? That's pretty extreme. What social programs do you like? Do you think we should fix not end Medicare? How about Social Security? A strong constitutionalist typically means doing only what the Constitution says, with no room for interpretation. Sounds like Scalia, who is neither a social liberal or a fiscal conservative. Frankly, you seem very interested in putting me and other liberals down whenever it suits you. You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. |
Weinergate
|
Weinergate
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:35:56 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:44:20 -0700, wrote: You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. Like I said, I'm here mostly to discuss boating. You are not, and should avail youself of the nearest exit. Feel free to stop trying to tell me what to do. You're not qualified. I'll talk about anything I choose to talk about, and if you don't like it, you're welcome to leave yourself. I notice that you're unable to qualify your nonsense response that you're a strict constitutionalist. I doubt you even know what that means. |
Weinergate
On Jun 7, 7:44*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:49:14 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:26:57 -0700, wrote: Interesting that you claim you're not a right winger.... It's not a claim, it's a fact. *If pressed to declare some sort of political allegiance, I usually tell people that I'm a social liberal and fiscal conservative. * That's pretty close. *Maybe a libertarian? I'm also a strong constitutionalist however you want to interpret that. *It seems quite unlikely that our founding fathers, who actually wrote the constitution, quite anticipated the type of government that we have evolved into. Frankly though I'd rather talk about boats and boating. I have yet to see you say anything that would indicate you're other than way right of center. Libertarian? Like Ron Paul? That's pretty extreme. What social programs do you like? Do you think we should fix not end Medicare? How about Social Security? A strong constitutionalist typically means doing only what the Constitution says, with no room for interpretation. Sounds like Scalia, who is neither a social liberal or a fiscal conservative. Frankly, you seem very interested in putting me and other liberals down whenever it suits you. You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. "Mirror, Mirror...." |
Weinergate
On Jun 7, 8:47*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:35:56 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:44:20 -0700, wrote: You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. Like I said, I'm here mostly to discuss boating. *You are not, and should avail youself of the nearest exit. Feel free to stop trying to tell me what to do. You're not qualified. I'll talk about anything I choose to talk about, and if you don't like it, you're welcome to leave yourself. I notice that you're unable to qualify your nonsense response that you're a strict constitutionalist. I doubt you even know what that means. "...on the wall" |
Weinergate
On 07/06/2011 4:49 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:26:57 -0700, wrote: Interesting that you claim you're not a right winger.... It's not a claim, it's a fact. If pressed to declare some sort of political allegiance, I usually tell people that I'm a social liberal and fiscal conservative. That's pretty close. Maybe a libertarian? I'm also a strong constitutionalist however you want to interpret that. It seems quite unlikely that our founding fathers, who actually wrote the constitution, quite anticipated the type of government that we have evolved into. Frankly though I'd rather talk about boats and boating. One thing better than talking is doing it. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
Weinergate
On 07/06/2011 6:44 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:49:14 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:26:57 -0700, wrote: Interesting that you claim you're not a right winger.... It's not a claim, it's a fact. If pressed to declare some sort of political allegiance, I usually tell people that I'm a social liberal and fiscal conservative. That's pretty close. Maybe a libertarian? I'm also a strong constitutionalist however you want to interpret that. It seems quite unlikely that our founding fathers, who actually wrote the constitution, quite anticipated the type of government that we have evolved into. Frankly though I'd rather talk about boats and boating. I have yet to see you say anything that would indicate you're other than way right of center. Libertarian? Like Ron Paul? That's pretty extreme. What social programs do you like? Do you think we should fix not end Medicare? How about Social Security? Why is that extreme? Because it is the opposite of liberal-statism? Me, I am a conservative libertarian with a social conscious. If you are a paid up SS, then you get SS. If you are a vet, the least your country can do is assure your don't hit the street begging. If you are truly disabled, and not a faker, you too get the early SS. But if your problem is drugs, dysfunction, lazy tardy, crime, it does not pay enough, bad attitude, poor work ethics, screwing is more importnt than work...tough. Replace welfar with workfare, even socialist countries like Norway and Sweden do this. Medicare, I think it can be fixed in technical form, but would take some czar like powers to do it. It needs to start by getting the political/money driven greedy selfish agenda type people kicked the hell out of the room with bats if need be. And bring in people who know of social and economic engineering. Sorry, Hank and Obama are not invited. A strong constitutionalist typically means doing only what the Constitution says, with no room for interpretation. Sounds like Scalia, who is neither a social liberal or a fiscal conservative. All corruption comes from the exceptions, not the rule. Free speech is free speech. If they gag you, I should only ask when will they gag me. Best answer, other than slander, gagging isn't permitted. Frankly, you seem very interested in putting me and other liberals down whenever it suits you. You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. We will when it gets stupid irrational, slanderous and just plane ignorance. But I think you will find for the most part, rational posts get rational responses. Irrational rsponses are game for big digs. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
