|
Weinergate
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:49:14 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:26:57 -0700, wrote: Interesting that you claim you're not a right winger.... It's not a claim, it's a fact. If pressed to declare some sort of political allegiance, I usually tell people that I'm a social liberal and fiscal conservative. That's pretty close. Maybe a libertarian? I'm also a strong constitutionalist however you want to interpret that. It seems quite unlikely that our founding fathers, who actually wrote the constitution, quite anticipated the type of government that we have evolved into. Frankly though I'd rather talk about boats and boating. I have yet to see you say anything that would indicate you're other than way right of center. Libertarian? Like Ron Paul? That's pretty extreme. What social programs do you like? Do you think we should fix not end Medicare? How about Social Security? A strong constitutionalist typically means doing only what the Constitution says, with no room for interpretation. Sounds like Scalia, who is neither a social liberal or a fiscal conservative. Frankly, you seem very interested in putting me and other liberals down whenever it suits you. You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. |
Weinergate
|
Weinergate
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:35:56 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:44:20 -0700, wrote: You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. Like I said, I'm here mostly to discuss boating. You are not, and should avail youself of the nearest exit. Feel free to stop trying to tell me what to do. You're not qualified. I'll talk about anything I choose to talk about, and if you don't like it, you're welcome to leave yourself. I notice that you're unable to qualify your nonsense response that you're a strict constitutionalist. I doubt you even know what that means. |
Weinergate
On Jun 7, 7:44*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:49:14 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:26:57 -0700, wrote: Interesting that you claim you're not a right winger.... It's not a claim, it's a fact. *If pressed to declare some sort of political allegiance, I usually tell people that I'm a social liberal and fiscal conservative. * That's pretty close. *Maybe a libertarian? I'm also a strong constitutionalist however you want to interpret that. *It seems quite unlikely that our founding fathers, who actually wrote the constitution, quite anticipated the type of government that we have evolved into. Frankly though I'd rather talk about boats and boating. I have yet to see you say anything that would indicate you're other than way right of center. Libertarian? Like Ron Paul? That's pretty extreme. What social programs do you like? Do you think we should fix not end Medicare? How about Social Security? A strong constitutionalist typically means doing only what the Constitution says, with no room for interpretation. Sounds like Scalia, who is neither a social liberal or a fiscal conservative. Frankly, you seem very interested in putting me and other liberals down whenever it suits you. You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. "Mirror, Mirror...." |
Weinergate
On Jun 7, 8:47*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:35:56 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:44:20 -0700, wrote: You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. Like I said, I'm here mostly to discuss boating. *You are not, and should avail youself of the nearest exit. Feel free to stop trying to tell me what to do. You're not qualified. I'll talk about anything I choose to talk about, and if you don't like it, you're welcome to leave yourself. I notice that you're unable to qualify your nonsense response that you're a strict constitutionalist. I doubt you even know what that means. "...on the wall" |
Weinergate
On 07/06/2011 4:49 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:26:57 -0700, wrote: Interesting that you claim you're not a right winger.... It's not a claim, it's a fact. If pressed to declare some sort of political allegiance, I usually tell people that I'm a social liberal and fiscal conservative. That's pretty close. Maybe a libertarian? I'm also a strong constitutionalist however you want to interpret that. It seems quite unlikely that our founding fathers, who actually wrote the constitution, quite anticipated the type of government that we have evolved into. Frankly though I'd rather talk about boats and boating. One thing better than talking is doing it. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
Weinergate
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:39:04 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 07/06/2011 6:44 PM, wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:49:14 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:26:57 -0700, wrote: Interesting that you claim you're not a right winger.... It's not a claim, it's a fact. If pressed to declare some sort of political allegiance, I usually tell people that I'm a social liberal and fiscal conservative. That's pretty close. Maybe a libertarian? I'm also a strong constitutionalist however you want to interpret that. It seems quite unlikely that our founding fathers, who actually wrote the constitution, quite anticipated the type of government that we have evolved into. Frankly though I'd rather talk about boats and boating. I have yet to see you say anything that would indicate you're other than way right of center. Libertarian? Like Ron Paul? That's pretty extreme. What social programs do you like? Do you think we should fix not end Medicare? How about Social Security? Why is that extreme? Because it is the opposite of liberal-statism? You're a moron, but to answer your question, no. RP is an extremist because he is unwilling to compromise to further his agenda. Having been in Congress so long, you'd think he would have figured that out. He will always be marginal at best. Me, I am a conservative libertarian with a social conscious. If you are a paid up SS, then you get SS. If you are a vet, the least your country can do is assure your don't hit the street begging. If you are truly disabled, and not a faker, you too get the early SS. You're an extremist and racist. You're also stupid. But if your problem is drugs, dysfunction, lazy tardy, crime, it does not pay enough, bad attitude, poor work ethics, screwing is more importnt than work...tough. Replace welfar with workfare, even socialist countries like Norway and Sweden do this. No. The problem is dumb bunnies like you. Medicare, I think it can be fixed in technical form, but would take some czar like powers to do it. It needs to start by getting the political/money driven greedy selfish agenda type people kicked the hell out of the room with bats if need be. And bring in people who know of social and economic engineering. Sorry, Hank and Obama are not invited. Czar? Sorry, but we're not Mother Russia. Fortunately, you are not invited. A strong constitutionalist typically means doing only what the Constitution says, with no room for interpretation. Sounds like Scalia, who is neither a social liberal or a fiscal conservative. All corruption comes from the exceptions, not the rule. Free speech is free speech. If they gag you, I should only ask when will they gag me. Best answer, other than slander, gagging isn't permitted. Total bull. I bet you have lots of experience with gagging. Certainly anyone who hangs around you long enough will experience it. Frankly, you seem very interested in putting me and other liberals down whenever it suits you. You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. We will when it gets stupid irrational, slanderous and just plane ignorance. But I think you will find for the most part, rational posts get rational responses. Irrational rsponses are game for big digs. More bs. You're a hate-filled little troll. |
Weinergate
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:24:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 07/06/2011 4:49 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:26:57 -0700, wrote: Interesting that you claim you're not a right winger.... It's not a claim, it's a fact. If pressed to declare some sort of political allegiance, I usually tell people that I'm a social liberal and fiscal conservative. That's pretty close. Maybe a libertarian? I'm also a strong constitutionalist however you want to interpret that. It seems quite unlikely that our founding fathers, who actually wrote the constitution, quite anticipated the type of government that we have evolved into. Frankly though I'd rather talk about boats and boating. One thing better than talking is doing it. You do neither. |
Weinergate
On 6/7/2011 9:35 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:44:20 -0700, wrote: You're unable to make a logical argument for your positions. Like I said, I'm here mostly to discuss boating. You are not, and should avail youself of the nearest exit. We knew, from the get go, she was a nut case. She came here, out of the blue, ranting on about the working conditions of some migrant car wash employees, and it's been downhill ever since. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com