Weinergate
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:39:04 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 07/06/2011 6:44 PM, wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:49:14 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:26:57 -0700, wrote: Interesting that you claim you're not a right winger.... It's not a claim, it's a fact. If pressed to declare some sort of political allegiance, I usually tell people that I'm a social liberal and fiscal conservative. That's pretty close. Maybe a libertarian? I'm also a strong constitutionalist however you want to interpret that. It seems quite unlikely that our founding fathers, who actually wrote the constitution, quite anticipated the type of government that we have evolved into. Frankly though I'd rather talk about boats and boating. I have yet to see you say anything that would indicate you're other than way right of center. Libertarian? Like Ron Paul? That's pretty extreme. What social programs do you like? Do you think we should fix not end Medicare? How about Social Security? Why is that extreme? Because it is the opposite of liberal-statism? You're a moron, but to answer your question, no. RP is an extremist because he is unwilling to compromise to further his agenda. Having been in Congress so long, you'd think he would have figured that out. He will always be marginal at best. Me, I am a conservative libertarian with a social conscious. If you are a paid up SS, then you get SS. If you are a vet, the least your country can do is assure your don't hit the street begging. If you are truly disabled, and not a faker, you too get the early SS. You're an extremist and racist. You're also stupid. But if your problem is drugs, dysfunction, lazy tardy, crime, it does not pay enough, bad attitude, poor work ethics, screwing is more importnt than work...tough. Replace welfar with workfare, even socialist countries like Norway and Sweden do this. No. The problem is dumb bunnies like you. Medicare, I think it can be fixed in technical form, but would take some czar like powers to do it. It needs to start by getting the political/money driven greedy selfish agenda type people kicked the hell out of the room with bats if need be. And bring in people who know of social and economic engineering. Sorry, Hank and Obama are not invited. Czar? Sorry, but we're not Mother Russia. Fortunately, you are not invited. A strong constitutionalist typically means doing only what the Constitution says, with no room for interpretation. Sounds like Scalia, who is neither a social liberal or a fiscal conservative. All corruption comes from the exceptions, not the rule. Free speech is free speech. If they gag you, I should only ask when will they gag me. Best answer, other than slander, gagging isn't permitted. Total bull. I bet you have lots of experience with gagging. Certainly anyone who hangs around you long enough will experience it. Frankly, you seem very interested in putting me and other liberals down whenever it suits you. You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. We will when it gets stupid irrational, slanderous and just plane ignorance. But I think you will find for the most part, rational posts get rational responses. Irrational rsponses are game for big digs. More bs. You're a hate-filled little troll. |
Weinergate
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:24:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 07/06/2011 4:49 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:26:57 -0700, wrote: Interesting that you claim you're not a right winger.... It's not a claim, it's a fact. If pressed to declare some sort of political allegiance, I usually tell people that I'm a social liberal and fiscal conservative. That's pretty close. Maybe a libertarian? I'm also a strong constitutionalist however you want to interpret that. It seems quite unlikely that our founding fathers, who actually wrote the constitution, quite anticipated the type of government that we have evolved into. Frankly though I'd rather talk about boats and boating. One thing better than talking is doing it. You do neither. |
Weinergate
On 6/7/2011 9:35 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:44:20 -0700, wrote: You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. Like I said, I'm here mostly to discuss boating. You are not, and should avail youself of the nearest exit. We knew, from the get go, she was a nut case. She came here, out of the blue, ranting on about the working conditions of some migrant car wash employees, and it's been downhill ever since. |
Weinergate
On Jun 8, 1:36*am, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:39:04 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 07/06/2011 6:44 PM, wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:49:14 -0400, Wayne B *wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:26:57 -0700, wrote: Interesting that you claim you're not a right winger.... It's not a claim, it's a fact. *If pressed to declare some sort of political allegiance, I usually tell people that I'm a social liberal and fiscal conservative. * That's pretty close. *Maybe a libertarian? I'm also a strong constitutionalist however you want to interpret that. *It seems quite unlikely that our founding fathers, who actually wrote the constitution, quite anticipated the type of government that we have evolved into. Frankly though I'd rather talk about boats and boating. I have yet to see you say anything that would indicate you're other than way right of center. Libertarian? Like Ron Paul? That's pretty extreme. What social programs do you like? Do you think we should fix not end Medicare? How about Social Security? Why is that extreme? *Because it is the opposite of liberal-statism? You're a moron, but to answer your question, no. RP is an extremist because he is unwilling to compromise to further his agenda. Having been in Congress so long, you'd think he would have figured that out. He will always be marginal at best. Me, I am a conservative libertarian with a social conscious. *If you are a paid up SS, then you get SS. *If you are a vet, the least your country can do is assure your don't hit the street begging. *If you are truly disabled, and not a faker, you too get the early SS. You're an extremist and racist. You're also stupid. But if your problem is drugs, dysfunction, lazy tardy, crime, it does not pay enough, bad attitude, poor work ethics, screwing is more importnt than work...tough. *Replace welfar with workfare, even socialist countries like Norway and Sweden do this. No. The problem is dumb bunnies like you. Medicare, I think it can be fixed in technical form, but would take some czar like powers to do it. *It needs to start by getting the political/money driven greedy selfish agenda type people kicked the hell out of the room with bats if need be. *And bring in people who know of social and economic engineering. *Sorry, Hank and Obama are not invited. Czar? Sorry, but we're not Mother Russia. Fortunately, you are not invited. A strong constitutionalist typically means doing only what the Constitution says, with no room for interpretation. Sounds like Scalia, who is neither a social liberal or a fiscal conservative. All corruption comes from the exceptions, not the rule. *Free speech is free speech. *If they gag you, I should only ask when will they gag me.. *Best answer, other than slander, gagging isn't permitted. Total bull. I bet you have lots of experience with gagging. Certainly anyone who hangs around you long enough will experience it. Frankly, you seem very interested in putting me and other liberals down whenever it suits you. You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. We will when it gets stupid irrational, slanderous and just plane ignorance. *But I think you will find for the most part, rational posts get rational responses. *Irrational rsponses are game for big digs. More bs. You're a hate-filled little troll. Pot-kettle-black |
Weinergate
On 6/7/2011 9:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:35:56 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:44:20 -0700, wrote: You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. Like I said, I'm here mostly to discuss boating. You are not, and should avail youself of the nearest exit. Feel free to stop trying to tell me what to do. You're not qualified. I'll talk about anything I choose to talk about, and if you don't like it, you're welcome to leave yourself. I notice that you're unable to qualify your nonsense response that you're a strict constitutionalist. I doubt you even know what that means. Wayne should feel free to talk about anything he chooses including highlighting your flaws. You are not qualified to grant any of us permission to do anything. We come and go as we please, so go **** yourself. |
Weinergate
On 6/8/2011 2:36 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:24:31 -0600, wrote: On 07/06/2011 4:49 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:26:57 -0700, wrote: Interesting that you claim you're not a right winger.... It's not a claim, it's a fact. If pressed to declare some sort of political allegiance, I usually tell people that I'm a social liberal and fiscal conservative. That's pretty close. Maybe a libertarian? I'm also a strong constitutionalist however you want to interpret that. It seems quite unlikely that our founding fathers, who actually wrote the constitution, quite anticipated the type of government that we have evolved into. Frankly though I'd rather talk about boats and boating. One thing better than talking is doing it. You do neither. You are distracting us from our mission to discuss boats. How are your car wash victims doing? |
Weinergate
|
Weinergate
On 6/7/11 9:35 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:44:20 -0700, wrote: You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. Like I said, I'm here mostly to discuss boating. That's just plain bull****, w'hine. |
Weinergate
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:32:30 -0400, Harryk
wrote: On 6/7/11 9:35 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:44:20 -0700, wrote: You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. Like I said, I'm here mostly to discuss boating. That's just plain bull****, w'hine. Completely. |
Weinergate
On 6/8/2011 9:32 AM, Harryk wrote:
On 6/7/11 9:35 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:44:20 -0700, wrote: You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. Like I said, I'm here mostly to discuss boating. That's just plain bull****, w'hine. If it wasn't for the distractions by you and your teammates this would be more of a boating oriented newsgroup. |
Weinergate
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:32:30 -0400, Harryk
wrote: Like I said, I'm here mostly to discuss boating. That's just plain bull**** ===== How is that new "no insults" policy working out for you? |
Weinergate
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:09:59 -0700, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:32:30 -0400, Harryk wrote: On 6/7/11 9:35 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:44:20 -0700, wrote: You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. Like I said, I'm here mostly to discuss boating. That's just plain bull****, w'hine. Completely. Good parrot, limited vocabulary. You two should get a room together. |
Weinergate
On 6/8/11 12:46 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:32:30 -0400, wrote: Like I said, I'm here mostly to discuss boating. That's just plain bull**** ===== How is that new "no insults" policy working out for you? That policy doesn't apply at a pigsty like rec.boats, and it is just another of your many hypocrisies to claim here that you aren't here "mostly" to insult those who don't agree with you. -- Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where personal insults are not allowed? http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:09 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com